• Aucun résultat trouvé

Paving a research roadmap on network of ontologies

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Paving a research roadmap on network of ontologies"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Paving a Research Roadmap on Network of Ontologies

1

Fábio Santos, Kate Revoredo and Fernanda Baião

Department of Applied Informatics, Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil {fabiomarcos.santos,katerevoredo,fernanda.baiao}@uniriotec.br

Abstract. Network of ontologies is the pairwise match of a set of ontologies, which be- came recently relevant due to its applicability in different domains, such as cultural evo - lution. However, the challenges faced in this area are not completely known and under- stood, neither are their relations to ontology matching counterpart problems. The goal of this paper is to identify challenges and applications of a network of ontologies and compare them to the 8 existing challenges of ontology matching. We identified four new challenges and related them with the eight challenges presented in [3].

Keywords: Ontology, Ontology Alignment, Network of Ontologies, Systematic Mapping Study.

1 Introducing research challenges on Network of Ontologies

After years of research and work on the Ontology field, different ontologies for de - scribing the same domain of discourse were developed, either from scratch or based on existing ones. To deal with a number of distinct ontologies for the same domain, various Ontology matching systems were developed towards improving the process of aligning ontologies in a pair wise manner. The field of Ontology Matching evolved significantly; yet, some challenges still remain, as highlighted in [3].

With the advances on matching techniques, a network structure naturally arose, composed by the set of discovered alignments and their respective ontologies. The network environment brings new tasks that were not necessary when we were dealing with single or pairs of ontologies. So to explore the network of ontologies issues, and try to understand the relation with the matching problems, we performed a systematic mapping study and compared the challenges we have found with the challenges pre - sented in [3]. The complete study and its results are detailed in [5].

Network of Ontologies (N.O.) is a set of ontologies with a set of alignments be- tween them [1], or a set of theories linked by different kind of relations [2]. At some point, an application may look for alignments options in a network or a network has to be maintained with supporting tools.

We investigated, through a systematic mapping study, a research question of "How similar is the N.O. alignment task when compared to the ontology matching" ? We have identified four challenges: network consistency detection, network revision and repair, network creation and management and inter-network matching. The first two 1 This research is partially funded by CNPq and CAPES Brazilian agencies, grant number 401505/2014-6

(2)

2

were mentioned in the articles selected and the last two were inferred by the N.O. def - initions presented in some articles.

Figueroaet al. [4] presented a methodology to build ontologies and a tool to man - age lifecycles. However, the approach does not address the definition of activities re- lated to N.O. administration including user access and rights, node management, net- work troubleshooting and other typical activities in network environments. These problems were also not covered in [3]. If we relate the known research areas in [3] to the four “new” challenges we found after this systematic mapping, as illustrated in Figure 1, we may reveal some characteristics of the challenges.

Fig. 1. Ontology Matching and N.O. challenges, and inter-related research areas

2 Final Considerations

This work provides a first roadmap for research on Network of Ontologies, by point- ing a set of challenges found through the use of a systematic mapping in the literature.

Interestingly, the identified challenges interrelate to previous Ontology Matching challenges posed in [3] by addressing overlapping research areas. Moreover, the new challenges found also transcend previous one with regard to specific issues such as consistency detection and alignment repair.

References

1. Euzenat, J. "Networks of ontologies and alignments." SWXO Lecture Notes (2011) 2. Euzenat, J. "Revision in networks of ontologies" Artificial intelligence 228,195-216 (2015) 3. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J. "Ontology matching: state of the art and future challenges." IEEE

Transactions on knowledge and data engineering 25.1 pp. 158-176 (2013)

4. Suárez-Figueroa, M. C., Gómez-Pérez, A., Motta, E., & Gangemi, A., “Ontology engineer- ing in a networked world”. Springer Science & Business Media, (2012)

5. Santos, F., Revoredo, K., Baião, F., Network of Ontologies – A Systematic Mapping Study and Challenges Comparison, Technical Report. Relate-DIA/UNIRIO, RT-0005/2017, 2017.

Available at http://www.seer.unirio.br/index.php/monografiasppgi/article/view/6833

Références

Documents relatifs

Existing methods use logical reasoning over computed equivalence relationships or machine learning based on lex- ical and structural features of ontology elements [7, 3].. While

Furthermore, when thinking of merging ontologies to one priority ontology, the research field of bioinformatics is of interest because of the need to investigate large

Once two entities are known to be aligned, the nature of the relation between them can be charac- terized using the following mapping types: exact, the connected vertices

We claim that matching to cross- domain ontology is more difficult for traditional ontology matching systems since a cross-domain ontology contains concepts from various areas and it

In this paper, we describe mismatches between AIRM-O and ATMONTO, evaluate performance of automatic matching systems over these ontologies, and provide a manual reference alignment..

This weakened semantics allows to reduce the reasoning complexity over a network of aligned ontologies since (i) only individual equalities and concept unsatisfiabilities such as a ≈

We consider that a ternary compound alignment is a set of correspondences (mappings) between classes from a source ontology O s and class expressions obtained by combining two

The development of the proposed network of ontologies is the starting point for the auto- matic construction and translation of models that are employed during the scheduling