Spin wave study and optical properties in Fe-doped ZnO thin fi lms prepared by spray pyrolysis technique
F. Lmai a , R. Moubah b , * , A. El Amiri b , Y. Abid b , I. Soumahoro c , d , N. Hassanain c , S. Colis d , G. Schmerber d , A. Dinia d , H. Lassri b
a
LPAT, Universit e Hassan II de Casablanca, Facult e des Sciences Ain Chock, B.P. 5366 Ma^ arif, Casablanca, Morocco
b
LPMMAT, Universit e Hassan II de Casablanca, Facult e des Sciences Ain Chock, B.P. 5366 Ma^ arif, Casablanca, Morocco
c
LPM, Facult e des Sciences, B.P. 1014, Universit e Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco
d
Institut de Physique et Chimie des Mat eriaux de Strasbourg (IPCMS), UMR 7504 CNRS-UdS, 23 rue du Loess, BP 43, 67034, Strasbourg Cedex 2, France
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 7 February 2016 Received in revised form 1 April 2016
Accepted 6 April 2016
Keywords:
Optical properties
Diluted magnetic semiconductors Spray pyrolysis
Magnetic properties Spin wave theory
a b s t r a c t
We investigate the magnetic and optical properties of Zn
1-xFe
xO (x ¼ 0, 0.03, 0.05, and 0.07) thin films grown by spray pyrolysis technique. The magnetization as a function of temperature [M (T)] shows a prevailing paramagnetic contribution at low temperature. By using spin wave theory, we separate the M (T) curve in two contributions: one showing intrinsic ferromagnetism and one showing a purely para- magnetic behavior. Furthermore, it is shown that the spin wave theory is consistent with ab-initio cal- culations only when oxygen vacancies are considered, highlighting the key role played by structural defects in the mechanism driving the observed ferromagnetism. Using UVevisible measurements, the transmittance, re fl ectance, band gap energy, band tail, dielectric coef fi cient, refractive index, and optical conductivity were extracted and related to the variation of the Fe content.
© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
ZnO is an interesting material for use in various potential ap- plications, ranging from optoelectronics and quantum well to spintronic devices [1,2]. This is related to its excellent properties which combine large band gap (E
g) (3.37 eV) and exciton binding energy (60 meV) with intrinsic magnetic properties obtained upon doping and control of structural defects [1 e 3]. In order to func- tionalize ZnO for a wider range of applications, intensive research activities have been devoted to doping with different elements and using various preparation techniques [4 e 11]. The use of transition metals as dopant for ZnO offers several advantages such as the enhancement of the Curie temperature and magnetization, with signi fi cant improvement of both optical and electrical properties [12 e 15]. Usually, transition metal dopants are supposed to replace, at least partly, Zn
2þions in the ZnO host matrix. Among the most used magnetic dopants, Fe has been particularly investigated.
Several studies have indeed reported the effect of Fe doping on the
optical and magnetic properties of ZnO thin fi lms grown by various techniques [16,17]. However, only few of them reported on the optical constants, re fl ectance, dielectric coef fi cient, refractive in- dex, optical conductivity and absorption coef fi cient of Fe-doped ZnO thin fi lms. In order to use Fe-doped ZnO thin fi lms in opto- electronic and optical devices, an accurate knowledge of the above optical properties is mandatory [18].
On the other hand, transition metals contain a partially fi lled 3d level, where unpaired electrons are present and thus affecting signi fi cantly the magnetic properties of ZnO [19]. The origin of the observed magnetism in transition metal-doped ZnO is not fully established. The theoretical explanation of the mechanism driving the observed magnetism is still a subject of intense debate. Thus, additional magnetic studies are necessary to improve the under- standing of magnetism in transition metals-doped ZnO system. So far, the spin wave theory has never been used to study the ZnO system. The spin wave theory is one of the milestones in magnetism and is recognized to be of fundamental importance [20]. This method allows an appealing modeling of long range magnetic or- ders. Here, we investigate both the magnetic and optical properties of Zn
1-xFe
xO thin fi lms with different Fe content deposited by spray pyrolysis method.
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: reda.moubah@hotmail.fr (R. Moubah).
