• Aucun résultat trouvé

Sleep Enhances Retention and Relearning Speed of Textual Information

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Sleep Enhances Retention and Relearning Speed of Textual Information"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-02487135

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02487135

Submitted on 21 Feb 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Sleep Enhances Retention and Relearning Speed of Textual Information

Raphaëlle Rebillart-Sauvaigo, Emilie Gerbier, Fabien Mathy

To cite this version:

Raphaëlle Rebillart-Sauvaigo, Emilie Gerbier, Fabien Mathy. Sleep Enhances Retention and Relearn-ing Speed of Textual Information. International meetRelearn-ing of the LabEx CORTEX, Jun 2019, Lyon, France. �hal-02487135�

(2)

Sleep Enhances Retention and Relearning Speed

of Textual Information

Raphaëlle Rebillart-Sauvaigo, Emilie Gerbier & Fabien Mathy

Laboratoire Bases, Corpus, Langage, UMR 7320, CNRS, Université Côte d’Azur

raphaelle.rebillart-sauvaigo@univ-cotedazur.fr

▪ The effect of sleep on consolidation of newly learned information is well known

(Rasch & Born, 2013). For declarative memories, many studies have shown better retention of verbal information when learning is followed by a period of sleep rather than an equivalent wake period (Plihal & Born, 1997 ; Gais et al., 2006 ; Schönauer et al., 2014).

▪ Most studies use simple experimental material (lists of word pairs, syllables, etc.).

However, a recent research (Cousins et al., 2018) showed the beneficial effect of a nap on learning of factual knowledge, which is closer to school learning.

▪ Studies about spacing effect have shown that spaced sessions of learning and

relearning leads to better long-term memorization than massed sessions (Cepeda et al., 2006). A period of sleep between learning sessions could optimize learning and long-term retention.

▪ A study (Mazza et al., 2016) showed that a sleep period between initial learning

and relearning provides better post-learning retention, faster relearning of forgotten information and better long-term memorization.

In the present study, 3 experiments were conducted to determine whether this

effect on relearning could be generalized to factual knowledge.

➢ In addition, if this effect is observed, is it different depending on the type of

information learned? Three kinds of informations were tested in these experiments : words (W), numbers (N) or pseudo-words (PW)

Introduction

Methodology

Results

Conclusion

Bibliography

12 hours

Learning

Evening

Morning

Relearning

7 days

Morning

Evening

Recall

All day long

1st reading Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 […] 2nd reading Question 2 Question 3 […] 3rd reading Question 3 […] Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 […] 1st reading Question 2 Question 3 […] 2nd reading Question 3 […] Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 […] Material : ▪ Computerized procedure

E1 : 1 text describing an imaginary

animal and its way of life + 25 questions (9 words, 10 numbers, 6 pseudo-words)

E2 : 1 text describing an imaginary

historical event + 17 questions (3 words, 4 numbers, 10 pseudo-words)

E3 : same text as in E2 with more details +

21 questions (4 words, 6 numbers, 11 pseudo-words)

Participants :

▪ Young adults aged 18 to 30 years (E1 : N =

30 ; E2 : N = 38 ; E3 : N = 34)

▪ 2 experimental groups (Sleep vs Wake)

Learning criterion :

▪ 1 correct answer per question

▪ Each question answered correctly is no

longer presented

Main measures :

▪ Number of correct answers at first cycle

of each session

▪ Number of trials needed to reach the

learning criterion 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Exp 1 Exp 2 Exp 3

Per ce n tage of c or rec t an sw er s Wake Sleep

Fig. 1 Percentage of correct answers given at first cycle of

relearning in each experiment for Wake and Sleep groups

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Exp 1 Exp 2 Exp 3

Per ce n tage of c or rec t an sw er s Wake Sleep

Fig. 3 Percentage of correct answers given during 7-day recall

session for Wake and Sleep groups

Sleep Group

Wake Group

Fig. 2 Number of trials to reach the learning criterion at

relearning ( = total number of questions asked) in each experiment for Wake and Sleep groups

Better retention of information after a night of sleep than a period of

wakefulness

▪ The benefit of nocturnal sleep on consolidation seems to be generalizable to factual

knowledge

Faster relearning speed after a night of sleep than a period of

wakefulness

▪ It seems that sleep facilitates the relearning of forgotten information

▪ Possible link with the synaptic homeostasis hypothesis (Tononi & Cirelli, 2006) :

desaturating the synapses during sleep would make it easier to create new memory traces during relearning and/or reuse recent ones

