MAY 10

A !l"UDY OF THE WORKlOAD OF TEAO-!ERS. ~N· THE aNTRAL AND REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOlS OF NEWFOUN£?t.AND

CE"i!RE FOR NEWFOUNDLAND STUDIES

TOTAL OF 10 PAGES ONLY MAY BE XEROXED

(Without Author's Permission)

KLAUS MICHAEL LUEDICKE

~.J

. '

.

.

^{~ .}

'·•

. '

i .

I,

-

. ' ^' ~ . ^{~ ~ ~} ... ^~-. ·: : .

.

^{' ' •: • ·~ • • • ' I • ' ' • •}

0 •

. ^{' ' . ,, .}

.

.

J '

. '.

...

· ."'A STUDY OF THE WORKLOAD

OF

^TEACHERS. r'N THE tENT_RAL

~-:.;.

^{• .} AND REGIONAL HIGH

~·CHOOLS

^OF·

NEWFOU~DLAND .

·. ~··

^'.

I ' •

' .

, .

.

.

^'

. ^;

, ·

J '

r .

.

..

^.

_{. . r . . .}

'·· · , A Thesis · .. . Presented to

' '

The ~epartment of Educational ·Administration . . :Memorial Univers)ty.of

Ne~fou~dland .

• • >'

In. Partia 1 Ful fi lllnent · · of the Requirements for the Degree

• h ' •

..

.

. '

Ma·ster of Education

n' .

.

^{' .}

by .

0

' '

Klaus Michael Luedicke

,.,• ,...,..~--~· --·· -· -·

.. May 197~ ·.

r•'

. 0

o . I

' .~ '

-

^' _.

_.

_~

' . "· ~

• J • • ~ • ' .., ·.·.. '. ~-~·

·.

^,;

. ^{, ~} .

0 · . ·

· . . : I

.. . . ^' :

~ .. . .

J

...

' · . "'· 1

• ' 0 ~ ••

'. .

.

. .

.

. ^'

~ '. .

( . " . . ·.

. '

,;

' · .. .

. .

: .... ~· ... ' ~

·. . · .

. .

I·

' .•

.., .

' .

' I

.. ^,,

.. ^'

''

·I ,.

···.

ABSTRACT

. \-

. ' .r-:r

The purpose of ·this study

was

·to examine-:. ("a} the. effect_ that

' . . ~'It' ' '• . . • . .

, . II • ,., • , -.•

a teather's sex and mari.tal status, years of'. teaching experien~e,

• - • 1 •

. ·,years of tr~ining, subject" field,, size .of sdlool,. .an~ average daily

· ·numbe.r of student contacts have·

~n

^the·

work.~t>a.d

^'of

:C~ntral, .

^ana

R~gi'onal

^·.

. . ·• I ' -

.. ^~

· High ScHool teachers. in Newfoundland; (b) t~e views that teachers hold

. .

toward their actual teacher ·workload; (c) the: teachers.':-estimation of·

\j" No';~'' . ~ . j:. ~ ..

a desirable workloa~ ~nd th~ recommendations of teachers for imple- menti ~g- the 'desired work-1 oad.

( .

Three t'tme intervals were used'when .

•' .

calculating a teacher's ·workload:. the fi~e-day wee.k~ the two_-day ·.

weekend·, and the seven-day week. ' .

• • I

. . . . Data for the studY: was obtained through a ·questionnaire.

· pre~J~ed

^{by t_he}-;nvestigator.

~fthe

^three

h~~dred _ques~ionnaires

sent. to teachers, a riet usab 1 e' return of 66.7 percent' was received.

. I ~ . • •

.

. .

·._An analysis of th~ data· reveale~ that• .a te~cher'~ sex a~d

. marjtai ~s'tatus, subject field, and average daily student contact have

f , .

an ·influence on a .teacher's. total workload, as well as on some. com- ponent~ comprising a"' ¹teaclier's workload.' On the other hand, ·^{. '. .} a·

,

^.

. teacher's years of teaching experience,. years of.trainin~, .~nd size

·,

of school have _. .little or no effect on·

_{· -}

a 'tea'cher's. total workload,

or

' .

.

. on the various components compr~Sing a teacher•·s wor.kload; . ,

.

_{. '}

' '

.

~

^Considefable dissatisfaction was

,~xp;e~sed

^.. by teachers.

t~w~rd :

their .actual

wo~kl~ad

^{. . They}

~ought { ti~e.' p;ovi~io~ du~ing·r. th~

^.regular:

sc~o·ol_

^{'day f!Jr}

p~eparati~d ~rking,

^{a reduced·}

class.ro~~ instru~tion

load, ·a· decrease· fn the 'student":"teacher ratio, a reasonable quantity

. .

