Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
Building Research Note, 1968-10-01
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC : https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=af1d6d49-dfc9-4b9f-95c1-a43b45db07f6 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=af1d6d49-dfc9-4b9f-95c1-a43b45db07f6
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.4224/40000643
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Transmission loss of plasterboard walls
Northwood, T. D.
C A N A D A
1 I
7
no.66
&.NALY
ZED.
byT.
I3
.
Northwood O F BUlLDFNG R E S E A R C H N A t r O N A L R E S E A R C H C O U N C I L.
O T T b C A N A D ATMNSWSSION LOSS O F PLASTERBOARD WALLS
Plasterboard walls constitute an important type of c o n s t r u c t i o n
particularly in modern dwellings, but also in other t y p e s of buildings. Such walls are relatively light, inexpensive, and e a s y t o e r e c t , and they may be
made t o provide adequate fire protection and sound insulation.
Although sound insulation measurements for various plasterboard walls
have been made by various laboratories, they have not, until r e c e n t l y , been
sufficiently well coordinated t o provide an understanding of the effects of various parameters. The purpose of this note is t o present. systematic measurements
on a wide variety of such canstructions. This will provide, f o r immediate u s e ,
up-to-date information on many practical walls obtained by the latest t e s t pro- cedures (ASTM E 9 0 - 6 6 T ) . The main objective, h o w e v e r , is to provide e x -
perimental information f r o m which general conclusians applicable to other
multi-leaf walls may be derived. T h i s note is a complete record of the t e s t
results; another paper analysing the general relations, f r o m empirical and
theoretical viewpoints, is also in preparation.
GENERAL NOTES
A typical plasterboard w a l l consists of two plasterboard leaves
separated by an air space and a system of s t u d s or framing members.
The sound transmission l a s s (TL) of such a wall depends on the T L t s of
the individual leaves and on the degree of coupling introduced by the i n t e r - vening air space and stud system.
It
is found that both the air space and the s t u d s play an important partin determining the over -all transrnis sion l o s s , and both paths must g e n e r a l l y
be considered when improvements in sound insulation are attempted. Trans
-
mission through the space depends on the internal spacing between wall leaves,
the degree of lateral subdivision of the space, and the amount oi absorption
t r e a t m e n t in the space. Transmission through the studs depends on the
r i g i d i t y of the studs and t h e stud-plasterboard connections; the p r o c e s s may
be thought of as the propagation of flexural vibrations f r o m one w a l l surface to the other by torsion in the studs. If the s t u d s have l o w torsional r i g i d i t y
(e. g , steel channels) transmission via the s t u d s a p p e a r s to be negligible. The effects of various stud and s f x d connection systems are examined in l a t e r
sections.
The performance of the individual heaves of the wall depends on t h e i r surface density {mass per unit area), stiffness, and internal damping.
E X P E R I M E N T A L DETAILS
A l l sound transmission measurements reported here w e r e made in
accordance with ASTM E90
-65T,
"Labor ator y Measurement of AirborneSound Transmission L o s s of Building Partitions." A f e w of the simpLer con-
structions, e specially single -leaf walls, have been tested by several l a b o r a -
t a x i e s and the results are found t o be reasonably reproducible. In addition, the transmission loss was calculated f o r some of the single -leaf walls
utilizing theory developed by L. C r e m e r some y e a r s ago. The p a r a m e t e r s r e q u i r e d f o r the calculation are the surface density, modulus of elasticity,
and internal damping of the material. These quantities w e r e determined
f o r plasterboard by static and dynamic experiments on small samples of
p l a s t e r b o a r d ,
The calculations will b e described in d e t a i l in a separate report but
one detail i s worth noting. The basic expression fox transmission ratio
applies t o a train of plane waves reaching the wall at a particular angle of incidence.
