• Aucun résultat trouvé

Part 1. Goalification

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Part 1. Goalification"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Praxis

1312

Canadian Family PhysicianLe Médecin de famille canadien Vol 56: DECEMBER • DÉCEMBRE 2010

Part 1. Goalification

Greg Dubord

MD

Our lives are spent either in doing nothing at all, or in doing nothing to the purpose, or in doing nothing that we ought to do; we are always complaining our days are few, and acting as though there would be no end of them.

Seneca (4 BC to 65 AD)

I

magine your practice with fewer complaining pa- tients. Imagine your patients more focused on their goals than their grievances. Patients begin with com- plaints, but complaints are just the raw material of goals.

Embedded within every complaint is at least one goal.

Our patients often need help seeing things that way.

Goalification is the term I use to describe the pro- cess by which we transform complaints into goals. You

“goalify” complaints by articulating their opposites. Put mathematically:

Goal = 1/complaint

You’re on an antonym quest. The International Classification of Diseases helps us with diagnosis and Roget’s Thesaurus helps us goalify. Here are some examples:

The core concern is that complaining leads nowhere. If you allow your patients to complain for 10 years—all the while providing exemplary empathy—they’ll no doubt feel “understood,” but there’s no assurance that they’ll have solved their problems. A decade of dedication to goal-focused behaviour doesn’t guarantee results either, but the odds are immeasurably higher.

There’s a standard script in primary care: patient complains  doctor draws empathy into syringe  doc- tor administers bolus of empathy  patient feels good and thanks doctor  patient returns to life, changing nothing  empathy buzz wears off  patient books another appointment.

You might have learned that lengthy supportive lis- tening is the sine qua non of caring. But science sug- gests there’s a U-shaped curve: outcome is optimized with a midrange of empathy. Overemphasis on sup- portive listening sometimes creates an “empathy addict”

with a stagnant life. It’s tough to goalify unless you pri- oritize being helpful over being thought nice and polite.

In the following dialogue I interrupt in the service of redirecting the patient’s energies:

If there’s patient buy-in at that point, the patient is directed toward a review of the things she or he is willing to do to make progress toward the goal (future articles in this series will elaborate on this). There’s sometimes an opportunity to highlight—in the nicest way possible—

that except in the most idealistic New Age philosophy, simply desiring an outcome is no guarantee that it will

“manifest.” Put more diplomatically, downstream from the same old behaviour is the same old mood. If the patient wants a new mood, the patient will likely have to behave differently. You have to earn your mood.

Goalification is particularly appropriate for chronic complainers. It assumes the following:

you’ve listened enough to understand the problem—and satisfactorily conveyed that understanding to the patient;

you’ve earned a relatively strong doctor-patient rela- tionship; and

you’re carefully attuned to the patient’s responses as you goalify.

Goalification’s goals include increased assurance that patient and physician energies are directed properly, improved outcomes, and prevention of physician burnout.

In summary:

Complaints  Goalification  Goals

Dr Dubord teaches cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Toronto. In this series of Praxis articles, he outlines the core principles and practices of medical CBT, his adaptation of orthodox CBT for primary care.

Acknowledgment

I thank the following CBT Whistler 2010 participants for their helpful critique of this paper: Dr Graham Mansell, Dr Desmond Konway, Dr Susan Burgess, Dr Greg Cully, and Dr Raj Rampersaud.

Correspondence

Greg Dubord, e-mail greg.dubord@cbt.ca

Next month: Scalification CoMPlaint Possible antonyMs (Goals)

Depression Happiness, contentment, enthusiasm, satisfaction, joy Anxiety Calmness, serenity, ease, peace, tranquility Social

anxiety

Extroversion, confidence, social comfort, social ease, participation

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Series

Pt: I’m so depressed [elaborates].

Dr: [Accurate but brief empathy statement, then …] It sounds like your goal is the opposite of that. I wonder what that would be? Maybe happiness?

Pt: [Slight pause, then resumption of complaining] Yeah, sure

… but I’m so depressed. I’m so depressed.

Dr: [Accurate but brief empathy statement, then …] Sorry to interrupt, but it sounds like you’re saying you have a goal of making yourself happier—do I have that right?

Pt: [Slightly longer pause, then resumption of bitter complain- ing] Yeah, but I’m so depressed. I’m so depressed.

Dr: Wow! I hear the passion in your voice! You’re fed up with being depressed, aren’t you? It sounds like you really want the opposite of that—that you really want to increase your happi- ness! It sounds like you’re ready to truly commit to doing the things required to make yourself happier. Have I got that right?

Pt: Yeah, it would be nice to be happier. But how do I do that?

Références

Documents relatifs

A comparison of the standard déviations of the médian and mean in columns (1) and (2) shows that for thèse observations the médian is better determined than the mean on 13 days,

While a model with a single compartment and an average factor of reduction of social interactions predicts the extinction of the epidemic, a small group with high transmission factor

In the first article (Upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma: location as a predictive factor for concomitant bladder carcinoma. Epub 2012 May 3) on the timing of Upper Urinary

Even though there are international standards for point of care testing (ISO 22870 Point- of-care testing (POCT) – Requirements for quality and competence) and point of care

2 What six things do you think would be the most useful things to have in the jungle?. Make a list, and say why each thing

In an analysis of the Patient-Centred Outcomes Study, Stewart and col- leagues 4 found that mean diagnostic costs in the 2 months following an index visit were significantly higher

S everal years ago, at the urging of some nonmedical friends, a small group of physicians and our spouses created a new board game called “Diagnosis.” Each player was a

2 Until a refrigerator-stable vaccine becomes available, however, varicella vac- cine will not be incorporated into the recommend- ed immunization schedule in Canada, as most