• Aucun résultat trouvé

Eigenvalues of the Laplacian acting on $p$-forms and metric conformal deformations

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Eigenvalues of the Laplacian acting on $p$-forms and metric conformal deformations"

Copied!
11
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-00002836

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00002836v2

Submitted on 18 Sep 2004

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

Eigenvalues of the Laplacian acting on p-forms and metric conformal deformations

Bruno Colbois, Ahmad El Soufi

To cite this version:

Bruno Colbois, Ahmad El Soufi. Eigenvalues of the Laplacian acting onp-forms and metric conformal deformations. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, American Mathematical Society, 2006, 134 (3), pp.715-721. �hal-00002836v2�

(2)

ccsd-00002836, version 2 - 18 Sep 2004

Eigenvalues of the Laplacian acting on p-forms and metric conformal deformations

Bruno Colbois and Ahmad El Soufi

Abstract

Let (M, g) be a compact connected orientable Riemannian mani- fold of dimensionn4 and let λk,p(g) be thek-th positive eigenvalue of the Laplacian ∆g,p =dd+ddacting on differential forms of degree ponM. We prove that the metricgcan be conformally deformed to a metric g, having the same volume asg, with arbitrarily largeλ1,p(g) for all p[2, n2].

Note that for the other values of p, that is p = 0,1, n1 and n, one can deduce from the literature that, ∀k >0, the k-th eigenvalue λk,p is uniformly bounded on any conformal class of metrics of fixed volume onM.

For p = 1, we show that, for any positive integer N, there exists a metric gN conformal tog such that, ∀kN, λk,1(gN) = λk,0(gN), that is, the first N eigenforms of ∆gN,1 are all exact forms.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 35P15, 58J50, 53C20.

Keywords: Laplacian, p-forms, eigenvalue, conformal deformations.

B. Colbois : Universit´e de Neuchˆatel, Laboratoire de Math´ematiques, 13 rue E. Argand, 2007 Neuchˆatel, Switzerland.

E-mail: [email protected]

A. El Soufi : Universit´e de Tours, Laboratoire de Math´ematiques et Physique Th´eorique, UMR-CNRS 6083, Parc de Grandmont, 37200 Tours, France.

E-mail: [email protected].

(3)

1 Introduction and Statement of Results

Let M be a closed connected orientable differentiable manifold of dimension n 2. For any Riemannian metric g on M, we denote by ∆g,p = dd + dd the corresponding Laplacian acting on differential forms of degree p on M. The spectrum spec(∆g,p) of ∆g,p consists of an unbounded sequence of nonnegative eigenvalues which starts from zero if an only if the p-th Betti number bp(M) of M does not vanish. The sequence of positive eigenvalues of ∆g,p is denoted by

0< λ1,p(g)λ2,p(g)· · · ≤λk,p(g)≤ · · · → ∞,

The case p = 0 corresponds to the Laplace-Beltrami operator acting on functions.

The study of the behavior of the eigenvalues of the Laplacian under metric deformations constitutes one of the main topics in spectral geometry. In particular, it is of great interest to find situations where the behavior of λk,p(g) for p1, differs completely from that ofλk,0(g) (see for instance the situation of collapsing manifolds described in [CC] and [L]).

In what follows, λk,p will be considered as a functional on the space M(M) of all Riemannian metrics of volume one on M (the ”volume one”

condition is a normalization since λk,p(cg) = 1cλk,p(g)). We will also con- sider its restriction to a given conformal class of metrics of fixed volume [g] ={g ∈ M(M) | g is conformal tog}.

There exists an extensive literature dealing with the scalar case p = 0 (see for instance the introduction of [CE] for a synthetic presentation of the main results). In particular, it is well known that,

(i) if n = 2, then λk,0 is bounded on M(M). More precisely, if M is an orientable compact surface of genus γ, then, there exists a universal constant C such that∀k 1,

sup

g∈M(M)

λk,0(g)C(γ+ 1)k (1) (see [YY] for k = 1 and [K] for general k).

(ii) if n 3, thenλ1,0 is not bounded on M(M), that is (see [CD]) sup

g∈M(M)

λ1,0(g) =∞. (2)

(4)

(iii) ∀g ∈ M(M), λk,0 is bounded on [g]. Indeed, there exists a constant C([g]) such that, ∀k 1,

sup

g∈[g]

λk,0(g)C([g])k2/n (3) (see [EI] for k = 1 and [K] for general k).

