A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
M. S. A. C. C ASTILLA V INICIO M OAURO P IERO N EGRINI
W ALDYR M UNIZ O LIVA
The four positive vortices problem : regions of chaotic behavior and the non-integrability
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 59, n
o1 (1993), p. 99-115
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1993__59_1_99_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1993, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
p. 99-1
The four positive vortices problem: regions of chaotic
behavior and the non-integrability (*)
M. S. A. C. CASTILLA
Vinicio MOAURO
Piero NEGRINI
Waldyr
Muniz OLIVA Departamento deMatematica,
Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brasil
Dipartimento di Matematica, Universita di Trento, Italy
Dipartimento di Matematica, Universita de L’Aquila, Italy
Departamento de Matematica Aplicada,
Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brasil.
Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré,
Vol. 59, n° 1, 1993, Physique théorique
ABSTRACT. - We consider the
problem
of theplanar
motion of fourpoint
vortices with intensities(1,1,1, E),
in a Eulerianincompressible fluid,
as a
perturbation
of theproblem
of three unit vortices. Theunperturbed problem
is reduced to aplanar
autonomous Hamiltonian system which admits saddle connections. For s > 0 andsufficiently small,
we alsoreduce,
in a
neighborhood
of the above saddleconnections,
theproblem
to aplanar
Hamiltonian system, which is nolonger
autonomous butperiodi- cally
timedependent.
ThePoincaré-map
of theperturbed problem
presents transversal intersections between stable and unstable manifolds of two(*) Work performed under the auspices of the Italian Council of Research (C.N.R.), the
Italian Ministry of the University and the Scientific and Technological Research (M.U.R.S.T.), the project BID-USP and the FAPESP (proc. 90/3918-5).
--
"
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique - 024fi-0211 1 Vol. 59/93/01/$4.00/B Gauthier-Villars
100 M. S. A. C. CASTILLA et al.
hyperbolic points;
thisimplies
that there are newregions
of chaoticbehavior,
different from the onespreviously
foundby Ziglin.
Inparticular
our result
yields
a newproof
of thenon-analytic integrability
of the fourpositive
vorticesproblem.
RESUME. 2014 Nous considérons le
problème
du mouvementplan
de quatre vortices avec intensités( 1,1,1, E),
dans un fluideparfait incompressible,
comme une
perturbation
duproblème
de trois vortices unitaires. Le pro- bleme nonperturbé
est réduit a unsystème
Hamiltonian autonomeplan qui
a des connections de selles. Pour E > 0 suffisammentpetit,
dans unvoisinage
de cesconnections,
leproblème complet
peut être aussi réduit aun
système
Hamiltonianplan qui
toutefois n’est pas autonome maispériodique
par rapport autemps.
La transformation de Poincaré duproblème perturbé
a des intersections transversales de variétés stable et instable depoints hyperboliques;
cela entraine l’existence deregions
decomportement
chaotique
different de laregion
obtenueprécédemment
parZiglin.
Enparticulier
notre résultat fournit une preuve nouvelle de la nonintégrabilité analytique
duproblème
des quatre vortices avec intensitéspositives.
1. INTRODUCTION AND THE GENERAL PROBLEM OF N VORTICES
Many
detailedpresentations
about theplanar
vortex model in fluidmechanics are available in the literature. We refer the reader to Chorin and Marsden
[C-M],
Marchioro and Pulvirenti[M-P]
and also to[01].
In the
present
paper we aredealing
with the vortex model in R2(that is,
with noboundary).
Thevorticity
is assumed to be concentrated in Npoint-vortices,
...,N,
and have constant inten- sities(circulations) Ki, ... , KN, respectively.
Thevelocity
atx = (x,
due tothe j-th
vortex isgiven by
provided
that weignore
the other vortices. When all the vortices are Nmoving, they produce
atx
thevelocity
fieldu (x, t) _ ~ uJ (x, t).
