Universit´ es Paris 6, Paris 7 & Paris-Sud, ´ Ecole Normale Sup´ erieure, ´ Ecole Polytechnique Master 2 iCFP – Parcours de Physique Quantique
Physique statistique hors ´ equilibre – Examen
Lundi 9 janvier 2017
R´ edigez vos r´ eponses ` a cette partie de l’examen sur une copie S´ EPAR´ EE.
Vous pouvez r´ ediger en fran¸ cais si vous le souhaitez.
Subject : Non-intersecting fluctuating lines and 1D fermions
Introduction : We study a model of non-intersecting Brownian lines in dimension 1 + 1, using the mapping on the 1D fermion gas. We consider lines going only forward in one of the two spatial directions (axis τ in Fig. 1), which can thus be considered as a fictitious “time”. Each line is described by a displacement field x n (τ ) ∈ R for τ ∈ [0, L]. Such models appear in various contexts : directed polymers, fluctuating interface models (for atomic terraces, wetting problems,..), etc.
Single line : The basic ingredient of the model is the functional for the elastic energy E[x(τ )] = c
2 Z p
dτ 2 + dx 2 − dτ
' c 4
Z L 0
dτ (∂ τ x(τ )) 2 ,
where it is assumed that distorsions are small, |∂ τ x| 1. The positive coefficient c is the elastic coefficient (the stress). The Gibbs measure exp
− E[x(τ )]/T is identified with the Wiener measure for the Brownian motion with diffusion constant D = T /c. Such a Brownian trajectory can be conveniently described by the Fokker-Planck equation
∂ τ P τ (x|y) = D ∂ x 2 P τ (x|y) , (1) where P τ (x|y) is the conditional probability for the Wiener process (free Brownian motion).
Part C is almost independent of parts A and B.
τ
1
y
2y
N
y
1y
2y
N... x
x
x
2(τ) x (τ)
1
(τ)
N...
...
0 L
y
Figure 1 : N non-intersecting elastic lines (directed polymers, fluctuating interfaces,...).
A. Properties of a single line.– We first study the fluctuations of a single line.
1/ Eq. (1) describes the single line. Recall its solution on R .
Hint : The initial condition is lim
τ→0P
τ(x|y) = δ(x − y).
2/ Fluctuations.– We consider the situation where the line issues and ends at the same point, say x(0) = x(L) = 0. Justify
hx(τ ) 2 i = A L
Z
R
dx P L−τ (0|x) x 2 P τ (x|0) (2)
What is the normalisation constant A L ? Compute the variance hx(τ ) 2 i and plot it neatly as a function of τ ∈ [0, L]. Where are the fluctuations maximum ?
B. N non-intersecting lines.– We now consider N lines (x 1 (τ ), · · · , x N (τ ))
def= ~ x(τ ), still described by the free diffusion, with however some constraints for non-intersection
∂ τ P τ (~ x|~ y) = D ~ ∇ 2 P τ (~ x|~ y) with x 1 < x 2 < · · · < x N , (3) where ∇ ≡ ~ (· · · , ∂/∂x i , · · · ).
1/ Recall the general form for the decomposition of the propagator over the spectrum of the operator H N = −D ~ ∇ 2 , denoted {E n , Ψ n (~ x)} n=0, 1,···,∞ (with R
d N ~ x Ψ ∗ n (~ x)Ψ m (~ x) = δ n,m ).
Hint : Since the Fokker-Planck operator is Hermitian here, we can simply use the mapping of (3) onto the imaginary time Schr¨ odinger equation with Hamiltonian H
N.
2/ We assume that the N lines start from ~ x(0) = ~ y and reach the same set of values at final
“time”, ~ x(L) = ~ y (like in Fig. 1). Express formally the average of an observable hA(~ x(τ ))i at
“time” τ in terms of the propagator P τ (~ x|~ y). Argue that for τ and L − τ → ∞, this average can simply be written in terms of the ground state Ψ 0 (~ x) of the operator H N .
C. Compressibility and 1D fermionic gas.– We study the response of N 1 lines to an external perturbation. In the limit L → ∞, their statistical properties are controlled by the ground state Ψ 0 (~ x) of the operator H N . Thus, we can use the mapping between (3) and the Schr¨ odinger equation for a gas of N free spinless fermions of “mass” m = 1/(2D) = c/(2T ) (we set ~ = 1), where T is the original temperature of the lines and c their elastic constant.
We now consider the fermions, described by the Schr¨ odinger equation i∂ t Ψ(~ x, t) = H N Ψ(~ x, t) : fermions occupy 1D plane waves ψ k (x) = √ 1
L e ikx of energy ε k = 2m k
2. In a box of finite size L , the wave vector k is quantised (it is sufficient to remember that P
k → L /(2π) R dk).
1/ We consider a single fermion : the density operator is ˆ n(x) = δ(x − x) and its Fourier ˆ component ˆ n q = e −iqˆ x , where ˆ x is the position operator. Give the matrix element h ψ k |ˆ n q |ψ k
0i.
