A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION B
D ÃO Q UANG T UYÊN
On the asymptotic behaviour of sequences of random variables and of their previsible compensators
Annales de l’I. H. P., section B, tome 17, n
o1 (1981), p. 63-73
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPB_1981__17_1_63_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1981, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section B » (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/anihpb) implique l’accord avec les condi- tions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute uti- lisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
On the asymptotic behaviour
of sequences of random variables and of their
previsible compensators
DÃO
QUANGTUYÊN
Institut de mathematiques, 208 D Dbi Can, Hanoi, Vietnam
Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré.
Vol. XVII, n° 1, 1981, p. 63 -73.
Section B :
Calcul des Probabilités et Statistique.
INTRODUCTION
This paper is divided into two parts : the first part deals with the compa- rison or the sets of convergence of two sequences
(Vn)
and(hn)
of randomvariables
adapted
to anincreasing family
of (7-fields(ffn)
andsatisfying
the
inequality Vn
+hn.
One of the corollaries of our main theorem of this part is ageneralisation
of a result of Robbins andSieg-
mund
[8 ].
The second part deals withC-sequences,
i. e. sequences of random variables whoseprevisible predictor
do not oscillate. Wegive
a number of conditions for the convergence of such sequences, conditions which include the classical
supermartingale
convergence theorems. We endby giving simple examples
of amarts which are notC-sequences
andof
C-sequences
which are not amarts.It is known that the convergence theorem for
Li-bounded asymptotic martingales
cannot begeneralized
to the cases of infinite dimensional Banach space valued variables(see [2] ] (a)
and(b)).
Wehope
that ourtheorem 4 can be
generalized
in such directions.NOTATIONS AND CONVENTIONS. - In this paper,
(Q, iF, P)
is a fixed pro-bability
space, 1 is a fixedfamily
ofincreasing 6-algebras
containedin iF. A sequence
(Xn)
of random variables will be said to beadapted
ifAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section B-Vol. XVI I, 0020-2347% 1981 /63,$ 5,00/
(Q Gauthier-Villars
for
each n, Xn
isffn-measurable.
Unless otherwisestated,
convergencemeans almost sure
(a. s.)
convergence tofinite
valued random variables.If ~ is a
property, { ~’ ~
will denote the seti (resp. i)
indicates «increasing » (resp. decreasing)
to. For A e~ , 1 A
willdenote the characteristic function of A.
Finally R
will denote the extended real line.I. SOME RESULTS ON THE CONVERGENCE
OF
SEQUENCES
OF RANDOM VARIABLESTHEOREM 1. - Let
(hn)n
1 and 1 be twoadapted
sequences of real random variables suchthat
1)
for every n,Vn and hn
areintegrable
andVn + hn
Then the set on which convergences is almost
surely equal
to theset on which convergences.
Proof
-Setting
is a
supermartingale.
The condition2)
thenimplies
that(Wn)
convergences a. s.
[6].
The statement of the theorem then follows imme-diately.
THEOREM 2. - Let
1 and (Vn)n~ 1 be
twoadapted
sequences of real random variables such that1)
For every n,hn
andVn
areintegrable
and 0 a. s.2) Vn
+hn.
Set
Then on
B,
the set on which(Vn)
converges is a. s.equal
to the set onwhich convergences.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section B
65 ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOUR OF SEQUENCES OF RANDOM VARIABLES
Proof - Setting again
we obtain since isdecreasing
for all a :where
Therefore,
sinceV" >_ 0,
and theorem
1, applied
to the sequences and allows us to state that :{(Vn1an) convergences} = {03A3hn1an converges },
and thereforeusing
thedefinition of
1an
{bn a) ~ {Vn1an converges }
=n { bn a} n { converges }
1 1
and the theorem follows
by letting
a go to + 00.We now
give
a few corollaries to theorems 1 and 2.COROLLARY 1.1. - Let
(hn),
be as in theorem 1. Let(gn)
be anadapted
sequences of
strictly positive
random variables such that :1) gnVn
+hn
for all nThen
Vol.
Moreover on the set
1 --~ 0
, the se quence anProof - Apply
theorem 1 to the sequences(V~
=(hn
=anhn).
COROLLARY 1.2. - Let
(Xn)
be anadapted
sequence of realintegrable
random variables. If
1)
~cn
then
LXn
converges a. s. if andonly
if converges a. s.n
Proof - Apply
theorem 1by setting Vn = ~ Xj, hn = E(Xn+
1
COROLLARY 1.3. - Let
(Xn)
be as incorollary
1.2. Let(an)
be a sequence of real numberstending
to 00 . Then :In
particular, secting
an = n,(Xn)
verifies the law oflarge
numbers if andonly
if the sequence(E(Xn+
does.corollary
I. 1.The
following generalises slightly
a result of Robbins andSiegmund.
