• Aucun résultat trouvé

Spectral triples for finitely generated groups, index 0.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Spectral triples for finitely generated groups, index 0."

Copied!
8
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-00529553

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00529553v8

Preprint submitted on 14 Jan 2011

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Spectral triples for finitely generated groups, index 0.

Sébastien Palcoux

To cite this version:

Sébastien Palcoux. Spectral triples for finitely generated groups, index 0.. 2010. �hal-00529553v8�

(2)

GROUPS INDEX 0

EBASTIEN PALCOUX

Abstract. Using Cayley graphs and Clifford algebras, we are able to give, for every finitely generated groups, a uniform construction of spec- tral triples with a generically non-trivial phase for the Dirac operator.

Unfortunatly D+ is index 0, but we are naturally led to an interesting classification of finitely generated groups into three types.

Warning 0.1. This paper is just a first draft, it contains very few proofs.

It is possible that some propositions are false, or that some proofs are in- complete or trivially false.

Contents

1. Introduction 1

2. Basic definitions 2

3. Geometric construction 2

4. Clifford algebra 3

5. Class C and Dirac operator 3

6. Homogenization and general case 4

References 7

1. Introduction

In this paper, we define even spectral triples for every finitely generated groups such that the phase of the Dirac operator is generically non-trivial but unfortunatly D+ is index 0. We use Clifford algebra and topics in geometric group theory (see [3]) as the Cayley graph. We start giving a first construction running for a particular class of group called C; then for the general case, we homogenize the construction. The idea is that the more we need to homogenize, the more it increases the chances that the Dirac phase is trivial. We are then led to classify the finitely generated groups into three types A0, Aλ and A1 according to the need of homogenization;

C is a particular class of type A0.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 46L87. Secondary 20F65.

Key words and phrases. non-commutative geometry; spectral triple; geometric group theory; Clifford algebra; Cayley graph; Dirac operator; finitely generated group.

1

(3)

2 S. PALCOUX

2. Basic definitions

Definition 2.1. A spectral triple(A, H, D)is given by a unital ⋆-algebraA representated on the Hilbert spaceH, and an unbounded operator D, called the Dirac operator, such that:

(1) D is self-adjoint.

(2) (D2+I)−1 is compact.

(3) {a∈ A | [D, a]∈B(H)} is dense in A.

See the article[6]of G. Skandalis, dedicated to A. Connes and spectral triple.

Definition 2.2. A group Γ is finitely generated if it exists a finite gener- ating set S ⊂Γ. We always take S equals to S−1 and the identity element e6∈S.

We can also defined a group by generators and relations: Γ =hS|Ri.

3. Geometric construction

Definition 3.1. Let ℓ : Γ → N be the word length related to S. Let G be the Cayley graph with the distance d(g, h) =ℓ(gh−1), see [3].

Definition 3.2. Let p: Γ→Nwith p(g)the number of geodesic paths from g to the identity element e, on the Cayley graph G.

Definition 3.3. Let ps : Γ → N with ps(g) the number of geodesic paths from g to e, starting by s∈S. Then P

s∈Sps =p.

Remark 3.4. If ps(g)6= 0 then ps(g) =p(gs).

Definition 3.5. Let2(Γ) be the canonical Hilbert space of base (eg)g∈Γ and lets (s∈S) be the unbounded operator definited by:

s.eg = ps(g)

p(g)ℓ(g)eg.

s is a diagonal positive operator, sos =∂s andss =∂ss. Example 3.6. Let Γ =Z2, S ={a, a−1, b, b−1}, R ={aba−1b−1}.

Let g = anbm = (n, m) with n, m ∈ N, then ℓ(g) = n+m, p(g) = Cn+mn , pa−1(g) =Cn+m−1n−1 , pb−1(g) = Cn+m−1m−1 , and so C

n−1 n+m−1

Cn+mn (n+m) =n.

Let1 =∂a−1 and2 =∂b−1, then:

1e(n,m) =ne(n,m) and2e(n,m)=me(n,m), as for the canonical derivations !

Example 3.7. Let Γ =F2, S ={a, a−1, b, b−1}, R =∅. Let g ∈F2, g 6=e, then p(g) = 1, let s∈S with ps(g) = 1, then ∂s.eg =ℓ(g).eg.

(4)

4. Clifford algebra

We quickly recall here the notion of Clifford algebra, for a more detailed exposition, see the course of A. Wassermann [7].

