HAL Id: jpa-00245598
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00245598
Submitted on 1 Jan 1987
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of
sci-entific research documents, whether they are
pub-lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
Polyx multicrystalline silicon solar cells processed by
PF+ 5 unanalysed ion implantation and rapid thermal
annealing
W.O. Adekoya, Li Jin Chai, M. Ajaka, J.C. Muller, P. Siffert
To cite this version:
Polyx multicrystalline
silicon solar cells
processed by
PF+5
unanalysed
ion
implantation
and
rapid
thermal
annealing
W. O.
Adekoya,
Li Jin Chai(*),
M.Ajaka,
J. C. Muller and P. SiffertCRN
(IN2P3),
Laboratoire PHASE(UA
du CNRS n°292), 23,
rue du Loess, 67037Strasbourg
Cedex, France(Reçu
le 26septembre 1986, accepté
le 8 décembre1986)
Résumé. 2014
Le recuit transitoire des défauts induits dans le silicium par
l’implantation
d’ions peut être unetechnique compétitive
par rapport au recuitclassique
pour la fabrication desphotopiles à
usage terrestre. Ilreste
cependant quelques inconvénients,
tels qu’une faible durée de vie des porteursphotogénérés-
et unetension en circuit ouvert peu élevée.
Nous
avons tenté de surmonter ces difficultés pour le siliciummulticristallin
(POLYX)
produit par la CGE(France)
en choisissant unetempérature
de recuit de la jonctiondopée au
phosphore,
d’une part, assez élevée, 800 °C(afin
d’obtenir une bonne recristallisation et uneactivation suffisante du
dopant)
et d’autre part, suffisamment faible, 900 °C(afin
de réduire les effets dedégradation
despropriétés électriques
de labase).
Le but de ce travail est d’étudier lescaractéristiques
I-V desphotopiles
et de les comparer à celles obtenuespar
recuitclassique
ou par diffusion dudopant.
Abstract. 2014Rapid
thermalannealing
ofdamage
induced by implantation in silicon can be a cost effectivetechnology
for theprocessing
of terrestrial solar cells ascompared
to classical furnace or pulsed laserannealing. Unfortunately,
drawbacks as poor bulk lifetime or lowopen-circuit-voltage
occur as well. We haveattempted to overcome these limitations for POLYX
multicrystalline
cast silicon grownby
CGE(France)
bykeeping
theannealing
temperature of thephosphorus doped layer
ashigh
as 800 °C(to
ensure a goodcrystalline
quality
and ahigh dopant activation)
whilebeing
less than 900 °C(to
minimize the effect ofdegradation
of the baseproperties).
The purpose of the present work is toinvestigate
the I-V characteristics of the cells and to compare to those obtained with classical furnaceannealing
or with classical diffusion process.Classification
Physics
Abstracts60.30 - 72.40 - 61.70T - 81.60
1. Introduction.
Multicrystalline
silicon can be considered as an attractive alternative tosingle
crystal
silicon as base material for the fabrication of solar cells. It offers thepossibility
ofachieving
strong
reduction of cell cost inspite
of arelatively
small decrease inef-ficiency.
Parallel to the work on newcrystal
growth
methods
including
ribbonsheet,
pulling
and castingot growing,
theincreasing
use of «off
grade »
low cost silicon necessitates theoptimization
of the cellmanufacturing
process andespecially
thejunction
formation.During
the last ten years, ionimplanta-tion has
gained
acceptance
as ahighly
effectivejunction
formation process. The results of several studies indicates that excellent solar cells can be fabricated[1, 2],
and the ionimplantation
process(*)
On leave from the lab. of Ion-beamPhysics,
Wuhan Univ. Wuhan(China)
has been
applied
to the fabrication of space[3],
flatplate
[4],
concentrator[5]
andhigh efficiency [6]
solarcells,
with notableperformances
achieved for each type of cell. Nevertheless thehigh
cost of conventional ionimplanters
hasprevented
wide-spread
use ofimplantation
for solar cell manufac-ture, sothat,
alternativeprocedures
using
unana-lysed
ionimplantation [7, 8],
orglow discharge [9]
have beenproposed.
