Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la
première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
Building Research Note, 1974-09
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC : https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=f09f6ca2-98d1-4df4-8df7-3d2fdd3003c9 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=f09f6ca2-98d1-4df4-8df7-3d2fdd3003c9
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.4224/40000614
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Sound transmission loss of masonry walls: twelve-inch lightweight
concrete blocks, comparison of latex and plaster sealers
! a
ANALYZED
i
3
3
zL yf7
I I1 D I V I S I O N OF BUlLDlMG a E S E A R E H-
M A T I O N A L R E S E A R C H COUHCIL O T T A W A C A H A D AI
ISOUND TRANSMISSION LOSS
OF
MASONRY W A L L S : 'Twelve -Inch Lightweight Concrete Blocks
Comparison of Latex and Plaster Sealers
by
SOUND TRANSMISSION LUSS
O F
MASONRY W A L I S :Twelve -Inch Lightweight Concrete Blocks - Comparison of Latex a n d Plaster Sealers
T . D . Nar+thwood and D. W. Monk
This i s the second of a proposed s e r i e s of notes reporting
laboratory measurements of sound transmission l o s s of masonry w a l l s .
The t e s t pro g r a m , w h i c h will extend o v e r several y e a r s , w i l l eventually
include a range of block t h i c k n e s s e s and d e n s i t i e s , and w i l l examine t h e effects of various additional layers and surface f i n i s h e s . T h e f i r s t note
(Building R e s e a r c h N o t e No. 90) reported six t e s t s on a basic 12-inch lightweight block w a l l w i t h various surface finishes. The present note reports t h r e e additional t e s t s on the same type of 12 -inch block wall.
DESCRIPTION O F
TEST
SPECIMENSA wall 1 0 f t long x 8 ft high was built i n a N R C sample mounting rack using nominal 12 -in. thick lightweight concrete blocks. The w a l l consisted of t w e l v e r o w s of b l o c k s l a i d up in a Type N mortar with
mortar joints 318 in. thick tooled to a concave f i n i s h on b t h s i d e s of t h e wall.
Each block w a s 7 -5 J 8 in. high x 15 -518 i n . long x 11-518 in. thick
w i t h i n s e t s o n e a c h e n d . The blocks c o n t a i n e d t h r e e c o r e s of which the two o u t e r cores were 8-112 in. l o n g x 2 - 5 1 8 in. w i d e , t h e centre core
was 8 in, long x 2 - 5 1 8 in. wide and t h e w a l l s between the cores 1-114 in. thick. The outer walls of t h e blocks w e r e 1-5/8 in. thick. All the
measurements w e r e the minimum dimensions measured on the section
w i t h the least amount of bearing s u r f a c e . The average weight of each block was approximately 4 3 lb,
Test 2A - The wall was plastered initially on the source r o o m s i d e with a base coat of s a n d plaa tar approximately 112 in. thick and a f i n i s h c o a t
1/16
in. thick. The base coat m i x by volume c o n s i s t e d of three parts sand to one part hardwall plaster with a small amount of finishing lime added to reduce the setting t i m e . The f i n i s h coat mix by volumeconsisted of t h r e e parts finishing lime to one part gouging plaster. The r e c e i v i n g room s i d e was left unsealed. Weight per s q f t of the wall was
T e s t 2B - O n the r e c e i v i n g room s i d e t h e wall of T e s t 2A was sealed w i t h latex base block f i l l e r . Three coats w e r e applied to the s u r f a c e allowing approximately one b u r d r y i n g time between c o a t s . The filler w a s
applied by b r u s h and a d e e p p i l e paint r o l l e r , A f t e r completing t h e f i n a l
coat the wall was allowed to d r y for approximately sixteen hours before
conducting a t e s t . W e i g h t per s q f t of the w a l l w a s 56 lb.
Test 2G - T h e latex block sealer w a s removed from the receiving room
s i d e by sand b l a s t i n g and t h e n this s i d e w a s plastered similarly t o the
source room s i d e . The weight per sq f t of the w a l l w a s 59 lb. A photo graph
of the sand blasted surface p r i o r to plastering is shuwn in Figure 2 .
TEST
P R O
CEDUREEach t e s t was d o n e in accordance with
ASTM
E9O
-70, Laboratory M e a s u r e m e n t sf Airborne Sound Transrnis sion Loss of B u i l d i n g Partitions.The results of the three t e s t s a r e g i v e n in Table 1.
COMbrlENTS
ON
TEST RESULTSThe results indicate that once one s i d e o f t h e w a l l is sealed w i t h
plaster t h e r e is little to be gained from t h e v i e w p o i n t of sound insulation by s e a l i n g t h e second side w i t h either block sealer or p l a s t e r . The
a d d i t i o n a l plaster layer makes a very s l i g h t improvement at the l o w e s t
test frequencies because of t h e increased m a s s , b u t o t h e r w i s e the results a r e almost indistinguishable as indicated in Figure 3. I t wiI1 be noted by reference te BRN No. 9 0 ( W a l l l B ) that sealing t h e w a l l with a layer of
plaster also results in a negligible improvement as compared to sealing
w i t h t h r e e c o a t s of latex block filler.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The t e s t s reported here w e r e done as a cooperative project w i t h t h e N a t i o n a l Concrete P r o d u c e r s ' Association, who furnished the materials and constructed t h e test specimens.
TABLE I
SOUND TRANSMISSION LOSS
O F
THREE TEST WALLS TRANSMISSION M S SIN
DECIBELSW a l l No
.
Centre Band
Frequency, Hz. - - 2A
-
2BFigure 1 Photograph of block section showing
plaster l a y e r .
Figure 2 Photograph showing wall surface after sand blasting to r e m o v e latex sealer
0
SOURCE ROOM RECEIVING ROOM
LATEX SEALER w O O a m O C 3 Q o O O C S O d O a N 5 0 O L n - O O m O O V ) O Q C 1 V ) o - C ~ m m - ~ s d a o ~ . a a v - o -'-CUCUm*