AN EXAMINATION OF THE CRITERIA OF TEACHER EVALUATION AS PERCEIVED BY THE SCHOOL TEACHERS OF NEWFOU DLAND
CENTRE FOR NEWFOUNDLAND STUDIES
TOTAL OF 10 PAGES ONLY MAY BE XEROXED
(Without Author's Permission)
MES HICKMAN
····" .' .f; ., . t.-1.
. I
in0803
'1
.r
' ... •
.
. .:·J· ... J·. \ . ·.
.i.
.. ~- ... :., .
!.-~ ••.•.
f·:·:
>
~~! .
_;· ,.:'
~-~ < :~ ~:t; ,· '7;
. ~l ..... ! • • • • • , ; - •.
t!:.". ·..:.
'
I
..
'i .
j.
l .
j .;
. '-'\
'
' . . . . ,~
...
.,
--..,.
. '
/
_.,
.. t
• <
~Jr.·. ·~
.
'MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF
. ' i
' 0
, I
AN
EXAM!~AT,I(>N ~)THE C~IT~Rl:
: AS PERCElVJ;:P
- ~~t
.TilE SCHOOL TE, I I
\·
i ' -
by ..
\
.
~ Ja~es. HickmanA,Thes.is
EWFOUNOLANO
l
~ TEACijE~ I
EVALUATION .I I
NEWFOUND~ND
• I
., '·----1 . .
" ' --- - - > •
. . . .-• .. __ ._:__
·Submitted· to the committee on· Graduate Studies·
~
.
@) . .
.0
'· /-
in Partial F'uifillinent of t~ Req~irements
" ' ,·.
.. DEPAR'IMENT OP
·. E~UCA~~N~ ~MI~IS~RATIOf
·. '
· .. C..~
.~\ .
. , .. ··.·:--.. ·~
..
.<
'·.
\
. ·.• .
\
.'
·"'-.. : ·~·.::/·\~
·.··:"'.~.:· ...
.. .. . :'~· ·. ; . •( , '•, I •' ;
. .
-- .
.f
.:~
. ~: . ~:
. .,
'
.~ " ·
~·
. . ,
"'-
;;---' ,,
~·
....
.•. '
~-
;
... .
f.·.
J _ ,
< 't I
...
~
I'
AB'STRACT
_.--::;,_ ' )
This study was conducted-"tO -determine the criteria
• • ' \ • #
that N_ewfoundland school .teachers felt should'be u-sed. in -eval~ating. 1Jea~hers f~r (a) t;eaclier_ competence, and ·(b)·
j .
promotion td_administrative. positi~ns.
~ ' . . .
"'
~he qu~itionnaiie consist~d o~ ·t~o parts: a ·
"
persdnal and schqo_i ba-ckground variahle questionnaire,
. .
ane! two evalua.t_i~n questionnaires. ·The latter. section of·· ._,
. I
. the que~tio~.aire contained identical thj.rty~item pat---. . '
, , • 0 • • ,..I ' ' ( , • I
t'er·ies· arranged 'in different sequences. _:·
These
·.items were·; ' . , . . . . . ... . . - . ' .
evenly .
dist~ibuted·.
._ .i~t~
. Mitzel. . 'sthre~ ~ategories"·'~
.-f
. .pr:esaqe, ·proces~ and produc;t' ·for:·.each eval~ative ·situ-
. . . . - • . . . . • . .. :1· • .
at£on.- The que-stionnaire .also a.sked- the· teachers
to
" . <:::;:' . . . '. . . . : - . . . . . . . .
indicate whom t-h~y-:fel~· was in-'the· bes:t ··position
to
e~aluate· their teaching~ The questionnai~e provided ample
i . \ . . ' Q . • .. .. ..._. •
.
sp~~e f~r~ - ~each~rs :. to:_ : inc~ude ·addit~~·ai. c~iteri~
1w~i:? . _, ..
they p~rc~iv~ to
be
·~p_ort~nt·~for ·e_ach·:.~v~iuative_ sftu.:..' ' .? ' o I • I (I o • • o ' o o 0 ' o ', •I 'o ,' o •
· ation, and space for-· teachers· to ·add~.comJnents -on the ·
. . · /
' . '
The _ :
questionnaire·was
mat ledto 3oo . , · . . . ·
, :, ' .. i~ .
randomly
s;~lected
' . Newfoundl-. - anci~chool' 1 t~_ ~ch~rs
of ~ which8 4. 3 per cent responded. ·. ·
,-· .