. ^,•

'

^.

. j-.·

,

.

. '•

. .

. ^" ...

.

^.

^.

....

.'. ' ' . .. . . '

·. ·•

-.

-' .. . '. I . ' ' t

.

• ^{. '},^.' '

.

.

^{' .}

. . · . .

. ^' . .. ^'

.' ,,< I < o

. ' ~ ..

.. -. '·'·

I ~ 'f I • • '

J /1 : •

0 ~: • ' ~ " • I \ ' • o ·,.: ,

0

; ~

. ^{'·· • o;' I '• ' •, , ~ • : • • ~ ;' I}

'.

• I

·.

·: .

,•

·.·

•'-

. .

I

..

' .·

I .

.

·., i

i. ;·

.

.•

· of· diffe·r~nt ·subjec'ts/cours~s taught by a teacher a.nd th~· virt~al

·, • I "• ' • '!i, •.; ,t'

. el iniinatiqn of non-pro_fessiona.l tasks. .t.·· • · ·

. I

<.. . • ' d) • • •

. . . :, The 'fi ndi 1,1gs further _i ndi c~ted that teachers des·i red a tota 1 ·.. '

\ . .. ·. '

.workload of. ·38.75 hou~s in a seven-day

. .

^· _wee~, as compar.e~ to an actual

I' .

·seven-day week workload of 43.83 hours. To implement ~he de~ired. workload, seventy-five recOmmendations directed primari~y toward

T

.

·-

' ;

,

.

^... .

^.

. •'

·· · local school administration,. school boards, and th{:!Department of

...

.'' ; I

"

..

· Education were· given. Appro-ximately one.-half of the· retonmendations.

• # • ' .. • • , • • •

' .

were with,iri the' control or .influence of the local .school to implement.

t • •• • ""' •• •

' . ^('•

A

reductio~;~ ^the student~teache~ ratio and the employment of'teacher

• •• • • - 6

' . . ...

.

^{. . . .}

aides were the·most often:cited recommenda~·1ons for implementing the

• .0 • • • "1.1 • ' • • • , ,.

.desired workload'. ·It was apparent in· the· study that teachers seek to

have their

· occupa~ion ,

"p'rofe.ssionalized". ·::In p'irt, this

mea~s·

^.bei'ng.

r,el ieved of mundane tasks so that more _{. . . . . . .} tim·~ can be devoted to 'planning

.- (b ' ' I

· and carrying out their work for stydents.

J

,·! I

I , 'I

• i I

. i.

I .

·j

·I ..

r

i ·

, .

· .

'·

...

·.'

I •

. '. ( '

• _{.. .}

.

.\ ·'

• j

.

I ' ,'•

. .

^·.

_...

'

., .

• I ' .,

. .

I • ' I ,,

\

I •

.

.··

'. ~----,)··-

--

^~·

. "

J I . I 't

' . ' .. -

. .

. . • • 1.

.....

·"!··

- ·

. .

' .

,.

. ~ ..

' . ^'

<.

· .. ^,' .

.

^{.. ~}

• I

I • .,.

. . r ) _'·.

II. •

• ''·' · · . 1,, • _t.

.· I' . . .

t . • •

' •• • I

.

^'

~ ' :

,

.·• ·. I.

., .

. . .

,•.

.

^~··

.. .

^{• • I • ,,}

· . . i ..

^...

^.

^:

' .

'

,• ~· l

. . . 'r .•

. ... · ...

I • •'

\ . ~ . ~-'

. ^'

.

^-.

) '

.. . ,\.._-;.;.+ .

.•

, .

' -~

I

~

..

^'··

'

.

.

_{. r}

I .

.·

... ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

•

···

The writet

.-

wfshes to,ackn

_

owledge·

the

assis_tance gi_ ven by.

iv

:

. -.

.. ·. . ^' '

·numerous

persons· in the

.

preparation of this thesis. Dr.

~obert-Fisher,

o ' ' ' 'o I

...

~

.. ~~~~.. ', • I •

in his capacity a~ s~p~rv:iso~ . of the ~~es~s, ~ff~re~ _m~nr.~~~e~_t,ions,

.:.

' '

. '·

' ..1

:•

.. _{. ,.}

.

^.

• 0:. . ' . . ·•

'

.

. ,• ·. . .. ^\

. ·.

. .

^{.. J;-;}

. ^~ ...

