Relationship between oral health and nutrition in very old people

Texte intégral


Relationship between oral health and nutrition in very old people





, E






, C






Division of Gerodontology and Removable Prosthodontics, Section of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, 19 rue Barthe´lemy-Menn, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland

1University Institutes of Geriatrics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Address correspondence to: P. Mojon. Fax (+41) 22 781 12 97. Email:


Objective:to evaluate the relationship between oral health status and nutritional deficiency.

Design:cross-sectional clinical study.

Subjects:324 institutionalized frail older adults (mean age 85).

Measurements: structured oral examination including an evaluation of mucosa, periodontal state, caries prevalence and denture quality. The nutritional status was assessed using serum albumin concentration and the body mass index. Physical dependence was assessed using the Barthel index. To identify oral health disorders associated with markers of malnutrition we performed the Pearsonx2test separately for edentulous and dentate patients. Subjects with at least one of the identified oral disorders were classified as having compromised oral functional status.

Results:about two-thirds of the subjects were functionally dependent and half had either a body mass index

<21 kg/m2or serum albumin <33 g/l. Among the edentulous, wearing dentures with defective bases or not wearing dentures at all were the factors most associated with malnutrition. In dentate subjects, corresponding identifiers were the number of occluding pairs of teeth (five or fewer, either natural or prosthetic), the number of retained roots (four or more), and the presence of mobile teeth. According to these criteria, 31% of the subjects had a compromised oral functional status. This was more frequently found in dependent subjects (37%) than semi- dependent subjects (18%; odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.4–4.8). Those with compromised oral functional status had a significantly lower body mass index and serum albumin concentration.

Conclusion:specific detrimental oral conditions are associated with nutritional deficiency in very old people.

Keywords:body mass index, geriatric dentistry, malnutrition, serum albumin


Nutritional deficiency, in particular protein-energy malnutrition, is common in older adults. About 60%

of older adults in long-term care facilities are mal- nourished [1]. There are many causes of malnutrition and it is not always easy to distinguish the age-related from the pathological [2]. Some have malabsorption [3]. Predisposing factors include poverty, disability, false beliefs about diet, depression and cognitive impairment [1, 4–7].

Teeth are not a prerequisite for proper digestion in healthy individuals [8, 9]. However, edentulous subjects with poor masticatory function take more drugs for digestive disturbances than those with a better masticatory function [10]. Furthermore, impaired masticatory function may lead to food selection and an unbalanced diet in older adults

[6, 11–19]. Besides masticatory efficiency, several oral conditions—including painful mucosal disorders [1], oral dryness [20] or the pain and discomfort associated with periodontal disease or caries—may be related to difficulty in chewing.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible association between malnutrition (identified by biological markers) and oral health status in very old subjects. Our hypothesis was that a poor dental or prosthetic status would be associated with nutritional deficiency.

Materials and methods

The second largest nursing home (maximum capacity 275 residents) in the canton of Geneva was chosen for a longitudinal study on the oral health, general health and


nutritional status of older people. The home was a long-stay care facility with medical supervision, and all residents were 65 or over and mentally or physically disabled. No dentist had been involved specifically in the care of residents before the study. Most residents (69%) had their dental treatment covered by a government plan. The present study reports on data collected from March 1993 to March 1995. The study was approved by the Geneva Dental School ethical committee. Oral consent was obtained from the residents when their mental health permitted. Those who could not give an answer because of cognitive impairment were excluded. When there was doubt about the cognitive capacity of a resident, the decision rested with the resident’s physician.

Medical data, taken from the patient file, included height, weight and serum albumin concentration. The body mass index (BMI) was computed from the weight (in kg) divided by the square of the height (in m). A BMI

< 21 kg/m2was considered as a marker of malnutrition [21]. The biological assessments were made biannually and the latest available data were used in the study.

Serum albumin was measured by colorimetric techni- que based on bromcresol assay (Kodak Ektachem, model DTSC II; Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY, USA) with a coefficient of variation of 2.3%. This technique gives higher values than the nephelometry technique [22] and the cut-off value indicating malnutrition was chosen at <33 g/l (which corre- sponds to the 30 g/l given by Rapinet al.[23] using the nephelometry technique). The degree of disability was evaluated using the Barthel index with a score of#20 indicating dependence [24].

One dentist performed all the oral examinations.

