• Aucun résultat trouvé

The family of Quasi-satellite periodic orbits in the circular co-planar RTBP

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "The family of Quasi-satellite periodic orbits in the circular co-planar RTBP"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01079974

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01079974

Preprint submitted on 4 Nov 2014

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

The family of Quasi-satellite periodic orbits in the

circular co-planar RTBP

Alexandre Pousse, Philippe Robutel, Alain Vienne

To cite this version:

Alexandre Pousse, Philippe Robutel, Alain Vienne. The family of Quasi-satellite periodic orbits in the circular co-planar RTBP. 2014. �hal-01079974�

(2)

The family of Quasi-satellite periodic orbits in the circular

co-planar RTBP

Alexandre Pousse∗, Philippe Robutel, Alain Vienne∗ September 15, 2014

Abstract

In the circular case of the coplanar Restricted Three-body Problem, we studied how the family of quasi-satellite (QS) periodic orbits allows to define an associated libration center. Using the averaged problem, we highlighted a validity limit of this one: for QS orbits with low eccentricities, the averaged problem does not correspond to the real problem. We do the same procedure to L3, L4 and L5 emerging periodic orbits families and remarked that for very high eccentricities FL4 and FL5 merge with

FL3 which bifurcates to a stable family.

1

Introduction

In the framework of the Restricted Three-body Problem (RTBP), we consider a primary whose mass is equal to one, a secondary in circular motion with a mass ε and a massless third body; the three bodies are in coplanar motion and in co-orbital resonance configura-tion. We actually know three classes of regular co-orbital motions: in rotating frame with the planet, the tadpoles orbits (TP) librate around Lagrangian equilibria L4 or L5; the

horseshoe orbits (HS) encompass the three equilibrium points L3, L4 and L5; the

quasi-satellites orbits (QS) are remote retrograde satellite around the secondary, but outside of its Hill sphere .

Contrarily to TP orbits, the QS orbits do not emerge from a fixed point in rotating frame as these orbits are always eccentric. Thus, we can reformulate QS definition in terms of elliptical heliocentric orbits which librate, in rotating frame, around the planet position. The QS libration center (l.c.) can be materialized in rotating frame by a one-parameter family of periodic orbits. Our goal is to study this family of periodic orbits in the plane.

IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, UPMC Univ. Paris 06, Univ. Lille 1, CNRS, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau,

75014 Paris, France

(3)

π/3 π 5π/3 0 θ FL3 FL5 FL4 QS l.c. 0.917 new dyn. l.c. 0 0.1 0.2 ν /n p la n e t FL4, FL5 QS l.c. 0.917 new dyn. l.c. -0.001 0 0.001 0.002 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 u e0 FL3 FL4, FL5 QS l.c. new dyn. l.c. 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -0.003 0 0.003 g /n p la n e t e0 FL3 FL4, FL5 QS l.c. new dyn. l.c.

Figure 1: Fixed points and frequencies evolution versus e0 for ε = 0.001 (Sun-Jupiter

system) in the averaged coplanar RTBP in circular case.

2

Method

With respect to the primary, we denote (a′, λ) the elliptic elements of the secondary and

(a, e, ω, λ) those of the third body. To reduce the dimension of the problem to 4, we introduce the resonant angle θ = λ − λ′ and average the Hamiltonian with respect to λ.

We use the method developed by [Nesvorn`y et al. (2002)] which is valid for all values of the eccentricity, to compute the averaged Hamiltonian and equations of motions.

In addition to θ and ω, we use the variables u = (√a −√a′)/aand Γ =a(1 −

1 − e2) which is a first integral. The variable ω being ignorable, the problem possesses

one degree of freedom – (θ, u) – for a given Γ. Instead of using Γ, it is convenient to introduce e0, the eccentricity value when u = 0.

In these coordinates, the QS family is represented by a family of fixed points parametrized by e0. When it is stable, each of these equilibria, processes a eigenfrequency ν that

corre-sponds to the libration frequency around this point in the plan (θ, u), and a second one g in the normal direction associated to (ω, Γ). This last frequency is also the precession rate of the third body’s pericenter.

(4)

We developed a numerical method to find this fixed point near the origin of the (θ, u) plane in each e0 and calculated the two frequencies on it. To compare QS with TP and

HS, we do the same procedure to FL3, FL4 and FL5 (the family of periodic orbits that

originate from L3, L4 and L5). The results obtained are presented in Fig. 1.

3

Discussion

Since QS orbits with low values of eccentricity imply close encounters with the secondary, the averaged problem does not represent the real problem in these conditions (phenomena also observed in [Robutel & Pousse (2013)] in the planetary Three-body problem). In Fig. 1, we remark that when e0 < 0.18, the frequencies of the QS family are of the same order

than the mean motion. This gives us a region where QS motion can not being studied with the averaged problem (hatched domain). We also present a particular orbit for e0 close to

0.8352 : g crosses zero and highlights a QS frozen ellipse in the fixed frame.

For a very high eccentricity (e0 > 0.917), an unexpected result is that FL4 and FL5

merge with FL3 which bifurcates to a stable periodic orbits family. This implies the

disap-pearance of TP and HS and the apdisap-pearance of a new type of orbits. These orbits librate around the point diametrically opposed to the secondary, relative to the primary.

References

[Nesvorn`y et al. (2002)] Nesvorn`y, D., Thomas, F., Ferraz-Mello, S. & Morbidelli, A. 2002, Cel. Mech. Dyn. Astr., 82, 323-361

[Robutel & Pousse (2013)] Robutel, P. & Pousse, A. 2013, Cel. Mech. Dyn. Astr., 117, 17-40

Figure

Figure 1: Fixed points and frequencies evolution versus e 0 for ε = 0.001 (Sun-Jupiter system) in the averaged coplanar RTBP in circular case.

Références

Documents relatifs

Earth-Moon transfer, low thrust, circular restricted three-body problem, optimal control, minimum time or fuel consumption trajectories, shoot- ing, discrete and

The objective of this article is to make a preliminary qualitative description of the time minimum transfers and to compare them with the energy minimum ones: section 2 recalls

Next, to bridge a gap between the averaged problem and the works of Henon and Guyot (1970) and Benest (1975), we devote the section 4 to revisit the motion in the rotating frame in

Other model parameters, such as the pitch angle distribu- tion and intensity of the source, wave loss rate, and the in- teraction region size (in the case of the drift removal),

The famous conjecture of V.Ya.Ivrii (1978) says that in every bil- liard with infinitely-smooth boundary in a Euclidean space the set of periodic orbits has measure zero. In the

If we consider no longer a periodic point of period 3 but a periodic point of period q &gt; 3 such that bt(z, f ) is of type pseudo- Anosov and if the singularities of the foliations

Voyant qu'il avait réussi à ramener son monde sur le plancher des vaches ou si vous préférez, à une plus juste perception de la réalité, Alexandre poursuivit sur sa lancée

Nous avons aussi organisé une collaboration de recherche avec une thèse CIFRE pour modéliser plus finement le comportement thermique et thermodynamique du GNL et