• Aucun résultat trouvé

FINAL EXAM REPORT Number of Students Total 36 Submitted 36 Not Submitted 0

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "FINAL EXAM REPORT Number of Students Total 36 Submitted 36 Not Submitted 0"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

FINAL EXAM REPORT

Number of Students

Total 36

Submitted 36

Not Submitted 0

GRADE DISTRIBUTION

DISTRIBUTION PER PROBLEM

(2)

INDIVIDUAL PROBLEM BREAKDOWN

Problem1 Problem 2 Problem3 Problem4 Problem5 Problem6 Total

Average 6.71 8.93 8.64 8.26 8.94 7.56 81.74

Std Dev 3.32 0.76 1.83 1.48 1.71 2.05 13.45

COMPARISON OF EXAMS IN FALL 2014

(3)

COMPARISON WITH LAST 4 YEARS

SPECIAL COMMENTS

Problem 1

 A lot of students did not figure out the problem is about CV. Mostly they tried to solve with Cd and Cl coefficient.

 Some of students did not consider flux for inlet in the momentum equation.

Problem 2

 Some students did not use BCs to show that v=0

 Some students did not use v=0 and/or gy=0 for y-momentum equation

 Some students did not substitute correctly for gx=-g

 A few students did not use correct boundary conditions to find C1 and C2

Problem 3

 Some students did not set up the correct Bernoulli equation to solve for the pipe velocity

 Some students did not use the correct transitional Reynolds number (2000 or 2300) to determine if flow was laminar or turbulent resulting in the incorrect friction factor

(4)

Problem 4

 A lot of students did not figure out what the problem is for in (a). They used blade radius in the local Reynolds number definition instead of chord length.

 Many students failed to convert rpm to rad/s unit.

 Many students used critical Reynolds for the turbulent flow given in (a) to solve the problem (b).

 Many students did not notice Rex is a function of U when they solve problem (c). So, they did not derive the equation correctly.

Problem 5

 A few students did not use correct equation for area

 A few students did not realize that D=W

 Some students did not find model velocity by equating Re for model and prototype

 Some students did not equate CD values for model and prototype to find the total weight

Problem 6

 A few students did not realize they need to use Bernoulli equation to find pressure at point 2

 Many students did not find velocity components by differentiating the velocity potential function

 Some students did not calculate the total velocity using the u and v velocity components

Références

Documents relatifs

 Many students were not able to simplify the cylindrical Navier Stokes equations with correct assumptions.  Some students who did simplify Navier Stokes were not able to solve

o By setting the model Reynolds number equal to the prototype Reynolds number, for fully dynamic similarity, the ratio of velocities is found and used when setting the model

 Nine students did not set the Reynolds number to 2000 in order to solve for the height of the water level in part c where the flow starts

 5 Students were setting the first location for the Energy equation at the top of the pipe at the bottom of the tank, this is incorrect because the pressure is not know at

 Only recurring error was identifying the correct Reynolds transition number for flow over a flat plate. o Reynolds number for flat plate external turbulent

 One recurring error was students were not using the correct table for.  Another recurring error was students were not using the plat

 Many students did not apply the proper boundary condition to solve for constant

 Some students used wrong units on speed of sound in air, units did not cancel correctly for Mach