Definition 4.1. Let Λ(RS) be the exterior algebra equals to2dk=0Λk(Rd), with 2d=card(S) and Λ0(Rd) =RΩ. We calledΩ the vacuum vector.

Recall that v1∧v2 =−v2∧v1 so that v∧v = 0.

Definition 4.2. Let av be the creation operator on Λ(RS) defined by:

av(v1 ∧...∧vr) = v∧v1∧...∧vr and av(Ω) =v

Reminder 4.3. The dual av is called the annihilation operator, then:

av(v1∧...∧vr) =Pr

i=0(−1)i+1(v, vi)v1∧...vi−1∧vi+1∧...∧vr and av(Ω) = 0

Reminder 4.4. Letcv =av+av, then cv =cv andcvcw+cwcv = 2(v, w)I.

Definition 4.5. The operators cv generate the Clifford algebra Cliff(RS).

Note that the operators cv are bounded and that Cliff(RS).Ω = Λ(RS).

Remark 4.6. RS admits the orthonormal basis (vs)s∈S. We will write cs instead of cvs, so that [cs, cs]+ = 2δs,sI.

5. Class C and Dirac operator

Definition 5.1. Let H be the Hibert space Λ(RS)⊗ℓ2(Γ), we define a self- adjoint operator D on a dense domain of H by:

D=X

s∈S

cs⊗∂s. Lemma 5.2. D2 =I⊗(P

s∈Ss2).

Proof. D2 =P

s,s∈Scscs⊗∂ss = 12P

(cscs+cscs)⊗∂ss =I⊗(P

s2) Lemma 5.3. (D2+I)−1 is compact.

Proof. First of all dim(Λ(RS)) = 22d<∞.

NextP

s∈S ps(g)

p(g) = 1, then it exists so∈ S such that psop(g)(g)2d1 . Now P

s∈S[ℓ(g)pp(g)s(g)]2 ≥[ℓ(g)pp(g)so(g)]2 ≥[ℓ(g)2d ]2. Definition 5.4. Let C be the class of finitely generated group Γ such that it exists a finite generating set S ⊂Γ (with S =S−1 and e6∈S) such that

∀g ∈Γ, ∃Kg ∈R+ such that ∀s∈S and ∀h∈Γ (with h6=e):

|ps(gh)

p(gh) −ps(h)

p(h)| ≤ Kg

ℓ(h)

Examples 5.5. The class C is stable by direct or free product, it contains Zn, Fn, the finite groups, and probably every amenable or automatic groups (containing the hyperbolic groups, see[2]).

(5)

4 S. PALCOUX

Warning 5.6. From now, the group Γ is in the class C. Definition 5.7. Let A=CrΓ, acting on H by I⊗ug, g ∈Γ.

Proposition 5.8. {a ∈ A | [D, a]∈B(H)} is dense in A.

Proof. [D, ug](Ω⊗eh) =...= (P

s∈S[ℓ(gh)pp(gh)s(gh)−ℓ(h)pp(h)s(h)]vs)⊗egh. Now |ℓ(gh)pp(gh)s(gh)−ℓ(h)pp(h)s(h)| ≤ℓ(gh)|pp(gh)s(gh)pp(h)s(h)|+|ℓ(gh)−ℓ(h)|pp(h)s(h)

≤Kgℓ(gh)

ℓ(h) +ℓ(g)≤Kg(ℓ(g) + 1) +ℓ(g). It’s bounded in h.

Now let v ∈Λ(RS) then it exists X ∈Cliff(RS) with v =XΩ.

By linearity we can restrict toX =cs1...csr withsi ∈Sandi6=j ⇒si 6=sj. Warning, the following commutant [., X] is a graded commutant:

[D, ug](v⊗eh) = ([[D, ug], X] + (−1)rX[D, ug])(Ω⊗eh) [[D, ug], X] = [[D, X], ug]

[D, X] = [P

s∈Scs⊗∂s, X] =P

s∈S[cs, X]⊗∂s

[cs, X] = 2P

(−1)i+1δs,sics1...csi−1csi+1...csr, si 6=sj if i6=j, then:

[D, X] =P

Xi⊗∂si with Xi = (−1)i+12cs1...csi−1csi+1...csr

[[D, X], ug](Ω⊗eh) =P

[ℓ(gh)pp(gh)si(gh) −ℓ(h)pp(h)si(h)]XiΩ⊗egh.

Now X and Xi are bounded; the result follows.

