HAL Id: jpa-00247301
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00247301
Submitted on 1 Jan 1996
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Dielectric Voltage Response in Spin-density Wave of (TMTSF)2AsF6 at Low Temperature
Mitsuharu Nagasawa
To cite this version:
Mitsuharu Nagasawa. Dielectric Voltage Response in Spin-density Wave of (TMTSF)2AsF6 at Low Temperature. Journal de Physique I, EDP Sciences, 1996, 6 (12), pp.2135-2140.
�10.1051/jp1:1996208�. �jpa-00247301�
Dielectric Voltage Response in Spin-Density Wave of (TMTSF)2AsF6 at Low Temperature
Mitsuharu ~agasawa (*)
Department
ofPhysics,
HokkaidoUniversity, Sapporo
060,Japan
(Received
26April
1996, revised 19August
1996, accepted 20August 1996)
PACS.61.66.Hq Organic
compounds PACS.75.30.FvSpin-density
wavesPACS.72.15.Nj
Collective modesle-g-,
m one-dimensionalconductors)
Abstract.
Voltage
response to constant unipolar puise current in the spin-density wave(SDW)
state of(TMTSF)2AsF~
was studied. Below 3 K,Ieading
andtailing edges
of thevoltage
response are rounded at Iow electric field. The time dependent
charge density
accumulated in the Iatticewas estimated from the
voltage
profiles. Itcon be fitted
by
a stretched exponentialformula; q(t)
cc qo (1-exp(-(t/Ti )~)).
Withincreasing
field qo increases and showsa maximum
at the threshold electric field for
depinning.
In the pinned state, the relaxation time Ti increases withdecreasmg
temperature and its activation energy isapproximately
equal to that of ohmicconductivity.
The indexfl
is ahnearly decreasing
function of temperature and it isextrapolated
to one at 0 K.
Screemng by
normal carriers becomes imperfect andcouphng
betweendensity
wave domains becomes stronger on
cooling.
1. Introduction
In varions
(TMTSF)2X
salts which arequasi-one
dimensionalorganic conductors,
theground
state of the electronic
system
is thespin-density
wave(SDW).
Thephase
transition from metalto
insulating
SDW is observedcommonly
at mJ 10 K. In the SDWphase,
theconductivity
is ohmic at low field but increases with field above the "threshold electric fieldET"-
Fromcompanson with the
charge-density
wave(CDW) systems,
it has been confirmed that thenonlinear conduction above
ET
is due to thesliding
SDWdepinned by
field.In
(TMTSF)2PF6
sait and at TmJ 3
K,
anomalies in~H-NMR
relaxation timeiii
and in heatcapacity
[2] have been observed. It has beenproposed
that the anomalies are related to aphase
transition from "SDWI" to "SDW2" oncooling
belowmJ 3 K
il,2j. However,
the nature of that transition has not been clarified. In theprevious study,
we havereported
that theSDW
dynamics
also shows anomalies at mJ 3 h in(TMTSF)2AsF6
sait [3]; both temperaturedependence
ofET
and the ratio of nonlinearconductivity
at low field to the ohmic component show breaks at thattemperature.
Weproposed
that these anomalies are indicative of aphase
transition, presumably sharing
a common mechanism with(TMTSF)2PF6. Furthermore,
we have shown that the narrow bandvoltage
noise under DC current and transientoscillatory voltage
response can be observed aboveET only
in the lowtemperature
"SDW2"phase
[4,5].
(*)Present
address: Natural Sciences,Faculty
ofEngineering,
Tokyo DenkiUniversity, Muzaigakuendai 2-1200,
Inzai Chiba 270-13,Japan (e-mail: nagasawafichiba.dendai.ac.jp)
@
LesÉditions
dePhysique
19962136 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
I N°12Below
ET
~v-here the SDW ispinned,
thevoltage
response for constantpuise
current is different between in the "SDWI" and in the "SDW2"phases.
In the "SDWI"phase,
thevoltage responds instantaneously
to theapplied rectangular
currentpuise.
On the otherhand, edges
of the responsevoltage
are rounded for thepuise
in the "SDW2"phase.
The time until thevoltage
becomes constant increases withdecreasing temperature [3,4].