2/ We now consider the fermion gas. A perturbation is introduced under the form of a scalar external potential V (x, t) = (1/L ) P
q V q (t) e iqx . The corresponding Hamiltonian is H ˆ pert (t) =
N
X
i=1
V (ˆ x i , t) = Z
dx V (x, t) ˆ n(x) = 1 L
X
q
V q (t) ˆ n −q ; (4) from now on ˆ n q = P
i e −iqˆ x
iis the density operator of the fermion gas. Its response is h n(x, t)i ˆ V = hˆ n(x)i +
Z
dt 0 dx 0 χ(x − x 0 , t − t 0 ) V (x 0 , t 0 ) + O(V 2 ) (5) i.e. hˆ n q (t)i V = n L δ q,0 + R
R dt 0 χ e q (t − t 0 ) V q (t 0 ) + O(V 2 ), where n = hˆ n(x)i is the mean density.
a) Express χ e q (t) as an equilibrium correlation function.
b) Write its Fourier transform χ(q, ω) = e R
R dt χ e q (t) e iωt as a sum over contributions of plane
waves. Analyse its analytical structure. Interpret the position of the poles of the integrand.
3/ Static compressibility.– The connection to the problem of fluctuating lines is made more transparent by considering the static response χ(q)
def= χ(q, e 0) at zero temperature.
a) We denote by f (ε k ) the Fermi-Dirac distribution. Show that χ(q) = −
Z dk π
f (ε k )
ε k − ε k+q (6)
where the integral is a Cauchy principal part integral (see appendix).
b) The zero temperature fermion gas involves the Fermi energy ε F = 2m 1 k F 2 controlling the number of fermions N. Compute explicitely χ(q).
c) Kohn anomaly.– Show that lim q→0 χ(q) is related to the density of states at Fermi level ρ 0 = πk m
F
. Analyse χ(q) for q → 2k F and q → ∞. Plot neatly −χ(q)/ρ 0 as a function of q/(2k F ).
Express k F and ρ 0 as a function of the parameters for the fluctuating lines (n, T and c).
d) Bonus.— Argue that the length of the lines L coincides with the inverse temperature of the fermions β ferm = 1/T ferm (go back to question B.2). Discuss the validity of the T ferm = 0 approximation, and then that of the small distorsion approximation made in the very begining (express the two conditions in terms of the parameters of the lines). For finite T ferm , what is the value of χ(2k F ) (in terms of T, n and c) ?
Appendix :
• Convention for Fourier transform in dimension d : ϕ q =
Z
Vol
d d x e −iqx ϕ(x) & ϕ(x) = 1 Vol
X
q
ϕ q e iqx −→
Vol→∞
Z d d q
(2π) d ϕ q e iqx (7)
• In pratice, Cauchy principal part integral − R
dx x−x ϕ(x)
0
= Re R
dx x−x ϕ(x)
0
±i0
+can be calculated with
− Z b
a
dx ϕ(x) x − x 0
= lim
η→0
+Z x
0−η a
+ Z b
x
0+η
dx ϕ(x) x − x 0
, (8)
where ϕ(x) is a regular function and x 0 ∈ [a, b] (if x 0 ∈ / [a, b], this is the usual integral).
• We recall that the grand canonical average of a commutator of many body operators, sums of one particle operators, of the form ˆ A = P N
i=1 a ˆ (i) and ˆ B = P N
i=1 ˆ b (i) , is h[ ˆ A , B]i ˆ = X
α
f α h ϕ α | ˆ a, ˆ b
| ϕ α i = X
α, β
(f α − f β ) a αβ b βα , (9) where the sum runs over one particle stationary states. a αβ = h ϕ α |ˆ a| ϕ β i is a matrix element of the one particle operator and f α = f (ε α ) denotes the occupancy of the individual eigenstate.
The problem is inspired by the article :
P.-G. de Gennes, Model for fibrous structures with steric constraints, J. Chem. Phys. 48(5), 2257–2259 (1968).
Solutions sur la page du cours : cf. http://lptms.u-psud.fr/christophe_texier/
Christophe Texier January 2017 Non-intersecting fluctuating lines and 1D fermions – Solutions
A. Single line.
1/ Solution is P τ (x|y) = √ 1
4πDτ exp
− (x−y) 4Dτ
2. Note that here, D has dimension [D] = [x] 2 /[τ ] = [length]
2/ Averaging takes the form
hx(τ ) 2 i = R
R dx P L−τ (0|x) x 2 P τ (x|0) P L (0|0)
(if one removes the x 2 in the numerator, one gets obviously h1i = 1, as required). The Gaussian integral gives the fluctuations of the Brownian bridge, hx(τ ) 2 i = 2D τ 1 − L τ
. Fluctuations are maximum at the middle τ = L/2, where the line is less constrained hx(L/2) 2 i = DL/2 = T L/(2c). Discussion : fluctuations increase with temperature and decrease with the stress. Sca- ling with the length is δx ∼ √
L as expected.
Dimensional analysis : [T ] = [energy] and [c] = [force] = [energy]/[length]. Ok.