Proposition 5.9. D+ :H+→H− is a Fredholm operator of index 0.

Proposition 5.10. For t >0, the operator e−tD2 is trass-class.

Theorem 5.11. (A, H, D)is an evenθ-summable spectral triple, the Dirac phase is generically non trivial, but D+ is index 0.

Proof. We use lemma 5.3 and proposition 5.8. The phase is generically non-trivial, because it’s non-trivial for Γ =Z2 orF2.

6. Homogenization and general case

The class C doesn’t contain every finitely generated group, we have the following non-automatic (see [2]) counterexample:

Counterexample 6.1. Baumslag-Solitar groupB(2,1),S ={a, a−1, b, b−1}, R={a2ba−1b−1}, a2n =bn−1a2b1−n, ℓ(a2n) = 2n with n >1,

|pb(a.a2n)

p(a.a2n) − pb(a2n) p(a2n)|=|2

4− 2 2|= 1

2

It should rest to prove that such a failure is independant of the presenta- tion...

Then, to obtain a construction in the general case, we need to operate a little homogenization. Let Γ =hS|Ri be a finitely generated group.

Definition 6.2. Let Bn

Γ={g ∈Γ | ℓ(g)≤n} the ball of radius n.

Definition 6.3. Let Sn

Γ={g ∈Γ | ℓ(g) =n} the sphere of radius n.

(6)

Definition 6.4. Let µ be the probability measure on Γdefined by:

µ(g) = (#(Sℓ(g)

Γ )2ℓ(g)+1)−1.

Definition 6.5. Let EΓ,S be the set of smooth functions f :R+ →R with:

(1)f(0) = 0, f ≥0, f ≥0 and f′′≤0.

(2)λf :=limx→∞(f(x))≤1.

(3)∀g ∈Γ, ∃Kg ∈R+ such that ∀s∈S and ∀h∈Γ (with h 6=e):

| X

γ∈Bf(ℓ(gh))

Γ

ps(γgh) p(γgh)

µ(γgh) µ(Bf(ℓ(gh))

Γ .gh) − X

γ∈Bf(ℓ(h))

Γ

ps(γh) p(γh)

µ(γh) µ(Bf(ℓ(h))

Γ .h)| ≤ Kg

ℓ(h) Remark 6.6. The condition (2) is well-defined becausef is decreasing and minorated by 0, so convergent at infinity.

Remark 6.7. Let f ∈EΓ,S, if ∃α >0 with f(α) = 0 then f = 0.

Lemma 6.8. EΓ,S is non empty.

Proof. We will show that f(x) =x+log2(x+ 1) defines a fonction inEΓ,S. First of all Blog2(ℓ(g))

Γ ⊂ (Bf(ℓ(g))

Γ .g), then µ(Bf(ℓ(g))

Γ .g) ≥ µ(Blog2(ℓ(g))

Γ ) ≥

1− ℓ(g)1 .

| X

γ∈Bf(ℓ(gh))

Γ

ps(γgh) p(γgh)

µ(γgh) µ(Bf(ℓ(gh))

Γ .gh) − X

γ∈Bf(ℓ(h))

Γ

ps(γh) p(γh)

µ(γh) µ(Bf(ℓ(h))

Γ .h)| ≤

|(1/µ(Bf(ℓ(gh))

Γ .gh)−1) X

γ∈Bf(ℓ(gh))

Γ

ps(γgh)

p(γgh)µ(γgh)|+

|(1/µ(Bf(ℓ(h))

Γ .h)−1) X

γ∈Bf(ℓ(h))

Γ

ps(γh) p(γh)

µ(γh) µ(Bf(ℓ(h))

Γ .h)|

+| X

γ∈Bf(ℓ(gh))

Γ

ps(γgh)

p(γgh)µ(γgh)− X

γ∈Bf(ℓ(h))

Γ

ps(γh)

p(γh)µ(γh)| ≤

1/ℓ(gh) + 1/ℓ(h) +| X

γ∈Γ\Bf(ℓ(gh))

Γ

ps(γgh)

p(γgh)µ(γgh)− X

γ∈Γ\Bf(ℓ(h))

Γ

ps(γh)

p(γh)µ(γh)|+

|X

γ∈Γ

ps(γgh)

p(γgh)µ(γgh)−X

γ∈Γ

ps(γh)

p(γh)µ(γh)|

≤2/ℓ(gh) + 2/ℓ(h)≤2/(ℓ(g)ℓ(h) +ℓ(h)) + 2/ℓ(h) = 1/(ℓ(g) + 1) ℓ(h)

The others conditions forf to be in EΓ,S are evidents.

