• Aucun résultat trouvé

volume decomposition functionals of polytopes Sharp affine isoperimetric inequalities for the Advances in Mathematics

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "volume decomposition functionals of polytopes Sharp affine isoperimetric inequalities for the Advances in Mathematics"

Copied!
29
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Contents lists available atScienceDirect

Advances in Mathematics

www.elsevier.com/locate/aim

Sharp affine isoperimetric inequalities for the volume decomposition functionals of polytopes

Yude Liu, Qiang Sun,Ge Xiong

SchoolofMathematicalSciences,TongjiUniversity,Shanghai,200092,PRChina

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Articlehistory:

Received26January2021

Receivedinrevisedform4May2021 Accepted28June2021

Availableonlinexxxx

CommunicatedbyErwinLutwak

MSC:

52A40 52B60

Keywords:

Polytope Cone-volume

Affineisoperimetricinequality Subspaceconcentrationcondition

The nth power of the volume functional Vn of polytopes P in Rn, according to dimensions of the spaces spanned by any n unit outer normal vectors of P, is decomposed into n homogeneous polynomials of degree n. A set of newsharp affineisoperimetric inequalitiesfor these volume decomposition functionals in R3 are established, which essentiallycharacterizethegeometricandalgebraicstructures ofpolytopes.

©2021ElsevierInc.Allrightsreserved.

1. Introduction

Thesetting for this paper isthe n-dimensionalEuclidean space, Rn. A convex body isacompact convexset thathas anonempty interior. Denote byKno theset of convex

ResearchoftheauthorswassupportedbyNSFCNo.11871373.

* Correspondingauthor.

E-mailaddresses:[email protected](Y. Liu),[email protected](Q. Sun), [email protected](G. Xiong).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2021.107902 0001-8708/©2021ElsevierInc. Allrightsreserved.

(2)

bodies inRn with the origin o in their interiors. A polytope in Rn is the convex hull of a finite set of points in Rn provided it has positive volume Vn (i.e., n-dimensional Lebesgue measure). The convex hullof asubset of these points is called a face of the polytopeifitliesentirelyontheboundaryofthepolytopeandifithaspositive(n1)- dimensionalLebesguemeasure.WritePon fortheset ofpolytopesinRn withtheorigin intheirinteriors.

Let P ∈ Pon and ubeaunitouternormal vectortoaface F ofP.Thecone-volume VP({u}) of P associated with u is the volume of the convex hull of the origin o and face F.Thesimplest formofcone-volumeisreducedto theareaformulaoftrianglesin ancient geometry.

However, it is strikingthatcombining the notionsof cone-volume of polytopes, lin- ear independence of vectors and dimension of spaces, a new geometry of polytopes is emerged: Thenth powerof volumeof polytopes inRn is naturallydecomposedinto n terms, and each term is a homogeneous polynomial of degree n. See Theorem 3.1 for details. Inthefollowing,weintroducetheso-called volumedecomposition functional of polytopes.

Definition1.1. SupposeP ∈ Pon,andu1,u2,. . . ,uN aretheunitouternormalvectorsof itsfaces.WedefinethekthvolumedecompositionfunctionalXk(P),k= 1,2,. . . ,n−1,n, by

Xk(P)n =

dim(span{ui1,...,uin})=k

VP({ui1})VP({ui2})· · ·VP({uin}).

As usual, span{ui1,. . . ,uin} in the above definition denotes the linear subspace spanned by n normal vectors ui1,. . . ,uin of the polytope P. Obviously Xk(P)n is a homogeneous polynomialincone-volumesofdegree n, k= 1,2,. . . ,n;Xk(P) iscentro- affine invariant, i.e., Xk(T P) = Xk(P) for T SL(n); and Xk(λP) = λnXk(P) for λ>0.

It isinterestingthatifk=n,then Xn(P) = (

ui1∧···∧uin=0

VP({ui1})VP({ui2})· · ·VP({uin}))n1,

whichis identical tothefunctionalU introducedbyE.Lutwak, D.Yang andG.Zhang (LYZ) [22] toattackthe longstandingunsolvedSchneider projection probleminconvex geometry;Fork=n,allthefunctionalsXk(P) aretotallynew.