When plaque accumulation was too heavy to enable an accurate clinical diagnosis of caries, a second examina- tion took place after the patient had received treatment from a dental hygienist [25]. The quality of removable dentures was evaluated according to a gravity scale from unstable dentures through loose denture, gross occlusal inadequacy, no fault and defective base to missing denture [26]. Only the worst fault was recorded. Teeth with active caries (i.e. root, coronal, or secondary caries [27, 28]) as well as teeth with pulpal exposures were recorded. Periodontal disease was scored for each tooth according to the community periodontal index of treatment needs method [29] and the scores translated into a 5-point scale for each patient. Mucosal diseases were classified into localized or generalized stomatitis, denture-induced ulcers and

‘various’ [30].

Statistical analysis

We used the Kolmogorov–Smirnov goodness-of-fit test to evaluate the normality of the distribution. Thus, age, BMI and serum albumin were normally distributed,

while the Barthel index and number of teeth were not.

Correlations were assessed using Pearson’s R coefficient when data were normally distributed.

Otherwise, the Spearman rank coefficient was com- puted. Comparisons between two groups were per- formed with the Student’s t-test. Since age was correlated with the two nutritional markers (albumin and BMI), we compared these markers on the age- adjusted means using an ANOVA procedure, with age introduced as a covariate. Associations between the dichotomized markers of malnutrition and oral health disorders were tested separately on edentulous and dentate subjects using x2 tests. When age was a confounding factor, two cross-tabulations were run, one with the group of younger and the other one with the group of older subjects. The median age was used to split the sample in two groups of equal size. A new dichotomous variable—oral functional status—was cre- ated, based on the results of thex2tests. Subjects who suffered from at least one of the oral health disorders associated with either or both nutritional markers were classified as having compromised oral functional status.

The new dichotomous variable was then used to evaluate the possible interaction between nutritional markers, level of dependency and oral health status.


A total of 324 residents were examined. The mean age was 85 years (SD 6.9) and 70% were women. About half (56%) of the residents or their husbands had been non- qualified workers, 31% had been qualified workers and 11% had been housewives. Only one (an architect) had been to university. Half (49%) of the subjects were edentulous.

Nutritional status

Overall, 52% of the sample had at least one of the two biological markers of nutrition lower than the selected cut-off. The mean BMI was 22.5 kg/m2(SD 4.5) and the mean serum albumin was 34.7 g/l (SD 3.4). The two biological markers were weakly but significantly correlated to each other (Pearson correlation: 0.18, P < 0.01) and negatively correlated to age (Pearson correlation: –0.19 and –0.21 for BMI and albumin respectively, both P < 0.01). Thus, the older the subject, the lower the value of the biological markers.

There was no relationship between biological markers and profession nor between biological markers and any recorded disease. However, the dependent subjects had a lower serum albumin concentration than the semi-dependent subjects (age-adjusted mean albumin:

34.3 g/l and 35.5 g/l respectively,P= 0.01).

Oral findings

Of the 160 edentulous subjects, 14% had no dentures, 14% did not use a lower denture, 12% had one or two


unstable dentures, 32% had one or two loose dentures, 23% wore a denture with defective base and 45% had denture stomatitis or denture-induced ulcers.

The main characteristics of the dentate subjects are shown in Table 1. Only 20% of subjects were caries- free. One-fifth (20%) had at least one tooth with pulpal exposure or a retained root. Many (61%) wore removable dentures. One-fifth (20%) of the dentate subjects had denture stomatitis or denture-induced ulcers, while only 4% suffered from other types of mucosal disorders (such as white lesions or aphthous ulcers).

Relationship between nutritional markers and oral health

The mean serum albumin and mean BMI of the sample stratified by degree of dependency and dental status are presented in Table 2. The dentate, dependent or semi-dependent subjects were younger than the edentulous dependent subjects (t-value: 3.84,P< 0.01) who were the oldest. A two-way analysis of variance with age as covariate showed that both dependency and dental status were significantly associated with serum albumin level (P = 0.009 and P = 0.058 respectively) but not with BMI (P= 0.10 andP= 0.32).

Among the edentulous subjects, a BMI of <21 was found more often in non-denture wearers than in those using one or two dentures [odds ratio (OR): 2.9, 95%

confidence interval (CI): 1.1–7.8]. Edentulous subjects who wore dentures with defective bases had a tendency to have a lower serum albumin (34.0 against 35.4 g/l, respectively; ANOVA with age as covariate, P= 0.10). There was no other relationship between the nutritional variables and the quality of the dentures or the presence of mucosal disorders among edentulous.