' '

... ... ,

. ' .,

and gave muth. apprec1ated·gu1dance and constructlVe cr1.Ji·

_{' . . .}

c'ism

. . Mr. .

• ' . t. ' · . • • ! ....

Joe Price· gave the writer conside-

_.

rable· help in tbe

·analysis of the

' .

. '

statistical.

.data. A

.

·thank

you· goes to all or the teachers

_{I '} who took·,^. -_ ^{,(Jl ...}

.

^'

their· va1 uapJ e tHne to proyide the

_irwestiga~~r.

with the teacher

_{I ' .}

: . ^•.

·workload data.

/

- ^I

. '. .

·\ _:.::._.. .· ^{' . '}

'

A. special

.

thank you

_. goe~r

to ^{the .} writer• s wife, Mar'ie,

_{. .}

-

-

who had

^.

,. ^~-

. ,•' '

' '· I : ,· . . ',•

-, .

, .

'·

'.

.... ^. '· ..

' I

t •.

I 0 , ^t i.

,·.

. ^{,, '}

· . ..

' ..

. . .. ^\. ..

. . ^•'

• • • t

. 1·

' I .

: . \ .

^.

•

^.

•

^\.

•

' .,

. -

^{' '}

.

,~ . ^.

: ^' ;_.'

.

.. .

• , .-. • I

. -?"-- .

' ·

..

. . • '

. ^{' '}

..7,•

.

^{'; .}

:

- '1'

• ' 0 •

'

\ .

-- -~

. I

~. . . .

- ·

. . . ^~

' .. ^~ . ,'•' ·. ^: ...

D 0

-~·

.

ca' • ' .

·, : ,I ' o

.

.

.. .. • ~ ,r

..

-

_. .

'' '

,

^. .

I ... · - .

-~--.

_ .,

. ,·,

..

..

.

^·'

. .

.

^{.. . ' ·~"} _·, '

·' . ..

. r A

.. ^{' .}

.

^{' .}

.. ,

.

^{. ....}

, · • r~· ·. 7. ·· : "

' .

...... . · . . , .. .

" . ^' ...

•, . ~ ~ .

. .: :' .. : . . :::·: '...-r_:_.~---~·, ^.'

. • · I

.

. ···' ·· ... -··

•.

J

I ·~

. .

• II . '

·'

^~

.

. ^{\ ' '}

I· _{I •}

'· TABLE OF-CONTENT~

.

.

v

^{· ··PAGE}

ABSTRACT

. ·

ⁱⁱ

1\CKNOWI... EDGEMENTS ~ . . .. · • • • • .

' . ~

. .

^{~ '..}

. ^{. .} . . .

: iv

' . p LIST OF TABlES ^{• ..!'}

...

^{.· . · viii}

erA

^{PTE~. . l}

I . . I NTRODUCTl ON ^.

. . . - . .

^•

.

^{J .•}

_{. .} . . . .

^.

^.

^{1 .}

, /

The Problem ^~ :.

- . . ^. . . . . .

^.

. . . .

. .

. . . . J

Nature of the p·roblem _{. , ..}

. ...

^'

. . . .

^.

. . . . . .

^{\ ' 1}

I .

.

^'

· .··

^~·

• I ~

'•'

Statement 'of the . Prob 1 em ·.' .

. . Slgriificance· of the .. Stu~y •. •.

...

^-

. .

^.

^.. . . . . .

._

. . .

^~

...

^_·

. . . . ..

^{\ . 2 ! .}

. 2'

. .

.

^'

· Defi nitipn· .of terms Used . · ... ·.

• I < •' ' • ' t

.· ^{I, •}

. . . .

^'

.

^.

. .

^.

. . .

^'

. .

_.4'1

< 0 I • • ' .I' • :. < o , ' '

: . .. . · ^,. l'1mita1iiorfs of study.· :· . . . .·.·.' .· . . .

,.

. . -. .. . ^: 5

I o •'• •

' \' ·. ·. .. · · .. Overview· Of.

T.he: .~ ^is

^{: .}

^{. :} ··.~·

^·.:,

:~ . .

5

Bas· ; t :

A·s~Limpt i 6.ns • • :-~ ; ·.• • .•

. . . . . .

^{.. '•}

.

, ^: . ^•. _{. I} 6

'•

I .

l . .

.

^{. .}

· · n . .

REV fEW

OF

RElATED LITERATURE· . .• :

. . . .

^t·

.

^'

. .

^{\ • • • .}

.