It is interestingthatthe nth powerof thevolumefunctional Vn(P) satisfiesthefol- lowing tidyidentity

Vn(P)n =X1(P)n+X2(P)n+· · ·+Xn(P)n, (1.1) which says that the nth power of volume Vn(P) of a polytope P is decomposed into n homogeneous polynomials Xk(P)n, k = 1,2,. . . ,n. It seems that the investigation

(3)

ofthese polynomials are helpfultofind outthedistributionof cone-volumesand outer normalvectorsofthepolytopeP.Therefore,thegeometricoralgebraicstructureofthe polytopeP ismoreclearlyvisualized.

Moreover,theidentity(1.1) suggeststhatthesenewfunctionalsXk,k= 1,2,. . . ,n−1, arecomplementary totheLutwak-Yang-ZhangU functional.So,insomesensewetrace theoriginofLYZ’sU functionalforthefirsttime.

Fortheproofofidentity(1.1),please referto Theorem3.1inSection3.

Atthis moment, we would dwell onthe story about thenth volume decomposition functionalXn,whatcertainlymirrorsthesignificanceof thesetofnewfunctionals Xk, k= 1,2,. . . ,n−1.

In2001, LYZ[22] conjectured thatifP is apolytopeinRn with its centroidat the origin,then

Xn(P)

Vn(P) (n!)n1

n (1.2)

withequalityifandonlyifP isaparallelotope.

It took more than one dozen years to completely settle this conjecture. The LYZ conjecture for origin-symmetric polytopes was firstly solved by He, Leng and Li [12], with an alternate proof given by Xiong [28]. The LYZ conjecture in R2 and R3 was alsoconfirmed in[28].A final solutionwasattributedto Henkand Linke[13].In 2016, BöröczkyandHenk[2] provedthatLYZ’sconjectureisalsoaffirmativeforconvexbodies.

ItisworthmentioningthatintheprocessofsolvingtheLYZconjecture,anessential

“concentration phenomenon” of cone-volumes of polytopes was discovered: If P is a polytope in Rn with its centroid at the origin and the unit outer normals of P are u1,u2,. . . ,uN, thenforeachsubspaceξ⊆Rn,

ui∈ξ

VP({ui}) dimξ

n Vn(P) (1.3)

withequalityforasubspaceξifandonlyifthereexistsasubspaceξ complementaryto ξinRn,suchthat{uj:uj ∈/ξ}⊆ξ.

In2013,Böröczkyand LYZ[4] originallyposedthe notionof subspaceconcentration condition (seeSection 2for itsdefinition) forfinite Borelmeasures on the unitsphere Sn−1,andprovedthatthisconditionissufficientandnecessarytoguaranteetheexistence ofsolutionstoevenlogarithmicMinkowskiproblems.

For more investigations and applications on subspace concentration condition, we referto[3,7,5,8,17,19,27,31].In[15],theauthorspointedoutthatsubspaceconcentration conditionisalsoconnectedtotheYau-Tian-Donaldsonconjectureinalgebraicgeometry.

BacktothenewvolumedecompositionfunctionalsXk,k= 1,2,. . . ,n−1,inlightof theidentity(1.1),wearetemptedto raisethefollowingproblem.

(4)

Problem X.LetP be apolytopeinRn withitscentroidat theorigin.Doesthere exist aconstantc(n,k) dependingonnandk,k∈ {1,2,. . . ,n−1},suchthat

Xk(P)

Vn(P) ≤c(n, k)?

Inthisarticle,theProblem XinR3is satisfactorilysolved.

Theorem 1.1.If P isapolytope inR3 withitscentroid attheorigin,then X1(P)

V3(P) 1 3

23

, X2(P) V3(P) 2

3 13

, and X3(P) V3(P) 213

323, and equalityholds ineach inequalityifand onlyif P isaparallelepiped.

Theorem 1.2.If P isapolytope inRn with itscentroidattheorigin, then X1(P)

Vn(P) ≤n1n1 with equalityifand onlyif P aparallelotope.

