• Aucun résultat trouvé

A learning gap between neuroscience and reinforcement learning

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "A learning gap between neuroscience and reinforcement learning"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texte intégral

Références

Documents relatifs

Cette partie établit un portrait de la recherche empirique suisse en éducation interculturelle, tel qu’il apparaît grâce à l’analyse de chacune des catégories définies, soit

Integrating Remote laboratories in LMS In our opinion, one path for the future of remote labora- tories remains linked to IMS-LD engines, which are using IMS-LD file format

Elle s’est donc promenée entre Neuchâtel (où vivaient deux garçons) et entre Lausanne (où habitaient deux adolescentes) afin de suivre les adolescents lors de leur temps libre. Je

However, in practice, the experiments conducted in this paper on a generic task (Garnet problems) show that for specific shapes of the unknown reward function, IRL algorithms

The SAEM algorithm is guaranteed to converge to a local maximum of the likelihood function for models in the exponential family, under general conditions that include the

The former recovers the demonstrated policy by learning the state-action mapping in a supervised learning way, while inverse reinforcement learning aims to learn the reward

mPF C: medial prefrontal cortex; CeA: Central Amygdala; BLA: Basolateral nucleus of the Amygdala; vSUB: ventral subiculum; BNST: Bed nucleus of the Stria Terminalis; dCA3:

Reward functions (R1) and (R2) increase the node’s con- sumption when the harvested energy increases whereas reward function (R4) increases the node’s consumption when it har- vests