• Aucun résultat trouvé

A zero-sqrt(5)/ 2 law for cosine families

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "A zero-sqrt(5)/ 2 law for cosine families"

Copied!
26
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01147792

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01147792

Preprint submitted on 1 May 2015

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

A zero-sqrt(5)/ 2 law for cosine families

Jean Esterle

To cite this version:

Jean Esterle. A zero-sqrt(5)/ 2 law for cosine families. 2015. �hal-01147792�

(2)

A zero-

p25

law for cosine families

Jean Esterle

Abstract: Leta∈R, and letk(a) be the largest constant such thatsup|cos(na)cos(nb)| <k(a) forb ∈R implies thatb ∈ ±a+2πZ. We show that if a cosine sequence (C(n))nZ with values in a Banach algebraA satisfiessupn1kC(n)− cos(na).1Ak <k(a), thenC(n)=cos(na) forn∈Z. Since p25k(a)≤ 3p83 for everya ∈R, this shows that if some cosine family (C(g))gG over an abelian groupG in a Banach algebra satisfiessupgGkC(g)c(g)k < p25 for some sca- lar cosine family (c(g))gG, thenC(g)=c(g) forgG, and the constant

p5 2 is optimal. We also describe the set of all real numbersa∈[0,π] satisfyingk(a)≤32. Keywords : Cosine function, scalar cosine function, commutative local Ba- nach algebra, Kronecker’s theorem, cyclotomic polynomials

AMS classification : Primary 46J45, 47D09, Secondary 26A99

1 Introduction

LetG be an abelian group. Recall that aG-cosine family of elements of a unital normed algebraAwith unit element 1Ais a family (C(g))gG of elements ofAsatisfying the so-called d’Alembert equation

C0=1A,C(g+h)+C(gh)=2C(g)C(h) (g∈G,hG). (1) AR-cosine family is called a cosine function, and aZ-cosine family is called a cosine sequence.

A cosine familyC=(C(g))gGis said to be bounded if there existsM>0 such thatkC(g)k ≤Mfor everygG. In this case we set

kCk=supgGkC(g)k,d i st(C1,C2)= kC1C2k.

A cosine family is said to be scalar ifC(g)∈C.1Afor everygG. It is easy to see and well-known that a bounded scalar cosine sequence satisfiesC(n)=cos(an) for somea∈R.

(3)

Strongly continuous operator valued cosine functions are a classical tool in the study of differential equations, see for example [2], [3], [15], [19], and a func- tional calculus approach to these objects was developped recently in [11].

Bobrowski and Chojnacki proved in [4] that if a strongly continuous opera- tor valued cosine function on a Banach space (C(t))tRsatisfiessupt0kC(t)− c(t)k <1/2 for some scalar bounded continuous cosine functionc(t) thenC(t)= c(t) pourt ∈R, and Zwart and F. Schwenninger showed in [18] that this result remains valid under the conditionsupt0kC(t)−c(t)k <1. The proofs were ba- sed on rather involved arguments from operator theory and semigroup theory.

Very recently, Bobrowski, Chojnacki and Gregosiewicz [5] showed more preci- sely that if a cosine functionC=C(t) satisfies suptRkC(t)−c(t)k <3p83for some scalar bounded continuous cosine functionc(t), thenC(t)=c(t) fort ∈R, wi- thout any continuity assumption onC, and the same result was obtained inde- pendently by the author in [10]. The constant 8

3p

3 is obviously optimal, since suptR|cos(at)cos(3at)| =3p83for everya∈R\ {0}.

The author also proved in [10] that if a cosine sequence (C(t))tR satisfies suptRkC(t)−cos(at)1Ak =m<2 for somea6=0, then the closed algebra ge- nerated by (C(t))tRis isomorphic toCk for somek ≥1, and that there exists a finite familyp1, . . . ,pk of pairwise orthogonal idempotents ofA and a family (b1, . . . ,bk) of distinct elements of the finite set∆(a,m) :={b≥0 : suptR|cos(bt)− cos(at)| ≤m} such that we have

C(t)= Xk j=1

cos(bjt)pj (j∈R).

Also Chojnacki developped in [7] an elementary argument to show that if (C(n))nZis a cosine sequence in a unital normed algebraAsatisfyingsupn1kC(n)− c(n)k <1 for some scalar cosine sequence (c(n))nZthenc(n)=C(n) for everyn, which obviously implies the result of Zwart and F. Schwenninger. His approach is based on an elaborated adaptation of a very short elementary argument used by Wallen in [20] to prove an improvement of the classical Cox-Nakamura-Yoshida- Hirschfeld-Wallen theorem [8], [13], [16] which shows that if an elementaof a unital normed algebraAsatisfiessupn1kan−1k <1, thena=1.