Neithertemperature
nor field
dependence
of this "dielectricvoltage response"
has beeninvestigated,
however.A similar rounded
voltage
response has beeninvestigated by Fleming
andSchneemeyer
[6]in the CDW of
Ko.3Mo03.
When currentpuise
for field aboveET
has the samepolarity
as thepreceding
one, thevoltage responds instantaneously
to thepuise.
On the otherhand,
when currentpuise
has theopposite sign
to thepreceding
one, thevoltage
response curve is rounded.This is the so-called
"puise-sign
memory effect". Parker and Zettl I?i have used thepuise-sign
memory effect to
investigate
the metastablepinning configuration
in the CD~V ofNbSe3.
Recently,
Kriza et ai. [8] observed the same effect in(TMTSF)2PF6. They
showed that thisanomaly
can be detected at E »ET Mihaly
et ai. [9] measured thelow-frequency
dielectricresponse of
(TàITSF)2PF6
belowET
and at 2 Kby
real-time relaxationtechnique. They
showed that the
polarization
relaxes withlong
time in thisregime.
It seems that theorigin
is thesame as that of the behavior observed
by
us at low field in the "SDW2"phase;
these dielectricphenomena
are due to the elastic deformation of thepinned
SDW. While discontinuonschanges
are
expected
in the dielectric behavior atET
because the SDW isdepinned by
field aboveET,
suchchanges
at mJET
have not been clarifiedyet.
In the
present study,
wereport
on the timedependent
accumulatedcharge density
whichis estimated from the
voltage profiles
and discuss the relation between field response of thepinned
SDW and functional formula of thecharge density.
2.
Experiments
Single crystals
of(TMTSF)~AsF6
were grownby
the standard electrochemical method. The electrical leads of annealedgold
wires of10 ~lm diameter were attached with silverpaste
togold pads evaporated
on thesample.
The whole areas of both ends of thesample
were coveredby
silverpaste
for uniform currentdensity.
At roomtemperature
and ambient pressure, theconductivity
a was about 400Q~~cm~~.
Thesample
wasslightly pressurized
in aclamp- type
bomb to avoid resistancejump.
The actual pressure at low temperature was lower than 0.1 GPa. The resistancejump
was not observeddunng applying
pressure andcooling.
Constantpulse
current was introducedalong
theconducting
axis and the responsevoltage
was measured.The
repetition
rate ofpulse
current withmJ 1 Hz was
carefully
chosen to avoid effect of Jouleheating.
In order to reducebackground
noise, bothvoltage
and currentprofiles
were recordedrepeatedly
andaveraged.
3. Results and Discussion
At low field and below 3
K,
thevoltage 1'(t)
increasesgradually
with time tduring
thepulse
width,although
constant current isapphed. Figure
1 shows atypical profile
of thevoltage
response to
rectanguiar
currentpulse
at 1.2 K.Voltage
tail is also observed after the current is turned off. Thevoltage profile
cannot be fitted to asingle
nor a stretchedexponential
function.We introduce a
parameter tm,
which satisfies the relation[V(tm) V(tm/2)]/V(tm)
= 0.01.To calculate the
conductivity
we usel~(tm)
as the saturatedvoltage Vit
=
cc),
because thepuise
width was rather limited to avoid Jouleheating. Though
tm itself is determinedonly crudely, V(tm)
is accurateenough
to discuss the essential feature of thestationary
current-voltage relation,
in which the ohinic region isclearly
observed andET
isclearly
determined.Î~
$7
0.04E
g
t0.8
T=1.2K ~~ (
fi
->
0.02l$
o
~
0 t
(msec)
10Fig.
1.Typical voltage
and currentprofiles
at theIeading edge.
The dashed hne represents thevoltage
at tm. Inset: the entirevoltage profile.
Below
ET,
tm is rather insensitive tofield;
thevoltage profiles
belowET
can be nornializedby V(tm)
into asingle
curve at a fixedtemperature.
Withdecreasing temperature,
tm in the low field range increasescontinuously.