Each;
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
101
THE FOUR POSITIVE VORTICES PROBLEM
vortex
ought
to move as it was carriedby
the netvelocity
field ofthe other
vortices,
that is each ...,N,
movesaccording
to theequations
or,
equivalently,
fori, j =1,
..., N:Because of the
symmetries
of the functionH,
system( 1.1 )
above has the four firstintegrals
The construction of the
velocity
fieldt) produces
formal solutions of the Euler’sequation
in R2 and has the property that the classical circulation theorems are satisfied(see
op. cit.above).
The
general problem
of N vortices( 1.1 )
is defined in an open and dense set ofR2N,
since(collisions
of vortices are notallowed )
andbecomes a Hamiltonian system
presenting
three firstintegrals independent
N
and in involution with ’ respect to the
symplectic
2-form Adya,
M=l
where the canonical coordinates
(x~, y~
aregiven by:
Indeed,
as was observedby
Aref andPomphrey [A-P],
where { , }
denotes the Poisson bracket.Therefore,
the vortex system for N = 3 is Liouvilleanalytically integrable.
The motion of three vortices wascompletely analysed by Synge [Sy].
In the case of
positive
intensities >0,
a =1,
...,N)
all the solutions in thephase
space are bounded(since 14
= Const. defines a compactset)
and defined for all time
(since
H =Const.);
inparticular,
when N = 2 or 3the
phase
space hasregions
foliatedby
invariant tori.Using carefully
KAM
theory,
Khanin[K]
showed that in thephase
space of any system with anarbitrary
number of vortices there exists a set ofinitial
conditionsof
positive
measure for which the motions of vortices arequasi-periodic.
Vol. 59, n° 1-1993.
102 M. S. A. C. CASTILLA et al.
On the other
side, Ziglin [Z]
considered the restrictedproblem
of fourvortices,
thatis,
three unit vortices and a fourth vortex with zerointensity (that is,
asimple particle
offluid).
Let a;, i =1, 2,
3 be the sides of thetriangle
determinedby
the three unitvortices,
andAi, i =1, 2, 3,
be theiropposite angles.
Then the relativeproblem
of the three vortices has thefollowing equations
derived from( 1.1 ):
System (1. 2)
admits twoindependent
firstintegrals:
andai + a2 + a3 = c2. Substituting a3=c31
into(1. 2) Ziglin
obtained theal a2
system
~=F(~,~), ~=(~1,~
with a center that corre-sponds
to anequilateral triangular configuration; then,
he took theperiodic
solutions close to thiselliptical
fixedpoint
which aregiven by
aone-parameter family
ofperiodic functions; choosing properly
a smallparameter
v for thisfamily,
he substituted theseperiodic
functions into the twoequations
of motion of the fourth vortex. In this way he obtaineda
periodically
timedependent
Hamiltonian systemwhere F = F
(~
11, T,v) = F 0 (ç, 11) + v F 1 (ç,
11,’t) +
... Theunperturbed
Hamiltonian
system (v = 0)
is definedby Fo (~, 11)
and thecorresponding phase portrait
has ahyperbolic
homoclinic fixedpoint.
As usual(see
Holmes
[H]),
for it is necessary to examine system( 1. 3)
in theextended
phase space {!;,
~, ’t(mod 21t)}
and consider the Poincaré map of theplane {r (mod 21t) =
toitself, given by
thecylindrical phase-
flow.
If,
for the homo clinic orbit of thathyperbolic
fixedpoint splits
into the unstable and the stable manifolds which intersect
transversally
ina
(nondegenerate)
homoclinicpoint,
then theperturbed
system presents a chaotic behavior(see
Moser[Mo]
and Smale[S])
since a horseshoe appears;in
particular,
no domaincontaining
the closure of thetrajectory
of thathomoclinic
point
admits ananalytic
firstintegral.
The existence of suchnondegenerate
homoclinicpoint
isassured,
if the so-called Melnikov[M]
integral
has asimple
zero.Ziglin
reduced theproof
of this condition to thenonvanishing
of animproper integral
and he succeeded inshowing this, by evaluating
theintegral by
computer. In[K] (appendix), Ziglin, by
Annales de I’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
THE FOUR POSITIVE VORTICES PROBLEM 103
using only continuity arguments,
extended theprevious non-integrability
result to the
problem
of four-vortices withpositive
intensities(K1, K2, K3, K4) sufficiently
close to the intensities(1, 1, 1,0)
of the restrictedcase.