T'he ,tleneral' Problem of Tea~her ·workload

. . _{. .} .

^·•

_{. .} ' \ _{. .} ^~

^..

^:

r 1 • • 1

I I

Meas~r·irig Teache·r Workloa~ ..•

'i.

Reducing. Tea.cher_ Workload •.

~Review of' Selected Studiei •

. . .

^.

.

·~

II I. PROCEDURE . • • • •

. .

^-

^. .

^.

.

^'

. . . .

. Data Collection

.. .

I . . ' '

· .. I·nstrum(mt

. . .

^.

. . . . . .

^..

. . . . .

Samp 1 e • • • • • · . ^{I I Jt, I} Data· Analysis

. . .

^•

^.\. . .

^I

.

^{' •.}

. .

^o

.

. . ...

: . . \

.

.

•· .

'

z

7 ...

l6

21

23

36 36 36 36

3a

^I

Qo •

\

. ^'

.. ~ ..

• I.

"' ·

'o. ••

\ .

' . . .

. ^~ .

.. ·

.

^..

:t•

. .

(

~

/

"J.·

.. t

; ...

•' . ·

. . ..

_.

'

...

• I

.. ..

CHAPTER -

IV . . THE SEX AND MARITAL STATUS OF .THE TEACHER.

. AS A FACTOR IN TEACHER WORKLOAD . . . · .

. ^.

,Sunmary .. . . · . ; .. ~ .· . . .

· • V. THE. YEARS OF TRAINING. OF T H E TEACHER AS A, FACTOR . IN , TEACHER · woRKLOAD . .

· . Sw:nna·ry ·. . . . . · . . . . .-. . . . ·. ··- .

VI.· THE YEARS -OF EXPERIENCE OF THE . TEACHER

AS A'FACTOR IN TEACHrR WORKLOAD . . .

_ . · Summ~·r.Y . .. . . . . . . . • . . . . . -~

VII. THE SUBJECT FIELD OF · THE TEACHER AS A FACTOR IN TEACHER WORKLOAD

Surrma r~ .; . . . . . . · . . : ·. . .

' .

...

_'

^{. . .}

j'

.

^..

. .

.

_.

.

_: ^~

. . . . .

.

^..

.

^•.

, . . . ^'

VII

I.

THE ·SIZE · OF SCHOOL AS A FACTOR IN TEACHER WORKLOAD . .• : ... .

. .

·~

.

SUmnary . . . . . • . . . • . .' • . . •. ~ . . • . ~ ^{Q ...} "1" .. ·.~ ^{•• :-•• ,}

.• ^{c. • ·( ....}

IX. THE AVERAGE -NUMBER OF DAiLY STUDENT CONTACTS OF THE

_.

. . TEACHER AS A FACTOR IN TEACHER WORKLOAD .

•. :-

. . . .

• ' • • t ~ ~ .. '

Sunmary· ·. ·. . . • .. . .· .-·.. • • . . ...

.

^.

. .

vi

PAGE

40 58 64 82

86 105

157

. '.

176

.. X. TEACHER VIEWS TOWARD THE ACTUAL

TEAC~~R-

WORKLOAD- • . 181

fllum'ber of Hours for .Preparation .·.· • . . . · . . ..

Ain~un·t

^of

~ssign~d

r C1assroom· .instruction Time . . •

Number of 'Hours_ for Marki-~g . . Student~Teaoner. Ratio • ·· .. . Number· of ·Subjects Taught·'.

' .

-C~erjcal Work . ~- . • • . . ·

,

N~mber tif 'Hour.s for Supervision ·.

. . . . ...

- .. J '

Mental Fatigue and Exha~stion Facto~~ in Teaching Summary ...

.. ~-- -

. ... . .... ...

.. '·

' .. -·

.

.

· •

. . .

.

.

^.

.

' _J 182

184

185

187 188

189 '190.

·191

·193

\

.. ^'

.

·'

•,

.

^~·.

. '

.

. .

^~

. •Vll

· CHAPTER

a '

'·

\

PAGE

•'

'XI. TEACHER VIEWS CONCERNING A DESIRED TEACHER WORKLOAD . .

194

•

.

f,..l

.

^{· '}

I ,

I '

'· .

A Comparison of the Desirea Teacher Workload and the Actual Teacher Workload .•

Recommendations for Implementing the·

Desired .Teache·r Workload •.

~-

.•

' .

Responsibility Resting with the Local School

' ' j • '

. ·The

~qcal_

.School and Its _Potential for Control.