Applying this result to the cosine sequencesC(ng) andc(ng) forgG, Cho- najcki observed in [7] that if a cosine familyC(g) satisfiessupgGkC(g)−c(g)k <

1 for some scalar cosine familyc(g) thenC(g)=c(g) for everygG.

In the same direction Schwenninger and Zwart showed in [17] that if a cosine sequence (C(n))nZin a Banach algebraAsatisfiessupn1kC(n)−1Ak <32, then C(n)=1Afor everyn.

The purpose of this paper is to obtain optimal results of this type. We prove

(4)

a "zero-p25" law : if a cosine family (C(g))gGsatisfiessupgGkC(g)−c(g)k <

p5 2

for some scalar cosine family (c(g))gG thenC(g)=c(g) for everygG. Since supn1¯¯cos¡2nπ

5

¢−cos¡4nπ

5

¢¯¯=cos¡

5

¢−cos¡π

5

¢=

p5

2 , the constant p25 is opti- mal.

In fact for everya∈Rthere exists a largest constantk(a) such that supn1|cos(nb)cos(na)| <k(a) implies thatcos(nb)=cos(na) for n ≥1, and we prove that if a cosine sequence (C(n))nZ in a Banach algebra A satisfies supn1|C(n)− cos(na)1A| <k(a) thenC(n)=cos(na) forn≥1. This follows from the following result, proved by the author in [10].

Theorem 1.1. Let(C(n))nZbe a bounded cosine sequence in a Banach algebra. If spec(C(1))is a singleton, then the sequence(C(n))nZis scalar, and so there exists a∈Rsuch that C(n)=cos(na)for n≥1.

The second part of the paper is devoted to a discussion of the values of the constantk(a). As mentioned above, it follows from [17] thatk(0)= 32, and it is obvious thatk(a)≤supn1|cos(na)cos(3na)| ≤3p83ifaπ2Z. We observe that k(a)=3p83 if aπ is irrational, and we prove, using basic results about cyclotomic fields, thatk(a)<3p83ifaπ is rational.

We also show that the setΩ(m) :={a∈[0,π]|k(a)m} is finite for every m< 3p83. We describe in detail the setΩ¡3

2

¢: it contains 43 elements, and the only values fork(a) for whichk(a)<32arep52=cos¡π

5

¢+cos¡

5

¢≈1.1180,p 2= cos¡π

4

¢+cos¡

4

¢≈1.4142, andcos¡

11

¢+cos¡

11

¢≈1.4961.

The zero-p25law follows then from the fact thatk(a)cos¡π

5

¢+cos¡π

5

¢=

p5 2

for everya∈R.

We also show that given a ∈Randm <2 the set Γ(a,m) of scalar cosine sequences (c(n))nZsatisfyingsupnZ|c(n)cos(na)| ≤mis finite. This implies that if a cosine sequence (C(n))nZsatisfies supnZkC(n)−cos(an)1Ak ≤m, then there existskc ar d(Γ(a,m)) such that the closed algebra generated by (C(n))nZ

is isomorphic to Ck, and there exists a finite family p1, . . . ,pk of pairwise or- thogonal idempotents of Aand a finite family c1, . . . ,ck of distinct elements of Γ(a,m) such that we have

C(n)= Xk j=1

cj(n)pj (n∈Z).

This last result does not extend to cosine families over general abelian group.

LetG=(Z/3Z)N: we give an easy example of aG-cosine family (C(g))gG with values inlsuch that the closed subalgebra generated by (C(g))gG equalsl, while supgGk1lC(g)k =32.

(5)

The author warmly thanks Christine Bachoc and Pierre Parent for giving him the arguments from number theory which lead to a simple proof of the fact that k(a)<3p83ifaπQ.

2 Distance between bounded scalar cosine sequences

We introduce the following notation, to be used throughout the paper.

Definition 2.1. Let aπQ.The order of a, denoted by or d(a),is the smallest integer u≥1such that ei ua=1.

Recall that a subsetSof the unit circleTis said to be independent ifz1n1. . .znkk 6=

1 for every finite family (z1, . . . ,zk) of distincts elements ofS and every family (n1, . . . ,nk)∈Zkof such thatzj6=0 forjjk. It follows from a classical theo- rem of Kronecker, see for example [14], page 21 that ifS={z1, . . . ,zk} is a finite independent set then the sequence (z1n, . . . ,zkn)n1 is dense inTk. We deduce from Kronecker’s theorem the following observation.

Proposition 2.2. Let a∈[0,π].For m≥0,set Γ(a,m)

b∈[0,π] :supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| ≤mª . ThenΓ(a,m)is finite for every m<2.

Proof : Fixm∈[1, 2). Notice that if b ∈R, and if the set ©

ei a,ei bª

is inde- pendent, then it follows from Kronecker’s theorem that the sequence¡¡

ei na,ei nb¢¢

n1

is dense inT2, and sosupn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| =2, andb∉Γ(a,m).