..
() .. _
. .
:··"·
.)
- '
_.,
. '~ .:~
. ' ' >' I
. ..
.. ·~ ';
.... ·.;
.
.
' ~. (·
I 1\, •
... . ··.
' , ..
.
f.... ~- t
• • • • t " • ··~·" • • • •• ~ .' • i .... ~ ' ..
_,··To analyse the·· data gathered, frequency .counts ·' .. ; .. ,- . ·'':·.
' • • • • • • • 0 • • ' ' • 0 • • • ' J. ,.} \ . , "'"·, • ., !~ .•
--- .
. , .
. ~ ~
were,co~pi~ed :-.to
plaae ·
erite~itiin
:tahk· ·6rder '·to .. : .. :·.
~·- ..
I . • .
::..-,. . :_f!_·., .;.'.:, :_', ''-. -. / ... ) . -. -....
- ~~
''
; , '.; • ' . 0 , ·,,- • 0
• l . f ' ) , ··
' 'o 't \ { • ', I '";• ,', ·;:~ .'iJ. • \ • ~ ', '. • ' ' •,<,,• > o \ • I o
.. • ,#, . ; \ ... : ~ ~ . .. • ·~ • • • 't • • ""::
-..
, ,
·,t_·;~t;; .. , 0 , . ; :. ;_ ~;:~,-~:;J ~J~~:~:.;.J~;~ ·-,.~~ 1·.: ~-•. ~.:. ·~-~;~~:~~ ~~i:.t~~!-:-!·-'t·~r. ~~~~~~.l~~~'(.;_,fl~t·i1f~ ;~;.;:.~Jz~~~! .. ;, ;~:;·--~ ~:.\·r~~~-!~;~. ·r:·r:~~.;:.~§;:~:; ~t~ :--~~!~~~:~~~ '~.:~~;;~:J .. ~~ l
.::..."~ .. / "' :)·' • .._\, .. •.:._'/ \1).':'• ~,,.,! .... 1•,":-~ . t ' :-... ~: !.r.. ...-•·. ~ . •.
r. ... " --· __ . ,_ . . ,. . . . ··',..;.. · ; -· ....
~ 0:.''.•7' t.. • • ...·.
,,
. ·~.
,
.. \ ·.:
... ;
·:.
., •.
('; • .. r ... <'( •
. l
determine whether or not ?t, common. ~o~y·· of· c·~iteri'a w·as perceived by ~he ~each~r~ as ~eing important in thi ~valu~
.
.•-a~ion- of teachei-s for botp ·evaluative ·sit~at~ons. Th~
ranked' criteria
w~r~.
·.compared for :bot}J~valu~ti
ve 'situ- .' • •' C"J • • • • ~
C:l:tion~ to see if the 'teacher.s perceived a change of.
emphasis in the use
of .
each .~ritED~ia~{from one eya'iuat.ive,· ...
·situa~io~· t~ :the .other . . Pearson correlation ~oeffibi~nts '
.
.
. . . . . . "'were· utiliz~d to. ~etermine ~hether . the. emphasis. p!i;\c~~
' , • ' • • • ' I • '
.upon the cr.i_.terltm·. . . ' chan'ged with each . .. eval~ati~e· situatio~·.
,• . .
.
; .. . .
Chi squ~re tests w~re: rised to ascertain if signi£i6ant.
' • ' :.,.:. #o ~ ..
I .., .,~-..;"/' . •• ~
differences existed in '. the respons~s~6f tea~hers . ~· . according to personai and school .vari~tes.
· ·For the· q~estion, "Who is in the best position· -to.· .. ·
\~ . . . ~ . , . .