. ' ' ·\, , . I . , ' /- . -

Responsibility

Restin~· with

the School Board . Responsibility

Restingrwi~h

the Department

of

Educ~tion

• • • • . • • . . .

.r ,r • •

Responsibfl ity Resting· with · other

BQdi~_s

- .

. .

Sunmary . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . ..

·xll. A

COMPARISON OF THE FINDINGS OF THE

STUD~

.. . . . TO THE RELATED

LITE~TURE

• . •

"

. . . .

.

^.

. .

. 194 : ,. ::/ ..

l : \

.

^. . ^{~ .}

200 201 203

. . .

^{. . 204}

.

: 0

. .

^{205 .}

\

207 ^.,

. ... .

_\

I

208 ^I

. . . .

209

.

\

'

' 209

r;- . .

The Actual Teacher Workload ·

The Desired Teacher Workload

..

'

C'

I

. _.

^'

.

^{e • e A e}

Sumnary .. . . ; . . • . . . . . •. . . . . . . .

I .

· · \ .. XI II. · SUMMA~Y

AND

CO~CLUSIONS ^{'· •t • •}

, I .

!

J

\ ·~ ..

:.

^':

. l ^~ ' ·'

. The Problem ••

~

. ^{. .}

. Procedure . . :

Findings Regarding . The Actual Teacher Workload

I •

.. .

Findings Regarding The Desired Teache!

Workl~ad '

· Conclusions •• . . .

^{• • • • • • • • 1.}

' I '

Recolllllendations . . . .

. .

Pro~lems

for Further Study • . .

^~··

.

^~·

. . .

BIBLIOGRAPHY

APPE. NDIX

^{• • , • • • • IJ • • • •}

>

~ . _{I '}

216

222 . 223 -223

.

²²⁵

• . 225 227 229. ^I 230 .

•. 232

• 234

,

• 238,

•'

' ^'·

~ ' I , .

',. ' ·' . . f

.. I I

·, .

. ^'

' • • t•

....

' t

. ^,

. , .

.. ^•

. I

....

TABLE

"

^.

"' ^" .

,

". ' . 'I\ ' .

L COMPARISON OF INSTRUMENTS FOR THE

. MEASUREMENT OF TEACHER WORKLOAD •

. . . .