Based on these results, edentulous subjects who did not have any dentures or used dentures with defective bases were considered to have a compromised oral functional status.

Among the dentate subjects, those with fewer than six occluding pairs of teeth (either natural or prosthe- tic) had a significantly lower serum albumin (33.0 against 34.7 g/l, respectively; ANOVA with age as covariate, P = 0.03). Subjects who had teeth with vertical mobility combined with pockets greater than 6 mm had a serum albumin < 33 g/l more often (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.1–6.2) as well as subjects who had more than three retained roots (OR: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.3–11.2). There was no other relationship between oral health vari- ables and the biological markers. Thus, we considered dentate subjects with fewer than six occluding pairs of teeth, or those who had more than three retained roots or at least one tooth with vertical mobility, to have a compromised oral functional status.

In all, 31% of the subjects had a compromised oral functional status according to these criteria. The presence of a compromised oral functional status

was more common in dependent (37%) than semi- dependent subjects (18%); OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.4–4.8).

Both BMI and albumin were lower in subjects with a compromised oral functional status (Table 3). Accord- ing to the two-way ANOVA models, oral functional status was a significant factor interfering with BMI and albumin while dependence was only significantly associated with albumin (Table 4). Serum albumin and BMI were lower when a compromised oral functional status was present among dependent but not among semi-dependent subjects (Table 3).


The characteristics of the sample were similar to subjects admitted to a geriatric hospital [31, 32]: the same proportion was malnourished and most had a poor dental state. The sample therefore seems repre- sentative of very old frail older adults.

Table 1.Oral characteristics of dentate subjects

Median no. of teeth (inter-quartile range) 9 (5–18)

Subjects with caries 79%

Median no. of caries when present (inter-quartile range) 3 (2–4)

Subjects with retained roots 48%

Mean no. of retained roots when present 2 (1–4) (inter-quartile range)

Periodontal index (derived from community periodontal index of treatment needs)

0. No sign of gingivitis on any tooth 4%

1. Generalized gingivitis 5%

2. Presence of visible calculus 35%

3. More than three teeth with pockets of 4–5 mm 30%

4. At least one tooth with pocket >6 mm or 26%

vertical mobility

Table 2.Biological measures and age according to degree of dependency and dental status (edentulous/dentate)

Dependency and oral status

. . . .

Dependent Semi-dependent

. . . . . . . .

Edentulous Dentate Edentulous Dentate (n=98) (n=95) (n=60) (n=66)

. . . .

Body mass index (kg/m2) 21.5 23.1 23.7 23.2

Serum albumin (g/l) 34.8 33.9 35.6 35.6

Age 87.3a 83.1 84.1 83.9

aSignificantly higher than all others atP< 0.01.

Data on dependence were missing in five subjects.


No attempt was made to record the diet of each resident, since all the meals came from the same kitchen and a dietician selected the menu items. In any case, many residents left food on the plates and the wastage was difficult to quantify.

We had not expected that the lowest serum albumin would be found in the dependent dentate residents.

Apart from being younger than the edentulous residents, the dentate dependent subjects were no different in terms of general health. A similar finding has been reported recently among older adults at home [19]; the edentulous subjects had a higher micronutrient intake than those with an inadequate dental status.

Objective assessments have demonstrated that the loss of teeth (whether or not replaced by removable dentures) will decrease masticatory function [11, 13–

15]. In our study, the presence of fewer than six occluding pairs of teeth was one of the two best predictors of malnutrition, whereas in edentulous subjects the absence of dentures was strongly asso- ciated with a low BMI. However, neither BMI nor albumin was lower in the edentulous than the dentate group. Similar findings have been reported in women of retirement age [33]. The edentulous subjects wearing one denture did not differ in nutritional

status from those with a set of dentures. Perhaps malnutrition is associated with poor masticatory function only when the situation is severely compro- mised, such as in the absence of both dentures or when fewer than six chewing units are present.

A direct but often weak relationship between poor dental state and insufficient dietary intake has been reported in older people [6, 12, 17, 18]. Similarly, in our study, the relationship between specific oral disorders and poor nutritional status was weak.

Caries were not related to malnutrition. Our findings are consistent with another study [18]. However, with the grouping of the disorders under the general term

‘compromised oral functional status’, the relationship became stronger. We found that the dependent subjects with a compromised oral functional status had the lowest BMI and albumin, while there was no difference among semi-dependent subjects with or without a compromised oral functional status. A compromised oral functional status had little influence on the nutritional status of semi-dependent elders, while those in poorer health might be more suscep- tible to poor oral function.

