• Aucun résultat trouvé

From the Individual to the Group: Integrating Asynchronous Collaboration with Co-located Work

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "From the Individual to the Group: Integrating Asynchronous Collaboration with Co-located Work"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-00689916

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00689916

Submitted on 20 Apr 2012

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

From the Individual to the Group: Integrating

Asynchronous Collaboration with Co-located Work

Petra Isenberg, Jean-Daniel Fekete

To cite this version:

Petra Isenberg, Jean-Daniel Fekete. From the Individual to the Group: Integrating Asynchronous

Collaboration with Co-located Work. Proceedings of the AVI Workshop on Supporting Asynchronous

Collaboration in Visual Analytics Systems, May 2012, Capri, Italy. �hal-00689916�

(2)

From the Individual to the Group: Integrating

Asynchronous Collaboration with Co-located Work

Petra Isenberg Jean-Daniel Fekete INRIA

(petra.isenberg | jean-daniel.fekete)@inria.fr

ABSTRACT

A large amount of data analysis work is conducted by indi-viduals interspersed with formally arranged or spontaneous face-to-face meetings. Visual analytics tools provide no easy solution to bridge the gap between such individual and face-to-face work situations. They are typically either designed to work well for individuals or for teams but do not sup-port to be used interchangeably in both synchronous and asynchronous work settings. In order to make collaboration effortless and worth undertaking, however, individuals have to be able to fluidly switch in and out of synchronous collab-oration with others, to bring their own data, its visual repre-sentations, as well as all data modifications and annotations to a shared meeting where both data and representations can not only be presented but also interacted with, modified, and further analyzed together with others.

1.

INTRODUCTION

Social exchanges around data are fairly common, people gather information together, discuss it, share it, form joint decisions based on it, or present it to others. Ultimately, supporting this collaborative nature of data analysis in new technology contexts can empower humans to more effectively and intuitively make use of information whenever and wher-ever it is needed the most. Yet, while the first tools to support both synchronous face-to-face (e. g., [1, 5]) and asyn-chronous distributed collaboration [4] are emerging, very little has been done to build bridges between the different types of collaboration.

In this position statement we argue that—to truly sup-port asynchronous and synchronous collaborative work phases—it is essential to support a tighter integration of asynchronous single-user and synchronous multi-user analytics tools and techniques. We have to tackle funda-mental problems of technological infrastructure and the design of data representation and interaction to build a bridge between individual (asynchronous) and team work for visual data analysis. The main challenge of this research is that hardly any design considerations exists on how

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise, to republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. AVI ’12, May 21–25, 2012, Capri Island, Italy Copyright 2012 ACM 978-1-4503-1287-5 ...$10.00.

data analysis phases of individual (asynchronous) and synchronous collaborative work relate to each other, when people switch between both types of analysis, for which types of questions and tasks, and what types of data analysis collaborations they want to engage in.

We are currently working on a research project that in-volves a stream of research modules, starting from fundamen-tally extending visualization toolkits for collaborative work and researching the necessary interaction and visualization mechanisms that will allow for a seamless and effortless setup of face-to-face data analysis with visualizations from phases of individual, asynchronous work. This is challeng-ing because existchalleng-ing tools, designed for a one-user settchalleng-ing, are notoriously difficult to adapt to a collaborative setting. The problems come from several levels: low-level access to multiple input devices, management of these devices in ex-isting libraries and toolkits, the lack of support for higher-level mechanisms to support collaboration such as per-user undo/redo or interactive feedback of other users’ activity to prevent conflicts, or the dedicated interfaces and visual design that are required for large interactive wall or tabletop displays. Fig. 1 gives an overview of our research focus.

2.

RESEARCH GOALS

The goal of our research is to devise technologies which best enable face-to-face collaborative data analysis as an inte-gral part of the continuum between single-user asynchronous and multi-user synchronous work. Our work is motivated by previous observational studies in a biological research lab where the need to bridge from individual to collaborative work on the analysis of experimental data was particularly evident. Biologists frequently engaged in paper-based discus-sions about printed data from their experiments with their colleagues, to ask their opinion and advice. Without proper collaborative technology, however, they could not compare to data from past experiments, modify the data they were examining, or easily share it. In business settings similar problems exist. Here decisions makers frequently come to-gether in meeting rooms to analyze and discuss data and form decisions. This data is typically presented in forms of charts and graphs on digital slide shows which can no longer be modified, interacted with, or re-represented. The collabo-rative meetings we observed were entirely disconnected from the previous individual work which had been done on the data and could no longer take advantage of these past work processes. It is these and similar scenarios that have a clear need for tools that support an interplay of asynchronous and synchronous face-to-face collaboration. A few of the

(3)

Visual Analytics

Same Time

Collaboration

Individual Work

           Transfer of data, representations, interactions

Synthesis, sharing, & relating individual analysis results: Sharing of data, representaions, interpretations Modifications to & interaction with data & representations

