• Aucun résultat trouvé

Cosmic distances

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Cosmic distances"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Skygazing: Astronomy through the seasons, 2016-10-04

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la

première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à [email protected].

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

[email protected]. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.

https://doi.org/10.4224/23000800

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Cosmic distances

Tapping, Ken

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC:

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=8e98e140-eb45-49c9-9eb7-5bb89f43deb7 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=8e98e140-eb45-49c9-9eb7-5bb89f43deb7

(2)

COSMIC DISTANCES

Ken Tapping, 4thOctober, 2016

For thousands of years people have used triangulation for surveying and measuring the distances of things. We can also use it for cosmic objects too. However, triangulation breaks down for distances more than about 1600 light years. A light year is the distance light travels in a year, which is a little less than 10,000,000,000,000 km. We can measure the distances to the nearest stars, but that is only our cosmic backyard. Most of our galaxy lies beyond that distance, and the other galaxies are much further away. Fortunately there is another method, which is usable out to the maximum distance telescopes can discern stars. Many stars vary in brightness. One such star is Delta Cephei, in the constellation of Cepheus. This star was noticed to be variable by John Goodricke, an 18thCentury English amateur astronomer. Delta

Cephei doubles in brightness over a cycle of just over five days. The variation is due to a structural instability in the star. More stars like this one were discovered, and were classified as “Cepheid Variables”, or just “Cepheids”.

In 1908 astronomer Henrietta Leavitt was studying at Cepheids in the Magellanic Clouds, small galaxies close to ours. Since those galaxies are very small compared with their distance from us, she could assume that all those Cepheids are at more or less the same distance from us. This led to her finding something really odd; the average brightness of Cepheids is related to the time it takes for them to cycle in brightness. We can measure that time, and from that establish how bright the star really is – its luminosity, and then measure how bright that star looks to us here on Earth. From that it is easy to calculate its distance. This was a revelation. If we can distinguish individual stars in a star cluster or distant galaxy, we can look for cepheids, measure their cycle times and apparent brightnesses, and determine the distance to that star cluster galaxy. Henrietta Leavitt had given us a ruler that extends nearly to the edge of the observable universe, and our

improving telescopes are making it possible to identify more and more distant cepheids. So far it has been possible to use Cepheid variable stars to measure distances out to about 7.5 billion light years; that is over halfway back to the Big Bang. Cepheids played a key role in establishing that our universe is expanding. Astronomers analyzing the light from distant galaxies found they are receding from us. Using cepheids to determine the distance, they found that the further away a galaxy is, the faster it is receding from us. We call this “cosmic redshift”. That does not mean everything in the universe has taken an aversion to us personally. Imagine the raisins in a rising cake as it bakes in the oven. No matter what raisin you are sitting on, you will see the same thing, all the other raisins are moving away, and the further they are, the faster that is happening. Of course, once the relationship between the distance and the rate of expansion was determined, it was an obvious move to determine if everything tracked back to the same point in space and time, and if so, when that was. Everything indeed started from the same place, just under 14 billion years ago.

At distances beyond where we can identify Cepheids we have to resort to other, rather less precise methods. We can use particular types of exploding stars and some types of galaxy. We can also use the relationship between distance and cosmic redshift, obtained by comparing Cepheid distances with redshift measurements. If we measure the cosmic redshift, we can estimate the distance. Using this method we calculate that the most distant galaxies, with redshifts of up to 11.1, lie about 13 billion light years away, that is, they existed only 400 million years after the Big Bang. Mars and Saturn lie very low in the southwest after dark. Mars is on the left and Saturn on the right. The Moon will reach First Quarter on the 8th.

Ken Tapping is an astronomer with the National Research Council's Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory, Penticton, BC, V2A 6J9.

Tel (250) 497-2300, Fax (250) 497-2355

Références

Documents relatifs

Two months later sitting on the street at night she was begging for money with her boyfriend I gave them five dollars. but they didn’t recognize me or thank me for the money which

Nevertheless “the integration of content and language learning brings into the fore the well-documented tensions between focus on meaning and focus on form which have been ongoing

If one minimizes over several trials, and purposefully under- estimates the outcome of each trial by a constant factor, then the probability that the sampled count exceeds the

Thierry Franchard, Remy Guebey, Julien Razafimahefa, Marcellin Andriantseheno, Harentsoaniaina Rasamoelina, Ronan Jambou.. To cite

Through these points, we hope to provoke thought about how explanation designers can better validate their design decisions via ExpG for explanation templates.. This is of

In VADA [21], all of format transformation, source selection, matching, mapping and data repair are informed by evidence in the form of the data context [20], instance values that

We proposed a novel metric, based on a simple structure from factor analysis, for the measurement of the interpretability of factors delivered by matrix de- composition

Afinal, muitos apps satisfizeram os critérios definidos por Wiley (2000) para OA, como ser um recurso digital de aprendizagem cuja característica principal é a