II.

~~~~tAL

WORKLOAD IN HOURS .. FOR . . . . ·~~· VARIOUS TIME INTERVALS .; .. • • • II.J. A COMPARISON OF. THE TEACHER WORKLOAD .

OF VARIOUS STUD.IES _. •· . • •• .'-. : .

" .

IV. EVALUATION OF TEACHING LOAD AS RELATED TO'AVERAGE NUMBER OF PUPILS TAUGHT DAIL~ .' • • • • ·'· • • • V. A COMPARISON OF THE ACTUAL WORKLOAD AND DESIRED '

WORKLOAD AS RECOMMENDED

BY

^{TEACHERS. AND}

PRINCIPALS . • • • • ·~ • • •. •• • • · •• · •• '· •.•

V1 •. THE SEX AND MARITAL STATUS OF: A SAMPLE OF 200 NEWFOUNDLAND CENTRAL AND REG10NAL HIGH · SCHOOL TEACHERS • • ~. • • • -~ • • • • • • •

. .

·VII, THE SEX ANO MARITAL STATUS OFT E TEACHER AND THE

I}

' J

viii ..

<"!'

., . r '

·'·

\ ^"

-PAGE

' "'

18

25·

27

;

32 ....

":

35 ^I

4_1

'· "

NUMBER OF HOUR·s DEVOTED TO C SSROOM INSTRUCTION 42' 'P'.

VIii. THE SEX AND .MARITAL STATUS.OF .HE.TEACHER AND THE NUMBER ·oF HOURS DEVOTED TO THE PREPARATION-OF · LESSONS AND MATERIALS • _{I , .} '. • • . • • _, . • • • • • • _. • •

. .

IX. THE SEX AND MARITAL STATUS OF THE TEACHER AND THE NUMBER OF HOURS DEYOTED TO MARKING • • • • • . • • •

44 . 46:·.

( J

X. THE SEX AND MARITAL STATUS OF THE TEACHER AND THE · · .~>

NUMBER .OF HOURS DEVOTED· TO STAFF AND .

" 1

DEPARTMEN~AL MEETINGS • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ·48 XI. THE SEX AND' MARITAL STATUS OF THE TEACHER AND THE ·

. · . NUMBER OF HOURS DEVOTED TO EXTRA-CURRICULAR · .

ACTIVITIES ~ • • • ~ . ~ • • • • • • • • • • • • . • . •. 49 . 'XII. THE SEX. AND MARITAL STATUS OF -THE TEACHER AND THE

'NUMBER OF HOURS DEVOTED TO SUPERVISION • • • • .•. ~ ~ 52

XJIL . THE SEX AND MARITAL STATUS OF THE TEACHER AND THE NUMBER OF HOURS DEVOTED TO· CLERICAl WORK· • • • ~ •

n .

· XIV. THE SEX AND W\RITAL STATUS· OF THE'·TfAtlfiER AND THE . . ~UMBER ·oF HOURS DEVOTED TO MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVlTIE~

. r:ll

- ·

^{.,. , .'> ..}

,.

53 '

54

{'

{

' . ^' . ...

•·

. . . . ^.~

~ . . .: ~

I .

' '

-

^{,; ·• ~}

.... "

. ^,

i _{. )} ' .

.... . '

... -

\ ·.

'

. .

. .

...,_..

_{. .}

_'

.. ^'

' t ^{', ;}

.

. ··~.

.... .

ix · .

: r

' .•

TABLE

' ... ^:

. PAGE. ... ^{· . . ,} . .

. .

..

^'

. XV ^o THE SEX AND. MARITAL STATUS OF THE TEACHER AND THE

.

. .

,· .. ^:

·NUMBER OF ·HOURS DEVOTED TO TOTAL TEACHING .. ' ACTIVITIES ^{o • • \ • • •} • • • • • • •• • .' • • • • • • •

. . . ^'

. XVI. SUMMARY OF THE SIGNIFICANT DJFFERENCES BETWEEN .THE . r

NUMBER OF HOURS DEVOTED TO THE VARIOUS TEACHING · ..

ACTIVIT! ES BY TEACHERS ACCORDING TO SEX AND :. .

.

^'

· MARITAL STATUS AND ALL·.OTHER; TEACHERS FOR A·

. FIVE-DAY WEEK • •.·· •. ^{o • • •o • • • • •} ~ ^{• • •. •• • •} ~

xvr

^{r 0 suMMARY}

oF

THE SIGNIFICANT. DIFFERENCES BETWE'EN

niE ~

.NUMBER OF HOURS. DEVOTED

' TO

T.HE VARIOUS TEACHING · . ACTIVIT! ES BV; TEACHERS ACCORIHNG TO SEX "AND

MARITAL _STATUS AND ALL OTHER. TEACHERS FOR A , . TWO-DAY WEEKEND • • • • • • • • • •. • . • • • • _ • •• • •

' • • ' • I ' ' ., L

. ' .

·: . XVII I. .. SUMMARY OF THt SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE

~~~~~T~~SH~~R~E~~~~~~D A~~O~~iN~A~~O~~X T~~~tfiNG

^·

. MARITAL·· STATUS AND ALL OTHER TEACHERS FOR ·A . . SEVEN-DAY WEEK _.. • ^{o • • • • • • • • • •• , • • :: • • •}

~ . ^'

~'Ix. THE' YEARS OF TRAINING OF. A SAMPLE. OF 199 ...

-NEWFOUNDLAND CENTRAL AND· REGIONAL H.IGH 'SCHOOL .

61 . ^'

. 62

63

. ·TEACHERS • ~ • • ^{o • • • • . • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • •} 65

. ^'

XX. THE YEARS, OF TRAINING OF THE TEACHER AND THE . NUMBER OF HOfJRS DEVOTED TO CLASSROOM

INSTRUCTiON • • • • • • ~ • • • : • • • • .• · • 66 · .· XXI. THE YEARS OF TRAINING OF THE TEACHER. AND THE·

NUMBER OF HOURS DEVOTED TO THE PREPARATION · . ·•

OF LESSONS AND

.

·MATERIAL.$

^-

• ~ • • • • • • • ·• .'- • ".. • . 68 XXI I. THE .YEARS OF TRAINING OF THE TEACHER AND THE .

NUMBER OF HOURS DEVOTED TO MARKING • • •

..

'. • XXIII. THE YEARS OF TRAINING OF" THE TEACHER AND THE ·

NUMBER OF HOURS DEVOTED . TO STAFF AND . DEPARTMENTAL· MEETINGS • • • • • •.••. ·• • • •

I . • • ^{/ ' 0}

X~IV ~ · THE YEARS OF TRAINING OF THE TEACHER AND THE NUMBER OF "HOURS 'DEVOTED TO. EXTRA-CURRICULAR

· ,! · - , ACTlVITIE.S . . . • . · . ." . . . . . . ~

. . . .

