• Aucun résultat trouvé

Are we a bit odd?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Are we a bit odd?"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Skygazing: Astronomy through the seasons, 2015-03-03

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.

https://doi.org/10.4224/23000221

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Are we a bit odd?

Tapping, Ken

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC: https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=a586118b-27ce-4f91-bbc9-cac02d4001ce https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=a586118b-27ce-4f91-bbc9-cac02d4001ce

(2)

We have now found well over 1000 worlds orbiting other stars. Our theories as to how stars form suggest most stars should have planets. It is nice to know that is the case – for two reasons: firstly it suggests we are thinking in the right direction, and secondly, that we are less likely to be alone in the universe. However, the majority of planetary systems we have found out there are distinctly different from ours. Either our Solar System is unique, or there is something else going on. We think we more or less understand our Solar System. Rocky balls located near the Sun, like Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars, lost most of their volatile materials when they formed, and then baked by the newborn Sun, leaving small planets with relatively thin atmospheres. On the hand, the outer planets: Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and

Neptune, hung onto more or less everything, so they ended up as gas giant planets. The asteroids, Pluto and the other stuff in the outer Solar System is believed to be left over construction material. However, what we are finding “out there” does not seem to fit this picture. Most of the planetary systems we are finding are starkly different from ours. We are finding Jupiter0sized planets orbiting so close to their stars they are almost red hot. Most of the worlds we are finding are big and close in. Half the planets in the Solar System are roughly Earth0sized. That does not seem to be the case with the systems we are seeing orbiting other stars. Out there, little, rocky worlds seem to be in the minority, with only a few of them at the right distances from their stars for them to have liquid water to sit on their surfaces. Either our theories need updating, or there is something wrong with our observations, or maybe a bit of both.

The obvious searching method is to use telescopes to see little faint dots orbiting other stars. Unfortunately this rarely works because of the glare of the star, but we have done it in a few cases. Most of the successful detections are being made using two other methods. Although stars are

much bigger than planets, they still wobble a little as their planets move round them. We can see this through the star moving towards us and away again. Directly measuring the changes in distance is near impossible, but we can easily measure the speed with which the star is approaching and receding. However, interpreting the results is complicated by the fact we are making the observations from the surface of a spinning ball that is careering around the Sun.

The other method is to monitor the brightness of a star with high precision and look for tiny dimmings as its planets pass in front of them. By measuring the depth and duration of the dimmings, and the intervals between them we can estimate the size of a planet and how far it is from its star. Satellite telescopes can monitor thousands of stars

simultaneously, hence the huge rate at which new planets are being found. Amateur astronomers are also discovering new worlds using this method. In general, big things that happen quickly and often are much easier to detect than small things that happen less often. A big planet like Jupiter orbiting very close to a star is far easier to detect than an Earth0like world orbiting at a safe distance. It will cause big, rapid wobbles in the star and will make large and frequent dimmings. In addition, the chance of a world far from a star passing in front of it is smaller than when a world is close in. The result is that our search methods are highly biased towards finding big planets close to their stars. However, we are getting better at finding planets that could be like ours. We cannot yet conclude whether or not our Solar System is unique. But our instruments and methods are improving, and the work continues. Watch this space5.

Venus lies in the southwest after sunset, with Mars close below and much fainter. Jupiter dominates the southern sky and Saturn rises around 1am. The Moon will be Full on 5th March..

! " # $

% & $' ! ( $

) * ( + % , -./0

$ 1 2 3/45 6 7 1 2 3/45

Références

Documents relatifs

Le comportement dynamique d’une charnière à trois lames est étudié dans le Section 3 à l’aide de la simulation du déploiement d’une structure.. Une explication du

Erik Hawkins est reconnu dans la communauté scientifique comme « le père fondateur » du « Language Awareness movement » (né en Angleterre dès 1974), traduit

One could argue that the missing Wat1004 is just not visible in the electron density because of the rather poor data (Table 3), but in this particular case, which concerns a

C’est pourquoi, dans cette thèse, après avoir fait un rappel précis de la physiologie cutanée, j’exposerai le processus de mélanogénèse, l’expression des

[…] On any level, it seems, the analysis of structure consists of the isolation of recurrent units, the determination of the relationship these units may have with

To evaluate to which extent such demographic events may result in spurious signals of association of some variants with the invasive status of populations, we simulated data sets

Parce que les adresses Internet ou adresses IP sont indépendantes du réseau, une machine d'un réseau A peut communiquer avec une machine d'un réseau B sans se préoccuper du type

La version française du questionnaire PRTEE a été adaptée interculturellement avec succès, et cette étude a montré que le PRTEE-F est fiable et valide pour