In the case of
large
grains
multicrystalline
silicon solarcells,
realisedby
ionimplantation,
only
few studies arereported
in literature :phosphorus
and arsenicimplantation
followedby
incoherentlight
annealing
[10, 11] ;
PFS
glow
discharge
plus
UV laserannealing
[12], PFS
unanalysed
implantation
+ YAGand
CO2
laserannealing [13, 15].
In thiswork,
we propose for POLYX material the realization of shallow N+ Pjunction
by
coupling
anunanalysed
ionimplantation
procedure
with arapid
thermalannealing processing.
Fastdopant
activation696
as well as
negligible
redistribution are the twoessential
advantages
of thisannealing procedure.
But the twomajor problems,
which are the reduction of theminority
carrier lifetime in the bulk and the presence of residual defects in the spacecharge
as well as in the frontregion, imply
serious limitations to the process as theopen-circuit
voltage
and thequantum
efficiency
are affected. We have thereforeattempted
to overcome these limitations inmulticrys-talline silicon solar cells
through keeping
theanneal-ing
temperature
in the range of 800 to 900 °C. The results ofexperiments
carried out on devices from POLYX(CGE)
material withimplanted
N+ Pjunc-tions are
presented.
The electricalproperties
wereanalysed by
using
sheet resistance measurements, dark and AMI illumination 1 Vcharacteristics,
as well asspectral
response.Our
choice ofannealing
parameters was based on results from studies carried -out on
single
crystal
silicon of a similarresistivity
as the wafer used in this work. Variousanalysis
likeRutherford
Backscattering
(RBS),
Transmission
ElectronMicroscopy (TEM),
Sheetresistance,
car-rier concentration andmobility profiling,
andDeep
Level TransientSpectroscopy
(DLTS)
measure-ments, all show that an
annealing
temperature range of 800-850 °C for 4-5 s, appears to beoptimal
for ourexperimental
conditions. 2.Experimental
conditions.2.1 DOPING. - As industrial
necessity
ofhigh
production
rates overlarge
surface wafers results inusing
sophisticated
andexpensive
ionimplantation
equipment,
we haveproposed
the realization of solar cellsby
using
a low cost,high
current, low energy,unanalysed
ionimplantation
procedure
[7],
which needs no
sophisticated
magnetic
network forisotope
selection,
norlong
beam lines. Thisdoping
processing
has been called AMI(Atomic
andTIME(sec)
Fig. 1. - Schema of the
Rapid
ThermalAnnealing
(RTA)
set up together with the
microprocessor
controlled thermalcycle.
Molecular ion
Implantation). Phosphorus
ions wereimplanted
at 30 keV energyby using
thistechnique
at an
optimized
doseof
2-3 x1015 ion/cm2.
Theuniformity
is about 10 % accross the wafer and10
% wafer to wafer as determinedby
means of the fourpoints
probe
technique performed
afterannealing.
2.2 ANNEALING. - Thesystem
ofRapid
ThermalAnnealing
(RTA)
used here is acommercially
available fumace(34
kW power HEATPULSE machine[16])
with acompressed
air and watercooled reflector to ensure a
good
temperature
homogeneity
of thesample
holder. A continuoushigh purity
argon gas flow is maintainedthrough
the chamberduring
the wholeannealing
process. Thetemperature
is controlledby
anoptical
pyrometerconnected to a
microprocessor.
Theheating
rate is fixed at about 50 °C/s and thecooling
rate is about 100 °C/s(see figure 1).
In order to compare the RTAannealing
to the classicalone, 10
cm2 POLYX
slices from the sameingot (n°
633,
resistivity
1.96n.cm)
were cut in 2cm2
samples,
so that there were manysamples
for each slice number. For the electricalanalysis,
we have restricted ourstudy
to two slices(number
33 and43)
coming
from the middle of theingot.
The measurements wereperformed
on 3-4samples
for eachexperimental
condition,
so that the maximumscattering
of theresults,
were taken in consideration.2.3 CELL PROCESSING. - The contacts of the cells were obtained
by simple
vacuumevaporation
of a Aulayer
on theback,
while aAg
grid
covers about 12.5 % of the front surface. The cells were tested on a simulatoradjusted
to deliver 100mW/cm 2
(AMI
conditions).