The types of oral health disorders highlighted by the analysis revealed neglect of mouth care. The large Table 3.Mean biological measures according to degree of dependency and oral functional status

Dependency and oral functional status

. . . .

Dependent Semi-dependent

. . . . . . . .

Adequate Compromised Adequate Compromised

(n= 146) (n= 82) (n= 75) (n= 16)

. . . .

Body mass index (kg/m2) 22.9a 21.2a 23.4 24.0

Serum albumin (g/l) 34.7a 33.4a 35.5 35.8

aSignificant difference atP#0.05 while adjusting for age.

Data on dependence were missing in five subjects.

Table 4.Multivariate analysis ANOVA: effect of the degree of dependence and the oral functional status on serum albumin and on body mass index

Measure Coefficient Standard error t-value Significance

. . . .

Effect on serum albumin

Dependence 5.21 0.231 2.258 0.024

Oral functional status 0.443 0.229 1.933 0.054

Age –0.096a 0.031 –3.086 0.002

Effect on body mass index

Dependence 0.398 0.314 1.269 0.206

Oral functional status 0.615 0.302 2.039 0.021

Age –0.107a 0.040 –2.637 0.009



plaque deposits observed on the teeth and the dentures corroborate this. Oral health is important for the general health and well being of older people [33–39]. Compromised oral health is a factor con- tributing to nutritional deficiency in very old and frail adults. A dentist and a dental hygienist should, there- fore, be included in the team of health professionals who care for older people.

Key points

• Poor oral health is common in institutionalized old people.

• A compromised oral functional status is found more often in dependent residents.

• A compromised oral functional status seems to be associated with nutritional deficiency.

• Preventive measures and simple dental procedures should be part of the routine care of people in nursing homes.


We are grateful to P. Baehni for his work in this project and to M. I. MacEntee for the thoughtful review of the manuscript. This investigation was supported by the Swiss National Foundation for Research, Grants 32–

35493.92 and 32–40905.94


1.Rapin CH, Bruye`re A. Nutritional inadequacies in the institutiona- lised elderly. In: Burckhardt P, Heaney RP, eds. Nutritional Aspects of Osteoporosis ’94. Challenges of Modern Medicine Volume 7. Geneva:

Ares-Serono, 1995; 194–201.

2.Vernon MJ, Bennett GCJ. Ageing: physiology or pathology.

Gerodontology 1995; 12: 6–11.

3.James OFW. Gastroenterology. In: Evans JG, Williams TF, eds.

Oxford Textbook of Geriatric Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992; 215–41.

4.Slesinger DP, McDivitt M, O’Donnell FM. Food patterns in an urban population: age and sociodemographic correlates. J Gerontol 1980;

35: 432–41.

5.Norton L, Wozny MC. Residential location and nutritional adequacy among elderly adults. J Gerontol 1984; 39: 592–5.

6.Nordstro¨m G. The impact of socio-medical factors and oral status on dietary intake in the eighth decade of life. Aging 1990; 2: 371–85.

7.White JV. Risk factors for poor nutritional status. Primary Care 1994; 21: 19–31.

8.Farrel JH. The effect of mastication on the digestion of food. Br Dent J 1956, 100: 149–55.

9.Ettinger RL. Oral disease and its effect on the quality of life.

Gerodontics 1987; 3: 103–6.

10.Brodeur J-M, Laurin D, Vallee R, Lachapelle D. Nutrient intake and gastrointestinal disorders related to masticatory performance in the edentulous elderly. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 70: 468–73.

11.Heath MR. The effect of maximum biting force and bone loss upon masticatory function and dietary selection of the elderly. Int Dent J 1982; 32: 345–56.

12.O¨ sterberg T, Steen B. Relationship between dental state and dietary intake in 70-year-old males and females in Go¨teborg, Sweden:

a population study. J Oral Rehab 1982; 9: 509–21.

13.Wayler AH, Chauncey HH. Impact of complete dentures and impaired natural dentition on masticatory performance and food choice in healthy aging men. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 427–33.

14.Wayler AH, Muench ME, Kapur KK, Chauncey HH. Masticatory performance and food acceptability in persons with removable partial dentures, full dentures and intact natural dentition. J Gerontol 1984; 39: 284–9.

15.Chauncey HH, Muench ME, Kapur KK, Wayler AH. The effect of the loss of teeth on diet and nutrition. Int Dent J 1984; 34: 98–104.