RestrictedtoP3n,i.e.,thesetofpolytopesinRnwhoseanythreeouternormalvectors (uptotheirantipodalnormalvectors)arelinearindependent,weprovethefollowing.

Theorem 1.3.If P isapolytope inP3n with itscentroidattheoriginandn≥3,then X2(P)

Vn(P) ≤nn1−1[(2n−11)(n1)]n1 with equalityifand onlyif P aparallelotope.

Thisarticleisorganizedasfollows.InSection3,weinvestigatebasicpropertiesofthe functionals Xk anddemonstratewhypolytopesshouldbe“positioned”withcentroidat theoriginintheProblemX.ForpolytopesPin(k+ 1)-generalposition,weestablishthe inversion formulaforXk(P),whichresemblestheclassicalinclusion-exclusionprinciple inspirit.Inthethirdpart,weverifythatX3 doesnot attain itsmaximumat parallelo- topesinR4,whichsuggeststhecomplexity oftheProblemXinhigherdimensions.

In Section4, we provetheTheorem 1.2 byusing themaximum principle forconvex functions. By solvingtwo constrained optimizationproblems, we present theproofs of Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.3 in Section 5 and Section 6, respectively. Meanwhile, delicateclassificationsviageometryofsubspacesareemployed.

Intheappendix,weshowthatthesetPkn,k= 1,2,. . . ,n,isdenseinKno inthesense of Hausdorffmetric.

(5)

2. Preliminaries

WritePcn and Psn forthe set ofpolytopesinRn with centroidat theoriginand the set of polytopes inRn symmetricwith respect to the origin,respectively. LetGn,k be thesetofk-dimensionalsubspacesofRn.

The standardinner product of the vectors x,y Rn is denotedby x·y. We write

|x|2=x·x,andSn1={x∈Rn :|x|= 1}fortheboundaryoftheEuclideanunitball B inRn.TheletterμwillbeusedexclusivelytodenoteafiniteBorelmeasureonSn−1. Forsuchameasure μ,wedenotebysuppμitssupportset.

ThesupportfunctionhK :Rn Rn ofaconvexbodyK isdefined,forx∈Rn,by hK(x) = max{x·y :y∈K}.

Observethatsupportfunctionsare positivelyhomogeneous ofdegreeoneandsubaddi- tive.

ThesetKon isoftenequippedwiththeHausdorffmetric δ.ForK,L∈ Kno, δ(K, L) = sup

u∈Sn−1|hK(u)−hL(u)|. AhyperplaneofRn canbe writtenintheform

Hu,α={x∈Rn:x·u=α}

withu∈Rn\{o}andα∈R.ThehyperplaneHu,α boundsaclosed halfspace Hu,α ={x∈Rn:x·u≤α}.

Cone-volumemeasureisanaturalgeneralizationofcone-volumeofpolytopestocon- vexbodies.ForK∈ Kno,itscone-volumemeasure VK isafiniteBorelmeasureonSn−1, definedforeachBorelset ω⊆Sn−1by

VK(ω) = 1 n

x∈ν−1K(ω)

x·νK(x)dHn−1(x), (2.1)

where νK : K Sn1 is the Gauss map of K, defined on K, theset of points of

∂K thathave auniqueouter unitnormal, and Hn1 is (n1)-dimensionalHausdorff measure.

Cone-volume measures have appeared in [1,9–11,20,21,23–26,29,30], and have been intensivelyinvestigatedinrecentyears.See,e.g.,[6,2,3,7,5,8,13,14,16,28].

FollowingBöröczkyandLYZ[4], wepresentthedefinitionofsubspaceconcentration condition and the celebratedBöröczky-LYZ existence theorem of solutionsto the even logarithmicMinkowskiproblem.

(6)

Definition 2.1.A finiteBorelmeasure μonSn1 issaidto satisfythesubspaceconcen- tration inequalityif,foreverysubspaceξ ofRn,suchthat0<dimξ < n,

μ(ξ∩Sn−1) 1

nμ(Sn−1)dimξ. (2.2)

The measure is said to satisfy the subspace concentration condition if in addition to satisfyingthesubspaceconcentrationinequality(2.2),whenever

μ(ξ∩Sn1) = 1

nμ(Sn1)dimξ,

forsomesubspaceξ,thenthereexistsasubspaceξ,whichiscomplementarytoξinRn, so thatalso

μ(ξSn−1) = 1

nμ(Sn−1)dimξ, or equivalentlyso thatμisconcentratedonSn−1∪ξ).