B. N lines.
1/ The decomposition of the propagator over the spectrum of H N = −D ~ ∇ 2 is P τ (~ x|~ y) = h ~ x | e −τ H
N| ~ y i =
∞
X
n=0
Ψ n (~ x) Ψ ∗ n (~ y) e −τ E
n.
2/ Averaging of a function of coordinates at “time” τ has the same structure as for one line.
Assuming a discrete spectrum, for long lines we write P τ (~ x|~ y) ' Ψ 0 (~ x) Ψ ∗ 0 (~ y) e −τ E
0, hence hA(~ x(τ ))i =
N ! R ∞
−∞ dx 1 R ∞
x
1dx 2 · · · R ∞
x
N−1dx N P L−τ (~ y|~ x) A(~ x) P τ (~ x|~ y)
P L (~ y|~ y) (10)
' N ! R ∞
−∞ dx 1
R ∞
x
1dx 2 · · · R ∞
x
N−1dx N Ψ 0 (~ y) Ψ ∗ 0 (~ x) e −(L−τ)E
0A(~ x) Ψ 0 (~ x) Ψ ∗ 0 (~ y) e −τ E
0Ψ 0 (~ y) Ψ ∗ 0 (~ y) e −LE
0.
Finally
hA(~ x(τ ))i '
τ & L−τ→∞ N ! Z ∞
−∞
dx 1
Z ∞ x
1dx 2 · · · Z ∞
x
N−1dx N |Ψ 0 (~ x)| 2 A(~ x) . (11) which corresponds to average in the ground state of H N . The factor N ! is required if we choose to normalise the eigenstates as R
R
Nd~ x |Ψ n (~ x)| 2 = 1.
From non-intersecting lines to 1D fermions : The constraints for non-intersection can be des- cribed by wave functions which vanish at coinciding points Ψ(· · · , x i , x i+1 = x i , · · · ) = 0.
Moreover, being restricted to the sector x 1 < x 2 < · · · < x N , we can construct a basis of wave functions antisymmetric under exchange of particles, i.e. fermionic eigenstates.
Remark : from the point of view of the diffusion, the Dirichlet boundary condition implies that normalisation is not conserved, i.e. R
d~ x P τ (~ x|~ y) ∼ e −E
0τ decays as time grows. However, dividing
by P L (~ y|~ y) in (10) implies that averaging is taken only over non-intersecting trajectories which
have survived.
C. Compressibility and 1D fermionic gas.– We now study the 1D fermion gas (the begining of the part C reproduces a result of the lectures).
1/ Matrix elements for the one-body density operator : h ψ k |ˆ n q | ψ k
0i = R dx
L e −ikx−iqx+ik
0x = δ k
0,k+q .
2/ Compressibility.– We apply one of the main results of the lectures : χ e q (t) = − i
L θ H (t) h[ˆ n q (t), n ˆ −q ]i (12) in terms of many-body density operator. The correlator can be expressed in terms of one-body matrix elements (relation of the appendix) :
χ e q (t) = − i
L θ H (t) X
k, k
0(f k − f k
0) |h ψ k |ˆ n q |ψ k
0i| 2 e i(ε
k−ε
k0)t where f k ≡ f (ε k ) = 1/ e β(ε
k−µ) + 1
. A Fourier transform over time finally gives the formula obtained in the exercice session (TD 8) :
χ(q, ω) = e 1 L
X
k
f k − f k+q
ω + ε k − ε k+q + i0 + (13)
where the 0 + in the denominator is a regulator. It ensures that singularities of the response function are in the lower complex plane of the frequency (causality). Besides we recognise the energy of a particle-hole excitation ε k+q − ε k .
3/ Static compressibility.– For zero frequency, we could drop the regulator which is not needed χ(q) = L 1 P
k
f
k−f
k+qε
k−ε
k+q. We prefer to use the symmetry of the spectrum ε k = ε −k and split the sum (which requires to keep the regulator)
χ(q) = 1 L
X
k
f k − f k+q
ε k − ε k+q + i0 + = 1 L
X
k
f k
ε k − ε k+q + i0 + − 1 L
X
k
f k ε k−q − ε k + i0 +
= 1 L
X
k
f k
ε k − ε k+q + i0 + + 1 L
X
k
f k ε k − ε k+q − i0 + finally, using Ω±i0 1
+= PP Ω 1 ∓ iπ δ(Ω),
χ(q) = 2 L
X
k
PP f k
ε k − ε k+q = − Z dk
π
f k ε k − ε k+q
The Fermi-Dirac distribution at T ferm = 0 is f k = θ H (k F − |k|). Writing ε k+q − ε k = m q (k + q/2) we find
χ(q) = − m q π −
Z +k
F−k
Fdk
k + q/2 = m q π ln
q − 2k F q + 2k F
(14) We obtain easily the limiting behaviours :
χ(q) ' −ρ 0 ×
1 for q k F
1
2 ln |q−2k 4k
FF
| for q ∼ 2k F 2k
Fq
2
for q k F
(15)
where ρ 0 = πk m
F
is the DoS per unit volume at Fermi level. The logarithmic singularity is called
the Kohn anomaly. It is due to a particle-hole excitation where the particle and the hole are
close to the two Fermi points.
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0.0
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5