Suppose thataπ∈Q, and denote byuthe order ofa, so thatei ua=1. If bπ∉Q, then the sequence¡

ei unb¢

n1is dense inT, and so

2≥supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| ≥supn1|1−cos(nub)| =2, which shows thatb∉Γ(a,m).

The same argument shows that ifπa∉Q, and ifbπ∈Q, thenb∉Γ(a,m). So we are left with two situations

1) aπQ, and there existsp6=0,q6=0 andk∈Zsuch thatbq=ap+2kπ.

2) aπ∈Qandπb∈Q.

We consider the first case. Replacingb∈[0,π] by−b∈[−π, 0] if necessary we can assume thatp≥1 andq≥1, and we can assume that we have

qb=p a+2kπ r ,

(6)

withg cd(p,q)=1,r≥1,g cd(r,k)=1 ifk6=0.

We have, sincer aπ ∉Q,

supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| ≥supn1

¯¯cos(nr q a)cos(nr qb)¯¯

=supn1¯¯cos(nr q a)−cos(nr p a)¯¯=suptR

¯¯cos(q t)−cos(p t)¯¯, Sinceg cd(p,q)=1, we havesuptR

¯¯cos(q t)−cos(p t)¯¯=2 ifporq is even, so we can assume thatpandqare odd. Sets=q21.

It follows from Bezout’s identity that there existn≥1 such thate

2i npπ q =e2i sπq and settingt=2nπq , we obtain

suptR

¯¯cos(q t)−cos(p t)¯¯≥1−cos µ 2sπ

2s+1

=1+cos µπ

q

¶ . The same argument shows that we have

suptR

¯¯cos(q t)−cos(p t)¯¯≥1+cos µπ

p

¶ . We obtain

pπ

ar ccos(m−1),qπ ar ccos(m−1). We also have

supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| ≥supn1

¯¯cos(nq a)cos(nqb)¯¯

=supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos(nq a)cos µ

np a+2nk qπ r

¶¯¯¯¯.

Assume thatk6=0, setd=g cd(r,q),r1= rd,q1=dq. Theng cd(k q1,r1)=1, and so there existsu≥1 such that2uk qr 1π

1r1 +2πZ. This gives supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| ≥supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos(nuq a)−cos µ

npua+2nπ r1

¶¯¯¯¯.

Ifr1is even, setr2=r21. We obtain supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos(nuq a)cos µ

npua+2nπ r1

¶¯¯¯¯

supn0

¯¯cos((2n+1)r2uq a)cos¡

(2n+1)r2up a)+π¢¯¯.

(7)

Since 2r2uaπQ, there exists a sequence (nj)j1of integers such that l i mj→+∞

¯¯

¯ei2njr2ua+i r2ua¯¯¯=1, so that

l i mj→+∞

¯¯cos((2nj+1)r2uq a)cos¡

(2nj+1)r2up a)+π¢¯¯=2, and in this situationsupn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| =2.

So we can assume thatr1is odd. Setr2=r21. The same calculation as above gives

supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos(nuq a)cos µ

npua+2nπ r1

¶¯¯¯¯

supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos((n(2r2+1)+r2)uq a)−cos µ

(n(2r2+1)+r2)up a+2(n(2r2+1)+r2) 2r2+1 π

¶¯¯¯¯

≥1+cos

µ π

2r2+1

¶ .

Hencer1=2r2+1≤ar ccos(mπ 1),r=r1dr1q≤³ π

ar ccos(m1)

´2

. This gives

2|k|πr|qbp a| ≤2π

µ π

ar ccos(m−1)

3

,|k| ≤

µ π

ar ccos(m−1)

3

. We see thatΓ(a,m) is finite ifπaQ, and that we have

c ar d(Γ(a,m))≤2

µ π

ar ccos(m−1)

7

.

Now consider the case where πa ∈Q, bπ∈Q. We first discuss the case where a=0,b6=0. We haveb=q , where 1≤pq,g cd(p,q)=1

Ifp=q=1, thenb=π, andsupn1|1−cos(nπ)| =2. So we may assume that pq−1. Ifpis odd, then we have

supn1|1−cos(nb)| ≥ |1−cos(qb)| =1−cos(pπ)=2.

So we can assume thatpis even, so thatq is odd. Setr = q21. There exists n0≥1 andr∈Zsuch thatn0prqZ, and we have

supnZ|1−cos(nb)| ≥ |1−cos(2n0b)| =

¯¯

¯¯1−cos µ 2rπ

2r+1

¶¯¯¯¯=1+cos µπ

q

¶ . We obtain againqar ccos(mπ 1), andc ar d(Γ(0,m))≤³

π ar ccos(m1)

´2

.