Lemma 2.1.(Böröczky-Lutwak-Yang-Zhang, [4]) A non-zero finite even Borel measure on theunitsphereSn−1 isthecone-volumemeasureofanorigin-symmetricconvexbody in Rn ifand onlyif itsatisfiesthesubspaceconcentrationcondition.

3. FundamentalpropertiesofXk andk-generalposition 3.1. FundamentalpropertiesofXk

Theorem 3.1.If P isapolytopein Rn with theoriginin itsinterior,andtheunitouter normalvectorsofP areu1,u2,. . . ,uN,thenVn(P)n =X1(P)n+X2(P)n+· · ·+Xn(P)n. Proof. SinceP containstheorigininitsinterior, byDefinition1.1,itfollows that

Vn(P)n= (VP({u1}) +VP({u2}) +· · ·+VP({uN}))n

= n k=1

dim(span{ui1,...,uin})=k

VP({ui1})VP({ui2})· · ·VP({uin})

= n k=1

Xk(P)n, as desired.

Remark1.Thefunctionals Xk,k= 1,2,. . . ,n,arenotcontinuousinPon.

Wesee thisbyconstructinganexample.LetPi= conv{Ai,Bi,Ci,Di},i∈N,where Ai = (1i 1,1),Bi = (1i + 1,1),Ci = (1i + 1,1),Di = (1i 1,1).That is, Pi is

(7)

Fig. 1.Pi.

anisoscelestrapezoidwithsymmetric tothey-axis inR2, whosesizesof upperbottom and lowerbottom are(22i) and (2+2i), respectively; thedistance from theorigin o toAiBi andCiDi is1,respectively.SeeFig.1.

Then,suppVPi ={e1,−e1,ui,vi}andui=−vi.Bycalculatingdirectly,wehave V2(Pi) = 1

2·(22

i + 2 + 2

i)·2 = 4, VPi({e1}) =1

2·(22

i)·1 = 11 i, VPi({−e1}) = 1

2·(2 + 2

i)·1 = 1 +1 i,

VPi({ui}) =VPi({vi}) = V2(Pi)−VPi({e1})−VPi({−e1})

2 = 1.

AccordingtothedefinitionofX1,itfollowsthat X1(Pi)2=

uv=0

VPi({u})VPi({v})

=(11

i)·(11

i + 1 +1

i) + (1 +1

i)·(1 + 1

i + 11

i) + 1·1 + 1·1

=6.

(8)

Note thatlimi→∞Pi=C,C= [1,1]2, andX1(C)2= 4·1·2= 8,itfollowsthat

i→∞lim X1(Pi) = 6=

8 =X1(C) =X1( lim

i→∞Pi),

which impliesthatX1 isnotcontinuous. Withthecontinuity oftheareafunctional V2

and thefactthatV2(Pi)2=X1(Pi)2+X2(Pi)2,itfollowsthatX2 isnotcontinuous.

Now, we explainthe reasonswhypolytopesshouldbe “positioned” with centroidat the origin, when we consider Problem X. Specifically, restricted to the set of origin- symmetric polytopes inRn, weprovethe following theorem by essentially makinguse of Lemma2.1.

Theorem 3.2.supP∈Pn s

Xn(P)

Vn(P) = 1, infP∈Psn

Xk(P)

Vn(P) = 0, k= 1,2,. . . ,n−1.

Proof. ForanaturalN,N > n,let

βi = (1, i, i2, . . . , in−1), i= 1,2, . . . , N.

BythepropertyofVandermondedeterminant,itfollowsthat

det(βtl1, βlt2, . . . , βltn)= 0, ∀ {l1, l2, . . . , ln} ⊆ {1,2, . . . , N},

whichimpliesthatanynelements oftheset 12,. . . ,βN}arelinearindependent.