The measurements were taken at 28 °C. 3.Characteristics
of thedoped layer.
3.1 REGROWTH BEHAVIOUR. - We
report
infigure
2 the RBS spectra obtainedfor ~100~
monocrystal-line silicon
samples
annealed at615,
725, 770,
820 and 980 °C for 4 s. Thecomparison
between thealigned
and the random curves shows that within thetemperature range 615-770
°C,
thedamaged
layer
is stillamorphous
while anannealing
at 820 °C is sufficient to have acrystal quality
close to that of avirgin sample
as confirmedby
measuring
the minimumyield
X min which reaches a value of 5 %.Complementary
Transmission Electron Mi-croscopy(TEM) [17]
measurements confirm the relativegood crystal
quality
for 820 °C/4 sannealing
withonly
the presence of small 100-200À
diameterdefects,
probably
precipitates ;
whereas attempera-tures above 950 °C dislocation
loops
androd-shaped
defects appears.3.2 DLTS ANALYSIS. - Since
Fig. 2. - Rutherford
Backscattering
(RBS)
measurements of the residual disorder after RTA process.Fig. 3. - DLTS signal for a
PFS
implanted
sampleannealed at 615 °C/4 s, 820 °C/4 s and 1100 °C/4 s.
temperature/time
compromise
in order to achievegood crystal quality,
we haveinvestigated, using
the DLTStechnique,
a series ofsamples
annealed under these conditions as well as above and below it in order to see the evolution ofelectrically
active defects within the range 600-1100 °C. Our main results are summarized infigure
3.These results indicate that one defect level at 542 meV with a concentration and effective cross section of 2.7 x
1014 cm- 3
and 2.1 x10-14 cm-2, respectively
had formed at 615 °C/4 s. This same level wasobserved in all the other
samples
annealed up to1100 °C/4 s, we remark that its concentration
greatly
diminished at thehighest
temperature.At 820 °C/4 s, two other levels are seen to have formed one of which is not yet characterizable. The other level shows up at 180 meV with a concentration of 4.8 x
1013 cm- 3
and an effective cross-section 9.3 x10-16 cm2.
This level wasagain
observed after 1 100 °C/4 sannealing,
however,
with ahigher
con-centration as shown infigure
3.The kinetics of formation of these levels is the
subject
of anotherstudy,
but theirimportance
at themoment is seen in the fact that under
quasi-ideal
annealing
conditions,
they
remain in thejunction.
3.3 ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES. - In
figure
4,
the sheet resistance of the N+doped
layer
of POLYXmulticrystalline
silicon isplotted
a)
versus thean-nealing
temperature in the range 700-1 000 °C for a 4 sduration,
b)
versusannealing
time for a tempera-ture of 850 °C. ’ It isnoteworthly
that the sheet resistance reaches a minimum value of 90-110 03A9/~ when theannealing
temperature
is more than 800 °C. This value is as low as those obtained for the classical thermal process(three-step annealing
550 °C, 1
h ;
850 °C,
1/4h ;
550°C,
1h)
(Fig. 4c).
Moreover,
it is known that to avoiddegradation
effects on the lifetime ofminority
carriers in thebulk,
it is necessary to utilize the lowestannealing
temperature
whichgives
agood recrystallization
of theamorphized
layer.
For this reason, we decided tocarefully analyse
the 800-900 °C range forannealing
times between 2 and 8 s.Fig. 4. - Evolution of the sheet resistance
as
a)
a functionof RTA temperature for 4 s
heating
time,b)
a function of698
In
figure
5,
we havereported
the carrierconcen-tration
profiles
as deduced from anodicstripping
technique
for~100~
monocrystalline
siliconsamples
annealed at differenttemperature-time couples,
whichgive
a maximum activation of thedopant.
Thephosphorus
peak
activity
reaches a level close to theequilibrium solubility
limit(about
4 x1020
cm- 3)
fortemperature-time couples
such as(75
°C,
15s)
or(900 °C, 2 s).
Thephosphorus
activefraction,
as deduced from the total incident dose of theE
PFn
ions is about 24 % to 30 %. It is also to be noted that no diffusion occursby increasing
thetemperature
due to shorterprocessing
durations.Fig. 5. - Carrier concentration
profiles
of ~100~
mono-crystalline silicon samples annealed at different RTA
temperature-time couples.
