• Aucun résultat trouvé

improve breeding efficiency and predict useful

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "improve breeding efficiency and predict useful"

Copied!
10
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

The Genomic Selection of Theobroma cacao: a

new strategy of marker assisted selection to

improve breeding efficiency and predict useful

traits in new populations

F. Ribeyre (1), O. Sounigo (2), X. Argout (2), C. Cilas (1), B.

Efombagn (3), M. Denis (1), J.M. Bouvet (4), O. Fouet (1),

C. Lanaud (1)

(1) CIRAD, France (2) CIRAD, Colombia (3) IRAD, Cameroon (4) CIRAD, Madagascar

(2)

Why Genomic Selection for cocoa ?

Markers assisted selection: Markers significantly associated with trait

Genomic selection: all genetic markers simultaneously (Meuwissen et al.

2001)

A solution for the prediction of performance in complex traits ?

accuracy of Genomic selection depends on:

• linkage disequilibrium between markers • the heritability of the trait

• the size of the training population

• the relationships between the training sets and the test sets • the number of markers

• the statistical method to estimate the GEBV • the distribution of underlying QTL effects • the genotype x environment interaction …

(3)

What is Genomic Selection ?

• Training population: genotyped and phenotyped

model

• test population: genotyped

predictions

GEBV: sum of all markers effects by

regressing phenotypic values on all

available markers.

(4)

Objectives

Two traits

“Heritable” “Less heritable”

• Evaluate 2 models

• Evaluate the predictive abilities of models

(5)

Data to test genomic selection

Cocoa trees Marker 1 Marker 50224 Average weight of a bean % of rotten pods Tree 1 … Tree 287

A cacao farm plot in Cameroon with a mixture of hybrids

Histogram of the average weight of a bean - 232 trees

Histogram of the percentage of rotten pods - 287 trees during 3 years

(6)

The statistical challenge

Best linear unbiased prediction model based on markers (G-BLUP)

Mixed model that suppose a normal distribution of markers effects with same variance A large number of QTL with small effects

genetic values are modeled as u ~ N(0, Uσ2

u),

where U is the realized relationship matrix calculated from the markers and σ2

u is the genetic variance pertaining to model

Bayesian lasso model (BL)

We suppose a double exponential distribution of markers effects.

A lot of markers with effects near 0 and some with moderate to large effects m ∼ N(0, Tσ2)

T = diag(τ1 2, ..., τ

(7)

Results using R-package synbreed

(Wimmer et al., 2012)

Percentage of rotten pods Average weight of a bean

(8)

Evaluate models : cross validation

% rotten

Weight

Predictive ability = 0,42 (GBLUP 2 folds) Predictive ability = 0.59 (GBLUP 2 folds) = 0,37 (BL 2 folds) = 0,58 (BL 2 folds)

(9)

Evaluate models

Observed mean of 10% higher predicted Observed mean of 10% lower predicted Percentage of rotten pods 67 48 Average weight of a bean 1.6 0.96

Good differentiation

(10)

Conclusion

• Good predictive ability of models

• A promising method to improve these cocoa traits

• predict tolerant cocoa trees to disease only present in another

environment ?

Références

Documents relatifs

In simulation II, five replicates of data were used to study the effects of alternative parameterizations of the genetic model, for the RAM only. Genetic and

When allelic e ffects are simple additive effects and Q −1 and G −1 exist, this transformation can give unique estimators of allelic e ffects, because genotypic and allelic

A Bayesian alternative to maximum marginal likelihood estimation is presented in A Bayesian Approach to a Mixed Model Structure In the Numerical application section,

In this method, by treat- ing a pair of QTL as one variable in the RJMCMC algorithm, the proposed method will work well, not only in cases where either of the two QTL has main e

When combined with additive marker effects, they allow the exact derivation of the Mendelian sampling (co-)variances of (estimated) breeding values for several traits, as well for

ues. The univariate t-model was the closest, although the residual scale pa- rameter is not directly comparable with the residual variance of the Gaus- sian model.

So, the impact of the baffle effect on the cMUTs response is reduced when the mechanical impedance is increased, since it appears in the low frequency domain of the

Figure 5.3: Schematic of displacement and tilt modulation measurement beyond the quan- tum noise limit. Prior to the modulation generated via a PZT at a few MHz, a bright TEM 00 beam