.
. . ' . .. evai.ua'te?", freq'ue~cy coun~s \iere compiled. to-ci"eterrni~e·Ji. . ' ~,..
.. '
whom the
teacher~
felt was in the best~osition t.c> : eva'lu- ~
ate t~eir work. Chi sq,uare te~ts_. we~e. a.iso used to .
. :
.
ascer:ta:in wh~ther.·o~ not . ~igf\ificant differences: ,. . . _existed .
. .
. . in the· responses of . .. .
the
teachers . .. . ~ecord!ng . to pe'rs6nal /~~~ ..and school bac-~ground variables" _ I ' ' ; .
0 • ••
Tl\i~
styy revealed tb!'tt~~cberS d~ 9~rte:Cal~y ~
at;1ree on ~. -~f~. on body of criteria ·which they ~eel . ~ho.uld .. , be used for bot evaluative s.ituations. Teachers were.
. ' : .· . . . . . . '). .
·.·more l'ikely--~ .feel.·':that· "pro~ess"· c~iteria sho~id. be
. . . .
emphasized wh~n .-eva.luating teachers for competence,.·
. 1 , I . . ...
whi.le:
"·pre-~a~~" .ic~iteria
.shoul(l .. be l!lsedwhei~ ' c~ns~~er~~g
·.·'.• • I ~. . : ~
I
(._
' '
' . . ••', I
..
' 1',
• I . • ,
·' ' . '·
"
,· .. -· ....
. . ;. . ·''· . .'1
~-.~
. -. ~-' '
. ,' ; .··..:
teachers for adm.inistrati~e l>osi tiona. .
oniy
a .few. . ,. ... ·• • • -. • • • - · • • • • • • • ' : • \ \ ' 0 .. . ' ;. -• . - .
- ! · · -: .
·, ~ ~~ , 1. (iJ ~ ' , I!
~ . 1. ·: ... . ~-~,f'.t· :·· ·. ~ .. ~~:
' .· -· :t".:J:!J'··' <t ,.,, ...
0
:·,
.~~ ,~L;~~~~·- h~~
..•b ,~ 0
, • • •• , ; • ••~
: • • \ 0:; _ ;; ·: :,~. \ o: ·: , · o o ' ··. · . . . ~: 0 .~.,~ : . o .· z}i~ :: o;;,~,"·:: ~l"":5 . ·~~ o·~i{~- I:~~
•.
., '
.,
.
:A tJ
..
I .\
!!-' ,. ~
. ·
'.
. ~'
.
'··'
.\
". ,
' ..
., ... .
~~
\
\ ·
\' I
'sig.nif icarit· '.relationship's were
o ' o I I':, ..
I
criteria,. of
,..
evaluat.ion. "and thesc~ool. )??Ckground' v'ariables.
, ·I
.· •!
..
' \ '
.t . c-. .
·''.
·.
obse:tve4 between ·certain t.eachers" .~~rsonal and~ ,/ ' !
Th~ ·teachet~· felt that the . .
school prin,cipa;t ·. w.a .. s in the best po.s.it'.i.on to ev:aluate.
f' • • • • ~
their work.
I '
·-
,.•
·. ,.
;-' rl.$
,o' ' I
·'
'··'· . : ·~ ..
. , t'·
.• .
'o
. ~ .. '
.. ....
.·.
, ...
'• .·
: .
.
'·•
\ 0 • ~ • •I 0 , 't. •
.·. \ . :_,-:.:.:~·; . .. · :.;: : >.)~ >:: :~:;·)::~~-,,: . . . ,;.~- ~. ;;: .·~.:' /;~: ~·
. .
,.,
...
I
,"f,'·
\
I .
•,
. •
..
I,.
·. . ~ .- ·
;..
·-..:·;.
. .
~·
,.
.,, -:
•.i
. ; ~.~:·.~
·~
. '"·
• J,
.. ·.··-~
. \
..: ·}
, :.l~
',)'
., ~ . ".
.. ....
-~~ ..
' ··' ~,..