Problem : do these results still hold when we replaceλk,0 withλk,p, p1? Using the Hodge-de Rham decomposition theorem, one can easily see that for an orientable compact surface, λk,0(g) = λk,1(g) = λk,2(g). Thus, the result (i) above is also valid for the eigenvalues of the Laplacian on forms.

The case n 3 and p 1 was first considered by Tanno [T] who ex- amined a 1-parameter family of Berger metrics (gt)t on the sphere S3 for which λ1,0(gt)→ ∞ ast→ ∞, and showed that λ1,1(gt) is bounded. On the other hand, Gentile and Pagliara [GP] proved that if n 4, then for any p[2, n2],λ1,p is not bounded on M(M) :

sup

g∈M(M)

λ1,p(g) =∞. (4)

Hence, the result (ii) above is still valid for λ1,p, 2 p n2. Note that the case p= 1 (and its dual p=n1) remains open.

In this paper, we focus, as in the result (iii) above, on the restriction of the functional λk,p to a given conformal class of metrics of fixed volume [g]

on M. As we saw in (iii) above, for any k 1,λk,0 is bounded on [g]. Since d∆g,0 = ∆g,1d, the differential df of any eigenfunction f is an eigenform of degree 1 with the same eigenvalue. In particular, we have, ∀k 1,

λk,1(g)λk,0(g).

Consequently, λk,1 is also bounded on [g] and the result (iii) is still valid for the eigenvalues of the Laplacian acting on 1-forms. Thanks to the Hodge duality, the same is also true for the eigenvalues of the Laplacian on (n1)- forms and on n-forms. Thus, λk,p is bounded on [g] for p = 0, 1, n1 and n.

Our main theorem shows that the situation differs drastically for the other values of p. Indeed, it turns out that if 2 p n2, then the functional λ1,p is never bounded on [g], whatever the conformal class [g] we consider.

More precisely, one can conformally deform any metric g on M in such a way that the n3 eigenvalues λ1,p, 2 p n2, become simultaneously arbitrarily large.

(5)

Theorem 1.1 Let (M, g) be a compact Riemannian manifold of dimension n 4 and let A be any positive real number. There exists a metric gA conformal to g and having the same volume as g, such that, ∀p[2, n2],

λ1,p(gA)A.

In particular, ∀p[2, n2], we have sup

g∈[g]

λ1,p(g) =∞.

Or, equivalently,

sup{λ1,p(g)V(g)2/n| g conformal to g}=∞, where V(g) denotes the volume of the manifold (M, g).

Note that when the supremum is taken over all the metrics of volume 1, then there is no difference between the scalar case p = 0 and the case 2pn2 (that is, supg∈M(M)λ1,p(g) =∞) as proved in [GP].

As an application of Theorem 1.1 and the result of Korevaar (3) above, we obtain the following.

Corollary 1.1 Let (M, g) be a compact Riemannian manifold of dimension n 4. For any positive integer k, there exists a metric gk conformal to g such that, 2pn2,

λ1,p(gk)> λk,0(gk) and

λ1,p(gk)> λk,1(gk).

If we set, like in [Tk], Gapp,qk,l(g) = λk,p(g)λl,q(g), then Corollary 1.1 tells us that, ∀k 1 and l1, every conformal class of metrics [g] contains metrics g satisfying, 2pn2,

Gapp,0k,l(g)>0 and Gapp,1k,l(g)>0.

Recall that the gaps Gap0,1k,k(g) = λk,0(g)λk,1(g) between the eigenval- ues on functions and those on 1-forms are all nonnegative. An interesting question is to know whether the nature (zero or nonzero) of some of them is imposed by the differential or the conformal structures of the manifold.

Takahashi [Tk] (see also [GS]) proved that any manifoldM of dimension n 3 admits both a metric g1 with Gap0,11,1(g1) = 0 and a metric g2 with

(6)

Gap0,11,1(g2) > 0. Thus, the nature of the first gap is not an invariant of the differential structure of M.

The following result shows that there is no differential or conformal ob- struction for any finite number of gaps to be zero. Indeed, we have the following.

Corollary 1.2 Let (M, g) be a compact Riemannian manifold of dimension n 4. For any positive integer N, there exists a metric gN conformal to g such that, ∀k N,

λk,1(gN) =λk,0(gN),

that is, the first N eigenforms of gN,1 are all exact forms.