Constructing afiniteeven discretemeasureμN onSn−1 suchthat suppμN={±β1, . . . ,±βN}, and

μN(i}) =μN({−βi}) = 1

2N, i= 1,2, . . . , N, where βi= |ββi

i|.

For any j dimensional subspace ξ of Rn, 0 < j < n, since any n elements of 12,. . . ,βN} are linear independent, it follows that any (j + 1) elements of 12,. . . ,βN}arealsolinearindependent,andthereforeξcontainsatmostjelements of 12,. . . ,βN}.Thus,

μNSn−1)2j· 1 2N < j

n,

whichimpliesthatμN satisfiesthesubspaceconcentrationcondition.

ByLemma2.1, thereexists anorigin-symmetricpolytope PN,suchthatVPN =μN. So,

suppVPN ={±β1, . . . ,±βN}, and VPN(i}) =VPN({−βi}) = 1

2N, i= 1,2, . . . , N.

(9)

FromthedefinitionofXn andthefactthatanynelementsoftheset12,. . . ,βN} arelinearindependent,itfollowsthat

Xn(PN)n Vn(PN)n =

u1,u2,...,un∈suppVP

u1u2∧···∧un=0

VPN({u1})VPN({u2})· · ·VPN({un}) 1

=2N·2(N1)· · ·2(N−n+ 1)( 1 2N)n

=N ·(N1)· · ·(N−n+ 1)

Nn 1, N→ ∞.

So,

0 Xk(PN)n

Vn(PN)n ≤Vn(PN)n−Xn(PN)n

Vn(PN)n 0, N → ∞, k= 1,2, . . . , n1.

Thus,

P∈Psupsn

Xn(P)

Vn(P) = 1, inf

P∈Pns

Xk(P)

Vn(P) = 0, k= 1,2, . . . , n1, asdesired.

By Theorem 3.2, it yields that supP∈Pn c

Xn(P)

Vn(P) = 1,infP∈PcnXVk(P)

n(P) = 0, k = 1,2,. . . ,n−1.

Theorem3.3. supP∈Pn o

X1(P) Vn(P) = 1.

Proof. Assume thatP is aregular simplex inRn with Vn(P)= 1,and the unit outer normalsofP areu1,u2,. . . ,un+1.MoveP togetasequenceofsimplices{Pi}i∈N sothat VPi({u1})= 12i1,and VPi({uj})= 2ni1 ,j = 2,3,. . . ,n+ 1.Then

X1(Pi)n=

dim(span{uj1,uj2,...,ujn})=1

VPi({uj1})VPi({uj2})· · ·VPi({uin})

=

n+1

j=1

VPi({uj})n > VPi({u1})n = 1 1

2i n

1, i→ ∞.

So,limi→∞X1(Pi)

Vn(Pi) = 1,asdesired.

Proposition 3.4.If P is a polytope in Rn with the origin in its interior, then the two assertionsare equivalent.

(1) suppVP ⊆ {±u1,. . . ,±uN}, and VP({±ui})>0, i= 1,2,. . . ,N. (2) suppVP suppVP ={±u1,. . . ,±uN}.

(10)

Proof. Assume assertion (1) holds. In light of suppV−P = suppVP, it yields that suppVP ⊆ {±u1,. . . ,±uN}.Hence,suppVPsuppVP ⊆ {±u1,. . . ,±uN}.Meanwhile, sinceVP({±u})>0 foru∈ {±u1,. . . ,±uN},itfollowsthatu∈suppVPoru∈suppV−P. Thatis,u∈suppVPsuppV−P.Thus,suppVPsuppV−P ={±u1,. . . ,±uN}.

Assume assertion (2) holds. Let ui suppVP suppVP. Then, ui suppVP or

−ui suppVP. Thus, VP({±ui})=VP({ui})+VP({−ui})>0.AddedthatsuppVP {±u1,. . . ,±uN}, thenassertion(1) holds.

Theorem 3.5.If P ∈ Pon andsuppVPsuppVP ={±u1,±u2,. . . ,±uN},then Xk(P)n=

ξGn,k

i1,i2,...,in∈{1,2,...,N} span{ui1,ui2,...,uin}=ξ

VP({±ui1})VP({±ui2})· · ·VP({±uin}),

k= 1,2, . . . , n.