T o
obtain the '"random incidence" transmission 10s s , thise x p r e s s i o n is averaged f o r a uniform distribution of all angles from normal
t o g r a z i n g incidence. Grazing incidence is an u n r e a l i s t i c limit f o r finite
r o o m s and walls and, unfortunately, the calculated result is quite sensitive to this limiting value. S o m e w r i t e r s , noting that s o m e measured
T L
v a l u e sw e r e about
5
dB higher than calculated random incidence values, have i n f e r r e d t h a t the limiting angle of incidence is about 78 degrees, the so-called ''field incidence" case. The present series of calculations and laboratory measure- ments give the b e s t fit: f o r a limiting angle of 8 5 degrees. It appears,however, that there can be a spread of about 5 d B among various laboratory
and field measurements, depending an the exact angular distribution of the
incident sound field.
T e s t specimens w e r e mounted in an opening 1 0 f t wide by 8 f t high
separating two r e v e r b e r a t i o n r o o m s . The source room has a volume of
2100 cu f t and the receiving r o o m has a volume of about 9 0 0 0 cu f t . Following
ASTM E 9 0 , each room is equipped with fixed and moving diffusing panels
designed t o provide as good an approximation as possible to the diffuse sound
field that is as s u e d in t r a n s m i s s i o n 10s s theory. The sound pressure l e v e l
in each room i s sampled by a set of nine microphones whose outputs are
observed individually. The variation i s s m a l l enough that a simple arithmetic mean of sound pressure levels i s sufficient to d e t e r m i n e the space-average
sound pressure level in each room. The t e s t signal consists of third-octave
bands of "pink" noise and measurements a r e taken at a s e r i e s of t h i r d - o c t a v e s
c e n t r e d on 1 2 5 t o 4 0 0 0 Hz. In some measurements, the results w e r e extended
to 5000
Hz
to permit a better study of coincidence effects in the high-frequencyPREPAJUTION O F TEST WALLS
The t e s t specimens are described briefly i n the tables or' results, but
a few construction details are elaborated on as folZows,
J o i n t s
Preliminary t e s t s w e r e m a d e with joints between plasterhoard
sheets finished with the conventional tape and joint compound. T h e s e
gave results identical t o those obtained when the joints w e r e simply sealed with masking tape ( s e e Group
I,
W a l lNo.
1 - 2 ) . Most subsequent t e s t s weredone with masking tape on the joints.
Lamination P r o c e d u r e
When two layers (plasterboard or other mate rials) w e r e laminated
together with g y p s u m joint compound, a special applicator w a s used to
apply the compound in a uniform manner i n strips 5/8 in. wide b y 518 in.
high and spaced 1 3/4 in. apart. The second layer of plasterboard w a s
then pressed into place. T e m p o r a r y screws holding the two sheets together
during c u r i n g were removed before t e s t . Two test walls w e r e installed by
a local contractor, using an alternative technique consisting of a few small
patches of joint compound and an extra s e t of permanent s c r e w s driven
through the first sheet into the shkds. In the few instances when contact
cement was used for lamination, it w a s spread over the e n t i r e surfaces.
Space Absorption
Mineral wool or glass f i b r e batts about 2 in. thick or g r e a t e r w e r e
used.
It
was found that the results were not critically sensitive t o thickness1
or density; a 2-in. glass f i b r e board was slightly l e s s effective as an
a b s o r b e r at l a w frequencies, but similar t o the thick b a k s at high frequencies.
Studs
Canventional 2 x 4 wood studs
11
5/8 b y 3 5 / 8 in. ) w e r e used at 1 6 - and 24-in. spacings. They were s e t i n a 2 x 4 frame around the perimeterof the t e s t opening, T e s t s conducted without s t u d s utilized the same 2 x 4
p e r i m e t e r frame for supporting the plasterboard. Steel channels 3 518
&.
and 2 s in. wide, spaced at 24-in. c e n t r e s , w e r e mounted in the appropriateperimeter channel frame, A f e w t e s t s were done also with 1 5/8-in, channels
1
Caulking
T o
avoid problems relating toleakage
at the perimeter, a bead of caulking compound was applied around the perimeter in every case. Noattempt was m a d e in
this
study to investigate the efficacyof
control jointssuch as are needed in installations in actual buildings.