This means that, ∀N N, any metric g can be conformally deformed to a metric gN [g] whose N first gaps vanish, that is,

Gap0,11,1(gN) =· · ·= Gap0,1N,N(gN) = 0.

Finally, we point out that the existence of upper bounds on λ1,0 under other types of restrictions has been investigated, for instance in [BLY] and [P]. It would be of course interesting to study the existence of such upper bounds for λ1,p with p1.

2 Proof of Results

The idea of the proof of Theorem 1.1 consists in showing that the construction of [GP] to produce large eigenvalues for forms may be realized by conformal deformations. As in [CE], we will use the fact that any manifold is locally almost Euclidean. This implies that we can suppose first that the metric is Euclidean on a small neighbourhood of a point, construct a conformal deformation of the Euclidean metric, and then show that, by quasi-isometry, it gives a conformal deformation of the initial metric with the property we want.

Before going into the proof, let us recall some basic facts about the Lapla- cian on forms. Indeed, the Hodge-de Rham theorem gives the following or- thogonal decomposition of the space Λp(M) of differential forms of degree p on M:

Λp(M) =Ker∆g,p p−1(M)dΛp+1(M).

The operator ∆g,p leaves this decomposition invariant. Hence, if we denote by

λk,p(g);k 1 the eigenvalues of ∆g,p acting on the subspacep−1(M)

(7)

of exact p-forms, and by

λ′′k,p(g);k 1 those corresponding to the sub- space dΛp+1(M) of co-exact p-forms, then k,p(g);k1} is equal to the re-ordered union of

λk,p(g);k 1 and

λ′′k,p(g);k1 : k,p(g);k1}=

λk,p(g);k 1

λ′′k,p(g);k 1 . (5) Since d and d commute with the Laplacian, we have,

λk,p(g) =λ′′k,p−1(g) and then,

k,p(g);k 1}=

λk,p(g);k 1

λk,p+1(g);k 1 . (6) Proof of Corollary 1.2 : For p = 1 we have, ∀k 1, λk,1(g) = λk,0(g) and then

k,1(g);k 1}=k,0(g);k 1} ∪

λk,2(g);k 1 .

Applying Theorem 1.1 and Korevaar’s inequality (3), we get, for any positive integer N, the existence of a metric gN satisfying

λ1,2(gN)> C([g])Nn2 λN,0(gN).

The result of the corollary follows immediately. 2 Proof of Theorem 1.1. Recall first the idea of the proof in [GP]: they start with the manifoldM, make a hole and glue what they call a cigar, that is the union of a standard half-sphere with a cylinder [0, L]×Sn−1. Since a cigar is diffeomorphic to a ball, the resulting manifold is diffeomorphic to M. Then, they endow M with a metric gL so that it induces the standard metric on the cigar and show that, as L→ ∞,λ1,p(gL) is uniformly bounded below by a positive constant for 2 p n2. They conclude by noticing that the volume of (M, gL) goes to infinity with L.

First, let us show that the cigar may be realized as a conformal defor- mation of the n-dimensional Euclidean unit ball Bn. Indeed, the Euclidean metric geuc has the following expression in polar coordinates

geuc=dr2+r22,

where 0 < r <1 and 2 denotes the standard metric of the (n1)-sphere Sn−1. For any positive real numberL, we multiply this metric by the following positive function fL of the parameter r

(8)

fL(r) =

4e2L

(1+e2Lr2)2 if 0reL,

1

r2 if eLr 1.

The resulting metric fLgeuc on Bn is so that the part {r eL}, fLgeuc is isometric to

Bn,(1+r42)2(dr2+r22)

that may be identified, via a stereo- graphic projection, with the standard half-sphere (of radius 1), while the part {e−L < r <1} endowed with the metric fLgeuc = (drr)2+2, is isometric to the standard cylinder ]0, L[×Sn−1 with the product metric. Hence, the ball (Bn, fLgeuc) is isometric to a standard cigar CL of length L.

Note that the function fL is only of class C1, but, using classical density results, it is possible to smooth it in order to get a smooth metric ¯fLgeuc

conformal to geuc and quasi-isometric to fLgeuc with a quasi-isometry ratio arbitrarily close to 1.