Proof. From the definition of Xk and the fact that span{v1,. . . ,vn−1,−vn} = span{v1,. . . ,vn1,vn},byinterchangetheorderinthesummationswehave

Xk(P)n=

v1,...,vn∈suppVP

span{v1,...,vn}∈Gn,k

VP({v1})· · ·VP({vn})

=

ξGn,k

v1,...,vn∈suppVP

span{v1,...,vn}

VP({v1})· · ·VP({vn})

=

ξ∈Gn,k

v1,...,vn1∈suppVP

VP({v1})· · ·VP({vn1})

vn∈suppVP

span{v1,...,vn}=ξ

VP({vn})

=

ξ∈Gn,k

v1,...,vn−1∈suppVP

VP({v1})· · ·VP({vn−1})

vn∈{u1,u2,...,uN} span{v1,...,vn}=ξ

VP({±vn})

=

ξ∈Gn,k

vn∈{u1,u2,...,uN}

VP({±vn})

v1,...,vn−1∈suppVP

span{v1,...,vn}

VP({v1})· · ·VP({vn−1})

· · ·

=

ξGn,k

v1,...,vn∈{u1,u2,...,uN} span{v1,...,vn}

VP({±v1})VP({±v2})· · ·VP({±vn})

=

ξGn,k

i1,i2,...,in∈{1,2,...,N} span{ui1,ui2,...,uin}=ξ

VP({±ui1})VP({±ui2})· · ·VP({±uin}),

as desired.

(11)

Theorem 3.6. Let P and Q be polytopes in Rn with the origin in their interiors. If VP({±u})=VQ({±u})foranyu∈Sn1,then Xk(P)=Xk(Q),k= 1,2,. . . ,n.

Proof. Forany u∈suppVP suppV−P,itfollows thatVP{±u}>0 by Proposition3.4.

From the assumption that VQ({±u}) = VP({±u}), it yields that VQ{±u} > 0, and thereforeu∈suppVQsuppVQ.Hence,suppVPsuppVP suppVQsuppVQ.

Similarly,suppVQsuppV−QsuppVPsuppV−P.So,suppVPsuppV−P = suppVQ suppV−Q.FromTheorem3.5togetherwiththeassumptionthatVP({±u})=VQ({±u}) foranyu∈Sn1,itfollows thatXk(P)=Xk(Q),k= 1,2,. . . ,n.

Remark2.FromtheequationsXk(P)=Xk(Q),k= 1,2,. . . ,n,wecannot concludethat P =Q. Forinstance,letP be an equilateraltriangleinR2 with centroidat theorigin andunitouternormalsu1,u2,u3;letQbearegularhexagonwithcentroidattheorigin andunitouter normals±u1,±u2,±u3. LetP andQhavethesamearea.Itisevidently thatP andQsatisfytheconditionsinTheorem3.6.

Theorem 3.7.If P is a polytope in Rn with its centroid at theorigin, then there exists anorigin-symmetricpolytope QinRn suchthat Xk(Q)=Xk(P),k= 1,2,. . . ,n.

Proof. Letμbeafinitediscretemeasure onSn1 suchthatforu∈Sn1, μ({u}) =μ({−u}) =1

2VP({±u}).

Thenμisanevenmeasure.ForanysubspaceξofRn, μ(ξ∩Sn−1) =

u∈ξ∩Sn−1

μ({u}) =

u∈ξ∩Sn−1

1

2μ({±u})

=

uξSn1

1

2VP({±u}) =

uξSn1

VP({u}) =VPSn1).

Specifically,μ(Sn−1)=VP(Sn−1).Hence,foreverysubspaceξofRnwith0<dimξ < n, μ(ξ∩Sn−1)

μ(Sn1) = VPSn−1) VP(Sn1) .

Since the centroid of P is at the origin, its cone volume measure VP satisfies the subspaceconcentrationcondition.Sodoesthemeasureμ.

AccordingtoLemma2.1,thereexistsanorigin-symmetricpolytopeQsothatVQ =μ.

