• Aucun résultat trouvé

Transmission loss of plasterboard walls

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Transmission loss of plasterboard walls"

Copied!
11
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:

Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.

Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at

PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.

https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.

Building Research Note, 1968-10-01

READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.

https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright

NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC : https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=af1d6d49-dfc9-4b9f-95c1-a43b45db07f6 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=af1d6d49-dfc9-4b9f-95c1-a43b45db07f6

NRC Publications Archive

Archives des publications du CNRC

This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.

For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.

https://doi.org/10.4224/40000643

Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at

Transmission loss of plasterboard walls

Northwood, T. D.

(2)

C A N A D A

1 I

7

no.

66

&.NALY

ZED.

by

T.

I3

.

Northwood O F BUlLDFNG R E S E A R C H N A t r O N A L R E S E A R C H C O U N C I L

.

O T T b C A N A D A

(3)

TMNSWSSION LOSS O F PLASTERBOARD WALLS

Plasterboard walls constitute an important type of c o n s t r u c t i o n

particularly in modern dwellings, but also in other t y p e s of buildings. Such walls are relatively light, inexpensive, and e a s y t o e r e c t , and they may be

made t o provide adequate fire protection and sound insulation.

Although sound insulation measurements for various plasterboard walls

have been made by various laboratories, they have not, until r e c e n t l y , been

sufficiently well coordinated t o provide an understanding of the effects of various parameters. The purpose of this note is t o present. systematic measurements

on a wide variety of such canstructions. This will provide, f o r immediate u s e ,

up-to-date information on many practical walls obtained by the latest t e s t pro- cedures (ASTM E 9 0 - 6 6 T ) . The main objective, h o w e v e r , is to provide e x -

perimental information f r o m which general conclusians applicable to other

multi-leaf walls may be derived. T h i s note is a complete record of the t e s t

results; another paper analysing the general relations, f r o m empirical and

theoretical viewpoints, is also in preparation.

GENERAL NOTES

A typical plasterboard w a l l consists of two plasterboard leaves

separated by an air space and a system of s t u d s or framing members.

The sound transmission l a s s (TL) of such a wall depends on the T L t s of

the individual leaves and on the degree of coupling introduced by the i n t e r - vening air space and stud system.

It

is found that both the air space and the s t u d s play an important part

in determining the over -all transrnis sion l o s s , and both paths must g e n e r a l l y

be considered when improvements in sound insulation are attempted. Trans

-

mission through the space depends on the internal spacing between wall leaves,

the degree of lateral subdivision of the space, and the amount oi absorption

t r e a t m e n t in the space. Transmission through the studs depends on the

r i g i d i t y of the studs and t h e stud-plasterboard connections; the p r o c e s s may

be thought of as the propagation of flexural vibrations f r o m one w a l l surface to the other by torsion in the studs. If the s t u d s have l o w torsional r i g i d i t y

(e. g , steel channels) transmission via the s t u d s a p p e a r s to be negligible. The effects of various stud and s f x d connection systems are examined in l a t e r

sections.

The performance of the individual heaves of the wall depends on t h e i r surface density {mass per unit area), stiffness, and internal damping.

(4)

E X P E R I M E N T A L DETAILS

A l l sound transmission measurements reported here w e r e made in

accordance with ASTM E90

-65T,

"Labor ator y Measurement of Airborne

Sound Transmission L o s s of Building Partitions." A f e w of the simpLer con-

structions, e specially single -leaf walls, have been tested by several l a b o r a -

t a x i e s and the results are found t o be reasonably reproducible. In addition, the transmission loss was calculated f o r some of the single -leaf walls

utilizing theory developed by L. C r e m e r some y e a r s ago. The p a r a m e t e r s r e q u i r e d f o r the calculation are the surface density, modulus of elasticity,

and internal damping of the material. These quantities w e r e determined

f o r plasterboard by static and dynamic experiments on small samples of

p l a s t e r b o a r d ,

The calculations will b e described in d e t a i l in a separate report but

one detail i s worth noting. The basic expression fox transmission ratio

applies t o a train of plane waves reaching the wall at a particular angle of incidence.