AboveET, leading
andtailing edges
of thevoltage
responsebecome less rounded with
increasing
field. In fieldhigher
than2ET,
tm becomes too short to be determinedexperimentally;
trie dielectric response is due to triepinned
SDW. Trie SDW is deformed aroundpinning
centers or atedges
ofcrystal by
external field. Trie deformationaccumulates electric
charge
and trievoltage
is roundedduring charging
ordischarging.
In triepinned
state, trie accumulatedcharge
isexpected
to beensDwôr,
where ~sDw is the SDW condenseddensity
and ôr is the SDWdisplacement.
In thisscheme,
ôr should be smaller than theperiod
of thepinning potential
for trie SDWÀpIN
r~ 7À.
As a model of trie present real
system,
we consider aparallel
circuit of an ohmic resistor anda
capacitor.
The timedependent
accumulatedcharge density q(t)
is related to theinjected
current
density j(t)
and the electric fieldE(t);
~~~~
~Î~ ~~~~~~~~~'
where
a(cc)
isapproximated by
that at t= tm. When the SDW is
pinned, a(cc)E(t)
is the ohmic currentdensity by
normal carriers while in thesliding
state it is givenby
the sum of the ohmic currentdensity
and the DW currentdensity. Figure
2 shows accumulatedcharge
qo "
q(t
=
tm)
as a function of the fieldE(t
=
tm).
Kriza et ai. [8jreported
that trie accumulatedcharge
obtained from triepulse-sign
memory effect shows apeak
but triepeak
is not located atET.
On trie otherhand,
trie curves inFigure
2 show breaks atET
triepeak
corresponds
to triedepinning
of trie SDW. Trie maximum of qo, at E=
ET,
is not sensitive to temperature and then trie SDWdisplacement
ôr ismJ 0.3
À
which is not much smaller thanÀpIN
r~
7
À.
The result is consistent of the scheme of the SDW deformation in electric field.Below
ET,
qo increaseshnearly
with trie field. Trie ratioqo/E(cc)
isexpected
to be pro-portional
to the lowfrequency
dielectric constante(0).
FromFigure 2, e(o)
isindependent
of the field in the ohmicregion.
At 1.6K, e(o)
=10~
mJ
10~
isobtained,
which is of the same order ofmagnitude
as the lowfrequency
dielectric constant of(TMTSF)2PF6
at 2 K obtainedby Mihaly
et ai. [9] Withdecreasing temperature, s(0)
decreases butETe(0)
isapproximately
constant when trie
previously reported temperature dependent ET
is used. It bas been re-ported experimentally
thatETe(0)
bas a common value among trie varions materials[9j.
It is2138 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
I N°128
E~(i.9K)-~~
E~(1 7Ki. e 1.2 K
_
ET(1 2K) -X- 1.7 K
~~
+~.* j
~ l.9K~
1'
x ~~~jc
° ,Î ,' ~~l',
'j
/
~ g,
é
'
Gf
(
" ' ,ef o,
E
(mV/cm)
Fig.
2. Accumulatedcharge
density qo as a function of the field at tm. The cross-sectional area and the distance betweenvoltage
contacts are 0.285 x 0.091 mm~ and 1.12 mm,respectively.
io°
T 1.2 K
10~
~ ~ ~~~ ~~_~
~~ ~~
t
(8ec)
Fig.
3. Ratio (qoq(t))/qo
us. time. The broken Iine isexpressed
asexp(-(t/Ti)~)>
where therelaxation time Ti and the exponent 0 are 3.2 ms and 0.7,
respectivelv.
confirmed that trie relation
ETe(o)
mJ con8tant 18 realized
qualitatively
at zerofrequency
when the temperaturedependent ET
obtained in ourprevious
paper [3] 18 used. Combined with theexperimental finding
thatETe(o)
has a common value among the vanous matenals[9],
it is established thatETe(o)
has a universaltemperature-mdependent
value among DW materials.In the
sliding state,
if the SDW isdepmned coherently,
qo would beequal
to zero. InFigure
2, qo decreases aboveET
but is finite betweenET
andmJ
2ET.
It issuggested
that apart
of the SDW is stillpinned
in that range dueto,
e.g..spatial
distribution of pinningpotential
in thecrystal.