Thus, VQ({±u}) = μ({±u}) = VP({±u}). By Theorem 3.6, it yields that Xk(Q) = Xk(P),k= 1,2,. . . ,n, asdesired.

ByTheorem 3.7,ityieldsthatsupP∈Pn c

Xk(P)

Vn(P) = supP∈Pn s

Xk(P)

Vn(P),k= 1,2,. . . ,n−1.

(12)

3.2. k-generalposition

Inthispart,weposethenotionofk-generalposition,k∈ {1,2,. . . ,n},whichgeneral- izes theessentialgeometricnotion:generalposition.Restrictedtotheclassofpolytopes in(k+ 1)-generalpositioninRn,weestablishtheinversion formula ofthekth volume decomposition Xk. Thefactthatpolytopes ink-general position inRn is densein the set Kon isprovedinAppendixA.

Definition 3.1.Let Z be a finite set of unit vectors in Rn, and Z (−Z) = {±u1,±u2,. . . ,±uN}. Z is said to be in k-general position, k ∈ {1,2,. . . ,n}, if Z is notcontainedinaclosedhemisphereofSn1andanykelementsof{u1,u2,. . . ,uN}are linearlyindependent.

ApolytopeP inRnissaidtobeink-generalposition,ifthesetofunitouternormals of P isink-generalposition.

Write Pkn fortheset ofpolytopes inRn whichareink-generalposition andcontain theoriginintheirinteriors.Theinclusionrelation

Pnn⊆ Pn−1n ⊆ · · · ⊆ P3n⊆ P2n=P1n=Pon

is evident.

RecallthatKárolyiandLovász[18] firstposedthenotionofgeneralposition:Afinite set Z of unitvectors inRn is said to be ingeneralposition, ifZ is notcontained ina closed hemisphere of Sn−1 and any n elements of Z are linearly independent. So, the n-generalposition isindeedthegeneralpositioninthesenseof KárolyiandLovász,up to antipodalunitouternormals.

WriteLn⊆ PonforthesetofpolytopesinRnwhoseunitouternormalsareingeneral position. Then,Ln ⊆ Pnn.However,acubeC= [1,1]n∈ Pnn,butC /∈ Ln.

RestrictedinPk+1n ,k∈ {1,2,. . . ,n−1},weestablishtheinversionformulaofthekth volumedecompositionXk.

Theorem 3.8.If P ∈ Pk+1n andsuppVP suppV−P ={±u1,. . . ,±uN},then

Xk(P)n=

1i1<i2<···<ikN

k l=1

(1)k−l

{j1,...,jl}⊆{i1,...,ik}

(aj1+· · ·+ajl)n,

where aj=VP({±uj}),j= 1,. . . ,N.

Proof. From Theorem 3.5, and the assumption that P is in (k+ 1)-general position (therefore, any k-dimensional subspace spanned by unit outer normals of P precisely containsk normalsof P,uptotheirantipodalnormals),itfollowsthat

(13)

Xk(P)n=

ξ∈Gn,k

j1,...,jn∈{1,...,N} span{uj1,...,ujn}=ξ

aj1· · ·ajn

=

1≤i1<i2<···<ik≤N

nm=1{jm}={i1,...,ik}

aj1· · ·ajn

=

1≤i1<···<ik≤N

l1,...,lkN+ l1+···+lk=n

ali11ali22· · ·alikk n l1

× n−l1

l2

· · · n−l1−l2− · · · −lk−1 lk

=

1≤i1<···<ik≤N

l1,...,lkN+ l1+···+lk=n

ali11· · ·alikk l1!· · ·lk!n!.

Fixingi1,. . . ,ik, let k

l=1

(1)kl

{j1,...,jl}⊆{i1,...,ik}

(aj1+· · ·+ajl)n =

l1,...,lk∈N l1+···+lk=n

c(l1, . . . , lk)ali11· · ·alikk, (3.1)

wherec(l1,. . . ,lk) isthecoefficientofali11· · ·alikk.

Observethatwhen l1,. . . ,lk N+,ali11· · ·alikk appearsonly ifl =k onthe leftside.

