Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la
première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez
pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the
first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site
LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
4th International Building Physics Conference (4th IBPC) [Proceedings],
2009-06-14
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC :
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=6b961ba8-cede-4e34-af51-acd6ebd7528c
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=6b961ba8-cede-4e34-af51-acd6ebd7528c
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. /
La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version
acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Moisture Management and Energy Rating in Building Envelopes / Part I
: A field monitoring study of interstitial condensation in wood-frame
walls in cold climate
W. Maref, M. Armstrong , M. Rousseau
Part I- A FIELD MONITORING STUDY OF INTERSTITIAL
CONDENSATION IN WOOD-FRAME WALLS IN COLD CLIMATE
MOISTURE MANAGEMENT AND
ENERGY ANALYSIS IN BUILDINGS
2 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Team
K. Abdulghani
W. Lei
M. Armstrong
W. Maref
Outline
Background & Objectives
Field Exposure of Wall Facility (FEWF)
Part I
•
Experimental Approach
–
Construction Details
–
FEWF Instrumentation
•
Results and Discussion
Ventilation and Wall Research House Facility
2. FIELD EXPOSURE
OF WALL FACILITY –
(FEWF) BES
Study & compare traditional
& innovative BE strategies
1. VENTILATION,
HEATING AND
COOLING FACILITY
- IE
Study & compare
traditional & innovative
ventilation, heating &
cooling strategies
Field Exposure of Wall Facility (FEWF)
Objectives
•
Compare performance of different side-by-side wall assemblies
•
improve understanding of HAM response of wall and window
assemblies exposed to naturally occurring climate loads of
Ottawa as well as to indoor environment loads of T, RH and P
defined by occupancy and HVAC systems.
6 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
IRC Field Exposure of Wall
Facility (FEWF)
Roadmap
•
Year 1 (2006-2007) Commission the facility by monitoring three identical
test specimens of traditional construction (2x6) through Fall, Winter and
Spring.
(Part I)
•
Year 2 (2007-2008) Partnership with CMHC & NRCan to investigate the
effects of two energy retrofit strategies on the wetting and drying potential
of wall assemblies.
(Part II)
•
Year
3
(2008-2009)
Partnership
with
FPInnovation
(Forintek)
to
investigate the effects of the interior air/vapour barrier polyethylene
membrane on the wetting and drying potential of wall assemblies and
extending the project with CMHC & NRCan for one retrofit strategy.
•
Year 4 (2009-2010) Partnership with CMHC & NRCan to investigate the
the dynamic heat transmission characteristics through Insulated Concrete
Form (ICF) wall assemblies over a full year cycle of weather exposure
•
Year 5 (2010-2011) PERD Project to Test the Next Generation Envelope
Systems (i.e. Vacuum Insulated Panel)
•
Year 6 and beyond Investigate the performance of wall specimens of
different innovative designs based on industrial collaboration/partnership.
Objectives
•
Validate: identical test specimens, protocol and
instrumentation
•
Characterize heat and moisture response
8 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
DETEC_9 DETEC_11
T_10
T_8
16.0
T_9
RHT_7
DETEC_12MP_1
2.0
DETEC_10T_7
RHT_6
15.0
20.0
17.0
3.0
LAYER 4 - Interior Face of OSB
HF_1
(W2 only)
JW_3
DETEC ThermistorHeat Flux
Moisture Pin
Wireless
Relative Humidity
10 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
14.0
7.0
DETEC_17 DETEC_16MP_3
LAYER 5 - Stud Cavity
DETEC_15
MP_2
HF_2
(W2 only)
RHT_9
15.0
T_13
T_14
17.0
T_11
RHT_8
T_12
LAYER 6 - Interior Face of Insulation & Stud
Cavity (Exterior side of Vapour Barrier)
P_3
(Low Pressure)
7.3
10.0
HF_3
(W2 only)
JW_4
Delta Pressure
12 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
LAYER 7 - Interior Face of Drywall
17.0
15.0
T_18
T_17
RHT_10 (air)
T_16
T_15
7.0
T_19
(W2 and W3 only)
Thermocouple
14 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
W3
W2
Methodology - Instrumentation
Instrumentation - Plan View
Interior
Drywall
Air/Vapour Barrier
Stud Cavity with
Glass Fibre Insulation
Vinyl Siding
Sheathing Membrane
OSB
Air Pressure sensor
Moisture Pins
RH and T sensor
Thermocouple
Exterior
Wireless RH&T Sensor
16 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/
12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Exterior