On thecontrary,
above mJ2ET,
the SDW slidescoherently
in thelarge
fraction ofsample
volume because qomJ o and the transient
voltage
oscillation is observed.Finally,
we discuss the timedependent
accumulatedcharge density q(t
<tm)
belowET.
As shown in
Figure 3, q(t) obeys
the relationq(t)
c~qo(1- exp(-(t/Ti)~)).
In the entire10~~
o
la l~° o.8
-
)
oç
~
'~ ° X 0.6
~
~
x o o
x x
o
°~
°~
o.4 o o~
x
0.2
x
o.4 0.6 0.8 °
o 2
1/T
(1/K)
T(K)
Fig.
4.Fig.
5Fig.
4. The relaxation time Tias a function
of1/T
for twosamples.
Fig.
5.Exponent fl
as a function of temperature for twosamples.
temperature
range, the relaxation time Ti is shorter than tm and theexponent fl
is smaller thanone.
Mihaly
et ai. [9] found that the timedependent polanzability
of(TMTSF)2PF6
at 2 Kobeys
the above stretchedexponential.
Both Ti andfl depend
ontemperature.
Withdecreasing temperature
Ti increasesexponentially
asexp(ED /T) (Fig. 4)
andfl
increaseslinearly (Fig. 5).
The activation energy obtained from
Figure 4, ED
r~ 13 K is not much different from the thermal activation energy of the ohmic
conductivity
mJ lî K. Normal carriers screen theinhomogeneous
electric fieldby
the SDW deformation and the screening becomesimperfect
withdecreasing temperature.
Even in thepinned
state, the above scheme of thescreening proposed by
Littlewood[loi
is realized.Therefore,
thecoupling
between SDW domains screenedby
normal carriers becomes
stronger
withlowering temperature.
As discussedby Mihaly
et ai.[9],
the stretchedexponential
formulasuggests
that the SDWsystem
isglassy. Glassy system
iscomposed
of many domains withslightly
distributed relaxation time andfl
represents the distribution of the relaxation time. If the relaxation time is uniform within thecrystal, fl
should beequal
to one and thecrystal
should behave as asingle
domain. As shown inFigure 5, fl
extrapolates
to one at o K. In the "SDW2"phase,
the number of SDW domains decreases withlowenng temperature
due toimperfect screening by
normal carriersand,
at T= o
K,
thepinned
SDWsystem
would becomposed
of asingle
domain.Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Prof. T.
Sambongi
and Prof. K. Nomura for their instructive advice and continuaiencouragement dunng
this work. I also would like to thank Prof. H. AnzaiHimeji
of Institute ofTechnology
forproviding tetra-n-butyl
ammonium hexa-fluoroarseniic andhelpful
2140 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
I N°12advice on the
synthesizing
of(TMTSF)2X crystal.
I would like to thank Prof. K. I<awabata for valuable discussions, and Prof. N. Mohri and Dr. H. Takahashi of the Institute for SolidState
Physics
theUniversity
ofTokyo
forhelpful
advice onhigh
pressuretechnique.
I would hke to thank Prof. K. Nemoto for comments onglassy system.
References
iii
TakahashiT.,
ManiwaY.,
Kawamura H. and Saito G..Physica
143B(1986)
417-421.[2]
Lasjaunias
J.C.,
OdinJ., Biljakovic K.,
Monceau P. andBechgaard K.,
J.Phys. Colloq.
France 3
(1993)
C2-365-368.[3]
Nagasawa M., Sambongi T.,
Nomura K. and AnzaiH.,
Solid State Commitn. 93(1995)
33-36.
[4]
Nagasawa
M.~Sambongi T.,
Nomura K. and AnzaiH.,
J.Phys. Colloq.
France 3(1993)
C2-19î-200.
[5]
Nagasawa M., Sambongi
T., Nomura K. and Anzai H..Synth.
Met. 71(1995)
1î1î-1718.[6]
Fleming
R-M- andSchneemeyer L.F., Phys.
Reu. 828(1983)
6996-6999.[7] Parker
I.D.,
ZettlA., Phys.
Rev. 845(1992)
3260-3264.[8] Kriza
G.,
Kim Y. andMihaly G., Phys.
Rev. 845(1992)
1466-1468.[9]