. • )t' ·-:~~:~
,• '
..
·'.::~~.. :: ~ .t:: ~
.
··;·· ... ~ ..· .. ,~ ~·-~·· .. i .. ~4 :~"
:
••
..
, I '
.·
.·.,
\
,..... .;,.· .
.. i ' .
{
I 't • •
'
. I
..
' ·' ....:
..'.. I~.
,. '
•'
• { \ o • •' o I'
.' '·,· .. ".. . .
' I I ; ~ 0 :: " , ~' • ,·
' '
. . ~ '. :.-·.. . .
. .
.
1 -··... - - -··. -~---
, ...
. ~ .. ;·_,
., ~ ,._,, ~
. .
'· ~ .
.,
o • • ... • ·.·:;·,f+-~---~----'~:.•
IACKNOWLEDGEME'N'l'S - . · .
• . J'
'; .. : · ··A/-· ~\. _ : . : , ,
The writer wishes
to
ex'p.ie'ss~'his •gratitude for· th~. : '. v 0 .
• • . • 1 1-
, ~ .
-.
·' . . .. ass~st~nce, adv.iceo an,d encoura,ge~e~t of Or.. D. · Kirb~, th~
~ , .
.
,,....
. . . .
· . Ap rec_;iatlon ±s---ats~es.seq for · the comments
~ . . 4 .
Wool&ridge
' ' '
ions given·by· D'r. K.W. waiiace land Dr. G.·
l
w~llingly of· their· time:. l __ ..
i . . :_ .
is also expressE?d to
the·
Newfoundlansi ... . . t;t"" •' .. , • ~ , . •<04 ~ I "', ' . .
school teachers" who took time 'out 'of their busy schedule
. . ' \ . . . .
to
rCOmpl~te" .~e - ques-t'io~n~ire_._ . Wi~hout . theilr _ CO~perat.ion
' · . ' . ~-
ihis
study.
.~ould not. - ha~e becqrne a ... \_.:.... reality •·. _,. .. ' . . ~Finally, the w~iter ·wishes ~to exp.ress·· appreci~tion
.t'
' / .
·to .his wife and family for the'ir . . . . . •' ·patience,. . understanding,· . . . .
. V' . . • ·.~'.. •
~~c~urageJnent. and assistan¢e. while· the thes ;is· was being compiled. -· ·
I ,
' :
l
. .
J,''
Q
,,•
.
· \
·.
'iii
-
. .
'0
_.
.,,
,.
--~
'
<
...
•• •I
' '.,
or!.'-
":
·.\
_,.
) ., '
~, .,
\ ..
I t' ' ,,
''
;I
· - . ..
..
'.•. . . .. \:.. ..
• - • • I' 1"
f ·"• ' • • : . •• • ··.- .f
.
- .' . '\ . .. ~ ·.J·-:~ •;;" ,,.._~., ,;~~\,~." ~ .. ,.:·:~u .. ~ ... j:.~-·~)~ .=.. .:...:~".'";;!,..,• : ... :, :r~~;l7~\
.. !'
i. I
:i I
! i
\ .
.I ..
,.._
__ _
'I .
'f
i\
.'\
I I 1 I
1.\.
I ).
'' '
. .
\
TABLE OF CONTENTS
-
. ...,________.----.
~. \ .
ITS SIGNIF~CANCE / . :
I .
...
. \ . .
___...__."_emen t ~f.---the P·roblem Hypotheses
""':
. .
. S( ..
Import!ance of l the Study
J .
. I .1·
Definition of Terms Evaluation •, e I a ...
. cr.i. ter iqn: ~ I a • .I I • •
·c~as~es of Cri.ter~a Teacher
. -. • .
Pe·. rmanent . .'certifica.tion
. ·
interim
cer-tification. ' . I ." • · ' >
I
•. .
..
Schools
. . / \ . _ __ .
. /" . -,.,---.. '·
RELATED' LITERlVl'URE . • II. ':SURVEY .OF
. '
/
PAGE
1
.9
9 12.
. . ..