4. Photovoltaic
performances.
In table
I,
we present acomparison
of the results of the AMIperformance
of thesingle
crystal
andpolycrystalline
cells. Our results for the former arecompared
with those obtained from cellsprepared
by
implantation
of P+ andPFS
ions followedby
a similar incoherentlight annealing
[18]
orby liquid
phase
laserannealing
[12-14]
and with thosereported
for SILSO material[10-12].
In the case of
single
crystal
cells,
we observed that the short circuit current(Isc)
is almostequivalent
in all theprocessed
cells,
whereas the open circuitvoltage
(V oc)
of thePF+
implanted
samples
is low(below
500mV)
whencompared
with results ob-tained for P+implantation [18]
and forPFS
after laserannealing
[12-14].
This is also the case with thepolycrystalline
cells.These
lowVoc
values can be attributed to thepersistence
of a defectiveregion
near thejunction
as confirmedby
DLTS and also tothe presence of fluorine which inhibits the
regrowth
during annealing
[17, 19].
The results from the cellsFig. 6. -
Evolution of the
V,., I.
and ~ as a function ofRTA :
a)
temperature andb)
duration ;c)
classical
processed
on the POLYXingot
633using
the RTAannealing
set-up
arecompared
with those from cellsprepared using
the classicalthree-step annealing
procedure
(i.e.
550 °C,
1 ;
850°C,
1/4h ;
550 °C,
1 h).
For the purpose of
comparison,
we show infigure
6 the evolution of the open circuitvoltage
(Voc),
the short circuit current(Isc)
and theefficiency (~)
for the fast thermalprocessing a)
in thetemperature
range 700-1 000 °C for a fixedannealing
time 4 s,b)
at a fixedtemperature
850 °C for differenttimes,
andc)
for theclassically
annealed referencesamples.
For these series of measurementsper-formed on POLYX
material,
we have alarge
scattering
in theexperimental
results moreespecially
for the
Isc
current and forefficiency
values(about
± 10
%)
than for the sheet resistance and theVoc
values. Thisscattering
effect is in agreement with other results obtained on SILSO material for a similarannealing technique
[10, 11].
One can see on this
figure :
- that the
Voc
values in the range 800-900 °C areas
good
as the valuesreported
for classicalannealing
and that theannealing
durationplays
anegligible
role in this case ;- that
higher
current values than those obtainedfor the
three-step
process can be obtained for the lowerannealing
temperature
of 800 °C which from RBSresults,
assures a sufficientregrowth
of thedamaged
layer.
However,
theannealing
duration isimportant
here as theIsc
values decrease as a function ofincreasing
the duration in the range2-8 s ;
- finally,
theefficiency
values confirm these tendencies so that therapid
thermalprocessed
cells have about one per cent more conversionefficiency
than those obtained from thethree-step annealing.
However,
the results obtained to dateby
the association of theRapid
ThermalAnnealing (RTA)
with the Atomic and Molecular ionImplantation
(AMI)
have not reached the level of thoseprocessed
using
fordoping,
classical ionimplantation
or dif-fusion of thedopant,
andpulsed
laser for theannealing (see
Table1).
5. Conclusion.
The aim of this
study
was theinvestigation
of thepossibilities
offeredby
theRapid
ThermalAnnealing
(RTA)
to regrow the POLYX silicondamaged
layer
due to thedoping
processusing
the Atomic andTable I. -
Photovoltaic properties
of
mono andpolycristalline
cellsproduced
by
AMIimplantation followed
by
classical and RTAannealing.
Someresults,
obtainedby
classical ionimplantation
orby
classicaldiffusion
of
thephosphorus
dopant
aregiven
for
comparison.
700
Molecular ion
Implantation
(AMI)
process withPF5
ions.Our main results show that cells have not reached in the
present
processing
conditions,
the level of cellsprocessed
with the conventionaltechnique,
even
though
theregrowth
and electrical activationseem to be sufficient. The
V oc
andefficiency limiting
factor which result from thisprocessing
is due toresidual
defectsand
to the presence of fluorine. A better controled andpossibly
slowercooling
rate can be the way to eliminate this serious drawbacks.Acknowledgments.