Interior
Vinyl Siding
Sheathing Membrane
OSB
Stud Cavity with
Fiberglass Insulation
Vapour Barrier
Drywall
Material
P1
P2
P3
P Chamber
Reference for all Pressure Sensors: Room Interior
Pressure Tap Locations
+ve pressure
= pressure at
the tap
location is
higher than
the pressure
in the room
18 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Experimental Approach
Challenging the wall experimental begins:
•
Stage 1- Create air leakage path and monitor
under naturally occurring int. and ext. conditions
on two of three specimens (1 week)
20 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Air Leakage
Path
Challenging the wall experimental begins:
•
Stage 1- Create air leakage path and monitor
under naturally occurring int. and ext. conditions
on two of three specimens (1 week)
•
Stage 2- Increase indoor RH to 70% and induce 5
Pa positive pressure while air leak is present in
two specimens, for a certain period of time
22 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Drywall
W1
W2
W3
Conditioning Chamber on the Room Side
Walls 2 and 3 exposed to
chamber conditions
Control T, RH, Pressure
Deficiency in air barrier
Challenging the wall experimental begins:
•
Stage 1- Create air leakage path and monitor
under naturally occurring int. and ext. conditions
on two of three specimens (1 week)
•
Stage 2- Increase indoor RH to 70% and induce 5
Pa positive pressure while air leak is present in
two specimens, for a certain period of time
•
Stage 3- Return to naturally occurring conditions
to monitor drying. Disassemble the indoor
chamber
24 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
26 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Condition A
• 0 Pa pressure
• 70% RH
Condition B
• 5 Pa pressure
• 50% RH
28 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Condition C
• 5 Pa pressure
• 30% RH
Condition D
• 0 Pa pressure
• 50% RH
30 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Diagram for Moisture
Detection Tape Locations
on the interior of the OSB
32 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Diagram for Moisture
Detection Tape Locations
in the Stud Cavity
Wind speed data
is from the Ottawa
Airport
34 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Wind from the West causes
+ve pressures and infiltration
Wind from the East causes
–ve pressures and exfiltration
36 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
When the chamber is
pressurized, the exfiltration
condition is forced (chamber
and stud cavity pressure is
higher than exterior pressure)
When the chamber is
pressurized, the exfiltration
condition is forced (chamber
and stud cavity pressure is
higher than exterior pressure)
Except when +ve pressures
from North and West winds
negate the effect.
38 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Conditions
Condition
Pressure
RH
Opening
Week
A
0 Pa
70%
None
7
B
5 Pa
50%
6 mm
3 days in
week 8
(22 to 24 Feb)
C
5 Pa
~30%
3 mm
2 days in
week 11
(16 to 17 Mar)
D
0 Pa
50%
3 mm
15
40 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
42 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Condition A:
0 Pa, 70% RH, no opening
• Despite the high humidity on the interior of the room
(71%), the humidity behind the air/vapour barrier is
low, 15%
• The location with the highest RH is the interior of the
OSB, at ~81% - still below dewpoint
T
RH
T
Interior
T
• The dewpoint of room
air is ~17°C, a condition
met by temperatures
partway through the
insulation
• The interior of the wall
44 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
• A large drop in the
moisture content of the
air occurs across the
vapour barrier
• Air moisture content on
the exterior side of the
vapour barrier is nearly
identical to the reference
wall – with no added
indoor humidity loads
Condition A:
0 Pa, 70% RH, no opening
46 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Resistance (k
Ω
)
Condition A:
0 Pa, 70% RH, no opening
• The interior surface of
the OSB remains dry at
all moisture detection
tape locations
Interior
Exterior
Condition B:
5 Pa, 50% RH, 6mm opening
• The interior of the room is at 49% RH, the humidity
behind the air/vapour barrier is 30% RH – indicating
T
RH
48 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
• The dewpoint of room
air is ~12°C, a condition
met by temperatures at
the middle of the
insulation
• The opening in the
vapour barrier allows
moisture to enter the
cavity, condensation is
expected anywhere to the
exterior of the insulation
• The pressure and
opening allow the high
RH to enter the interior of
the wall