T o

obtain the '"random incidence" transmission 10s s , this

e x p r e s s i o n is averaged f o r a uniform distribution of all angles from normal

t o g r a z i n g incidence. Grazing incidence is an u n r e a l i s t i c limit f o r finite

r o o m s and walls and, unfortunately, the calculated result is quite sensitive to this limiting value. S o m e w r i t e r s , noting that s o m e measured

T L

v a l u e s

w e r e about

5

dB higher than calculated random incidence values, have i n f e r r e d t h a t the limiting angle of incidence is about 78 degrees, the so-called ''field incidence" case. The present series of calculations and laboratory measure- ments give the b e s t fit: f o r a limiting angle of 8 5 degrees. It appears,

however, that there can be a spread of about 5 d B among various laboratory

and field measurements, depending an the exact angular distribution of the

incident sound field.

T e s t specimens w e r e mounted in an opening 1 0 f t wide by 8 f t high

separating two r e v e r b e r a t i o n r o o m s . The source room has a volume of

2100 cu f t and the receiving r o o m has a volume of about 9 0 0 0 cu f t . Following

ASTM E 9 0 , each room is equipped with fixed and moving diffusing panels

designed t o provide as good an approximation as possible to the diffuse sound

field that is as s u e d in t r a n s m i s s i o n 10s s theory. The sound pressure l e v e l

in each room i s sampled by a set of nine microphones whose outputs are

observed individually. The variation i s s m a l l enough that a simple arithmetic mean of sound pressure levels i s sufficient to d e t e r m i n e the space-average

sound pressure level in each room. The t e s t signal consists of third-octave

bands of "pink" noise and measurements a r e taken at a s e r i e s of t h i r d - o c t a v e s

c e n t r e d on 1 2 5 t o 4 0 0 0 Hz. In some measurements, the results w e r e extended

to 5000

Hz

to permit a better study of coincidence effects in the high-frequency

(5)

PREPAJUTION O F TEST WALLS

The t e s t specimens are described briefly i n the tables or' results, but

a few construction details are elaborated on as folZows,

J o i n t s

Preliminary t e s t s w e r e m a d e with joints between plasterhoard

sheets finished with the conventional tape and joint compound. T h e s e

gave results identical t o those obtained when the joints w e r e simply sealed with masking tape ( s e e Group

I,

W a l l

No.

1 - 2 ) . Most subsequent t e s t s were

done with masking tape on the joints.

Lamination P r o c e d u r e

When two layers (plasterboard or other mate rials) w e r e laminated

together with g y p s u m joint compound, a special applicator w a s used to

apply the compound in a uniform manner i n strips 5/8 in. wide b y 518 in.

high and spaced 1 3/4 in. apart. The second layer of plasterboard w a s

then pressed into place. T e m p o r a r y screws holding the two sheets together

during c u r i n g were removed before t e s t . Two test walls w e r e installed by

a local contractor, using an alternative technique consisting of a few small

patches of joint compound and an extra s e t of permanent s c r e w s driven

through the first sheet into the shkds. In the few instances when contact

cement was used for lamination, it w a s spread over the e n t i r e surfaces.

Space Absorption

Mineral wool or glass f i b r e batts about 2 in. thick or g r e a t e r w e r e

used.

It

was found that the results were not critically sensitive t o thickness

1

or density; a 2-in. glass f i b r e board was slightly l e s s effective as an

a b s o r b e r at l a w frequencies, but similar t o the thick b a k s at high frequencies.

Studs

Canventional 2 x 4 wood studs

11

5/8 b y 3 5 / 8 in. ) w e r e used at 1 6 - and 24-in. spacings. They were s e t i n a 2 x 4 frame around the perimeter

of the t e s t opening, T e s t s conducted without s t u d s utilized the same 2 x 4

p e r i m e t e r frame for supporting the plasterboard. Steel channels 3 518

&.

and 2 s in. wide, spaced at 24-in. c e n t r e s , w e r e mounted in the appropriate

perimeter channel frame, A f e w t e s t s were done also with 1 5/8-in, channels

1

(6)

Caulking

T o

avoid problems relating to

leakage

at the perimeter, a bead of caulking compound was applied around the perimeter in every case. No

attempt was m a d e in

this

study to investigate the efficacy

of

control joints

such as are needed in installations in actual buildings.

Plasterboard

W i t h the ca-operation of several manufacturers, spe cia1 samples

w e r e obtained of gypsum board, representing the extremes of density

and thickness allowed under CSA Standard A8 2.27

-

1963. It was found that within this range there was no measurable difference in performance f o r a particular nominal thickness. Similarly, no difference w a s found between

conventional gypsum board and the so-called Type

X,

fire -resistant

version, Results for vinyl-covered board (vinyl applied o v e r paper) were

c l o s e to those f o r the ordinary paper -covered versions.