12"./
. .
12.:(;
) 12.
I ·
j :'l3 .
· I . .
/
• / . 13
/
/,
/ ' I
..
\.
\
13 14 . .14 '
I
'\
·\-.
. .
. - L
-~ __
_,/ _ -
·-.
'.:·
In~rolduct-~on /and· Historical Background -·~ · '-·\ ·~. ·.15 _'-_ -· .. ...-
• ., ,./... • • :· ~ < • • j
,.,.. . ,.
Recent Studies· on
Teacher
EvaluationI "--... . . .
. ""
' . . . -_./'What 1s Evai.uation? · ~...-?~~···.
. i . . . . ... --~.-:._,;__.,_.~J/
--~W.~Y\.·Eval.ua,te·?
. .· · ~ chQ0.1
:Boat;d. ... .
. " -~
. .
..
---
The.· Pub~'ic. • •· •--... _.
· . A-?
II ,j ·
,..
- I i,
. .
' '
20i .
~· .. ..
...
.
20 :':;
23
J•
. ,. ' .
,\
-· 1
·~ ...
.'.··.
( . .:;
. . . .
I .·
,, . ' : · .
·· .. t· . .
.... ·:· ; .
·.
. ·~
I;
\
.. I '.' ·. 4 '. I ' • ·~ :'>! ... ,.·. .
<;:HAPTER
..
.I
XII.
•
~--"' ·. • • IIV.
. i
•• • . " # It
. ..
Tea·cher-s ·.
· -
' ··'
. .
Wh~ Should' ~Ya.l~1pte?---•... •
.... I ' _.
.•
.
A~thor i-ty.··~ igures . . . . Self-.Evaluation. ··
. .
.·. '.
, .
Student : I J
~':"'~·':.:·
· ·Other T~acher . . • • . ·. ·1
..
"
. .
.. ',r'
· When should
~yalua~il~2 1 ·occ~r.
'.
• • t \.-~·.;;· . • •
,-- ·where Should the Emphasis( be
_./ 1( •
. I f
/· ~n Teacher Ev~lyation?
.
'. .
P_laced
) .
-~ 1J~-
Presage .. · .• . • .
,, > I ·
I ' (t"f\
• 'r ·•
· ~_, Pro&ess . . . .
. .
.. \'
,..
· . · Product
. I .
". .
.. .
~ .. / . .
Recent Re~earch Related to· the
. /
. ..----/ . . ·. P~~~sent / . Study . . .
./ ,• . .
. . . . . ,
Conclusion
-
.. . . . . . . .
.. . .
· .
•'
THE o·ES~GN OF. THE ' STUDY · p • . •
...
-0 .. The·· Ih-~rument . ._
.
.
'I J/ "' '
Sampl.e .and ·Data Collection .
. .
.-~·-·--·
1Treatment of 'the_ ~Data .
~~ .
:'1 .Limi t~t.i~ns
/ . .
.. . . j : , . . • . ..
. ..· . .
• ! •.. .
I '
Delimitations .~/. -~ • • • .. ,. ··J· •
, . _,1' _ / • •• ~::, • / ' ' :. . • ' • ·.' , •
EVALUATIV~
. .
· CRXTER:J:A. r / . .
P.ERCEIVEO.
AS.
S'lGN-~Fic'A.. -.
:SY. NEWFOpNDUNI> SCHOOL '.tEACHERS • ~ . • ..•
Evaluatio~ ·o£
. Teacher
.C~mpeten.~e. .. ,'1 ,' ., •
' .· . ·' . '·
...
PAGE''
. .
. . 26.~-
... 27
. .
. 28 ...• . ·3132 .
134
3.5
35 ~· 36
. . . .
40. •
4A47 49
..
.
·..
.60.'
.I
,.
../
o .
.
... 7/
:
..
..
\
.·.·a- . " .
·,
: •', I,
·' .
' .
r
()
I '
..
·-· "'·· .-. ?'·
. .
' '. • ;) ~ 0
CHAPTER
Evaluation ... £or Promotion to an
()0 • •
Admi~istrat;:ive_ Position .
