A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION C
E. F ADELL
S. H USSEINI
Infinite cup length in free loop spaces with an application to a problem of the N-body type
Annales de l’I. H. P., section C, tome 9, n
o3 (1992), p. 305-319
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPC_1992__9_3_305_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1992, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section C » (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/anihpc) implique l’accord avec les condi- tions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute uti- lisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
Infinite cup length in free loop spaces with
anapplication to
aproblem of the N-body type
by
E.
FADELL(*)
and S. HUSSEINI(**)
Vol. 9, n° 3, 1992, p. 305-319. Analyse non linéaire
Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, U.S.A.
ABSTRACT. -
Cup lengths
in thecohomology
of the space of freeloops (over
fields of finitecharacteristic)
arecomputed
and resultsapplied
toprove the existence of
infinitely
many solutions of a Hamiltoniansystem
ofN-body type.
RESUME. -
« Cup » longueurs
dans lacohomologie
del’espace
deslacets libres
(sur
corps decaracteristique finie)
sont obtenues et sontappliquees
ademontrer,
l’existence d’une infinite de solutions d’unsystème
Hamiltonien a
N-corps.
1. INTRODUCTION
Let E denote the Sobolev space
WT~ 2 (W)
ofT-periodic
functions from the reals R to Euclidean n-space tR".Then,
if U is an open set in[Rn,
setClassification A.M.S. : 58 E 05.
(*) Supported also by the Universitat Heidelberg, Mathematisches Institut und Institut fur Angewandte Mathematik (SFB).
(**) Both authors were supported in part by NSF under Grant No. DMS-8722295.
Annales de l’lnstitut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire - 0294-1449 Vol. 9/92/03/305/15/$3.50/0 Gauthier-Villars
306 E. FADELL AND S. HUSSEINI
E(U) equal
to thoseq ~ E
whose range is in U. Thetopology
ofE(U) plays
animportant
role in manyproblems
inAnalysis.
Forexample,
if Uis
connected, simply
connected and notcontractible,
it is known that the(Lusternik-Schnirelmann) category
ofE (U)
is infinite[FHI]
and this fact is instrumental inestablishing
the existence ofinfinitely
many solutions tosingular
Hamiltoniansystems,
where U is the domain of thecorresponding potential
function(see
e. g.,[AC], [BR], [C], [Rl]).
Aspecial
case of thissituation is the so-called
N-body problem
in whereE = WT° 2 (lRkN)
andfor
non-collision
solutions the subset E(U),
where U =FN (IRk)
is the N-thconfiguration
space ofplays
an essential role(see
e. g.[BR]).
Theproof
of the above result[FH 1]
that catE (U)
is infinite does notrequire knowledge
of the cuplength
in thecohomology
ofE (U).
Infact,
the cuplength
of E(U)
may very well be finite over certain coefficient fields. Forexample,
whenn >_
3 isodd,
and U =i~ - ~
0},
the cuplength
of E(U)
overthe
field
of rationals Q is 1[VS].
The
topological analogue
of E(U)
is the space of freeloops A U,
where for anytopological
spaceM,
AM =~° (Sl, M),
the space of continuous maps from the circleS 1
to the space M.E (U)
has the samehomotopy type
as A M[K]
so thatcategory
and cuplength
of E(U)
may be studiedthrough A
U. Forexample,
thegeneral
result in[FH1]
states that forsimply
connected space M with non-trivialfinitely generated cohomology (over
somefield),
A M has infinitecategory
and thisimplies
the corre-sponding
result forE (U)
mentioned above.(The
case where M is finitedimensional but not
necessarily simply
connected or of finitetype
is contained in[FH2].)
Even
though
the cuplength
in thecohomology
of A M does notplay a
role in the above
general
results in[FH 1 ], nevertheless,
it is still useful to know that over somefields, depending
onM,
the cuplength
is infinite.We will show in this note, that for
spheres S"’,
A Sm has infinite cuplength
over
712
and forcomplex projective space C Pn,
CPn has infinite cuplength
overZ~,
where r divides n + 1.Incidentally,
A C Pn hasonly
finitecup
length
over the rational field[VS].
The first result will allow us tocompute
the relativecategory [Fl]
of thepair (A M, A N),
where M is awedge
ofspheres
and N a"subwedge".
In this case both A M and AN have infinitecategory
and the relativecategory
cat(A M, AN)
is shownto be infinite
using
a cuplength type
argument. This resultprovides
analternative tool for the
topological part
of a theorem of Bahri-Rabinowitz[BR]
of3-body type
and should be useful in thegeneral
case N>3(see § 2).