Work on same or different data Using same or different darta epresentations

     

Our research focus

Figure 1: The research focus and challenges of our work on the interplay of asynchronous and synchronous collaborative visual analytics.

challenges we would like to address are:

2.1

Infrastructure Challenges

For building groupware, several toolkits and frameworks exist but none provide dedicated capabilities for building visualization applications. In order to make visualization toolkits groupware-ready, it is important to study the struc-ture of both. Our goal is to review groupware toolkits for their features and software design with a focus on those that support synchronous, co-located work. This work will be important to derive basic software requirements for ex-tending visualization toolkits. Ultimately, we want to de-liver results on the underlying software and algorithms nec-essary to bridge between single-user to multi-user visualiza-tion tools and allow others to more easily build integrated single-user/collaborative visualization tools.

2.2

Interaction and Visualization Challenges

On the interaction design-side our goal is to develop mech-anisms for shared workspaces to give each individual team member effective access to shared resources while dropping in- and out of a collaborative workspace. This will also include metaphors for adding and taking visualization to a collaborative workspace, for sharing data visualizations and their parameters, and for data modification in a shared setting. A first step towards this goal will be presented at the conference [2]. We further plan to research how asynchronously used single-user visualizations have to be modified for the collaborative workspace. We will specifi-cally research modifications to provide support for aware-ness, common ground formation, and data synthesis [3]. We will begin to introduce these modifications in form of meta-visualizations. In order to build these meta-visualizations we will develop algorithms which aid in automatic synthesis and comparison of data and their visual representations that in-dividuals bring to a joint analysis session. These algorithms will provide the data which the meta-visualizations represent and which in turn aid users of the collaborative workspace to see how their past work relates, can be synthesized, orga-nized, and further analyzed.

2.3

Evaluation Challenges

We plan to evaluate our work and expect to encounter challenges in studying tools and applications situated at

the intersection of asynchronous and synchronous work. In particular, it will be challenging to study multiple asyn-chronous work settings in depth so that the synasyn-chronous collaborative work phases can be readily understood and effectively evaluated.

3.

CONCLUSION

In summary, we hope to provide researchers and practi-tioners with (1) clear design considerations for developing visualization systems which are useful and usable for both individual as well as collaborative work, (b) practical tools in the context of a toolkit on which to build for promoting collaborative visualization use in a variety of application do-mains, and (c) results from validation and iterative improve-ment of the techniques which are meant to bridge between individual and collaborative work.

4.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work is sponsored by the French Research Organiza-tion, project grant ANR-11-JS02-003.

5.

REFERENCES

[1] P. Isenberg and D. Fisher. Collaborative Brushing and Linking for Co-located Visual Analytics of Document Collections. Computer Graphics Forum, 28(3):pp. 1031–1038, 2009.

[2] S. Klum, P. Isenberg, R. Langner, J.-D. Fekete, and R. Dachselt. Stackables: Combining Tangibles for Faceted Browsing. In Proc. AVI . ACM, 2012. [3] A. C. Robinson. Collaborative Synthesis of Visual

Analytic Results. In Proc. VAST , pp. 67–74. IEEE, 2008.

[4] F. B. Vi´egas, M. Wattenberg, F. van Ham, J. Kriss, and M. McKeon. Many Eyes: A Site for Visualization at Internet Scale. IEEE TVCG, 12(5):pp. 1121–1128, 2007.

[5] D. Wigdor, H. Jiang, C. Forlines, M. Borkin, and C. Shen. WeSpace: The Design Development and Deployment of a Walk-up and Share Multi-Surface Visual Collaboration System. In Proc. CHI , pp. 1237–1246. ACM Press, 2009.

Figure

Figure 1: The research focus and challenges of our work on the interplay of asynchronous and synchronous collaborative visual analytics.

Références

Documents relatifs

Based on the experiences gained from developing an University Service Bus in a project within the timespan of nine years, key issues and strategies for being able to

Essentially this theory questions the cognitive view that considers learning as a transfer of a bunch of abstract knowledge from a more expert person to a less expert one

2.3 Collaboration and interoperability 2.4 Computer–human interface Since experts need to work in parallel style with different DMU representations in the concept of

This paper describes some of the initial work carried out in the area of developing tools to identify connections, which forms part of the wider system to

Phase II looked at the social and economic im- pacts of E-RGM on the source communities of mobile workers who commute to and from the nickel processing facility at Long Harbour.. A

The Towns in Labrador West did not want work camps built, so efforts were made to develop perma- nent housing for workers and their families.. One company, Dexter, was able to

Residents in the region are engaged in multiple forms of mobile work, including commuting to sites of large projects such as Bull Arm (Hebron), the Come- By-Chance refinery, and

Cryopreservation of human failed- matured oocytes followed by in vitro maturation: vitrification is superior to the slow freezing method. Viability of frozen-thawed human