A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
J. L. R ICHARD
Possible derivation of some SO(p, q) group
representations by means of a canonical realization of the SO(p, q) Lie algebra
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 8, n
o3 (1968), p. 301-309
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1968__8_3_301_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1968, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
301
Possible derivation
of
someSO(p, q) group representations by
meansof
acanonical realization
of the SO(p, q) lie algebra
J.
L. RICHARD(Centre de Physique Théorique C. N. R. S., Marseille).
Vol. VIII, nO 3, 1968, Physique théorique.
ABSTRACT.
- Starting
from the usual realization of theinhomogeneous SO(p - 1, q - 1) algebra
in terms ofquantum
mechanicaloperators,
we
get
a realization of theSO(p, q) algebra by introducing supplementary
variables and
arbitrary parameters.
In this way we show how we can derive somerepresentations
of theSO(p, q)
group(pq ~ 0).
SOMMAIRE. - En
partant
de la realisation habituelle del’algèbre
de Liedu groupe
inhomogene 1, q - 1)
ecrite en termesd’operateurs
de la
mecanique quantique,
nous obtenons une realisation del’algèbre
deLie des groupes de rotation non
compacts SO(p, q)
par addition de constantes arbitraires et de variablescanoniques supplémentaires.
Nous montronsalors comment on
peut
deduire de cettefaçon
certainesrepresentations
des groupes
q) ~ 5~ 0).
I. - INTRODUCTION
In this note, we
investigate
a realization of the Liealgebra
of the non-compact
rotation groupsSO(p, n - p) (n
>p, p # 0)
in terms of quantum mechanicaloperators. Writing
the elements of theinhomogeneous
302 J. L. RICHARD
SO(p - 1,
n - p -1) subalgebra
as functions of the canonicalvariables xi
and p;
(i
=1, 2,
..., n -2),
we could express all theSO(p,
n -p)
gene- rators in terms of thex;’s
andp;’s.
But in this way we deriveonly
somerepresentations
ofSO(p,
n -p). Indeed,
if we want toget
all theunitary
irreducible ones, we know
[1]
that theSO(p,
n -p)
Liealgebra
must beexpressed
withpairs
ofconjugate
variables and[n/2] arbitrary parameters [2]
so thatin the
general
case we have to use, in addition to thexi’s
andp;’s
newcanonical variables
[3].
In
fact,
we show in Section II that we have to consider two cases, one when n4,
the other when n > 4. In this later case, we derive thegeneral expression
of theSO(p, n - p) generators
and deduce in Section III the mostdegenerate
series ofrepresentations.
In Section
IV,
weinvestigate
the case n 4 and show as anexample
how we can derive the
representations
of the Lorentz group.II. - THE REALIZATION
OF THE
SO(p, n - p)
ALGEBRA(n
>4)
Let us consider the
SO(p, n - p)
group for which the generatorsMJLV satisfy
thefollowing
commutation rules :where p,
v, p, (1 =1, 2,
... , p, p +1,
..., n,and g
= 1if
+
1, if
# v.We know that the
generalized Wigner
rotations[5] [6] leaving
invarianta
given light-like
vector,generate
asubgroup
ofSO(p, n - p), isomorphic
to the
inhomogeneous SO(p - I, n - p - 1)
group. The generators of thissubgroup expressed
in terms of theMJlv
are chosen to be[7]
with
[6’] z,y = 1, 2,
...,p-I, p + I,
...,n- 1.We can
enlarge
this groupby adding
asupplementary
generatornamely
the dilatation operator D and
get
in this way the similitude group whichwe define as the group
leaving
invariant the direction of agiven light-like
vector. It is
easily
seen that the dilatation operator D isMoreover,
we putwhich can be
interpreted
as the «special conformal
transformations »acting
in an euclidian space ofsignature (p - I, n - p - 1).
The commu-tation rules between the
generators (3) (4) (5)
areLet us choose now the usual canonical
realization
of theinhomogeneous SO(p - 1, n -
p -1) subalgebra, namely
with
Following
the comment of SectionI,
we are led to introduce in additionto the
(n - 2) pairs
of variables xi, p~new
pairs
of canonical variables which we shall denoteby çp
and ~r~ with[~ nv]
= The values of N andN~ [Formulas (1)
and(13)]
with respectto the
type
ofnon-compact
rotation group aregiven
in table I. Let us note thatfor n
4only,
the number of variables introduced in the generators(11) (12)
of theinhomogeneous subgroup
is sufficient toget
all therepresentations
ofSO(p, n - p). So,
we have to consider asspecial
304 J. L. RICHARD
cases the groups for which n
4,
and we treat them in acomplete
way in Section IV.Now,
let usgive
theexpression
of the dilatationoperator (4).