As in [CE], we will need the two following remarks (see the remark O1 and Lemma 2.3 (i) p. 343 of [CE]) :

(i) if two Riemannian metricsg1, g2on a manifoldM areα-quasi-isometric, then for any smooth positive function f, the conformal metricsf g1 and f g2 are also α-quasi-isometric.

(ii) if (M, g) is a compact Riemannian manifold and x0 M, then for any positive δ, there exists a Riemannian metric gδ on M which is flat in a neighborhood ofx0 and (1 +δ)-quasi-isometric tog (that is, ∀v T M, (1 +δ)−2gδ(v, v)g(v, v)(1 +δ)2gδ(v, v)).

Now, let us fix a Riemannian metric g on M and a positive real number δ (0,1).Thanks to the previous remark (ii), there exists a metricgδ onM which is flat in a neighborhood of a pointx0 M and (1 +δ)-quasi-isometric to g. Up to a dilatation, we can suppose that this neighborhood contains an euclidean ball of radius 2 centered at x0. On the ball of radius 1, B(x0,1), we make the conformal change described above in order to get a cigarCL of length L. On the annulus {1 r 2}, we interpolate by considering the conformal metric given in polar coordinates by h(r)(dr2+r22), where his any smooth function, 12 h(r)1, satisfying

h(r) =

1

r2 if 1r 43, 1 if 53 r 2.

(9)

Hence, we get, ∀L >0, a smooth metric gδ,L onM conformal to gδ and such that a neighborhood of the point x0 is isometric to a standard cigar CL of length L. In particular, (M, gδ,L) contains a regular domain ΩL naturally identified with the cylinder [0, L]×Sn1. Moreover, the rest of the manifold (M L, gδ,L) does not depend on L (up to an isometry). Using arguments as in [GP] and [M], it is possible to compare the first eigenvalue λ1,p(gδ,L) of the Laplacian ∆gδ,L acting on exact p-forms on M with the first positive eigenvalue µ1,p(ΩL) of ∆gδ,L acting on exact p-forms on ΩL under absolute boundary conditions. Indeed, there exist three positive constants a, b and c, independent of L, such that (see [GP], Lemma 1)

λ1,p(gδ,L) a

b

µ1,p(ΩL)+c.

On the other hand, recall that for any integer p [1, n2], the Laplacian acting on p-forms on the standard sphere Sn−1 admits no zero eigenvalues.

Hence, ∀p[2, n2], we have µ1,p(ΩL) = µ1,p([0, L]×Sn−1)

min

µ1,0([0, L]) +λ1,p(Sn1), µ1,1([0, L]) +λ1,p1(Sn1)

min

λ1,p(Sn1), λ1,p1(Sn1)

min

1≤q≤n−2λ1,q(Sn1).

Therefore, there exists a positive constant C, independent of L, such that,

∀p[2, n2] and ∀L >0, we have

λ1,p(gδ,L)C.

The volume one metric ¯gδ,L=V(gδ,L)−2n gδ,L satisfies, ∀p[2, n2],

λ1,pgδ,L)CV(gδ,L)n2 KL2n (7) for some positive constant K.

Let us denote, ∀L > 0, by φL the conformal ratio between ¯gδ,L and gδ, that is ¯gδ,L=φLgδ. The mericgL=φLg is then conformal to g and (1 +δ)- quasi-isometric to ¯gδ,L (see remark (i) above). The volume of gL is bounded below by (1 +δ)nVgδ,L) = (1 +δ)n while its first eigenvalue on exact p- forms satisfiesλ1,p(gL)(1 +δ)−2(n+2p+1)λ1,pgδ,L) (see [D] prop. 3.3 p.441).

Hence, for any p[2, n2], we have

λ1,p(gL)V(gL)n2 KL¯ n2 (8)

(10)

for some positive constant ¯K.

In dimension n = 4, the space Λ2(M) is invariant by the Hodge star operator which commutes with the Laplacian and satisfies ∗dΛ1(M) = dΛ3(M). Consequently, using (5) above, λ1,2(gL) =λ1,2(gL) =λ′′1,2(gL) and then

λ1,2(gL)V(gL)2n KL¯ n2.

In dimension n 5, for anyp= 2,3, . . . ,[n2], where [n2] is the integer part of

n

2, we have 2p < p+ 1n2, and then, using (6) and (8) above, λ1,p(gL)V(gL)n2 = min

λ1,p(gL), λ1,p+1(gL) V(gL)n2 KL¯ 2n.