16.Halling A, Bengtsson C, Lenner RA. Diet in relation to number of remaining teeth in a population of middle-aged women in Gothen- burg, Sweden. Swed Dent J 1988; 12: 39–45.

17.Ranta K, Tuominen R, Paunio I, Sepponen R. Dental status and intake of food items among an adult Finnish population. Gerodontics 1988; 4: 32–5.

18.Norle´n P, Steen B, Birkhed D, Bjo¨rn AL. On the relations between dietary habits, nutrients, and oral health in women at the age of retirement. Acta Odontol Scand 1993; 51: 277–84.

19.Appollonio I, Carabellese C, Frattola A, Trabuchi M. Influence of dental status on dietary intake and survival in community-dwelling elderly subjects. Age Ageing 1997; 26: 445–55.

20.Dormenval V, Budtz-Jørgensen E, Mojon P, Bruye`re A, Rapin C-H.

Associations between malnutrition, poor general health and oral dryness in hospitalized elderly patients. Age Ageing 1998; 27: 123–8.

21.Fricker J, Gausseres C, Boulier A. Inte´reˆt clinique des marqueurs nutritionnels en ge´riatrie. Age Nutr 1991; 2: 70–8.

22.Blagg CR, Liedtke RJ, Batjer JDet al.Serum albumin concentra- tion-related Health Care Financing Administration quality assurance criterion is method-dependent: revision is necessary. Am J Kidney Dis 1993; 21: 138–44.

23.Rapin CH, Feuz A, Weil R. La malnutrition prote´ino-e´nerge´tique chez le malade aˆge´. Rev The´rapeutique 1989; 46: 43–50.

24.Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42:


25.Mojon P, Favre P, Chung JP, Budtz-Jørgensen E. Examiner agreement on caries detection and plaque accumulation during dental surveys of elders. Gerodontology 1995; 12: 49–55.

26.Mojon P, MacEntee MI. Discrepancy between need for prostho- dontic treatment and complaints in an elderly edentulous population.

Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1992; 20: 48–52.

27.WHO. Oral Heath Surveys, Basic Methods, 3rd edition. Geneva:

World Health Organisation, 1987.

28.Nyvad B, Fejerskov O. Active root surface caries converted into inactive caries as a response to oral hygiene. Scand J Dent Res 1986;

94: 281–4.

29.Ainamo J, Barmes D, Beagrie G, Cutress T, Martin J. Development of the World Health Organisation (WHO) community periodontal index of treatment needs (CPITN). Int Dent J 1982; 32: 281–91.

30.Pindborg JJ. In: Atlas of Diseases of the Oral Mucosa. 3rd edition, revised. Copenhagen: Saunders, 1980.


31.Rentsch A, Mojon P, Roehrich N, Von der Muehll D, Baehni P, Budtz-Jørgensen E. Situation bucco-dentaire chez les patients aˆge´s hospitalise´s a` l’Hoˆpital de ge´riatrie de Gene`ve. Rev Mens Suisse Odontostomatol 1995; 105: 1523–8.

32.Dormenval V, Budtz-Jørgensen E, Mojon P, Bruye`re A, Rapin CH.

Nutrition, general health status and oral health status in hospitalised elders. Gerodontology 1995; 12: 73–80.

33.Norle´n P, O¨ stberg H, Bjo¨rn AL. Relationship between general health, social factors and oral health in women at the age of retirement. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 1991; 19: 296–301.

34.MacEntee MI. Clinical epidemiologic concerns and the geriatric prosthodontic patients. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 487–91.

35.Palmqvist S, O¨ sterberg T, Carlsson GE, Mellstrom D. Self-assessed general health and dental status among the elderly in a Swedish county. Gerodontology 1986; 5: 191–6.

36.Limeback H. The relationship between oral health and systemic infections among elderly residents of chronic care facilities: a review.

Gerodontics 1988; 7: 131–7.

37.Rosenberg D, Kaplan S, Senie R, Badner V. Relationships among dental functional status, clinical dental measures, and generic health measures. J Dent Educ 1988; 52: 653–7.

38.Mattsson U, Heyden G, Landahl S. Comparison of oral and general health development among institutionalised elderly people. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 1990; 18: 219–22.

39.MacEntee MI, Stollar E, Glick N. Influence of age and gender on oral health and related behaviour in an independent elderly population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993; 21: 234–9.

Received 1 June 1998; accepted in revised form 24 November 1998





Sujets connexes :