From(6(a))
and(6(b)),
we deduce thatif n 4,
theonly possible expression
for Dis
2014 ~ ~
+ In thegeneral
case n >4,
we shall add the term1/2(03BE03C0 +03C0.03BE)
where areconjugate
variableswith p
=1, 2,
...,N03BE.
Finally,
theexpression
of D is chosen to be :From
(8),
we see that theI11
defined in(5)
transform like a vector under the and then are of thetype Spi
+S’xi
where S and S’ are scalar func- tions. It is easy to determine theexpression
of these twoquantities
withthe aid of
(6(b))
and(10). Finally,
we are led towhich
satisfy (9),
theonly
condition onn) being
So,
thej~/2] arbitrary parameters
we have to introduce must beput
in7r).
Forinstance,
it can be shown that this function is oftype A~
+A~, ~]+
for theS0(4, 1)
andS0(3,2)
groupsM,
thevector ~ being
one-dimensional andA,
A’ twoarbitrary
realparameters (see
tableI).
TABLE I
SO(p, n-p)
Grouns SO(2, 1)
S0(3,l) SO(4J) S0(4,2)
_____________________so(2,2) S0(3,2)
, ~ even > 4 4
!
/
rank 1 2
,
2 3
~ (~-1)/2
________________’____’___________
N ’
/
1 ’ 2 1 4 , 6 .~-2)/4 ~ ) [(~-1)/2]~
N~ ’
j
/
0’ ’
0;
1 1 2f (~-2)(~-4)/4 ’
’ [(~-1)(~-.5)/2]- 1
III. - THE MOST DEGENERATE REPRESENTATIONS OF
SO(p, n - p)
FOR n > 4If we want to find the most
degenerate
series ofrepresentations
ofSO(p, n - p),
it is not useful in thegeneral
case to introduce therequired
number of variables of
type çbut only
one and onearbitrary parameter. So,
we suppose that in
(14) and (15)
we introduceonly
onepair
ofvariables (, a
and
take f(j, x)
in thefollowing
formwhich
satisfy (16).
Abeing
anarbitrary
real number.Then,
all the invariantoperators
are fixedexcept
the second order Casi- miroperator :
which becomes
By solving
theeigenvalue problem,
we are led to thefollowing
results:if A #
0,
weget
the discrete energyspectrum
for which theeigen-functions
are of
type
corresponding
to theeigen-values
m2 being
the translational invariantoperator
of theinhomoge-
neous
SO(p - I, n - p - 1) subgroup,
andJy
a Bessel function of whichthe order v is an
integer
when n even and halfinteger
when n is odd.If A =
0,
theeigenfunctions 4Y
are of the form:where oc is a number. The
eigen-values
of the Casimiroperator (19)
becomes :
306 J. L. RICHARD
and then we get the continuous
spectrum.
We see that the case for whichno variable of
type ç
is introducedcorrespond
to aparticular
value of(23), namely
C2 = -[(n
-2)/2]~.
Of course, these results are in accordance with those of Raczka Niederle Limic
[9]
and L. Castell[10]
who obtains them in the case of the conformal groupSO(4,2) by
ananalogous
way.IV. - THE REALIZATION OF THE
SO(p, n 2014~)
LIE ALGEBRAWHEN n 4
The case of the
SO(2,1)
group has beeninvestigated
in paper of ref[11] ]
and we do not talk about.
So,
let us consider theSO(3,1)
andSO(2,2)
groups for which we have to introduce twoarbitrary
parameters in their Liealgebra
and nosupple-
mentary
variable oftype ç (see
tableI).
In theSO(3,1)
case, asimple
calculus leads to the
following expressions
of D andwhere A and B are real
arbitrary parameters.
By analytic continuation,
we get theSO(2,2)
case,namely
x
being
realand f3
pureimaginary.
Theangular
momentumJ3
is takenin its usual form.