(8)

Now assume thata6=0, and letu≥2 be the order ofa. We have supn1|1−cos(nub)| =supn1|cos(nua)cos(nub)| ≤m,

and so there exists there existsc∈Γ(0,m) such thatcos(nc)=cos(nub) forn≥1.

In particularcos(c)=cos(ub), andb= ±uc +2kπu , wherek∈Z. We obtain c ar d(Γ(a,m))≤2uc ar d(Γ(0,m))≤2uc ar d

µ π

ar ccos(m−1)

2

. ä

We do not know whether it is possible to obtain a majorant forc ar d(Γ(a,m)) which depends only onmwhenaπQ.

Theorem 2.3. Let a∈R, let m<2,and let(C(n))nZ be a cosine sequence in a Banach algebra A such that supn1kC(n)−cos(na)k ≤m.Then there exists kc ar d(Γ(a,m))such that the closed algebra generated by(C(n))nZis isomor- phic toCk,and there exists a finite family p1, . . . ,pkof pairwise orthogonal idem- potents of A and a finite family b1, . . . ,bkof distinct elements ofΓ(a,m)such that we have

C(n)= Xk j=1

cos(nbj)pj (n∈Z).

Proof : Sincecn=Pn(c1), wherePndenotes then-th Tchebishev polynomial, A1is the closed unital subalgebra generated byc1 and the mapχχ(c1) is a bijection fromcA1ontospecA1(c1). Now letχAc1. The sequence (χ(cn))n1is a scalar cosine sequence, and we have

supn1¯¯cos(na)−χ(cn)¯¯<2.

It follows then from proposition 2.2 thatspecA1(c1) :=©

λ=χ(c1) :χ∈cA1ª is finite. HencecA1is finite. Letχ1, . . . ,χmbe the elements ofAc1. It follows from the standard one-variable holomorphic functional calculus, se for example [9], that there exists for every jman idempotent pj of A1 such thatχj(pj)=1 and χk(pj)=0 fork6=j. Hencepjpk=0 for j6=k, and Pm

j=1

pjis the unit element of A1.

LetxA1. Then (pjcn)nZis a cosine sequence in the commutative unital Banach algebrapjA1, andspecpjA1(pjc1)={χj(c1)}.

Sincesupn1°°pjcos(na)pjcn°°≤2kpjk, the sequence (pjcn)n1is boun- ded, and it follows from theorem 2.3 that (pjcn)n1 is a scalar sequence, and there existsβj∈[0,π] such thatpjcn=χj(cn)pj=cos(nβj)pjforn∈Z.

(9)

Hencecn = Pm j=1

χj(cn)pj = Pm j=1

cos(nβj)pj forn≥1. Since A1 is the closed subalgebra ofAgenerated byc1, we havex= mP

j=1

χj(x)pjfor everyxA1, which shows thatA1is isomorphic toCm

Corollary 2.4. Let a≥0∈R,and let k(a)be the largest positive real number m such thatΓ(a,m)={a}for every m<k(a).If(C(n))nZ is a cosine sequence in a Banach algebra A such that supn1kC(n)−cos(na)1Ak <k(a), then C(n)= cos(na)1Afor n∈Z.

Theorem 2.3 does not extend to cosine families over general abelian groups, as shown by the following easy result.

Proposition 2.5. Let G:=(Z/3Z)N.Then there exists a G-cosine family(C(g))gG

with values in lwhich satisfies the two following conditions (i) supgGk1lC(g)k =32,

(ii) The algebra generated by the family(C(g))gGis dense in l.

Proof : ElementsgofG can be written under the formg=(gm)m1, where gm∈{0, 1, 2}. Set

C(g) := µ

cos µ2gmπ

3

¶¶

m1

.

Then (C(g))gGis aG-cosine family with values inlwhich obviously satis- fies (i) sincecos¡

3

¢=cos¡

3

¢= −12.

Now letφ=(φm)mZbe an idempotent ofl, and letS:={m≥1|φm=1}.

Setgm=1 ifmS,gm=0 ifm≥1,mS, and setg=(gm)m1. We have C(0G)−C(g)=1lC(g)=3

2φ,

and soφA. We can identifyltoC(βN), the algebra of continuous func- tions on the Stone-C˘ech compactification ofN, andβNis an extremely discon- nected compact set, which means that the closure of every open set is open, see for example [1], chap. 6, sec. 6. Since the characteristic function of every open and closed subset ofβNis an idempotent ofl, the idempotents oflseparate points ofβN, and it follows from the Stone-Weierstrass theorem thatAis dense inl, which proves (ii).ä

(10)

3 The values of the constant k (a)

It was shown in [17] thatk(0)=32. We also have the following result.

Proposition 3.1. We have k(a)=3p83 if aπ is irrrational, and k(a)< 3p83 if aπ is rational .