So,

c(l1, . . . , lk) = n l1

n−l1

l2

· · · n−l1−l2− · · · −lk−1 lk

= n!

l1!· · ·lk!.

Whenl1·l2· · ·lk = 0, assumelp1,. . . ,lpm >0 and lp1 +· · ·+lpm =n,m ≤k−1.By comparingthecoefficientofalipp1

1· · ·alipm

pm ofbothsidesoftheequation (3.1),wehave c(l1, . . . , lk) =

k l=m

(1)k−l

{p1,...,pm}⊆{j1,...,jl}⊆{i1,...,ik}

¯ c

= ¯c k l=m

(1)kl k−m l−m

= ¯c

k−m

l=0

(1)kml k−m l

= ¯c(1−1)k−m= 0,

wherec¯isthecoefficientofalpp11· · ·alppmm in(ap1+· · ·+apm)n.So, k

l=1

(1)k−l

{j1,...,jl}⊆{i1,...,ik}

(aj1+· · ·+ajl)n =

l1,...,lkN+ l1+···+lk=n

ali11· · ·alik

k

l1!· · ·lk!n!.

(14)

Hence,

Xk(P)n=

1≤i1<i2<···<ik≤N

k l=1

(1)kl

{j1,...,jl}⊆{i1,...,ik}

(aj1+· · ·+ajl)n.

3.3. Thecomplexity of theProblemX

Inthispart,weconstructtwoexamplestoshowthatinR4,thevolumedecomposition functional X3(P) does not attain its maximum at parallelotopes, which indicates the complexity oftheProblemXinhigherdimensions.

Example 1.LetQbe anorigin-symmetricparallelotopeinRn.SupposethatsuppVQ = {±u1,. . . ,±un}andVQ({±ui})= 1,i= 1,2,. . . ,n.Then, Q∈ Pnn andVn(Q)=n.

ByTheorem3.8,itfollowsthat Xk(Q)n= n

k k

l=1

k l

(1)k−lln. Inparticular,

X1(Q)n= n 1

=n, X2(Q)n= n

2

2n 2 1

=n(n−1)(2n−11), X3(Q)n= n

3

3n 3 2

·2n+ 1 1

·1n

= n(n−1)(n2)

2 (3n−12n+ 1).

Example 2.Let P be a simplex in R4 with its centroid at the origin. Suppose that suppVP ={u1,u2,u3,u4,u5}andVP({ui})= 1,i= 1,2,3,4,5.Then, P ∈ P44, V4(P)= 5.

ByTheorem3.8,itfollowsthat X3(P)4= 5

3 3

1

14 3 2

24+ 3 3

34

= 360.

Thus,

X3(P)4 V4(P)4 =360

54 = 72 125. However,takingn= 4 inExample 1,wehave X3(Q)4

V4(Q)4 = 4(41)(42)

2 (34−124+ 1)1 44 = 9

16= 1125

2000 < 1152 2000 = 72

125 =X3(P)4 V4(P)4,

Références

Documents relatifs

The sharp bounds for the affine invariant ratio of the mixed cone-volume functional to the Minkowski first mixed volume are obtained, and therefore new affine isoperimetric inequalities

We prove that energy minimizing Yang–Mills connections on compact homogeneous 4-manifolds are either instantons or split into a sum of instantons on passage to the adjoint bundle..

Lutwak, Yang and Zhang defined the cone volume functional U over convex polytopes in R n containing the origin in their interiors, and conjectured that the greatest lower bound on

A non-zero finite even Borel measure on the unit sphere S n−1 is the cone- volume measure of an origin-symmetric convex body in R n if and only if it satisfies the

A major thesis of thé présent paper is that, while in principle thé martingale method has a wider range of applications, in many situations thé abstract inequalities of Part 1 are

It is expected that the result is not true with = 0 as soon as the degree of α is ≥ 3, which means that it is expected no real algebraic number of degree at least 3 is

The pattern formation for the model (2.1) with the above mentioned and associated functions, has been established in [31] using Turing’s principle and the linear stability

For the rest of this paper, without further comments, we shall reserve the letter P for a strongly independent, perfect, metrisable subset of the locally compact abelian group