• Air moisture content on
the exterior side of the
50 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Resistance (k
Ω
)
Condition B:
5 Pa, 50% RH, 6mm opening
The interior surface of the
OSB is wet, particularly at
the base of the wall
Low resistance indicates the
presence of liquid
Slit in OSB
Drying
Wetting
Wetting
Condition B:
5 Pa, 50% RH, 6mm opening
For a large portion of the
Condition B period, wind
52 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Condition B:
5 Pa, 50% RH, 6mm opening
In two instances, the exterior pressure
dropped below the chamber pressure,
allowing exfiltration, and corresponding
to the wetting patterns
54 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
FEWF Wall 2 - Stud - Layer 5 - Liquid
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
2/23/07
12:00
2/23/07
18:00
2/24/07 0:00 2/24/07 6:00
2/24/07
12:00
2/24/07
18:00
2/25/07 0:00
Date and Time
R
esi
st
an
c
e
(
k
¬
)
215L
216L
217L
Resistance (k
Ω
)
Condition B:
5 Pa, 50% RH, 6mm opening
Low resistance indicates the
presence of liquid at the base
of the stud cavity
56 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Results
After
Before
58 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Condition C:
5 Pa, 30% RH, 3mm opening
• The interior of the room is at 27% RH, the humidity
behind the air/vapour barrier is 29% RH – indicating
that moisture is being introduced through the opening
• The location with the highest RH is the interior of the
OSB, at 100% - condensation would be expected
Interior
Exterior
T
RH
•The dewpoint of room air
is ~4°C, a condition met
by temperatures towards
the outside of the
insulation
• The opening in the
60 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
• The pressure and
opening allow the
humidity to enter the
interior of the wall
• Air moisture content on
the exterior side of the
vapour barrier is higher
than the reference wall –
with no added indoor
humidity loads
Condition C:
5 Pa, 30% RH, 3mm opening
East winds for the majority of Condition C, kept
exterior pressures low and allowed the Chamber and
Stud Cavity Pressures to remain above the Exterior
Pressure, creating an exfiltration condition
62 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Condition C:
5 Pa, 30% RH, 3mm opening
A change in wind direction towards the end of
Condition C brought exterior pressure conditions
close to stud cavity and chamber pressure.
Condition C:
5 Pa, 30% RH, 3mm opening
The interior surface of the
OSB is wet, particularly at
the base of the wall
Resistance (k
Ω
)
64 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Condition C:
5 Pa, 30% RH, 3mm opening
Low resistance indicates the
presence of liquid at the base
of the stud cavity
Resistance (k
Ω
Condition D:
0 Pa, 50% RH, 3mm opening
• The interior of the room is at 50% RH, the humidity
behind the air/vapour barrier is 27% RH
Interior
Exterior
T
RH
66 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
•The dewpoint of room air
is ~12°C, a condition met
by temperatures at the
middle of the insulation
•Condensation is
expected at the OSB,
however, measurements
indicate that room air is
not exfiltrating as much
as in Conditions B and C
• While the air moisture
content on the exterior
side of the vapour barrier
is higher than the
reference wall, the effect
is not as pronounced as
Conditions B and C –
68 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Condition D:
0 Pa, 50% RH, 3mm opening
West winds dominate at the
beginning and end of Condition D,
creating conditions for infiltration
Condition D:
0 Pa, 50% RH, 3mm opening
East winds cause the exterior pressure to
be below the interior pressure, resulting in
exfiltration conditions
70 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
Condition D:
0 Pa, 50% RH, 3mm opening
The interior surface of the
OSB is dry at all
measured locations
Resistance (k
Ω
)
Condition D:
0 Pa, 50% RH, 3mm opening
Resistance (k
Ω
)
The surface of the stud
cavity is dry
72 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009
SUMMARY
Successful characterization of hygrothermal
performance.
Water detection tape provided valuable data
on wetting locations
Strong relationship between wind conditions
and air infiltration/exfiltration
SUMMARY (Cont’d)
We looked at risk of condensation due to
exfiltration (wetting) combined with infiltration
(drying)
Similar results for the three test specimens
FEWF can be used for future exposure tests:
74 – Moisture Management in Buildings / Gestion de l’humidité dans les bâtiments – 12thCCBST/ 12 CCSTB Montréal, May 2009