Proof : Assume thataπ∉Q. Then 3a∉ ±a+2πZ, and we have

k(a)supn1|cos(na)cos(3na)| =supxR|cos(x)cos(3x)| = 8 3p

3. We saw above that If bπ inQ, then supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| =2, and we also have supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| =2 ifp aqb∉2πZfor (p,q)6=(0, 0). So if supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| <2, there existspZ\ {0},q∈Z\ {0} andr ∈Zsuch thatp aqb=2rπ.

Ifp6= ±qthen it follows from lemma 3.5 of [10] that we have

supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| ≥supn1|cos(nq a)−cos(nqb)| =supn1|cos(qna)−cos(pna)|

=supxR|cos(q x)cos(p x)| =supxR

¯¯

¯¯cos µp

qx

cos(x)

¯¯

¯¯≥ 8 3p

3. We are left with the case whereb= ±a+2sπr , wherer∈Z\ {−1, 0, 1}, and we can restrict attention to the case whereb=a+2sπr wherer ≥2, 1≤sr−1, g cd(r,s)=1. It follows from Bezout’s identity that there exists for everyp ≥1 someu∈Zsuch thatubua2pπr ∈2πZ. Ifr is even, setp=r2. We have, since the set©

ei(2n+1)aª

n1is dense in the unit circle,

supn1|cos(nb)cos(na)| =supnZ|cos(nb)cos(na)|

supn1|cos((2n+1)ub)−cos((2n+1)ua)|

=2supn1|cos((2n+1)ua)| =2.

Now assume thatr is odd, and setp=r21. We have

supn1|cos(nb)cos(na)| ≥supn1|cos((2n+1)ub)−cos((2n+1)ua)|

supn1

¯¯

¯cos((2nr+1)ua)−cos³

(2nr+1)ua+(2nr+1)³ ππ

r

´´¯¯¯

(11)

supxR

¯¯

¯cos(x)+cos³ xπ

r

´¯¯¯≥2cos³π 2r

´

≥p 3> 8

3p 3.

Now assume thatπa is rational. If the order ofais equal to 1, thenk(a)=1.5, and we will see later that this is also true if the order ofaequals 2 or 4.

Otherwise we have

k(a)≤supn1|cos(na)cos(3na)| =max1nu|cos(na)cos(3na)|. We have|cos(nx)cos(3nx)| <πp83ifx∉ ±ar ccos³

p1 3

´

+πZ. Ifna∈ ±ar ccos³

p1 3

´ + πZfor somen≥1, then ar ccos

³p1 3

´

π would be rational, andα:= p13+

p2i p3 would be a root of unity. Soβ=α2= −13+2

p2i

3 would have the formβ=e2i kπn for some n≤1 and some positive integerknsuch thatg cd(k,n)=1.

LetQ(β) be the smallest subfield of C containingQ∪β. Since 3β2+2β+ 3=0, the degree of Q(β) over Q is equal to 2. On the other hand the Galois groupG al(Q(β)/Q) is isomorphic to (Z/nZ)×, the group of invertible elements ofZ/nZ, and we have, see [21], theorem 2.5

H(n)=d e g(Q(β)/Q)=2,

whereH(n)=c ar d((Z/nZ)×) denotes the number of integersp∈{1, . . . ,n} such thatg cd(p,n)=1.

LetP(n) be the set of prime divisors ofn. It is weil-known that we have, wri- tingnpP(n)pαp, see for example [21], exercise 1.1,

H(n)=ΠpP(n)pαp1(p−1).

It follows immediately from this identity that the only possibilities to get H(n)=2 aren=3,n=4, andn=6. Since β36=1,β46=1, andβ66=1, we see thatβπ is irrational, and sok(a)<3p83ifaπ is rational.ä

ä

We know that if aπ is rational, and if bπ is irrational, thensupn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| =2. We discuss now the case where aπ and πb are both rational, with b∉ ±a+2πZ.

Lemma 3.2. Let a,b∈(0,π].

(i) If7a≤bπ2,or ifπ2b6 ,with¯¯b3 ¯¯≥7a,then supn1|cos(na)−cos(nb)| >1.55.

(ii) If 6bπ,and if b≥4a,then

(12)

cos(a)cos(b)>1.57.

Proof : (i) Assume that 7a≤bπ2, letpbe the largest integer such thatpb<

4 , and setq=p+1. We have4qb4 , 0≤q a28, and we obtain supn1|cos(na)−cos(nb)| ≥cos¡

q a¢

cos¡ qb¢

cos µ5π

28

+cos³π 4

´

>1.55.

Now assume that π2b6 , with|b3 | ≥7a, and setc= |3b−2π|. Since

¯¯b−3 ¯¯≤π6, we have 21a≤cπ2, and we obtain

supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| ≥supn1|cos(3na)cos(3nb)|

=supn1|cos(3na)−cos(nc)| >1.55.

