C AHIERS DE
TOPOLOGIE ET GÉOMÉTRIE DIFFÉRENTIELLE CATÉGORIQUES
K LAUS H EINER K AMPS
Note on the gluing theorem for groupoids and Van Kampen’s theorem
Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques, tome 28, n
o4 (1987), p. 303-306
<
http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CTGDC_1987__28_4_303_0>
© Andrée C. Ehresmann et les auteurs, 1987, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Cahiers de topologie et géométrie
différentielle catégoriques » implique l’accord avec les conditions
générales d’utilisation (
http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute
utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive
d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier
doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
NOTE ON THE GLUING THEOREM FOR GROUPOIDS
AND VANKAMPEN’S THEOREM
by Klaus
Heiner KAMPS CAHIERS DE TOPOLOGIEET
GÉOMÉTRIE DIFFÉPRENTIELLE CATEGORI QUES
Vol. XXVIII-4 (1987)
RÉSUMÉ.
Le but de cette note est de montrerque
le Théorème de vanKampen classique pour
legroupe
fondamental d’une uniond’espaces peut
6tre d6duit du Théorème de vanKampen g6n6ral
pour
legr-oupoi*de
fondamental dans 121 (voir aussi (61) enappliquant
le théorème de recollement pour lesgroupoides qui
est un cas
particulier
d’un théarèmeg6n6ral
de recollement enthéorie de
1’homotopie
abstraite (voir[7, 8]).
The
following
classical vanKampen
Theorem determines under suitable local conditions the fundamentalgroup n1(X,xo)
of atopo- logical space
X at xo eX,
when X is the union of twosubspaces.
THEOREM 1. Let
X1,
X2 besubspaces
of atopological space
X such that X is the union of the interiors ofX1, X2,
let Xo = x1nX2 and xo E Xo .Then,
ifXo,X1 ,X2
arepath-connected,
thediagram
where the arrows are induced
by
the inclusions ofsubspaces,
is apushout
in thecategory
G ofgroups.
It has been shown in 121 (see also
E63,
Ch. 17) that Theorem 1 can be deducedby
a retractionargument
from thefollowing general
van
Kampen type
theorem for the fundamentalgroupoid
nx of atopo- logical
space X.THEOREM 2. Let
X1 X2
besubspaces
of atopological space
X such that X is the union of the Interiors ofX1 X2,
let Xo = XInX2. Then thediagram
were the arrows are induced
by
the inclusions ofsubspaces,
is apushout
in thecategory
Gd ofgroupoids.
The aim of this note is to show
that, alternatively,
Theorem 1can be deduced from Theorem 2 in a more
conceptual
mannerby
anapplication
of thegluing
theorem forgroupoids
which is aspecial
case of a
general gluing
theorem in abstracthomotopy theory.
This note was
suggested by
a talkgiven by
M.Tierney.
In the
category Top
oftopological spaces
we have thefollowing
classical
gluing
theorem (see131,
7.5.7).THEOREX 3. Let
be a commutative
diagram
of maps oftopological spaces,
such that the front and the backsquares
arepusbouts
and f and g are closedcofibrations. Then if
ho, h1,
h2 arehomotopy equivalences,
the map h is also ahomotopy equivalence.
This theorem has been
generalized
to abstracthomotopy theory
in
171, (8.2) ,
thecategory Top being replaced by
anarbitrary category
withpushouts
Cequipped
with ahomotopy system (I, jo, j1, q), i.e.,
a functor I: C e C calledcylinder
functor and natural trans- formationssuch that
The
cylinder
functor has to be assumed to have aright adjoint
andto
satisfy
suitable Kan conditions in low dimensions (see[7], 2,3).
There are obvious notions of
homotopy
andhomotopy equivalence
inthis abstract
setting
(see171, (1.3),
(1.6)). There is also a notion of cofibration definedby
thehomotopy
extensionproperty
and aweaker notion of h-cof ibration (see
[7]
(1.8)). Then the abstract version of thegluing
theoremgeneralizes
in two ways from closed cofibrations in thetopological
case to h-cofibrations in the abstract case.In
[8], 2,5
it has been shown that thecategory
Gd ofgroupoids
carries the structure of an abstract
homotopy theory
in the abovesense.
Here,
thecylinder
functor I isgiven by
theproduct
with thegroupoid
Iconsisting
of twoobjects 0,
1 andonly
twonon-identity morphisms
1..: 0 e 1 and its inverse v-1: 1 e 0. In Gd ahomotopy
is anatural
equivalence
of functors (see also131, 6.5, 141,
1). The notion of cofibration has been characterized in151,
5.8.PROPOSITION 4. A functor of
groupoids
is a cofibration .if andonly
ifit is
injective
onobjects.
Note that this notion of cofibration for
groupoids
has alsoproved adequate
for the construction of a model structure in thesense of
Quillen
[9] for thecategory
ofgroupoids
(see forexample
CID.
In order to deduce Theorem 1 from Theorem 2 consider the fol-
lowing diagram,
in which the front square is that of Theorem 2 and hence apushout
in thecategory
Gd ofgroupoids by
Theorem 2.Let
A,
iz be the arrows inducedby
the inclusion ofsubspaces
and letthe back square be chosen as a
pushout of 11,12
in thecategory G
ofgroups.
Then the backsquare
is also apushout
in Gd. Letbo, bi, b2
denote the inclusions of a fundamental
group
into thecorresponding
fundamental
groupoid
and let h be the inducedmorphism
from the backsquare
pushout.
Then 12and )6
are cofibrations ofgroupoids by Prop-
osition 4 and
ho, h1,
2h arehomotopy equivalences
ofgroupoids
sincein Theorem 1
Xo, XI
X2 are assumed to bepath-connected. By
anapplication
of thegluing
theorem forgroupoids
it follows that h isa
homotopy equivalence
ofgroupoids.
Hence the inducedhomomorphism
of