• Aucun résultat trouvé

Does crop diversification impact plant-soil interactions?

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Does crop diversification impact plant-soil interactions?"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

DOES CROP DIVERSIFICATION IMPACT PLANT-SOIL INTERACTIONS ?

MIRA Sébas7an(1 ,2) , MOUGEL Christophe (2), LE CADRE Edith(1)*

(1) AGROCAMPUS OUEST, Joint Unit Research Soil, Agro- and Hydrosystems, Spa7aliza7on, Rennes – France.

(2) INRA, Joint Unit Research Gene7cs, Environment and Plant Protec7on, Le Rheu – France. * contact person email : [email protected]

Take home messages

Acknowledgement Authors thank Chaire Agriculture Ecologiquement Intensive for its financial support and technical staff from both INRA and AGROCAMPUS OUEST for their help during harvesFng and collecFng data.

Results and discussion

PLOT 1 : monoculture PLOT 2 : intercropping

Sunshine

Bulk soil properties (pH, SOM, CEC, texture)

Rain & [CO2]

Rhizosphere

Rhizosphere

Cultural practices (inputs, tillage)

Hypothesis (1) : Bulk soil ≠ Rhizosphere along a cultural cycle Hypothesis (2) : Rhizosphere effect is maintained along a gradient

of diversifica7on

Context and objec7ves

Plants modify physical and chemical proper3es around their roots1 The rhizosphere is an hot spot of biological ac3vity²

Rhizosphere func3onning may explain plant performances3

References

1 : Hunter, P. J., Teakle, G. R., & Bending, G. D. (2014). Root traits and microbial community interacFons in relaFon to phosphorus availability and acquisiFon, with parFcular reference to Brassica. FronFers in Plant Science, 5, 27.

2 : van der Pu[en, W. H., Bradford, M. A., Pernilla Brinkman, E., van de Voorde, T. F. J., & Veen, G. F. (2016). Where, when and how plant-soil feedback ma[ers in a changing world. FuncFonal Ecology, 30(7), 1109–1121.

3 : KulmaFski, A., Beard, K. H., & Heavilin, J. (2012). Plant-soil feedbacks provide an addiFonal explanaFon for diversity-producFvity relaFonships. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1740), 3020–3026.

Material and methods

BULK

SOIL RHIZO

SPHERE

Soil samples (4 replicates)

Rhizosphere Soil (RS) & Bulk Soil (BS)

-Phosphate & Nitrate fluxes estimated using Anion Exchange Membranes

(ANV Selemion)

-Enzymatic activities

Indicator used : BS – RS / BS + RS

3 winter wheat plots (Triticum aestivum)

Dynamic sampling : 6 dates of sampling per farm

April 24th--- May, 2nd--- May 14th --- May, 28th --- June, 11th --- June, 25th

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 PHOS

GLU

PAK ARN

Stem elongation (April, 24th)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 PHOS

GLU

PAK ARN

Booting (May, 2nd)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 PHOS

GLU

PAK ARN

Heading (May, 14th)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 PHOS

GLU

PAK ARN

Flowering (May, 28th)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 PHOS

GLU

PAK ARN

Development of fruit (June, 11th)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 PHOS

GLU

PAK ARN

Ripening (June, 25th)

Farm A

Farm B

Farm C

Wheat Wheat IRG + CC Maize

2016 2017 2018

Faba bean Wheat Rapeseed Wheat

2015 2016 2017 2018

Cover crop

Cover crop Cover crop

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Wheat clover Maize Red Barley Rapeseed +

red clover Faba bean

3 farms - 3 degrees of diversification

Stem elongation Booting Heading Flowering Development of fruit Ripening

Figure 1 : Nitrate (1) and phosphate (2) fluxes (ng/day) in rhizosphere (green) and bulk soil (red) measured with a method using Anion Exchange Membranes (AEM). Bars indicate standard errors.

Differences are significant (p < 0,05) between soil samples for each date of sampling.

6 5

4 3 2

1 0

350

300 250 200

150 100

50 0

(1) N=4 (2) N=4

Boo7ng Heading Flowering Development of fruit Ripening Boo7ng Heading Flowering Development of fruit Ripening

Diversification +++

Diversification +++

Diversification +

Figure 2 : Enzymatic activities (PHOS = acid phosphatase, PAK = alakaline phosphatase involved in P cycle, ARN = Arylamidase involved in N cycle , GLU= Glucosidase involved in C cycle) in mU/g of soil in rhizosphere (green) and bulk soil (red). Differences are significant (p < 0,05) between soil samples for each date of sampling.

Bulk soil > Rhizosphere Bulk soil < Rhizosphere

0 1 -1

Bulk soil = Rhizosphere

Boo7ng Heading Flowering Development of fruit Ripening

Stem elonga7on Boo7ng Heading Flowering Development Ripening of fruit

Diversification +++

Diversification ++

Diversification +

v  NO3- & PO43-- fluxes

Low diversifica7on à BS ≠ ≠ RS v  EnzymaFc acFviFes

High diversifica7on à BS ≠ ≠ RS

Figure 4 : Differences in enzymatic activity of alkaline phosphatase between bulk soil and rhizosphere in function of diversification degree and plant growth stage. Differences are significant (p < 0,05)

between soil samples for each date of sampling.

Figure 4 : Differences in nitrate (green variations) and phosphate fluxes (red variations) between bulk soil and rhizosphere in function of

diversification degree and plant growth stage. Differences are significant (p < 0,05) between soil samples for each date of sampling.

v Soil analysis should collect rhizosphere soil (and not only bulk soil) to explain plant performances

v Rhizosphere is a dynamic compartment as variables are greatly influenced by plant growth stage and species

v Intensity of crop diversificaAon (duraAon of the crop rotaAon and number of culAvated species) impact rhizosphere funcAonning

v  NO3- fluxes in BS > NO3- fluxes in RS à NO3- uptake by the plant v  PO43- fluxes in BS < PO43- in RS àplant effect on P availability v  EnzymaFc acFviFes RS > EnzymaFc acFviFes in BS

à higher microbial ac7vity in RS

Hypothesis (1)

Hypothesis (2)

Bulk soil ≠ Rhizosphere √

Diversification impact

rhizosphere processes √

Références

Documents relatifs

In addition to organic ligands, plant root exudates, which generally include acetic, oxalic, fumaric, citric, and tartaric acids, also affect Zr solubility in soil and its uptake

Soil factor effects on plant community structure are addressed by highlighting plant trait selection by degraded habitats in ultramafic soils for mine reclamation [3], by specifying

Modelling soil-plant-atmosphere water transfer in greenhouse cultivation, under water restric- tion: how does plant growth affects transpiration and soil hydrodynamic

• We want to use the presence of synchronization in natural ecosystem (ie: grassland) to restore it in crop production. • To observe that we set up wheat /

Camille Cros, Gaël Alvarez, Frida Keuper, Sandrine Revaillot, Robert Falcimagne, Sébastien Fontaine.. To cite

If the main objective of the control is to maintain the crop yield above a critical threshold, then plant growth and plant-insect interactions have to be taken into account.. They

However, up to now, biological control modelling has primarily focused on pests-natural enemies interactions considering somehow that crop yield is not affected by the pests..

Interaction plot for soil moisture (from GLS and GLM) between (A) substrate depth and number of days after rain in summer and autumn 2016 (means and standard errors) and (B) Substrate