We would like to thank Miss A. Grob and S. Barthe for
performing
RTAannealing
and Miss C.Weymann
and M. J.-P. Schunck for the contacts of the cells.We are also
grateful
to the FrenchEnergy Agency
AFME(Agence
Française
pour la Maîtrise del’Energie)
and to the PIRSEM from the French CNRS(Centre
National de la RechercheScientifi-que)
for financial support.References
[1]
DOUGLAS, E. C., D’AIELLO, R. V., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED 27(1980)
792.[2]
MINNUCCI, J. A., KIRKPATRICK, A. R., MATTHEI, K. W., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED 27(1980)
802.[3]
SPITZER, M. B., NOWLAN, M. J., Record of the NASA SPRAT Conf. Cleveland, Ohio,April
(1982).
[4] NOWLAN,
M. J., KREISMAN, W. S., YOUNGER,P. R., 15th IEEE Photovoltaic
Specialists
Conf.Orlando, USA
(1981) p. 972.
[5]
YOUNGER, P. R., BUNKER, S. N., Solar Cells 6(1982)
79.[6]
SPITZER, M. B., TOBIN, S. P., KEAVNEY, Ch. J.,IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED 31
(1984)
546.[7]
MULLER, J. C., Proc. of the EC Contractors meeting(Nov.
16-17,1982).
Brussels Solar Energy (R. and D. Reidel,Ed.)
Vol. 3(1983)
67.[8]
SPITZER, M. B., BUNKER, S. N., 16th IEEE Photo-voltaicSpecialists
Conf. SanDiego
USA(1982)
p. 764.
[9]
YOUNG, R. T., VAN DER LEEDEN, G. A., WOOD,R. F., WESTBROOK, R. D., 16th IEEE Photovol-taic Specialists Conf. San
Diego
USA(1982)
p. 748.
[10]
NIELSEN, L. D., LARSEN, A. N., 5th EC Photovoltaic SolarEnergy
Conf.(Athens)
Greece(Oct.
17-21,
1983) (Ed.
D.Reidel)
1983, p. 997.[11]
NIELSEN, L. D., LARSEN, A. N., BORISENKO, V. E.,1st MRS Europe Conf.
Strasbourg
Fr.(1983)
J.Physique Colloq.
44(1983)
C5-381.[12] RUCKTESLER,
R., WOOD, R. F., WEST BROOK,R. D., 6th EC Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conf.
London U.K.
(April
15-19,1985) (Ed.
D.Reidel) 1983,
p. 1006.
[13]
COM-NOUGUE, J., KERRAND, E., TESSARI, C., COURCELLE, E., MULLER, J. C., SIFFERT, P.,Conf. reference
[10]
p. 1118.[14]
MULLER, J. C., COURCELLE, E., BARTHE, S.,SIF-FERT, P., COM-NOUGUE, J., KERRANO, E., TESSARI, C., Conf. reference
[11]
p. 375.[15]
MULLER, J. C., SIFFERT, P., HO, C. T., HANOKA,J. I., WALD, F. V.,
Colloque
du CNRS Semicon-ducteursPolycristallins,
J.Physique Colloque
43(1982)
C1-235.[16]
AG Associates, 1052 Elwell Court, PALO ALTO(CA)
94303.[17] PEDULLI,
L., CORRERA, L., ADEKOYA, W. O., GROB, A., MULLER, J. C., SIFFERT, P., 4thEuropean MRS
Meeting, Strasbourg,
May(1985), Energy
Beam Solid and Transient Ther-mal Processing, Ed. by Nguyen V. T. and Cullis A. G.(Editions
dePhysique)
p. 325.[18]
MULLER, J. C., ADEKOYA, W.O., GROB, A.,SIF-FERT, P., CORRERA, L., RIZZOLI, R. and
PEDULLI, L., conf. reference
[12]
p. 985.[19]
ADEKOYA, W.O., MULLER, J. C., SIFFERT, P. andPEDULLI, L., MRS Fall
Meeting
Symp. B,Rapid
Thermal Processing, Boston