Remark 6.9. The class C is the class of group Γ for which ∃S with 0 ∈ EΓ,S.

We are led to a classification of finitely generated groups into three types:

(7)

6 S. PALCOUX

Definition 6.10. Let λΓ :=minS⊂Γminf∈EΓ,Sλf, with S and λf as previ- ouly. By definition λΓ ∈[0,1] then:

A0: Γ is a type A0 group if λΓ = 0 and ∃f with λf = 0.

Aλ: Γ is a type Aλ group if it is not A0 and 0≤λΓ <1 . A1: Γ is a type A1 group if λΓ = 1 .

Definition 6.11. Let A+0 be the subclass of type Aλ groups with λΓ = 0.

Remark 6.12. Every groups of the class C (as Zn, Fn etc...) are of type A0.

Conjecture 6.13. Every Baumslag-Solitar groups B(n, m)are of type A0. Problem 6.14. Existence of type A+0, Aλ or A1 groups.

Definition 6.15. LetΓ = hS|Ribe a finitely generated group, letf ∈EΓ,S be a function with (almost) minimal growth, we define De as D using:

∂es.eg = [ X

γ∈BΓ

f(ℓ(g))

ps(γg) p(γg)

µ(γg) µ(Bf(ℓ(g))

Γ .g)]ℓ(g)eg.

Remark 6.16. For the class C, we can take f = 0 and so De =D.

Theorem 6.17. (A, H,D)e is an evenθ-summable spectral triple, the Dirac phase is generically non trivial but De+ is index 0.

Proof. The proof runs exactly as for theorem 5.11.

Definition 6.18. Let C be the class of groups Γsuch that ∀S, ∀f ∈EΓ,S, the phase of De is always trivial.

Problem 6.19. Existence of groups of class C.

(8)

References

[1] A. Connes, Noncommutative differential geometry. Inst. Hautes tudes Sci. Publ.

Math. No. 62 (1985), 257360.

[2] D. Epstein, J. Cannon, D. Holt, S. Levy, M. Paterson, W. Thurston,Word process- ing in groups.Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston, MA, 1992.

[3] P. de la Harpe,Topics in geometric group theory. Chicago Lectures in Mathematics.

University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2000.

[4] P. Julg, A. Valette, Fredholm modules associated to Bruhat-Tits buildings. Mini- conferences on harmonic analysis and operator algebras (Canberra, 1987), 143155, Proc. Centre Math. Anal. Austral. Nat. Univ., 16, Austral. Nat. Univ., Canberra, 1988.

[5] M. Pimsner, D. Voiculescu, KK-groups of reduced crossed products by free groups.

J. Operator Theory 8 (1982), no. 1, 131156.

[6] G. Skandaliseom´etrie non commutative d’apr`es Alain Connes: la notion de triplet spectral. Gaz. Math. No. 94 (2002), 4451.

[7] A. Wassermann,Lecture notes on Atiyah-Singer index theorem, Lent 2010 course, http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/∼ajw/AS10.pdf

Institut de Math´ematiques de Luminy, Marseille, France.

E-mail address: palcoux@iml.univ-mrs.fr, http://iml.univ-mrs.fr/∼palcoux

Références

Documents relatifs

Abdollahi and Taeri proved in [3] that a finitely generated soluble group satisfies the property ( 8 k , Q ) if and only if it is a finite extension by a group in which any

L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » ( http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/ ) implique l’accord avec les

answer to the following question of the author (see [3]): is a soluble group polycyclic if all centralizers of its finitely generated subgroups.. are finitely

In Section 2 we recall some defini- tions and facts related to compact quantum groups, free wreath product by quantum permutation group and quantum isometry group of spectral

Using a Cayley complex (generalizing the Cayley graph) and Clifford algebras, we are able to give, for a large class of finitely presented groups, a uniform construction of

Also, W — 82 is a closed semi analytic set in C 2 of dimension at most one, and can hence be written as So u Si where So is a finite set of points and Si is a relatively

According to Theorem 2.6 [11], the loop L satises the condition of max- imality for subloops and, thus, the total number of prime numbers p for which L contains a p -cyclical group

The celebrated Tits Alternative states that if G is a finitely generated linear group over any field, then either G contains a non-abelian free subgroup, or it is virtually