Many
discussionsappeared,
afterZiglin
result waspublished,
but noother
proof
waspresented.
We decided to come backagain
to thequestion
of the chaotic behaviour and the
non-integrability
of the four vorticesproblem.
Ourapproach
is to consider theproblem
of four vortices with intensities(1, 1, 1, E)
as aperturbation
of theproblem
of motion of three unit vortices. This lastproblem
admits saddleconnections,
and we reduceit,
in aneighborhood
of a saddleconnection,
to theintegration
of aplanar
Hamiltonian autonomous system. For 8>0 small
enough,
we also reduce theproblem
of the four vortices with intensities( 1, 1, 1, E)
to aplanar
Hamiltonian system, which is no more autonomous but
periodically
timedependent.
The Poincaré map related to this system has still two saddlepoints;
the existence of a transversal intersection of the stable manifold of the first one with the unstable manifold of the other one isproved (by using
the Melnikovmethod) by showing
that a certainintegral
is different from zero. Thisintegral
has been evaluatedby
numerical methods and the accuracy of the result is assuredby
the boundedness of theintegrand
function. Our result still
implies
that there are newregions
of chaoticbehavior in the
problem
of four vortices withpositive
intensities( 1, 1, 1, E) and,
inparticular, gives
anotherproof
to theanalytic non-integrability.
In
[02]
one of the authors of thepresent
paperreproduced
the contentof a survey talk which dealed
briefly
with thesubject
of this paper,by
that time in
preparation.
In
[K-C],
Koiller and Carvalhopresented
ananalytical proof
of thenon-integrability
of the four vorticesproblem,
but in the case of twoopposite
strong vortices and two advected weak ones.2. THE CASE OF FOUR VORTICES WITH POSITIVE INTENSITIES AND THE INTEGRABLE CASE
OF THREE VORTICES
2.1. Let us consider three vortices
i =1, 2, 3,
with unit intensities and a vortex?4.=(~, y4)
withintensity
s > 0. LetMo
andM 1
be the center of mass of
P1 P2 P3 P4
andP1 P2 Ps, respectively (the
massesare the intensities of the
vortices).
Then thefollowing equalities
hold:Vol. 59, n° 1-1993.
104
and in
particular
Using
theseequalities,
one caneasily
get:Let us set:
and let us determine
positive
numbers ’11, a,P,
y, such that the transforma-tion which takes ((x1, y1), (x2, y2), (x3, y3), ~(x4, y4))
into y0,p1,
~
~2~82,
~3’93)
is a canonical one.Then,
onenecessarily
has:and the transformation is
given by:
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
THE FOUR POSITIVE VORTICES PROBLEN 105
If one makes
s = 0,
we haveM1 =Mo,
and thetransformation
above isreduced to the canonical transformation which takes xo, yo,
Pi’ 01, P2’ 0~
to the cartesian coordinates of the three vortices
Pi, P2, P3
and to thetransformation
The Hamiltonian function H of the
system
isgiven by:
Ho being
the Hamiltonian function of the three unit vorticesproblem.
2.2. The squares of the distances between the three vortices will be
expressed
in the new coordinates as follows:Therefore:
We remark that:
(a) Ho
does notdepend
on xo, yo and therefore xo and yo are firstintegrals
of the three vorticesproblem;
(b) Ho depends
on81
and0~ by
their differenceonly; consequently
Pi + p2
is a firstintegral
of the system of three vortices.Vol. 59, n" 1-1993.