, ./' • .' r ,

XXV. . THE YEARS OF TRAINING OF THE TEACHER AND iHE .

70 .

73 ·:

NUMBER OF HOURS DEVOTED· TO SUPERVISION • • ·• :. . :· 75 · . _ . ' -XXIV. THE YEARS OF· TRAiNING OF .THE TEACHER .AND THE . . .

NUMBER OF HOURS -DEVOTED TO CLERICAL WORK . • • · ~ • . • · " : 77 . . ·

• 1.! ...

. ·-:"-/ .

.

^{. . J.}

...

.

0

0 •

....

' .... :6.

·

.

..

^{' ..}

^.

~ ! ' ~ : .

' . ' . . ..

'

\ . •,, . . ^{•' ' .}

. I .

•"J

.·-·. ^•', :. ··· .

l . .. •. f

4 •

...

\'

. '·

" ~'11) ' ^I

li' .

' ..

)

..

^/

l

•

••

⁰

,,. I

, . ^{· ..}

^{. ?< .}

·. ~LE

. .., . \xxvi

^I.

PAGE

c .

I

THE YfARS OF TRAINING OF .THE TEACHER AND THE'· . NUMBER OF·-HOURS DEVOTED TO MISCELLANEOUS/~

ACTIVITIES •• ·• • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • XXVI II. THE YEARS OF TRAINING OF THE TEACHi;R AND THE '

NUMBER. OF Hm~RS DEVOTED TO TOTAL TEACHING-

ACTIVITIES " •• , • • • • • • • • . • •. • • • •

. .

XXIX·. ··SUMMARY OF THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BET~EEN THE · NllMBER OF HOURS DEVOTED-TO VARIOUS TEACHf'NG

ACTIVITIES BY TEACHERS ACCORDING TO YEARS OF

·TRAINING AND.-ALL OTHER TEACHERS FOR A FIVE-DAYo

79

81

. WEEK • • • • . • • • • • • • .• · • .• • •. • • • • 83' XXX.- SUMMARY OF THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE

· NUMBER OF HOURS DEVOTED TQ, VARIO~ TEACHING

. ACTIVITIES BY TEACHE~~~CORDING ft} YEARS OF

TRAINING AND ALL OTHEJ T~ACHERS FOR A TWO-DAY.

WEEKEND • • • • . • • • . ~ ... ;.--· • • • . • : • . • : • • • •

84

~ . ~

XXXI. SUMMARY OF THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE~ ^{/ /}

· · NUMBER OFo .HOURS DEVOTED TO VARIOUS TEACHING. · "'- /

. ·ACTIVITIES BY.TEACHERS ACCORDING TO.YEARS·OF /___/.

. TRAINING ANO ALL OTHER T~CHERS F_OR A SEVEN- / /···

.. / . DAY WEEK· ; • • • • • • • • • • · • •· • • • ·• • / _ __.- • 85

. . . . - ,/

.~ ·~..:. .. . . . ^{/ ... '}

· XXXII~ THE'-YEARS OF .EXPERIENCE OF A SAMPLE OF 19-r

. NEWF:OUNDLAND C.ENTRAL AND REGIONAL HIGH

SCHOOL TEACHERS • • t • • :· • • • • • • • • •

XXX.!' I I • THE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE OF THE TEACHER

AND

THE .

. NUMBER OF HOURS DEVOTED TO CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION • 88 XXXIV.· THE :YEARS OF EXPERIENCE OF THE TEACHER AND THE

. NUMBER OF HOURS DEVOTED. TO THE PREPARATION OF LESSONS 'AND MATERIALS( • • • • • • • • • • XXxv· •. · THE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE OF THE TEACHER AND . THE

NUMBER OF HOURS DEVOTED· .. TO MARKING • . • • • •

...

XXXVI. THE YEARS OF EXPERI-ENCE OF THE TEACHER AND THE .NUMBER OF HOURS DEVOTED TO STAFF AND .

. DEPARTMENTAL· MEET.I.NGS •· • ·... • ~ • • • • • • • XXXVII._

NUMBER OF HOURS DEVOTED TO E TRA-CURRICULAR

. .

^~·

THE ·YEARS OF .. EXPER.IE.NCE OF TH~EACHER AND THE . ACTIV-ITIES • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ~. ·•

· XXXVIU.-

.. \l•

. · r

. . .

-THE YEARS OFNUMBER OF. HOURS DEVOTED TO SUPERVIS10N · EXPERl'ENCE OF TH

TEACHER~

^{AND THE}

'

I

I I

I

90 ....