Mixed results on the long-term (7 days) retention of information after a

night of sleep

▪ Only one experiment (E2) showed better long-term retention for the Sleep group

during the 7-day recall

▪ Further studies are needed to confirm or dispove a long term sleep benefit

Differential effect according to item type

▪ The results support a preferential sleep effect for the consolidation of pseudo-words

information, which require the creation of new mental representations

▪ Further studies are needed to understand whether these results are really due to the

specific item type or to the ceiling effect observed for words and numbers

Item Analysis No. of correct answers at first cycle of

relearning No. of trials at relearning 7-day recall

E1

W : ceiling effect W : not signif. (p = .28)

Data not available

N : signif. For sleep group (p = .01) N : signif. For sleep group (p = .02) PW : trend for sleep group (p = .07) PW : trend for sleep group (p = .04)

E2

W : ceiling effect W : not signif (p = .18)

Data not available

N : not signif. (p = .39) N : not signif. (p = .32)

PW : signif. for sleep group (p < .001) PW : signif. for sleep group (p < .001)

E3

W : not signif. (p = .29) W : not signif. (p = .16) W : not signif. (p = .33) N : not signif. (p = .14) N : not signif. (p = .16) N : not signif. (p = .32)

PW : signif. for sleep group (p < .001) PW : signif. for sleep group (p < .001) PW : trend for sleep group (p = .08)

E1 E2 E3

➢ All 3 experiments showed a significant

effect of sleep on retention before relearning

➢ All 3 experiments showed a faster

relearning speed for the Sleep groups

➢ Only E2 showed a significant effect of

sleep on the long term retention (7 days)

▪ Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological bulletin, 132(3), 354.

▪ Cousins, J. N., Wong, K. F., Raghunath, B. L., Look, C., & Chee, M. W. (2018). The long-term memory benefits of a daytime nap compared with cramming. Sleep, 42(1), zsy207.

Gais, S., Lucas, B., & Born, J. (2006). Sleep after learning aids memory recall. Learning & Memory, 13(3), 259-262.

▪ Mazza, S., Gerbier, E., Gustin, M. P., Kasikci, Z., Koenig, O., Toppino, T. C., & Magnin, M. (2016). Relearn faster and retain longer: Along with practice, sleep makes perfect. Psychological science, 27(10), 1321-1330.

Plihal, W., & Born, J. (1997). Effects of early and late nocturnal sleep on declarative and procedural memory. Journal of cognitive

neuroscience, 9(4), 534-547.

Rasch, B., & Born, J. (2013). About sleep's role in memory. Physiological reviews, 93(2), 681-766.

▪ Schönauer, M., Pawlizki, A., Köck, C., & Gais, S. (2014). Exploring the effect of sleep and reduced interference on different forms of declarative memory. Sleep, 37(12), 1995-2007.

Tononi, G., & Cirelli, C. (2006). Sleep function and synaptic homeostasis. Sleep medicine reviews, 10(1), 49-62.

1s t c ycle 2n d cy cle 3r d cy cle * *** *** ** t(28) = 2.34, p = .03 t(36) = 3.52, p = .001 t(32) = 5.47, p < .001 t(36) = 2.88, p = .01

Références

Documents relatifs

The underly- ing semi-Markov chain represents the succession of growth phases and their lengths (endogenous component) while the linear mixed models attached to each state of

Ce livre est un catalogue thématisé, couvrant les conflits majeurs de 1914 à nos jours, de la Grande Guerre à l’Afghanistan en passant par le Vietnam et la Shoah, présentant

No Espírito Santo, muitas cooperativas surgiram com apoio do governo estadual e da Associação de Crédito e Assistência Rural do Espírito Santo (Acares), hoje Instituto Capixaba

This study tested four sensitivity analysis methods: (1) lo- cal analysis using parameter estimation software (PEST), (2) regional sensitivity analysis (RSA), (3) analysis of

determination, Sex differentiation and Fertility. In blue the male and in pink the female factors. Positive regulation by CBX2.1 is depicted in green, negative regulation in

The next step is to study how migration decisions interact with investment decisions. In particular, we are interested in studying whether families send migrants with the aim

The analysis of the long version of the film shows that each ritual sequence appropriates a new space, sometimes using narration to restate or reinvent the values attached to

Les professionnels des bibliothèques universitaires n’ont pas ménagé leurs efforts depuis de nombreuses années pour s’adapter aux transformations apportées par