. .
. ~. .
..
• 0
v . .
A . COMPARISON.OF
THE ... EMPHASIS PLACED ·ON' . TEACHE~ ·EVALUAT;rON CRITERIA BYNEWFOUNDLAND SCHOOL TEACHERS . •
.
..
V'I.
1 .. .
Emp.I:tasis ~lacE;!d on Individual Criteria in Both Evaluative \
Situations.
. . . .
,.•. .
...
' .
An
Ani'llysis . c_>f . the D_ata Acc.ordin'!·To Mitze'l is categories. of Pr~sa·g~·,
• ' 6' 0... ,· " '
.Proces~ I
c 'anct'.
P_rod.uct , ..• · • .Teacher ·Evaiuation
Prq~otion ., to an Administrative Position ··.,. .. · . ~ .. . . . .
·· ... ,~:
\
RELATIONSHIP "B~-TWEEN ~TINGS OF
.
.
.
..
EVALUATIVE CRITERIA AND :sELECTED
CHARACTEIU.STICS · OF RESPONDENTS AND . THEIR· SCHOOLS .. . • • • r '
. ~ ·.· ./":· .. · ·.\
Personal •. and ·Professional.
Ch~racteristics of Teac}lers. ~
.. . .
~.
.·
. .
_,.. . . .. . . . . .
• 0 •
.. .
Age and S~x
Age
• ~:l· •· • • •I •.•
. . 0 •• • • • • • " ' •
-1 ',
.
seX . . . . ' •-..-, •. .,. . : . . • . .,: . .. ~. -•. • .... . .
.•
.
~ '(f • .J I p I o ~ • • J\,
·· Expez;ience· and · P~o~essi~Qal ,
I ' •
Preparatj,on . . . ~
.. . . • · . .. ...
'
. I '
:vi ..
.. ,
. ·_, ...
.: • ••• ~ l •
~
. .
,• \• · . .
. •.. .. ,·, ..
·· . ... · \
·-· . . ·.
.. ~
· .....
. ... . ' .. : ~~~ ...
.I
PAGE
. 67'
74
._,_,,
. I
74
-b .
83
63
s.a: " .
.,
.i
97 •. j
'
97
• • • l.. l:f\
· I
r JT
,o • .~ • ..,I,
97 99 '
.
....102 =-
, . •• ~ .. • ••• l
105" -..
' • > ,1
.• .
:·- --
' ;- ; ···:.
. ~~ ... ; .
'"
. ' '
''
,,,.,\ . .. t ,I
I
,' :: '!' :t, ..
-
..
.·'
...
'•
.. CHAPTER
Teaching Experie_nce • • • • 0 •
··Professional~ Trainin'g . .
' . . .
-·
·School Variables
.
-
.Type of School Board
I
.1 .
. '
The Nuinb-e'r of Classrooms
Grade Area .• .
. .
,.
". .
· Summary •.
. . . (
VII. WljO IS IN THE BES'.C POSI'l'ION
·rro . .• ·
EVALUATE?
.
\. .
.. . .
.
~.
'.
!
V1II. · · SUMMARY, GONCLUSIONS AN IMPLICATIONS
0 • t1 · conc~usions. and. Illlpli ations·.
·Recommendations for ·i~
· i;.her
.
...
.
~
_\
I .
. ·: Res'earch and . Stud;y
. ,. .
.. .
I
.
BIBLIOGRf\PH:Y ~. '
. . .
'. . · .
.. .
,
. .
APPENDIX A
. .
. '.
~. . .
. .
.,.
~
C9r-~espondence
to _
Teachers Fir~t ·l~ollow;..up ·.Letter•..
. .
'. .. .
{.
. ..
. ·'
.
'. . . .
.: '
.•PAGE
.108.
J.lO 113
l.l.J
. .
114
115 ..
i18
120 1'25
~
127 129 ..
134
·137.
..
1.114
145 146
.
.
second Follow-up Le'tter . . ·~.. • • (._. . • 14 7·
;l . . . . . . .