(ii) If6bπ, and ifb≥4a, then 0<aπ4, and we have cos(a)cos(b)≥cos³π

4

´

+cos³π 6

´

>1.57.

Lemma 3.3. Let p,q be two positive integers such that p<q.

(i) If q6=3p,then there exists up,q≥1such that, if or d(a)≥up,q we have supn1|cos(np a)cos(nq a)| > 8

p3.

(ii) If q=3p,then for every m<3p83there exists up(m)≥1such that if or d(a)u(m)we have

supn1|cos(np a)cos(3np a)| >m.

Proof : Setλ=supxR|cos(p x)cos(q x)| =supx0|cos(p x)−cos(q x)|. An elementary verification shows thatλ>3p83 ifq6=3p, andλ=3p83 ifq=3p, see for example [10]. Now letµ<λ, and let η<δbe two real numbers such that

|cos(p x)−cos(q x)| >µforηxδ. Since {ei an}n1={e2niπu }1nu, we see that supn1|cos(np a)cos(nq a)| >µifu <δη, and the lemma follows.ä Lemma 3.4. Assume thataπ andbπare rational, let u≥1be the order of a and let v be the order of b.

(i) If u 6=v,u6=3v,v6=3u then supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| ≥1+cos¡π

5

¢>

1.8>3p83.

(13)

(ii) If u=v,and if b∉ ±a+2πZ,then there exists w∈Zsuch that2≤wu2

and g cd(u,w)=1satisfying

supn1cos(na)−cos(nb)| =supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nπ

u

cos

µ2nwπ u

¶¯¯¯¯. (2)

Conversely if aπQhas order u,then for every integer w such that g cd(w,u)= 1,there exists bπQof order u satisfying (2).

(iii) If v=3u,then there exists an integer w such that1≤wu2and g cd(u,w)= 1satisfying

supn1cos(na)−cos(nb)| =supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nπ

3u

cos

µ2nwπ u

¶¯¯¯¯. (3)

Conversely if aπQhas order u,then for every integer w such that g cd(w,u)= 1there exists bπQof order3u satisfying (3).

(iv) If u=3v,then there exists an integer w such that1≤wu6and g cd¡u

3,w¢

= 1satisfying

supn1cos(na)−cos(nb)| =supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nπ

u

cos

µ6nwπ u

¶¯¯¯¯. (4)

Conversely if the order u of aπQis divisible by3,then for every integer w such that g cd¡u

3,w¢

=1there exists bπQof orderu3 satisfying (4).

Proof : (i) Assume thatu6=v, say,u<v, and letw 6=1 be the order ofub, which is a divisor ofv. We haveub=2παw , withg cd(α,w)=1, and there exists γ≥1 such thatαγ−1∈wZ. We obtain

supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| ≥supn1|cos(nuγa)cos(nuγb)| =sup1nw1−cos µ2nπ

w

¶ . Ifwis even, thensupn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| =2. Ifwis odd, sets=w21. We

obtain

supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| ≥1−cos µ2sπ

w

=1+cos³π w

´.

Ifw≥5, we obtain

supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| ≥1+cos³π 5

´

>1.8> 8 3p

3.

Ifw=3, letd=g cd(u,v), and setr=ud. Thenw=3=dv >r. So eitherr =1 orr=2.

(14)

If r =2, we have u =2d,v =3d, a = 2pπ2d = d with p odd,b = 2q3dπ with g cd(q, 3d)=1, and we obtain

supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| = |cos(3d a)−cos(3d b)|

≥ |cos(3pπ)cos(2qπ)| =2.

Ifr=1 thenu=dandv=3d=u.

We thus see that ifv>uandv6=3u, thensupn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| ≥1+ cos¡π

5

¢>1.8>p33, which proves (i).

(ii) Assume thatu=v, and thatb∉ ±a+2πZ. There existsα,β∈{1, . . . ,u− 1}, withα6=β,α6=uβsuch that a ∈ ±2απu +2πZand b ∈ ±2βπu +2πZ, and g cd(α,u)=g cd(β,u)=1. It follows from Bezout’s identity that there existsγ∈Z such thatαγ−1∈uZ. Ifβγ±1∈uZthen we would haveαβγ±ααuZuZ, and β±αuZ, which is impossible. HenceγβwuZfor somew∈{2, . . . ,u−2}, g cd(w,u)=1 sinceg cd(γ,u)=g cd(β,u)=1, and we have

supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| ≥supn1|cos(nγa)cos(nγb)|

=supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nπ

u

cos

µ2nwπ u

¶¯¯¯¯≥supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nαπ

u

cos

µ2nαwπ u

¶¯¯¯¯

=supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nαπ

u

cos µ2nβπ

u

¶¯¯¯¯=supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)|.

By replacingwbyuwif necessary, we can assume that 2≤wu2.