106 M. S. A. C. CASTILLA et al.
Let
(pi
ql, p2,qz)
be new coordinates definedby
the canonical transformation:The Hamiltonian function of the three unit vortices is
expressed
in thenew coordinates
by:
and the
equations
of the motion of three vortices are written as:By defining
V as:and
introducing
the new time:[Ho
is constantalong
the solutions of(2 . 2)],
system(2.2)
turns into:Due to the definition of
51, P2
and to(2 .1 ),
we will consider the function V restricted to the set:Annales de l’Insritut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
107
THE FOUR POSITIVE VORTICES PROBLEM
3. THE REDUCTION OF THE THREE UNIT VORTICES PROBLEM TO A PLANAR HAMILTONIAN SYSTEM As p2 is constant
along
the solutions of(2. 3),
theintegration
of system(2. 3)
isequivalent
to theintegration
of thesystem:
with j positive parameter.
The criticalpoints
of(3 .1 ), satisfying
0 ~,are:
(I) = 0 equilateral triangle configurations;
(II)
P1- 3 ~~ sinQ1
= 0 collisions ofP~
andP 3
orP 1
andP~;
4
(III) ~1= -~,
sin ql = 0 collinearconfigurations P 1 P 2 P 3
orP 3 P 1 P 2;
4
The
points (I)
and(II)
are centers and thepoints (III)
are saddles. The function V assumes thevalue 2014 ~
at thepositions (III). Therefore,
thesaddle connections are on the energy level V ql,
1.1) = - ~,3.
As wehave:
the curve:
is a saddle connection of
(3.1)
contained in the set(2.4).
Thephase portrait
of(3 .1)
is illustrated in thepicture (see
p.108).
Now,
we are interested inconsidering
the solutions of(2.3) belonging
to a
preassigned
energy level:V(~i~i~2)=-~0. (3 . 3)
Equation (3 . 3)
can beexplicitely
solved with respect to p2 and we have:Vol. 59, n° 1-1993.
108 M. S. A. C. CASTILLA et al.
with the
right
hand side defined for0/~~.
The branch of(3.4) containing
the curve(3 . 2)
is:As,
in aneighborhood
of theseparatrix (3.2),
we have2014~0,
thesolutions of
(2.3)
whichsatisfy (3.3)
and whose orbits are near~2
to(3.2)
can be
parametrized by
meansof q2
andsatisfy (3.5)
and the system:The solution of
(3.6), having
as orbit the curve(3.2),
is obtainedby integrating
theequation:
Annales de /’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
THE FOUR POSITIVE VORTICES PROBLEM 109
We have:
Let us set:
then we have:
with
and
We observe that
F ( - x) = (F (jc)) ~, and, therefore s ( - x) = - s (x) .
Vol. 59, n° 1-1993.
110
~
M. S. A. C. CASTILLA et al.
4. NEW REGIONS OF CHAOTIC BEHAVIOUR IN THE PROBLEM OF FOUR VORTICES
Let us consider the Hamiltonian function of the four vortices as function of the coordinates
(pi, 91; P2’ 82; p3, 93):
with :
It is easy to check that:
with
A,
B and C defined as follows:Now it is
possible
to evaluateri4 . r34,
and one obtains:with
~1
and~2
definedby:
Annales de 1’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
THE FOUR POSITIVE VORTICES PROBLEM 111
Let us denote the
product E3~2 P2.
We have:By
means of the canonical transformation:the Hamiltonian
function
H turns into:where W is defined
by:
with and cr
(s) expressed by
means of the new coordinates. Inparticular:
The function W is defined for p3 > p2, it is
2 n-periodic
in q2 and it isindependent
of q3. We have:By using
the new time T definedby:
Vol. 59, n° 1-1993.
112 M. S. A. C. CASTILLA et al.
the
equations
of motion are written as:System (4 .1 )
has the two firstintegrals:
p3=Const.
W (Pi’
ql, p2, q2, p3,E) =
Const.As,
for a fixed>0,(~W ~p2)
_
= ~0
alon g
the cu r ve(3 . 2),
then theequation:
is solvable with respect to p2 for
~>0, 8>0,
Esmall,
and in a suitableneighborhood
of the curve(3.2).