COROLLARY 1.4. - Let be
adapted
sequences. We sup- pose 0,~ ~ 0, ~ ~ 0~,
> 0 and thatAnnales de l’lnstitut Henri Poincaré-Section B
ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOUR OF SEQUENCES OF RANDOM VARIABLES 67
n
Then the sequences
(VJ
and converge almostsurely
on the seti
Proof - Setting
we see that
n n
Moreover,
onB, the
sequences(Vn)
andresp. ~k
and~k,
resp. and have the same set of
convergence.
1Theorem 2
applied
to the sequences and(~n) implies
that(Vn)
conver-ges almost
surely
on B. SetOn
A, (V~)
andE(~k -
have the same set of convergence,by
theorem 2.Since on
B,
the seriesE(~k -
converges if andonly
ifdoes,
the corol-lary
follows.II.
C-SEQUENCES
Before
defining C-sequences,
we prove a « Doobdecomposition
theorem ».THEOREM 3. - Let
(V")
be anadapted
sequence ofintegrable
randomvariables. Then there exists sequences
(Mn),
of random variables suchthat
1)
2) Vi =
0 andVn
isFn- 1-measurable
forevery n ~
23) Mn
is anffn-martingale.
Vol. n° 1-1981.
This
decomposition
isunique.
Proof - Setting Mi
1 =Vi,
we get the desired
decomposition.
To proveuniqueness,
we note that ifVn
=M~
+Bn
is anotherdecomposition verifying 1), 2)
and3),
we haveThus B = V and the
uniqueness
isproved.
-
The
following terminology
and notation is standard.DEFINITION.
- If (Vn)
is a sequenceverifying
thehypotheses
of theorem3,
(V)
will denote the sequence definedby Vi == 0,
is called the
previsible
compensator of(Vn).
DEFINITION. - An
adapted
sequence of random variables(Xn)
is calleda
C-sequence
if theVn’s
areintegrable
and if the sequence converges inR.
It is called a strictC-sequence
if(Vn)
converges in R.Martingales, submartingales, supermartingales, quasi-martingales
areC-sequences. Adapted
sequences(Vn) satisfying
are
C-sequences
but the converse is not true as is seenby
thefollowing example.
Let
(Xn)
be a sequence ofindependent identically
distributed randomAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section B
ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOUR OF SEQUENCES OF RANDOM VARIABLES 69
v
variables with =
0,
0E(X~)
oo. Thenputting V~
= -" it is easyto see that
(VJ
aC-sequence
but that nTHEOREM 4. - Let be an
adapted
sequence ofintegrable
randomvariables such that
1) sup E(Vn-)
00n
2)
sup o0n
Then
(Vn)
converges almostsurely
if andonly
if it is aC-sequence.
Proof
WriteVn
=M~
+Vn
where(Mn)
is amartingale (cf.
theorem3).
If
(Vn)
converges a. s.,sup E(Vn+)
+sup E(Vn )
whichn n n
implies
that(Mn)
converges a. s. The same is then true for(Vn). Conversely,
suppose
(Vn)
converges a. s. inf~.
Theequalities
imply
thatand this last term is finite
by hypothesis. Using
Fatou’slemma,
we concludethat lim and lim
V~
arefinite,
i. e. converges a. s.(in R).
Thehypo-
thesis of our theorem allows us now to
apply
theorem 1 and to concludethat the sequence converge a. s.
COROLLARY 4.1. - Let
(VJ
be anadapted
sequenceofintegrable
randomvariables. If
1)
~)n
2)
there exists a constant k such that3) Vn
converges to 0 a. s.Then converges to 0 a. s.
Vol. 1-1981.
Proof
- We havewhere
condition
2) implies
that 0 for all m. FurthermoreThis last term converges to 0 a. s.
by
condition3).
Thus is aC-sequence.
Since
(using
the aboveinequality
and condition1),
condition2)
of theorem 4 issatisfied and therefore
(Vn)
converges a. s.COROLLARY 4 . 2. - Let be an
adapted
sequenceof integrable
randomvariables. If
1)
supE(Vn )
oo -n
2) Vn
if n is oddVn if n
is even3) E(Vn+ 1/~n) - Vn I .~
0 a. s.then
(Vn)
converges a. s.Proof - By
the convergence theorem foralternating series, (VJ
is aC-sequence.