Plasterboard
W i t h the ca-operation of several manufacturers, spe cia1 samples
w e r e obtained of gypsum board, representing the extremes of density
and thickness allowed under CSA Standard A8 2.27
-
1963. It was found that within this range there was no measurable difference in performance f o r a particular nominal thickness. Similarly, no difference w a s found betweenconventional gypsum board and the so-called Type
X,
fire -resistantversion, Results for vinyl-covered board (vinyl applied o v e r paper) were
c l o s e to those f o r the ordinary paper -covered versions.
RESULTS
The results of aBL the transmission tests included in this s e r i e s
(approximately 100) a r e reported in the attached tables. The t e s t
specimens are arranged in four groups as fallows.
Single -Leaf W a l l s (Table
I)
In
this group are gathered the t e s t results for single layers ofplasterboard and other materials, plus composite constructions consisting
of various sheet materials laminated together. It is hoped that these d a t a ,
together with results f o r two-leaf walls, will provide material f o r testing
any theory applicable to two-leaf walls.
1
Double -Leaf W a l l s , Main Components 2-in. Plasterboard (Table
II)
Included in this group are all the walls in which *-in. p l a s t e r b o a r d
forms the main component of each leaf. W a l l s with additional l a y e r s that
add damping or that affect the s k d - p l a s t e r b o a r d connection are also included. Double-Leaf W a l l s . 5/8-in. Plasterboard (Table
IIIE
Many
of
the s e walls e s s entially duplicate constructions alreadydescribed ~JI Table
II,
but f o r f i r e resistance purposes 518-in. plasterboard1
is g e n e r a l l y more acceptable in practice. As compared to
z-in.
plasterboard,s u r f a c e density. . Above 1000 H e the coincidence dip with
518-in.
p l a s t e r b o a r d falls about one-third octave below the dip for $-in. board, T h i s results inslightly poorer high frequency performance.
Included in the t e s t s listed in Table WC were studies of various systems
f o r connecting plasterboard to studs.
Double -Leaf W a l l s E m p l
Different Thicknesses of Plasterboard (Table
IV)
This group includes walls f orrned from different thicknesses of
plasterboard or multiple layers thereof,
For each wall t e s t e d the right-hand portion of the table contains a brief description of the specimen, including the surface d e n s i t y of t h e
wall leaves and, as a single-figure rating, the ASTM Sound T r a n s m i s s i o n
C l a s s . On the left-hand s i d e of the table a r e given the t r a n s m i s s i o n l o s s e s
f o r the standard third-octave frequency bands f r o m 125 to 4000 Hz (in
some instances up to 5000
Hz),
1 . L. G r e r n e r : The Propagation of S t r u c t u r e -Borne Sound. Sponsored
Research (Germany)
-
Report Na. 1 , Series B [Ca 19491,m~ m a t -N Y N r r l V Y m .+ U 0 3. w Y 0 C 2 A n. .- k U m
:
: 2 2 ' d 7-4 m s l u o m . n w ~ o o - o-
m P a m --
1 1 1 m m m ~ ~ m n m m mmmm W N N W nl ~ ~ . l nfi 'TI c.-
e U P 'd ij.2
L 0 U U u " U S U * r J _ U ; E ' - U - V 6 00 C 5 R Ma
W O i E 4 d 3 U U - - - - - -N-N-M;u- --
- - - - - - - - - n l N r J Nz
a < y - 3 y - , y P ' t n 3 . Q 3 *. . . -
m m , , . D m * - d d " r - r - a m ~ 4 r ~ ~ + ~ m ~ m m , . G t - 4 r n d h i r ; ; 2 r j N ' N I T.-
-- - - - .-. d n u - u o : n o v d n u d + - , - * - a t - m 0. 4+ 4 - 3 . - , 3 0 d N . - # T In y , , m m . n . . . . . * - .-
.
.-. - - - .- -. . -. $ Q v