Pascale Engel
1
, Susan Gathercole
1
, Romain Martin
2
, & Flávia Santos
3
1
University of York,
2
University of Luxembourg,
3
Universidade Estadual Paulista
1
3
Working memory - the ability to store and manipulate information in mind for
a brief period of time in the course of ongoing cognitive activities (Baddeley &
Hitch, 1974) - has been suggested to play a crucial role in children’s
language acquisition; native and foreign (Gathercole, 2006; Service, 1992)
Working memory model (Baddeley, 2000) Phonological loop Central executive Visuo-spatial sketchpad Episodic buffer short-term store short-term store
The central executive and the phonological loop have been
found to make significant contributions to vocabulary acquisition
and the comprehension of language (Cain, Oakhill, & Bryant,
2004; Masoura & Gathercole, 1999; Papagno, Cecchetto, Reati,
& Bello, 2007)
How does growing up with an immigrant background affect children’s
linguistic
and working memory skills?
2
Summary
Participants
SES: Socio economic status
20 Luxembourgish
children
7 years old
living in Luxembourg
20 Brazilian children
10 low SES 10 high SES 7 years old, living in Brazil
Working memory skills, vocabulary and comprehension were investigated in native and secondary
languages in a population of Portuguese immigrant children growing up in Luxembourg - a country in
which Luxembourgish is mainly used in social interactions, and German and French are instructed in
schools
20 Portuguese children
7 years old
having lived in Luxembourg
for at least 5 years
Portuguese
Brazilian low SES Luxembourgers Brazilian high SES
I know it is ‘Wollek’ in Luxembourgish,
but what is it in Portuguese? Maybe Wollk-ão?
I know the word in Portuguese
but what is it again in Luxembourgish?
Central executive
Material
Counting recall
Backwards digit recall
6 5 7 3 9 9 3 7
Phonological loop
Nonword repetition
Digit recall
ʃeɪvlɛksʊәstәl 8 2 5 8 2 5The monolingual children performed the tasks in their native
language and the Portuguese immigrant children in both languages – Luxembourgish and Portuguese.
Lux. nonwords were based on the sound structure of
Luxembourgish and the Port. nonwords were based on the
Portuguese language. Lux. Port. Bra.
4
Material
Expressive
vocabulary
Receptive
vocabulary
Syntactic
comprehension
Expressive One Word Picture Vocabulary Test
British Picture Vocabulary scale
Test for Reception of Grammar
Lux. Port. Bra. Lux. Port.
__ Lux. Port. __
__
Tables: Languages in which the different groups of children performed each language task
Tasks in Luxembourgish Tasks in Portuguese
The 4 groups did not differ on digit recall and backwards digit recall. The Portuguese immigrant children performed equally well to their Brazilian counterparts in the repetition of the Portuguese sounding nonwords, whereas their performance in the
repetition of the Luxembourgish nonwords was below that of the native Luxembourgish speakers.
On counting recall the low SES group from Brazil manifested scores that were below the three other groups. 22.1 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 Lux. 20.5 20.8 Portuguese 20.7 Brazilians low SES 21.2 Brazilians high SES Digit recall 7.5 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 Lux. 7.4 6.9 Portuguese 8.4 Brazilians low SES 7.9 Brazilians high SES
Backwards digit recall
13.6 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 Lux. 12.9 12.6 Portuguese 12.4 Brazilians high SES 10.3 Brazilians low SES
*
Counting recall Nonword Repetition 27.6 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 Lux. 34.7 Brazilians low SES 34.3 Brazilians high SES 22.7 32.9 Portuguese*
*
5
Expressive vocabularyIn the Portuguese immigrant children, language competences in Portuguese, Luxembourgish, and German were at an equal level that was below the linguistic competence of monolingual speakers from Brazil and from Luxembourg.
Tasks in Luxembourgish Tasks in Portuguese Tasks in German 59.7 64.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Lux. 31.2 31.8 35.4 Portuguese 57.5 Brazilians low SES 70 Brazilians high SES
*
*
*
*
*
53.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Portuguese 58.3 Brazilians low SES 67.3 Brazilians high SES*
*
*
Receptive vocabulary 28 30.6 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Lux. 24 24.7 Portuguese*
*
Comprehension7
levels on the working memory measures, their poor language performance in all three languages is
unlikely to be related to a fundamental cognitive deficit. The fact that their knowledge of Portuguese vocabulary was even lower than that of children from impoverished backgrounds in Brazil also rules out the hypothesis that their poor language skills are simply a reflection of lower SES. Instead, the findings appear to be a direct consequence of growing up as an immigrant in a multilingual society.
As the Portuguese immigrant children and their monolingual peers from Luxembourg and Brazil performed at comparable
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In B. G. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and
motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York: Academic Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? Trends in
Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417-423
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42.
Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(4), 513-543.
Masoura, E. V., & Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Phonological short-term memory and foreign language learning. International Journal of Psychology, 34(5-6), 383-388.
Papagno, C., Cecchetto, C., Reati, F., & Bello, L. (2007). Processing of syntactically complex sentences relies on verbal short-term memory: Evidence from a short-term memory patient. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24(3), 292-311.
Service, E. (1992). Phonology, working memory, and foreign-language learning. Quarterly Journal
of Experimental Psychology Section a-Human Experimental Psychology, 45(1), 21-50.
References