92

95

. 96

98

·'

·~

,

' o " I

' : .. ..

1\

...

'

v

,{

',[

•'

.

.

1 ••

. ^\•

'

^{. .} _· ..

: I ,. .

. .

( .

· ·xr ^{t .}

' .,, . ·'

..

'

.

^'

TABLE ~AG.E

.

.

XXXIX • . THE .YEARS OF ,EXPERIENCE OF THE TEACHER-AND THE .· ' -.NUMBER OF.. HOURS DEVOTED TO CLERICAL WORK • _ ••• • • .. 99

.

^'

XL. THE YEARS OF . EXPERIENCE OF THE TEACHER AND THE· · .

· NUMgER OF HOURS DEVOTED TO MISCELLANEOUS

A~IVITIES •• ·•· • • • .v • •· • • : .• • • • • • ; . 101

,.

^{' '}

• •

, .,

4

"' . . . _.

^'

• • " ·-1 ""-::- • \ • . . , • •

r· . ·XLI. THE .YEARS OF EXPERIENCE OF THE TEACHER AND THE· . . . NUMBER OF HOURS DEVOTED TO TOTAL TEACHI~G ACT.IVITI_E~: 1 03

. \ ^{. .}

. • - . !( .

SUMMARY OF THE SIGNLFICANT DIFFERE~CES BETWEEN

· THE NUMBER OF~ HOURS DEVOTED TO THE' VARIOUS · ·· t XLII:

.~

TEACHING ~CTIVITIES BY TEACHERS ACCORDING TO

· YEARS .OrtXPERIE~CE AND ALL OTHER TEACHERS ~ . ; · ., FOR A!fiVE·-DAY WEEK • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 106

,,

.XLI II .• SUMM~RY OF'THE SI~IFlCANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN · . . THE NUMBER OF H RS DEVOTED TO THE VARIOUS .. ·

TEACHING·ACTIVI IES BY TEACHERS ACCORDING TO

YEARS-OF EXPERI CE· AN~ A~~ 9THER 1EACHERS · FOR A TWO-DAY WE KENO • • • • • • • • • , • • • _.

.

· ••

XLIV. ·SUMMARY OF THE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ^o.

THE' NUMBER OF HOURS DEVOTED TO 'THE VARIOUS' . TE~CHING ACTIVITIES eY TEACHERS ACCORDING TO · . ' YEARS OF EXPERIENCE AND ALL OTHER TEACHERS . •

· F~A SEVEN-DAY WEEK •• ' • • ., • •. : • .• . •

I

XLV •. THE SUBJECT FiELD OF A SAMPLE OF 200 NEWFOUNDLAND

f.· /

CENTRAL AND REG,IONAL HIGH SCHOOL T.EACH~S • • •

• ( I '

XLVI.- THE SUBJECT FIELD OF. THE TE~CHER AND THE NUMBER

;OF HOURS DEVOTED TO CLASS~OOM INSTRUCTION • • . • • ..•

.

. .

XLVII. THE SUBJECT FIELD OF THE TE~CHER AND THE NUMBER ,

• I

· OF HOURS DEVOTED TO THE PREPARAII ON OF

LESSONS AND MATERIALS • • • • • , • • • • •

" . - • 0

XCVIII. THE. SUBJECT FIELD OF THE TEACHER AND THE NUMBER · OF._ :H9URS. DEVOTED- TO MARKING • • • • • • • • . • • XLIX. THE ·SUBJECT FIELO OF THE TEACHER AND THE NUMBER. · .•

~ OF HOURS DEVOTED TO STAFF AND DEPARTMENTAL ~

r

• 107 (I t;lo

.108 .

f.

l12

114

_!·

MEET! NGS . • • • • _~. • • • • • • • • _~ • • • • • • • 11 9

f • •• (} •

L. THE SUBdECT FIELD OF·THE TEACHER AND JHE NUMBER

. OF HOURS DEVOTED TO· EXT~CURRICU~~k -~~T~VITIES

7

^{_.~ _121}

~I.

^THE· SUBJECT FIELD OF THEtTEACHER AND THE NUMBER OF .

'I

.

^'

HOURS DEVOTED TO ^I SUPERYISI6N . • • • • • .... . ·• • • ' 1_2~- ~ ..

I

. .

.0 .

.

.

<J .

.

^.

. ..

\ •' . . ...

·.

...

..o I

·'

..

,,

.

' .

.

. ^.

,

..

• •' ·,.;I'. ^'I

..