This last estimate still holds forp= [n2]+1, . . . , n−2 since we haveλ1,p(gL) = λ1,n−p(gL) thanks to the Hodge duality.

Finally, we have, ∀n4 and ∀p[2, n2], λ1,p(gL)V(gL)n2 KL¯ n2

and thenλ1,p(gL)V(gL)n2 → ∞asL→ ∞. Theorem 1.1 follows immediately.

2

References

[BLY] Bourguignon J-P., Li P., Yau S.T.: Upper bound for the first eigen- value of algebraic submanifolds, Comm. Math. Helv. 69 (1994) 199-207.

[CC] Colbois B., Courtois G.: A note on the first nonzero eigenvalue of the Laplacian acting onp-forms, Manuscripta Math.68(1990), no. 2, 143–160.

[CD] Colbois B., Dodziuk J.: Riemannian metrics with large λ1. Proc.

Am. Math. Soc. 122, no 3, (1994) 905-906.

[CE] Colbois B., El Soufi A.: Extremal eigenvalues of the Laplacian in a conformal class of metrics: The conformal spectrum, Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry 24 (2003) 337-349.

[D] Dodziuk J.: Eigenvalues of the laplacian on forms, Proc. Am.

Math. Soc. 85 (1982) 438-443.

[EI] El Soufi A., Ilias S.: Immersion minimales, premi`ere valeur propre du laplacien et volume conforme, Math. Ann. 275(1986) 257-267.

(11)

[GP] Gentile G., Pagliara V.: Riemannian metrics with large first eigen- value on forms of degreep, Proc. Am. Math. Soc123, no 12, (1995) 3855-3858.

[GS] Gurini P., Savo A.: Eigenvalues and gap estimates for the Lapla- cian acting onp-forms, Trans. Am. Math. Soc.356(2004) 319-344.

[K] Korevaar N.: Upper bounds for eigenvalues of conformal metrics, J. Differ. Geom. 37, No.1, (1993) 73-93.

[L] Lott J.: Collapsing and the differential form Laplacian: the case of a smooth limit space, Duke Math. J. 114 (2002), no. 2, 267–306.

[M] McGowan J.: Thep-spectrum of the Laplacian on compact hyper- bolic three manifolds, Math. Ann. 279 (1993) 729-745.

[P] Polterovich L.: Symplectic aspects of the first eigenvalue, J. Reine Angew. Math. 502 (1998), 1–17.

[T] Tanno, S.: Geometric expressions of eigen 1-forms of the Laplacian on spheres, Spectra of Riemannian Manifolds, Kaigai Publications, Tokyo (1983), 115-128.

[Tk] Takahashi J.: On the gap between the first eigenvalues of the Laplacian on functions and p-forms, Annals of Global Analysis and Geometry 23 (2003), 13-27.

[YY] Yang P., Yau S.T.: Eigenvalues of the Laplacian of compact Rie- mann surfaces and minimal submanifolds, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup.

Pisa 7 (1980) 55-63.

Références

Documents relatifs

The object of the present paper is to study a quasi-conformally flat ( k, μ )-contact metric manifold and such a manifold with vanishing extended quasi-conformal cur- vature

Moreover, they showed that if the curvature tensor with respect to the semi-symmetric non-metric connection vanishes, then the Riemannian manifold is projectively flat. In the

This lower bound —therefore, the sub-multiplicative inequality— with the following facts: (a) combinational modulus is bounded by the analytical moduli on tangent spaces of X, and

An infinitesimal increase of the volume ∆v brings an increase in p int , so that the piston moves until another equilibrium point with a bigger volume. On the other hand, a

We define a partition of the set of integers k in the range [1, m−1] prime to m into two or three subsets, where one subset consists of those integers k which are &lt; m/2,

Then it seems likely that for β &gt; 1/2 there is a Ricci flat K¨ ahler metric on the complement of the curve with standard cone singularities of cone angle 2πβ away from the origin,

The solution of the geodesic equation (Theorem 4.1) gives a precise sense to how geodesics in ( M , g N ) generalize those discovered by Calabi [4,5] for the subspace of Kähler

This lower bound—therefore, the sub-multiplicative inequality—with the following facts: a combinational modulus is bounded by the analytical moduli on tangent spaces of X, and b