RESULTS

The results of aBL the transmission tests included in this s e r i e s

(approximately 100) a r e reported in the attached tables. The t e s t

specimens are arranged in four groups as fallows.

Single -Leaf W a l l s (Table

I)

In

this group are gathered the t e s t results for single layers of

plasterboard and other materials, plus composite constructions consisting

of various sheet materials laminated together. It is hoped that these d a t a ,

together with results f o r two-leaf walls, will provide material f o r testing

any theory applicable to two-leaf walls.

1

Double -Leaf W a l l s , Main Components 2-in. Plasterboard (Table

II)

Included in this group are all the walls in which *-in. p l a s t e r b o a r d

forms the main component of each leaf. W a l l s with additional l a y e r s that

add damping or that affect the s k d - p l a s t e r b o a r d connection are also included. Double-Leaf W a l l s . 5/8-in. Plasterboard (Table

IIIE

Many

of

the s e walls e s s entially duplicate constructions already

described ~JI Table

II,

but f o r f i r e resistance purposes 518-in. plasterboard

1

is g e n e r a l l y more acceptable in practice. As compared to

z-in.

plasterboard,

(7)

s u r f a c e density. . Above 1000 H e the coincidence dip with

518-in.

p l a s t e r b o a r d falls about one-third octave below the dip for $-in. board, T h i s results in

slightly poorer high frequency performance.

Included in the t e s t s listed in Table WC were studies of various systems

f o r connecting plasterboard to studs.

Double -Leaf W a l l s E m p l

Different Thicknesses of Plasterboard (Table

IV)

This group includes walls f orrned from different thicknesses of

plasterboard or multiple layers thereof,

For each wall t e s t e d the right-hand portion of the table contains a brief description of the specimen, including the surface d e n s i t y of t h e

wall leaves and, as a single-figure rating, the ASTM Sound T r a n s m i s s i o n

C l a s s . On the left-hand s i d e of the table a r e given the t r a n s m i s s i o n l o s s e s

f o r the standard third-octave frequency bands f r o m 125 to 4000 Hz (in

some instances up to 5000

Hz),

1 . L. G r e r n e r : The Propagation of S t r u c t u r e -Borne Sound. Sponsored

Research (Germany)

-

Report Na. 1 , Series B [Ca 19491,

(8)

m~ m a t -N Y N r r l V Y m .+ U 0 3. w Y 0 C 2 A n. .- k U m

:

: 2 2 ' d 7-4 m s l u o m . n w ~ o o - o

-

m P a m -

-

1 1 1 m m m ~ ~ m n m m mmmm W N N W nl ~ ~ . l nfi 'TI c.

-

e U P 'd ij.

2

L 0 U U u " U S U * r J _ U ; E ' - U - V 6 00 C 5 R M

a

W O i E 4 d 3 U U - - - - - -N-N-M;u- -

-

- - - - - - - - - n l N r J N

z

a < y - 3 y - , y P ' t n 3 . Q 3 *

. . . -

m m , , . D m * - d d " r - r - a m ~ 4 r ~ ~ + ~ m ~ m m , . G t - 4 r n d h i r ; ; 2 r j N ' N I T.

-

-- - - - .-. d n u - u o : n o v d n u d + - , - * - a t - m 0. 4+ 4 - 3 . - , 3 0 d N . - # T In y , , m m . n . . . . . * - .

-

.

.

(9)

-. - - - .- -. . -. $ Q v

-

Fi D 0 * . . .n 0 r - p m p r m m m r r m- r- 0v 4~ + i+ n+ t+-mo em -m F % Z r- Y VI0 V d 1 P L n In m Q - - - m & + G d r - I - N - ~ ~ m . - r * T? m e *r n v e e y - s ~ d m ~ a %n c, mo m+

?