The fondamental invariants take the values : for
SO(3J)
for
SO(2,2)
The Hilbert space of
representations
will begiven by solving
theeigenvalue problem
-~20142
r
being
the translational invariantoperator
of theinhomogeneous subgroup. Thus,
we shallget
conditions on theparameters A,
B anda,
~3.
For
example,
let uspoint
out thepossible
derivation of the Lorentz~ --2
group
representations.
In this case, theexpression
of r becomesSolving
theequation (28),
we find thegeneral
solutionwhere
(r, cp)
are thepolar
coordinates in theplane. Jy
is a Bessel function ofarbitrary
real order v and m theeigenvalues
of theangular
momentum(m
=0,
+1,
±2, ...).
Theparameter
B is related to the order vby
The constant A is left
arbitrary.
A more detailled discussion in which the construction of an orthonormal basis isconsidered,
wouldgive
theusual values
[12]
of the invariants(26).
308 J. L. RICHARD
v. -
CONCLUSION
We have shown
that, starting
with the usual canonical realization of theinhomogeneous SO(p - 1, n -
p -1)
group, we canget
theSO(p, n - p)
Lie
algebra
with which it should bepossible
to reduce the irreducibleunitary representations
of theSO(p, n - p)
group withrespect
to theinhomogeneous subgroup
ones. Inparticular,
this is ofphysical
interestfor the conformal group
SO(4,2)
since it contains asinhomogeneous
sub-group the Poincare group.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .
The author is indebted to Prof. H.
Bacry
who hassuggested
this workand thanks him for valuable discussions.
[1]
Ageneral
formula isgiven
in H. BACRY, Space time anddegrees of freedom of
theelementary particle,
Comm. Math.Phys.,
t.5, 1967,
p.97,
for thesemi-simple
Lie groups. Let us recall it:1/2(d - r)
= g whered, r, g
denote
respectively
thedimensionality
of the Lie group, the number of its fundamentalinvariants,
and the number of the generators of a maximal abeliansubalgebra
of theenveloping algebra.
This formula comes froma more
general
framework in GELFAND and KIRILLOV, Sur les corps liésavec
algèbres enveloppantes
desalgèbres
de Lie, Publications Mathéma- tiques, n° 31(I.
H. E.S.).
[2] [n/2]
denotes the rank of the group,namely n/2
if n is even,(n 2014 1)/2
if nis odd.
[3]
Let us note theapproach
of A. KIHLBERG in which he considers assubgroup
the maximal compact group and enters in similar considerations
(A.
KIHL-BERG, Arkiv
für Fysik,
t.30,
1965, p.121).
Many references on the study ofparticular
non compact rotation groups aregiven
in this paper. We recall someparticular
works in ref.[4].
[4]
The DE SITTER groupSO(4,1)
has been treatedthoroughly
by DIXMIER, inJ. Bull. Soc. Math. France, t.
89, 1961,
p. 9. TheSO(3,2)
group has beeninvestigated
by J. B. EHRMAN, in Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., t.53,
1957, p. 290.[5] E. P. WIGNER, Ann.
Math.,
t.40,
1939, p. 149. See also[6].
[6]
F. R. HALPERN and E. BRANSCOMB, Wigner’sanalysis of
the unitary represen- tations of the Poincaré group, UCRL-12359, 1965.[7] Y. MURAI, Progr. Theor. Phys., t.
11,
1954, p. 441.H. BACRY, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, A II, 1965, p. 327.
[8] In the
following,
the latin indices takealways
these values.[9] R. RACZKA, N. LIMIC and J. NIEDERLE, Discrete
degenerate
representationsof
non compact rotation group,IC/66/2,
Trieste and Continuousdegenerate
representationsof
non compact rotation groups,IC/66/18,
Trieste.[10]
L. CASTELL, Thephysical
aspectsof
theconformal
groupSO0(4,2), IC/67/66,
Trieste.
[11] H. BACRY and J. L. RICHARD, Partial theoretical group treatment
of
therelativistic
hydrogen
atom, 1967(to
bepublished
in J. Math.Phys.).
[12]
I. M. GEL’FAND, R. A. MINLOS et Z. Y.SHAPIRO,
Representationsof
therotation and Lorentz groups and their
applications,
Pergamon Press, 1963.For other
references,
see [6].Manuscrit reçu le 19 décembre 1967.