Now letw∈Zsuch thatg cd(u,w)=1. We havea=2απu , withg cd(α,u)=1.

The same argument as above shows that we have supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nπ

u

cos

µ2nwπ u

¶¯¯¯¯=supn1cos(na)−cos(nb)|,

withb=2wαπu , which has orderu.

(iii) Now assume thatv=3u. There existsα∈{1, . . . ,u−1} andβ∈{1, . . . , 3u− 1} such thata∈ ±2απu +2πZandb∈ ±2βπ3u +2πZ, andg cd(α,u)=g cd(β, 3u)=1.

Letγ∈Zsuch thatβγ−1∈3uZ. Theng cd(γ, 3u)=1, and a fortiorig cd(γ,u)=1.

There existsw∈Zsuch thatαγ∈ ±w+uZ, and we see as above that we have

supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| =supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nαπ

u

cos µ2nβπ

3u

¶¯¯¯¯

=supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos

µ2nαγπ u

cos

µ2nβγπ 3u

¶¯¯¯¯=supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos

µ2nwπ u

cos µ2nπ

3u

¶¯¯¯¯.

(15)

Conversely leta=2απuπQhave orderu, and letw∈Zbe such thatg cd(u,w)= 1. Ifαis not divisible by 3, theng cd(α, 3u)=1. Ifαis divisible by 3, thenuis not divisible by 3, and soα+uα+uZis not divisible by 3. So we can assume wi- thout loss of generality thatαis not divisible by 3, and there existsβ≥1 such thatαβ−1∈3uπZ. Similarly we can assume without loss of generality thatwis not divisible by 3, and there existsγ≥1 such that−1∈3uπZ. Setb=2αγπ3u . Thenbhas order 3u, and we see as above that we have

supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos

µ2nwπ u

cos µ2nπ

3u

¶¯¯¯¯≥supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos

µ2nαγwπ u

cos

µ2nαγπ 3u

¶¯¯¯¯

=supn1|cos(na)cos(nb)| ≥supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos

µ2nαγwβwπ u

cos

µ2nαγβwπ 3u

¶¯¯

¯¯

=supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos

µ2nwπ u

cos µ2nπ

3u

¶¯¯¯¯,

which concludes the proof of (iii).

(iv) Clearly, the first assertion of (iv) is a reformulation of the first assertion of (iii). Now assume that the orderuofaπQis divisible by 3, setv=u3, write a = 2απu , and let w∈Zsuch thatg cd(w,v)=1. We see as above that we can assume without loss of generality thatg cd(u,w)=1.

Sinceg cd(α,u)=1, we have a fortiorig cd(α,v)=1, so thatg cd(αw,v)=1, so thatb:=6αwu has ordervand we see as above thata,b,uandwsatisfy (4).ä

In order to use lemma 3.4, we introduce the following notions.

Definition 3.5. Let u≥2,and denote by∆(u)the set of all integers s satisfying 1≤su2,g cd(u,s)=1,and let1(u)=∆(u) \ {1}.We set

σ(u)=i n fw∈∆(u)

· supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2π

3u

cos µ2wπ

u

¶¯¯¯¯

¸ , θ(u)=i n fw∈∆1(u)

· supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2π

u

cos µ2wπ

u

¶¯¯¯¯

¸ . with the conventionθ(u)=2if1(u)= ;.

Notice that∆1(u)= ;ifu=2, 3, 4 or 6, and that∆1(u)6= ;otherwise since as we observed aboveH(n)=c ar d((Z/nZ)×)≥3 ifn∉{1, 2, 3, 4, 6}.

We obtain the following corollary, which shows in particular that the value ofk(a) depends only on the order ofa.

Corollary 3.6. Let aπQ,and let u≥1be the order of a.

(i) If u is not divisible by3,then k(a)=i n f(σ(u),θ(u)).

(ii) If u is divisible by3,then k(a)=i n f(σ¡u

3

¢,σ(u),θ(u)).

(16)

Proof : Set

— Λ1(a)=©

bπQ|b∉ ±a+2πZ,or d(b)=or d(a)ª ,

— Λ2(a)=©

bπQ|or d(b)=3or d(a)ª ,

— Λ3(a)=©

bπQ|3or d(b)=or d(a)ª ,

— Λ4(a)=©

bπQ|or d(b)6=or d(a)6=3or d(b)ª , and for 1≤i≤4, set

λi(a)=i n fb∈Λi(a)sup

n1|cos(na)cos(nb)|, with the conventionλi(a)=2 ifΛi(a)= ;.

Sinceb∉ ±a+2πZifor d(b)6=or d(a), we haveλ2(a)≤3p83, and it follows from lemma 3.4(i) that we have

k(a)=i n f1i4λi(a)=i n f1i3λi(a),

and it follows from lemma 3.4 (ii), (iii) and (iv) thatλ1(a)=θ(u) if∆1(u)6= ;, thatλ2(a)=σ(u), and thatλ3(a)=σ¡u

3

¢ifuis divisible by 3.ä We have the following result.

