• Aucun résultat trouvé

International Reception of Mithila Painting

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "International Reception of Mithila Painting"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01629907

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01629907

Submitted on 6 Nov 2017

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

International Reception of Mithila Painting

Hélène Fleury

To cite this version:

Hélène Fleury. International Reception of Mithila Painting. Humboldt Kolleg Helsinki 2017 „Vier- hundert Jahre Deutschland - Finnland, hin und zurück“., Oct 2017, Helsinki„ Finland. �hal-01629907�

(2)

M ithila Paintings introduced to world, redefined through outsiders’ needs and Western paradigms. Devoted places to paintings and more than 130 exhibitions in 25 countries (cf. maps).

3 phases of reception with valued discourses of Zeitgeist:

Late colonial and post - independence moment. Archer’s universal aesthetics stemming from colonialism, vanguards, psy- choanalyze, surrealism, organic art vision.

1

st

phase of globalization, ‘global 60s’, 1960-1989 (climax 70s).

Romantic world re - enchantment vs ‘technocratic soc.’ Véquaud:

‘hippie’ bohemia, neo - tantrism, prophetic painters, village com- munitarian utopia, return to pre - industrial & holistic community.

Mithila art misunderstood as homogenous, stable and rural.

2

nd

phase of globalization, ‘postmodernity’, 1995-today, (climax 1

st

half 2010s). Techn. & styles shared, wider motives.

Transversal dynamics of ‘Neo’ or ‘New’ Mithila artists. Women painters considered mostly through gender studies.

B etween religious, political and cultural fields . Diplomacy crucial to paintings globalization (I. Gandhi; A. Malraux; M. Singh, Indian ambassador in Finland, 80s...) Interactions between stake- holders, vectors of cross - cultural transfers, led to construction of

‘transnational’ cultural field.

Y. Véquaud, B.S. Mandal, Baua Devi, her husband J.Jha making Snakes, acrylics. Behind: King and Queen

Story and a River Inside, fresco. Magiciens de la Terre, Paris, 1989. Photo: Fr.-X. Bouchart © N. Beauthéac

I nternational R eception of M ithila P ainting

Hélène Fleury, PhD Candidate, Université Paris - Saclay, assoc. to CEIAS EHESS/CNRS

E volution of Mithila Art

I nternational Reception of Mithila Painting

1930 1960

14

th

c.

M ithila : N. Bihar (IND) & Terai (NEP). Birth place of Sita & Janaki (Râmâyana). Mithila painting : umbrella term for ritual & art forms.

Since at least 14

th

c., women’s domestic wall and floor (aripana) imagery:

Hindu deities, icons of fertility (elaborately for weddings in bridal room, kohbar ghar). 14

th

c.: rigid matrimonial relations in upper castes (Panji),

purdah (veil...), painting as outlet for women assertion. Impact of Vidyapati’s Maithili songs. 3 styles: geru (mostly red), bharni (vivid

colors), kachni (mostly lines in black and red).

1934 : Nepal - Bihar earthquake , W. Archer,

local officer, ‘discovered’ paintings on walls. 47 photogr. (Brit. Library). Close to nationalist Bengali

scholars, search for popular paintings. 1949 : his

article Maithil Painting underpinned by univer- sal aesthetics based on dominant movements in

Post-War Anglophone World. Ritual & formal aspects set in unchanging tradition (styles per castes; feminine, anonymous & collective practice).

M ithila art on global village,

transnational spaces (airports, galler- ies...). ‘New Mithila’ artists , art graduated, mix aesthetics, symbolic

elem. of global & local cultures.

Awareness of national & global position of a firstly local practice.

Transnational flows renew syncretic painting.

2000

60s : transferred on paper , paintings undergo changes:

recognition of artistic individuality, new styles (tantric &

godana/tattoos)... 1956: 1

st

commercialization (B. Kulkarni).

1966: Indian govt (P. Jayakar, I. Gandhi) provides patronage by giving women paper & colors: relief program further

to drought & famine of Bihar. Marketing policies (govt, develop. agencies) to attract national and worldwide audience:

exhibitions, paintings on Jayanti - Janata Express, Madhubani station (L.N. Mishra), National Awards for Craftsmen...

1940 1950 1970 1980 1990 2010

70s: Indian enchantment of counterculture ;

orientalist & romantic visions of S. Asian universe as spiritual, pantheist & sensorial. ‘Flower power’

quest: ‘on the road’ rather than ‘on the job’, free- love, spontaneous creation, anti - bourgeois. Kairos

of 60s indophily . Internat. mediators: E. Moser - Schmitt (D), J. Elder, R. & N. Owens (USA), T. Hasegawa (J), Y. Véquaud (F). Véquaud’s writ- ings: timeless village utopia, Sehnsucht of lost Eden.

Late 90s: deconstruction

of male Westerner interpretations through gender & cultural

studies , like paintings as immemorial expression of Hindu women rituals... Appearance of men

painters (10 %): gender categories redefined? But patriarchy not

called into question.

‘Indianness’, nation & art 2003: Mithila Art Institute

1980: Ethnic Art Foundation, USA.

Bright fanning, Sabhapati Das household, Kayasth, vill. Darema, Photogr. W. Archer, 1940, Brit. Library

Aspects of Franco-Indian cultural network around Mithila Paintings in 70s

Kohbar-ghar (lotus, bamboo grove) Godawari Dutt, April 2017, Ranti.

- 1970 1970 - 1975 - 1980 - 1985 - 1990 - 1995 - 2000 - 2005 - 2010 - 2015 -

G lobalization of Mithila Paintings: Worldwide Exhibitions

MITHILA

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

USA 23%

IND F 20%

15%

D 13%

NEP 10%

J 4%

Oths 15%

1980: Crafts Museum Delhi

Shiva and Parvati mural, Godawarri Dutt, Ranti, 2002.

Lakhola Jha, Krishna and Gopis, c. 1970, s.l., Bharni style. Holi Pigm. Priv. Collect. N. N. S. Nirala.

Photogr. 2017.

Baua Devi, Manasa, Snake goddess, 1980.

Mithila Painters, here Baua Devi

Ratna Fabri Pupul Jayakar Indira Gandhi

Yves Véquaud

André Malraux

Edouard Boubat

L.Narayan Mishra 1969

Ethnic Art Foundation

Mithila Museum

Mithila Art Institute Crafts Museum

Upendra Maharati Institute

Références

Documents relatifs

The great majority of Medieval Latin inscriptions were written in prose; nevertheless, a small but significant part of the epigraphic production used verses in Antiquity

use the DériF morphological analyzer (Namer, 2009, 2013) to produce a resource made up of derivational relations between pairs of lexemes L 1 and L 2 , labelled with lin-

International Reception of Mithila Paintings and Heroization : : Constructing Women (Painters) Figures in Véquaud’s Writings.. International Conference ”Bihar and Jharkhand

Endymion’s adventure in the quest for love and beauty, his encounters in the four major stages of this quest, his decisions and choices and final vi- sion, all point at the longing

extensively modified in the version actually made for the movie in favor of a more didactic imagery, one that would more accessible to the average member of

Artists Life of a Craphead will lead a SESSION on their recent work and research around themes of autobiography and fantasy.. Artists Life of a Craphead will lead a SESSION on

The guests, like the cast of their public access television- styled video series Everything Sacred is Far Away (2019), were drawn from the local NADI network: artists and peers

European colonization in Newfoundland shows evidence of the dispossession and displacement of the Mi’kmaw peoples, which can be viewed as contributing to the rapid assimilation