5

=

:

0 IR m --..

-

* . . 0 m r - r n b 9 - r n v -Vn* O' T~ VC O dr n C d - * + Z o m 0 . a - - vT l W, d *m m-? se n m l -. .- .- o m l n 0 ul . D l ; & & - J t - r - v ; 6 . 4 . V T u l U ' 7 U r *N *WVmTrnc4l1Om~ , *Q .f ml \u o7 t - I P - r * e r n F - 0 0 u! 0 O P . ' s * & N G Q T m v w * m m e m m r - r - = V o v - ? * v m r n * * in m tF - ma *m m o m 0 0 a . 4 i G - e r n 4 * I + - - r 1 1 1 * - 4 ' m Y- .+D-vF)mO +5 mm Y- i 'o- ?. m* V= l? der rr n) t- m 5 m 0 . - -- -- - - P G L + m m n ~ a * + e v v m rn- f$ Jf mmo vm mo W M O 0 0 0 * . * d V1 P W m - P O 4 0 N O F d m F l . 3 m m m v d ' * * L n m - Y * r h % ? m v u - ~ f \ n m + ' m m t-- 1I1 11) 0 m r r 4 t n ' ; m m n m * P - + w C T m = + i - ? & . Q . n o - D . n m m m . n - P ' - r -l "- -- 9w. LO m v

-

= m X - a = o o O i 4 . 6 m * m a m n m n - ? m m + . D * P t m m r U r u m m - T q * "U7 .' rO- PQ 2 z 3 0 "7 ul m u , r n G d r n n l - 9 N r u n ~ n l r r l e m m e " c - P = P n l r y N - 3 N C d . T rO ? Pm wT ww mm ** r

. .

- 0 0- VI 0 * m m m - 3 N N - 4 9. N CJ m .u "7 a; m & - i , a o r a o - * ~ h l + r n * m na E- m

-

lr "N IW mC N. -- 0 0 - . 'm Tn d ~ m m p . - m m N N . 1 I N - 7 r r l V I m dr - m* - lh *~t rl *m m m -D N MN r .Q ?

-

N r- w m m 0 0 lo rn 0 * . o d m i N r n m l T r l - o r - m m ' I I 1 N m m +b - - P + d o w ~ r u r n n r l Nd mN mm -N mr m~ m r-

.

VL m * . m U1 2 2 z z m~ a . 0 8 ' d n m * - w r - m n l r t N r l Y N m 7 dO hI ml -o 0 m "7 N . l r r l . - l o m 0 0 0 a n i . o ' G W N N ~ dr t r l C N 3 N N dm -m-r N1 0N0Nw Cd lg -l NN - e r n m m L n P - FI m Clm m m . D o . n * m e * r n n Z Z 3 5 Q + 2 3

s

rn r n v r t . o m -- - - - - w U

:

a

S

a *I M d

-

-

- -+ U a 111 "3 m W

"

2 I

-

a z z z m \ -N N N N N N r a r 4 ~ I N N ~ J N NN d d N W N b i

+

+

G d i 4 a ; d Ui d

,.--

m v l m

-

- 4 N - + d r \ l m + 0 0 6 0 d

-

4

-

r r ~ * l m - ~ r n a N N N N N N dm Nm mm * u 9 Q m m l l l l

s Z

N . R ; N . h ; ni hi d ni r j N ' r i n i 4 N ' -9 n r n * - a

-. -.

- - 0 0 0 m 0 0 6 I - 0 In H P1 0 0 In -1 0 0 0 PI 0 C rD ,-, 0 In -I rl

6

C IZI 3

2

a 0 ol a 2 0 0 m 0 0 -T ui d m 0 VI hl 0 Q r\l 0 Q 4 m N d

--

U

E:

(10)
(11)

Références

Documents relatifs

(2013) Length-weight relationship and seasonal effects of the Summer Monsoon on condition factor of Terapon jarbua (Forsskål, 1775) from the wider Gulf of Aden including

Identification and detection of a novel point mutation in the Chitin Synthase gene of Culex pipiens associated with diflubenzuron resistance...

These depend on which actor controls the trait (the vector or the parasite) and, when there is manipulation, whether it is realised via infected hosts (to attract vectors) or

Brennan TP, Woods JO, Sedaghat AR, Siliciano JD, Siliciano RF, Wilke CO: Analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 viremia and provirus in resting CD4+ T cells reveals a

The newly employed reactive magnetron co-sputtering technique has allowed us to enhance the absorption coefficient from the MLs owing to the high density of Si-ncs achieved and/or the

Market and communication schemes have taken a noticeable place in temples and some of them can be regarded as types of “mega-temples.” 2 This article describes the

Altogether, these results indicate that expression of the endogenous DRP1 protein is important for maintaining normal mitochondrial morphology in NHEK and that loss of this

sour rot symptoms in the field and in the laboratory (n = 5 bunches), ‘Post-harvest mild rot’ indicates fruit that were collected without rot symptoms but showed mild rot in