..~-..
~. - . .
r.'l
J 140: .\. ~~·~·.: . ...· APPEND·IX~B. :· ·: . •. • • . , • -~ • • • • :.·· • • ·• .:: ·. ' _ ..
Q ·,
~-~: . · ·· ;.
The·
Inst.r~ent·
• . .• •- ~
'•..__ • · .~
. . ·• . .. • .\~ ·:
· : . · ·. .·.' • . ·-...:.._./ I.
P~:t;'SOnal · aTl~.
•·Schoolyaliar· le, s • .' ~ • 1~.0
.:_- ~:~i;
Te~cper ~val~ati~~ Question'ruili:~e-
1
one :.. • . •
·Teacher Eva'luation .Ques.tionr1a ire---Two· . •
. . ' - . . ' - -, __ .j
J". 152
. c
1~4
~ .•: .'.
..:·. :~
. : ~' \
··-· ... ,
..______
. .
vii. _,' · · .,.. ~~:·-:~:~~
. '
I
·.. . -, .. ~ .
. . · . . . ~"' · ... . ~ : . ;: . . -:.· · ,:; ,, :r. ' • ~ c
. ·;.;t: .:.;; ,.";c;s.·~;:'.~"~";i,::~.~-~:~;~ff;
,•'\
'
,
·'·
\
. I
·I
/ / '
·. \ / .. I
/.~~ ... __ /
I . ·
-\' ~
I ;
·:~
...
. • ·f
·)· .. ·
-·•' ~ ..
. ·.
.•.;
.>
... .. !'
CHAPTER
·I '
. :· \
\
APPE~DIX t
;
Criteria Used. in the 'Instrument Set
O·
in Categories
' .
APPENDIX . Comments and Additional Criter.ia·-D
. ..
.:1..
..
..
·-
.-
I
;
.,
~·
\
. .
.~ ~.
., . ~.
+<
',
.. .
..
-
\·~
.···
·, ...
•,
"
.
. .
.
.PAGE
'. .. •' ' ~
.
1'56/
Out <>'
..
'
.
l:-570
159·
. ,
16~•I
0
• ..
'·'"
.. ' '
_a
...
'·-.
· ....
~ •' -.
,1',
···.:
.:i
-:~~,;:~~
. ~.:..'~"
. -1\
'"
.
.
J
'
.
... ·
~ ':
... i
..,,..;
'•
---..
· ·
' ,,.:·
.: ,,.
" '
: , ,
. ,.
II·.
·/
J;II.
''Y,-
.IV.
, . ..
....
...L .
LIST OF TABLES
.... . ·,·
'
·,\ .. .
Categories· of Effe~ti:ve : Univ.ersi ty .Teaching: . ~ '
Graduate Co~ents_of all
.·"
Faculties and Schools of 'the Univers~ty
·.~f.-.. Toronto .•
< '
.
.,.
,;-- • (jOrder of· the 16
-,
·criteria··~. . ./ . 2. ~. •... ~ .. ...
· .. ~ 1:,...\{~r~. !~o \.~ v} . '.r 'i~. ~·J~cJ
~.;V~.) t . ' \
Rat,~·, tp ·s.uruey .Questionnaire ·•
. ' ~ • • • • I • •
.·'
:::. .. r
;>-...
....
)by .Teachers
· ..:.o ·
be signific~t: in, Teacher .,.Evaluat±o'n
·a·
N = 253
' '. . . . . .
..Cri~eii~ Peiceived . ..
'•' . .
.. a.·-·
F.req.uency of ·M~ntiqn. of
• ' • I . .' .•
f •• •
Teache~s ;.to be. fpr:
· - P.romq;tion
toan
·
.
'PAGE
41
50 57
. '
0
6l
·,..
'•·~··
' '
. ' .
~.
.·~ · ..
· :
... :,~ . '.:·:·..:..-:·s!·'•' :.~ .. ~-'".._.
... ~. ~· {~.
.. .. ... ::. ... ·.~
I' " ~ •/"..
. .. l'f·
·.·· .,