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Optical Materials
j o u r n a l h o me p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / o p t m a t
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2016.04.009
0925-3467/© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
2. Experimental details
Zn
1-xFe
xO thin fi lms were grown on SiO
2substrates at 450
C by spray pyrolysis technique. Different Fe concentrations were used (x ¼ 0, 0.03, 0.05, and 0.07). ZnCl
2[0.05 M] and FeCl
2, 4H
2O were dissolved in distilled water at room temperature. A small amount of CH
3COOH was added while stirring the solution during 30 min. The SiO
2substrates were cleaned before deposition and heated grad- ually to reach the deposition temperature of 450
C. The deposition time was about 77 min and the fl ow speed of solution of 2.6 mL/
min. The fi lm thicknesses were around 300 nm. The structural and chemical analyses were studied previously using x-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [21]. All Zn
1-xFe
xO thin fi lms (x ¼ 0, 0.03, 0.05, and 0.07) are polycrystalline and pre- sent, as expected, the wurtzite (hexagonal) structure without any additional phases, indicating the incorporation of Fe within ZnO matrix. The SEM measurements show that all samples are uniform, and are chemically homogeneous in a good agreement with the XRD data. Optical measurements were performed using a U-3000 Hitachi spectrophotometer [22,23]. Magnetic measurements were carried out using a superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetometer with an external fi eld up to 5 T.
3. Electronic structure calculations
Ab-initio calculations were carried out by using Korringa-Kohn- Rostoker (KKR) combined with the coherent potential approxima- tion (CPA) technique [24,25]. In the ZnO cell, it is supposed that the form of the crystal potential is estimated by a muf fi n-tin potential.
The wave functions in the muf fi n-tin spheres were extended in real harmonics up to l ¼ 2. The spin-orbit coupling and relativistic effect were considered as well. The Morruzi, Janack, Williams functional setting is utilized for the exchange-correlation energy. All calcula- tions have been made considering the lattice constants deduced from XRD data of Ref. [21] (a ¼ 3.24 Å and c ¼ 5.19 Å).
4. Results and discussion
4.1. Magnetic properties
Fig. 1 shows the experimental change of magnetization as a function of temperature recorded at a fi eld of 5 T for a Zn
0.93Fe
0.07O sample (black spheres). While increasing temperature, the magnetization shows a rapid decrease which is a signature of a paramagnetic phase. Above 50 K, the magnetization decreases slowly with increasing temperature, which can be attributed to a weak ferromagnetic contribution. This M(T) variation was investi- gated in the framework of the spin wave theory. As mentioned above for T > 50 K, the M (T) curve presents a ferromagnetic-like behavior. Thus, we have modeled this part of magnetization using Block's law. By using the spin wave theory, the M (T) curve for ferromagnetic materials can be expressed using the following formula:
Mð4:2KÞ MðTÞ
Mð4:2KÞ ¼ BT 3=2 (1)
Where B is the spin-wave constant and M (4.2 K) is the magneti- zation at 4.2 K. Equation (1) is a good estimate of the change of magnetization as a function of temperature for ferromagnetic materials [26].
As can be observed in the inset of Fig. 1, the spin wave theory equation fi ts nicely with the experimental results for temperatures above 50 K. The extrapolation of the linear part for temperatures lower than 50 K, allows us to determine the whole temperature
range of the intrinsic ferromagnetic contribution of M (T) curve, which is shown in Fig. 1 (blue stars). Thus, the subtraction of the raw M (T) curve and the determined intrinsic ferromagnetic part allows deducing the paramagnetic contribution (red square) to the M (T) curve.
The spin-wave constant (B) expressed in equation (1) is linked to the spin wave stiffness constant (D) by this formula:
B ¼ 2:612 g m B
Mð4:2KÞ k B
4 p D 3=2
; (2)
In this equation, g is the spectroscopic g-factor (for iron g is equal to 2), m
Bis the Bohr magneton and k
Bis the Boltzmann constant. Using the fi t displayed in the inset of Fig. 1, we found the B parameter (Table 1), which is de fi ned as the slope of the linear fi t.
Finally, by knowing B and using equation (2), the spin wave stiffness constant (D) was also extracted.
On the basis of the itinerant electron model, the correlation between D and T
Chave discussed previously by Katsuki and Wolhfarth [27]. By using the effective mass estimate these authors have found the following formula:
D ¼ p k B T C 6 ffiffiffi
p 2
k 2 F ; (3)
Where k
Fis the Fermi wave-vector.
By using the Heisenberg model, the spin wave stiffness constant (D) can be expressed as [28,29]:
D ¼ k B r FeFe 2 T C
2ðS Fe þ 1Þ : (4)
Where r
FeFeis the interatomic distance between nearest Fe ions, S
Feis the spin moment of Fe ions. From equation (4), we calculate r
Fe-Fewhich is found to be equal to 7.2 ± 0.1 Å. The exchange con- stant (J) is related to spin wave stiffness constant (D) mentioned above by this formula: J ¼
2SrD2FeFe
. Finally, we calculate the difference
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
0 50 100 150 200 250
M
totIntrinsic ferromagnetic contribution Purely paramagnetic contribution M
tot(em u /c m
3)
T (K)
0 500 1000 1500
25 30 35 40 45