We can assume that the solution of(4. 2)
takes its values in{p2:| p2- |03B1 2},
and it can be written as:where x
is 2~-periodic
in q2. As(4 . 3)
solves(4 . 2),
we get:and:
The solutions of
(4.1),
which are near to the curve(3 .2)
and in the energy level(4.2), satisfy
the system:Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
THE FOUR POSITIVE VORTICES PROBLEM 113
System (4.6)
reduces to system(3.6),
which describes the motion of three unitvortices,
if we make E = o.The Melnikov
integral (see [M]
and[H]),
related with the solution of(3.6), having
as orbit the saddle connection(3 . 2),
and theperturbed
system
(4.6)
is written as:where
represent
the solution of(3 . 6),
defined
by (3 . 2)
and(3. 7)
with xo =0,
that is:with ql == x + 7~/2 and s (x)
definedby (3 . 9).
Let us denote the
pair (pl, ql) by
z; then one has:with
z=~, 0B ?=~, A By (4.4)
and(4.5),
it follows that:B4 / B4 /
where
Vol. 59, n° 1-1993.
114 M. S. A. C. CASTILLA et al.
Along
the motion(4. 7)
one hasho
q1,J.1)
= J.1, and therefore:with
Now fix a
= 1.
Then one has:2
Finally, by grouping
the factors of sin2 q2
and cos 2q2,
we have:Annales de I’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
THE FOUR POSITIVE VORTICES PROBLEM 115
To
have,
for 8>0small,
a transversal intersection of a stable manifold with an unstablemanifold,
it is sufficient that11
sin 2q2
+I2
cos 2q2
has asimple
zero,and,
forthis,
it isenough
to check thatI 1
~ 0. We have:The value
of 11
has been determinedby
computer and it was shown to be non zero. The boundedness of theintegrand
function in11 gives
to theresult the necessary accuracy.
Indeed,
the value obtained for1~
was 0.2621with an error of the order
10 - 4.
REFERENCES
[A - P] H. AREF and N. POMPHREY, Integrable and chaotic Motions of Four Vortices I.
The Case of Identical Vortices, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, Vol. 380, 1982,
pp. 359-387.
[C-M] A. J. CHORIN and J. E. MARSDEN, A Mathematical Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, Springer Verlag, 1979.
[H] P. J. HOLMES, Averaging and Chaotic Motions in Forced Oscillations, S.I.A.M. J.
Appl. Math., Vol. 38, 1, 1980, pp. 65-79. Errata, Vol. 40, 1, 1981, pp. 167-168.
[K] K. M. KHANIN, Quasi-Periodic Motions on Vortex Systems, Physics, Vol. 4D, 1982, pp. 261-269.
[K-C] J. KOILLER and S. CARVALHO, Non-Integrability of the 4-Vortex System, Analytical Proof, Comm. Math. Phys., Vol. 120, 1989, pp. 643-652.
[M-C] C. MARCHIORO and M. PULVIRENTI, Vortex Methods in Two Dimensional Fluid Dynamics, Edizioni Klim, Roma, 1983.
[M] V. K. MELNIKOV, On the Stability of the Center for Time-Periodic Perturbations, Trans. Moscow Math. Soc., Vol. 12, 1, 1963, pp. 1-57.
[Mo] J. MOSER, Stable and Random Motions in Dynamical Systems, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton N.J., Univ. of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1973.
[O1] W. M. OLIVA, Integrability Problems in Hamiltonian Systems, Ravello (Italy), XVI
Summer School on Mathematical Physics, 1991.
[O2] W. M. OLIVA, On the chaotic behaviour and non integrability of the four vortices
problems, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, Vol. 55, 21, 1991, pp. 707-718.
[S] S. SMALE, The Mathematics of Time. Essays on Dynamical Systems. Economic Process and Related Topics, Springer-Verlag, 1980.
[Sy] J. L. SYNGE, On the Motion of Three Vortices, Can. Journal of Math., Vol. 1, 1949, pp. 257-270.
[Z] S. L. ZIGLIN, Non Integrability of a Problem on the Motion of Four Point Vortices, Soviet. Math. Dokl., Vol. 21, 1, 1980, pp. 296-299.
( Manuscript received April 15, 1992.)
Vol. 59, n° 1-1993.