• Aucun résultat trouvé

Multimorbidity and clinical reasoning through the eyes of GPs: a qualitative study

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Multimorbidity and clinical reasoning through the eyes of GPs: a qualitative study"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Article

Reference

Multimorbidity and clinical reasoning through the eyes of GPs: a qualitative study

RITZ, Claire, et al.

Abstract

Despite the high prevalence of patients suffering from multimorbidity, the clinical reasoning processes involved during the longitudinal management are still sparse. This study aimed to investigate what are the different characteristics of the clinical reasoning process clinicians use with patients suffering from multimorbidity, and to what extent this clinical reasoning differs from diagnostic reasoning.

RITZ, Claire, et al . Multimorbidity and clinical reasoning through the eyes of GPs: a qualitative study. Family medicine and community health , 2021, vol. 9, no. 4, p. e000798

DOI : 10.1136/fmch-2020-000798 PMID : 34556495

PMCID : PMC8461689

Available at:

http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:155713

Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version.

1 / 1

(2)

Clinical reasoning processes: a graphical representation

Supplementary file 3:  

Clinicians find it difficult to describe their clinical reasoning processes. Charlin's et al. model to which we refer is one of the most interesting frameworks published in recent years. You will find in this file a link to the interactive model of Charlin whereby you can click on each step of process to better explicit what is at play.

https://edugenie.com/prc2015/ 

 

Charlin B, Lubarsky S, Millette B, Crevier F, Audétat M, Charbonneau A, et al. Clinical reasoning processes: unraveling complexity through graphical representation. Medical education. 2012 ;46:454–63.

 

BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance

Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) Fam Med Com Health

doi: 10.1136/fmch-2020-000798 :e000798.

9 2021;

Fam Med Com Health , et al.

Ritz C

Références

Documents relatifs

For example, they are needed to represent in OWL-DL an ‘hemisphere’ as an anatomical entity whose direct parts are lobes, each part being of a distinct type (i.e. frontal

This study aimed to evaluate how estimates of physical health- related quality of life vary in individuals with multimorbidity depending on the length of the list of

Results: Previous literature and liaison with the European Pathways Association resulted in five criteria being used to define a clinical pathway: (1) the intervention was a

Patients aged 18–80 years with ≥3 chronic conditions were referred to the Telemedicine IMPACT Plus intervention; a nurse and patient planned a multi-provider case conference during

Three themes emerged in the analysis: creating new per- spectives on care for patients with multimorbidity by sharing knowledge, skills and attitudes; the shift from a consultant

We find evidence for correspondence with postulate U1, which states that updating with the new fact must ensure that the new fact is a consequence of the update.. We find evidence

determinant for each condition in an individual with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bladder cancer, and intractable sinusitis, the patient is still considered to

These strategies will stimu- late the development of clinical reasoning skills on a daily basis, calling on both the resident and the super- visor to articulate