Also we notice that for all nand therefore theorem 4
applies.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section B
ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOUR OF SEQUENCES OF RANDOM VARIABLES 71
We now try to weaken
L 1
bounded conditions such thatTHEOREM 5. - Let
(Vn)
be anadapted
sequence ofpositive
randomvariables. If
(Vn)
is a strictC-sequence,
then(Vn)
converges a. s.Conversely
if
(Vn)
converges a. s., then(Vn)
converges a. s. on theset ~ sup Vn
n
COROLLARY 5.1. - Let
(Vn)
be anadapted
sequence of nonnegative
random variables. Then
(Vn)
converges a. s. if any one of thefollowing
conditions is satisfied
3)
For almost all cv, there exist aninteger k(OJ)
such thata) Vn
isalternating
whenn >__
b) Vn I ~.
0 when n >_k(cv).
As an
example
where thiscorollary
can be used(see [1 ])
take the unit interval with its Borel field andLebesgue
measure and setVi
=i2i
on0, 2i ,
0 elsewhere if i isodd, =
0 if i is even.We now rid ourselves of the
hypothesis
that theVn’s
arepositive.
THEOREM 6. - Let
(V")
be anadapted
sequence ofintegrable
randomvariables. Then on the set
(Vn)
converges a. s. if andonly
and converge a. s.If any two of the four sequences
(Vn), (V" ), (Vn ), ( ~
are strict C-sequences, then
(Vn)
converges a. s.The
proof
goes very muchalong
the lines of that of Theorem 5.COROLLARY 6.1. - Let be a
submartingale. If (Vn)
and(V" )
convergea. s., then so does
(Vn).
Remark. The conditions in this
corollary
are weaker than the usualcondition sup oo as can be seen
by considering
the sequence(Vn)
n
defined on the unit interval
by
the formulaCOROLLARY 6.2.
Any
of thefollowing
conditions is sufficient for the almost sure convergence of themartingale (Vn) :
We now show that
asymptotic martingales ( « amarts
», see[2] ] (h)
and[7])
are not
necessarily C-sequences
nor areC-sequences necessarily asymptotic martingales.
As a matter offact,
theC-sequence
defined in the remarkfollowing corollary
6.1 is not anasymptotic martingale.
Let
(Xn)
be a sequence ofindependent identically
distributed random variables suchthat XJ
1. Let(an)
be a sequence of real numbers diver-n
ging
to 00 soslowly that Xi ai does
not converge inR (this
ispossible by
the law of iterated
logarithm ( see [9])).
Then is anasymptotic martingale
sinceVn
convergesuniformly
to 0.Writing
and
using
theuniqueness
of the compensator it is seen that is nota
C-sequence.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author wishes to thank Dr. N. V.
Thu,
Professors M.Duflo,
J. SamLazaro and D.
Lepingle
for their kindhelp
andsuggestions.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré-Section B
ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOUR OF SEQUENCES OF RANDOM VARIABLES 73
REFERENCES
[1] D. G. AUSTIN, G. A. EDGAR, A. IONESCU TULCEA, Pointwise convergence in term of expectation. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Gebiete, t. 30, 1974, p. 17-26.
[2] [a] A. BELLOW, On vector valued asymptotic martingales. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.
U. S. A., t. 73, n° 6, 1976, p. 1798-1799.
[b] A. BELLOW, Several stability properties of the class of asymptotic martingales.
Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Gebiete, t. 37, 1977, p. 275-290.
[3] A. N. BORODIN, Quasi-martingales. Theory of Probability and Appl. 1978-3.
[4] DAN ANBAV, An application of a theorem of Robbins and Siegmund. Annals of Statistics, t. 4, n° 5, 1976, p. 1018-1021
[5] G. A. EDGAR, L. SUCHESTON, Amarts, A class of asymptotic martingales (Discrete parameter), J. Multivariate Anal., t. 6, 1976, p. 193-221.
[6] J. NEVEU, a) Mathematical foundations of the calculus of probability, Holden Day,
San Fransisco, 1965 ; b) Martingales discrètes, Masson, 1972.
[7] M. M. RAO, Quasi-martingales. Math. Scand., t. 24, 1969, p. 79-92.
[8] H. ROBBINS, D. SIEGMUND, A convergence theorem for non negative almost super-
martingales and some applications. Optimization methods in statistics, A. P.
New-York, 1971, p. 233-257.
[9] R. J. TOMKINS, A law of the Iterated Logarithm Logarithm for martingales.
Z. Wahrscheinlickeitstheorie verw. Gebiete, t. 33, 1975, p. 55-59.
(Manuscrit reçu le 6 octobre 198C).
Vol. 1-1981.