Theorem 3.7. Let m<3p83.Then the setΩ(m) :={a∈[0,π] :k(a)≤m}is finite.

Proof : It follows from lemma 3.3 applied tou andu that there existsu0≥1 such that we have, foruu0,

(i)supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nπ

u

cos

µ2w nπ u

¶¯¯¯¯>m if 2≤wi n f ³u 2, 6´

,

(i i)supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ6nπ

u

cos

µ2(3w+1)nπ u

¶¯¯¯

¯>m if 0≤w≤6, (i i i)supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ6nπ

u

cos

µ2(3w+2)nπ u

¶¯¯¯¯>m if 0≤w≤6.

Letuu0, and letw be an integer such that 2≤wu2. Il 2wπuπ/2, or if

2wπ

u6 , it follows from lemma 3.2 and property (i) that we have supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nπ

u

cos

µ2w nπ u

¶¯¯¯¯>m.

Now assume thatπ22wπu6. If¯¯wu3¯¯≥7, it follows from lemma 3.2 that we have

supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nπ

u

cos

µ2w nπ u

¶¯¯¯¯>1.55>m.

(17)

If¯¯wu3

¯¯<7, setr= |3w−u|. Then 0≤r≤20, and we have

supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nπ

u

cos

µ2w nπ u

¶¯¯¯¯≥supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ6nπ

u

cos µ2nrπ

u

¶¯¯¯¯.

Ifuis not divisible by 3, then eitherr =3s+1 orr =3s+2, with 0≤w≤6, and it follows from (ii) and (iii) that we have

supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nπ

u

cos

µ2w nπ u

¶¯¯¯¯>m.

Ifu is divisible by 3 thenr is also divisible by 3. Setv= u3 ands= r3. Then 0≤s≤6, and we have

supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nπ

u

cos

µ2w nπ u

¶¯¯¯¯≥supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nπ

v

cos µ2nsπ

v

¶¯¯¯¯.

Ifs∈{2, 3, 4, 5, 6} it follows from (i) that we have, ifu≥3u0, supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nπ

v

cos µ2snπ

u

¶¯¯¯¯>m.

Now assume thats=0. Ifu≥15, thenv≥5, and we have

supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nπ

v

cos µ2snπ

u

¶¯¯¯¯=supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nπ

v

−1

¯¯

¯¯≥1+cos³π 5

´

>1.8>m.

Now assume thats=1. We have, withǫ= ±1,

supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nπ

u

cos

µ2w nπ u

¶¯¯¯¯=supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nπ

3v

cos µ2nπ

3v +2nǫπ 3

¶¯¯¯¯

supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos

µ2(3n+1)π 3v

cos

µ2(3n+1)π

3v +2ǫπ

3

¶¯¯¯¯=p 3

¯¯

¯¯si n µ2nπ

v +2π 3v+ǫπ

3

¶¯¯¯¯.

There existsp≥1 andq∈Zsuch that π2πv2pπv +3v +ǫπ3 +2qπ≤π2+πv, and we obtain, foru≥21,w=v±1,

supn1

¯¯

¯¯cos µ2nπ

u

cos

µ2w nπ u

¶¯¯¯¯≥p

3cos³π v

´

≥p

3cos³π 7

´

≥1.56>m.

We thus see that ifuu0 is not divisible par 3, or ifumax(21, 3u0) is divisible by 3, we have, for 2≤wu2,

Références

Documents relatifs

The SF-analytic sets are precisely the analytic sets which are locally contained in some complex submanifold (with complemented tangent spaces) where they are finitely defined in

But, by the uniform boundedness principle, if the fn converge in this topology, then they must be bounded in the essential supremum norm as functions on (— jc, n). Therefore, they

Conversely, if I is infinite and G is not perfect, then G I maps onto the direct sum Z /p Z (N) for some prime p, so has cofinality ω and is not Cayley bounded, as we see by taking

In section 2, we present a proof of the fact that every monotone σ-complete dimension group is boundedly countably atomic compact in the language (+, ≤ ) (theorem 2.9); unlike

DIEHL, A conservation law with point source and discontinuous flux function modelling continuous sedimentation, SIAM J. MADAUNE-TORT, Analyse math´ ematique de mod` eles nonlin´

case when the (maximal monotone) subdifferential of a lower semicontinuous convex proper function f on E.. We start

Is every convex compact subset of a Hausdorff topological linear space ctb1. A positive answer to this problem would imply a positive answer

a total variation with respect to a non euclidean distance. Unlike the other papers on this subject, we don’t make any assumption on the dimension and the