• Aucun résultat trouvé

Workshop on Current Aspects of Knowledge Management in Medicine (KMM05)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Workshop on Current Aspects of Knowledge Management in Medicine (KMM05)"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Workshop on Current Aspects of Knowledge Management in Medicine (KMM05)

Marita Muscholl1 and Kerstin Maximini2 (Eds.)

1 International Healthcare Management Institute, University of Trier, 54286 Trier, Germany

muscholl@uni-trier.de

2 Department of Business Information Systems II, University of Trier, 54286 Trier, Germany

Kerstin.Maximini@wi2.uni-trier.de

Topics of KMM05

Traditional Knowledge Management systems in the medical field predominantly focus on medical knowledge and problem solving like diagnosis, prognosis, therapy planning and critiquing, image processing with image classification, and teaching or practising medical knowledge. Today, also economical, organizational, and quality aspects move into the centre of medical knowledge management, such as efficiency, analysis, and optimisation of hospital processes, workflow management and collabo- rative treatments by physicians of remote health care facilities. Using the changing accounting system based on flat rates, health care organizations have to change their operating philosophies to become profitable, enterprise-like organizations.

The Workshop KMM05 presented concepts and solutions that show how knowl- edge management can be applied profitably to solve today’s problems and challenges in the medical domain. The Program Committee accepted the ten most interesting papers, written by authors of seven countries, out of 15 submissions for inclusion in this workshop proceeding either as long (six contributions) or short papers (four con- tributions). The contributions were grouped according to the following headlines:

Integration and Acceptance of Knowledge Management Solutions

Three contributions focus on how KM solutions can be integrated into the daily rou- tine and how their acceptance can be increased. Bobrowski and Kreymann present a solution that provides medical knowledge mainly by means of standard software. In contrast Muscholl introduces a model-based architecture to support clinical pathways by adding and integrating knowledge management functions in hospital information systems. Puppe et al. discuss the benefits and acceptance of their KM solution proven by an evaluation that was carried out in a concrete hospital.

(2)

Availability and Usability of Clinical Document Knowledge

Clinical document knowledge plays an important role during the daily routine. Three contributions deal with the challenge of its availability and usability. Jablonski et al.

introduce a document classification method along clinical pathways, Alexandrini et al. describe the management of radiological reports with automatically generated, standardised reports and Katirai and Sax present an approach that uses “compilable templates” for translating CDA conforming clinical documents into relevant key data (and vice versa).

Cost Reduction and Cost Control in Healthcare

The last four papers describe KM systems that help to control and reduce the costs in health care organizations: Curé introduces an ontology-based system providing deci- sion support in self-medication. Eikemeier presents a peer-to-peer system architecture that supports cooperating physicians in preventing adverse drug reactions, but also keeps medical confidentiality. Tsymbal et al. propose a data mining method for prog- nosis and early detection of nosocomial infections in microbiology data and Herrler et al. present a multi-agent system approach for optimizing clinic processes.

Acknowledgements

Each submission was reviewed by two members of the KMM05 Program Committee and we would like to thank each member for participating and for assuring the work- shop’s success. All members in alphabetical order:

Prof. Dr. Hans Czap University of Trier, Germany

Dr. med. Jörg Eckardt Maria Hilf GmbH, Dernbach, Germany Dr. med. Kai U. Heitmann University of Köln, Germany Dr. med. Josef Ingenerf University of Lübeck, Germany Prof. Dr. Stefan Kirn University of Hohenheim, Germany Dr. rer. nat. Dirk Krechel SER Solutions GmbH, Germany Dipl.-Inform. Kerstin Maximini University of Trier, Germany Juniorprof. Dr. Marita Muscholl University of Trier, Germany Prof. Dr. Klaus Pommerening University Hospital of Mainz, Germany Prof. Dr. Huaglory Tianfield Glasgow Caledonian University, Great Britain Prof. Dr. Thomas Uthmann University of Mainz, Germany Prof. Dr. Aldo von Wangenheim Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brasil In addition, we would like to thank Mariana Bortoluzzi and Herculano de Biasi (both University of Trier, Germany) for contributing additional reviews.

We hope this short workshop description has made you curious to read the papers…

enjoy reading!

November 2004 Marita Muscholl and Kerstin Maximini

Références

Documents relatifs

Lotus Notes has been tried as base software for clinical information solutions before.. Little is published in MEDLINE though, but there are interesting reports on Notes based

To satisfy the requirements mentioned above but also keep the cost of integration low we propose an architecture, were only “static” information is exchanged between

This paper presents an approach for process oriented knowledge management along clinical pathways by using semantic document tagging generated by rules in the pathway models.. 1

Identification of gaps in knowledge and information, clarification of concepts, cross-country comparative studies on specific issues, harmonization of data standards and

The first step of this methodology consists on building an integrated model, based in well-known modeling techniques, such as business use cases and class models, which focus

Instead of computerizing a specific recipe for ventilation management 37, 47 , in designing NéoGanesh we tried to respect the golden rules of knowledge engineering: make an explicit

To achieve this goal this paper undertakes a research to define the concept of System of Systems (SoS) and System of Information Systems (SoIS), then move based on the defi- nitions

In our system, three knowledge levels are defined: the domain level (Image Processing), and the control and metacontrol levels that manage the representation and