For our
N-body problem application,
we willrequire
the category of a certainsubspace
of A Sm described as follows. Let~2 = ~ l, ~ ~
act onAsm
by
the action(~)(~)= "~( B ~+ - ~ / ), 0 -_ t __ 1, where q is considered
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
1- periodic.
LetAo Sm
denote the fixedpoint
set under this action.Ao Sm
fibers over S’" but for m even, this fibration does not admit a
section,
which is a
requirement
for the main tool in[FH1]. Nevertheless,
we showthat the cup
length
ofAo
S"" over7L2
is infinite and hence thecategory
of is infinite. As anapplication
of theseresults,
it follows that thesubspace
E(FN (IRk))
of the Sobolev spaceWT~ 2 corresponding
to thefree
loops
AFN (IRk)
on the N-thconfiguration
space of also has infinite cuplength
overZ~. Furthermore,
if we letAo (FN
denote thesubspace
of A
(FN (IRk»)
which is the fixedpoint
set of the~2-action
definedabove,
then
Ao (FN
has infinite cuplength
over~2
and hence catAo (FN {I~k)) _
oo. This result if thekey
toproving
a criticalpoint
theoremfor the functional associated with a
problem
ofN-body type,
whichimproves
a result fo Coti-Zelati[C]
who minimizes theappropriate
func-tional to obtain a critical
point.
In addition toyielding
an unboundedsequence of critical
values,
the theorem(see
Section3)
allows a non-autonomous
potential V (q, t)
which isC1 and T/2-periodic
in t.2. CUP LENGTH IN SOME FREE LOOP SPACES
We
employ
thefollowing
notation. I is the unit interval[0, 1]; MI
is thespace of maps from I to a space
M;
A M is the freeloop
space on Mgiven by
andQ(M)=(QM, *),
the space ofbased
loops,
i. e.loops
03B1~M such thata (©) = oc ( 1 ) _ * E M .
If we con-sider
tbe (Hurewicz)
fibration.where
a ( 1 )),
then thediagonal
inducesthe fibration.
We will also make use of the induced fibrations :
where
~(x)==(~ Jc)~M=(~ ~)
andpI M, p2 M
are contractible.The
Leray-Serre spectral
sequences of(1), (2),
p1and p2
will be denotedby d), L, d’), (-E~~ d").
Vol. 9, n° 3-1992.
308 E. FADELL AND S. HUSSEINI
We consider first the case M =
Sm + ~, m
+ 1even, m >__
1 and prove several lemmas under thisassumption.
If u is agenerator
of’E~~=H’"~ (M),
we define
by Furthermore,
we defineYEH2m(QM) by
With thesedefinitions,
theZ-cohomology
of Q 1 has the form H*
(Sm)QH* (Q 1)
where the first factor hasgenerator x in dimension m and the second factor is a divided
polynomial algebra
withgenerators
yl, y2, - . - , yk, . - . in dimensions 2 km and(see [1]).
2.1. LEMMA. -
d~ + 1 .x - -- u.
Proof -
This is asimple
calculationusing
the reverse map.where
(t)
= a(1- t). ’Then,
v° =v I ~ M,
has theproperty
thatvo (x)= -x
and henced"m+1 x=d"m+1 v*0 (-x)=d’m+1(-x)=u.
Comparing,
thespectral
sequences of p~l and ~2 with that of g wehave:
2 . 2. ~ LEMMA. -
dm
+ ~(x)
= u X 1-1 X u i~a ~m+ 1,~5~ + 1 )
_~m + i’ ° ~
we consider next the differential operator
dm
+ I :~rn + i’
m -~~m + ;
2 ~o ~
.and the kernel
of
is
generated by ((u X 1 ) x + (
1 xu) x).
Proof -
To prove(a)
consider(b)
followsfrom
a similar argument. Thusand an easy argument shows that the kernel of
c~~ + i ~ rn
has(u x 1 ) x + ( 1
xu) x
as generator.We now consider the
diagram:
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
Recall
that d
is the differential in the SSfor p,
and x EProof -
First observe that from Lemma 2. 2.Since, M’-M,
in the SSfor q,
it follows thatand
comparison
with the SS for piforces
theplus sign. Hence,
2 . 5. LEMMA. - Let i : ~2 M -~ ~
M,
denote the inclusion map, where M = as above.Then,
is
surjective.
Proof -
Consider the terms, = H*(Q M)
in thespectral
sequencefor p
over Z.Let Yk
denote one of thegenerators
of the dividedpolynomial algebra H* (S2 SZ m+ 1). Then, using induction,
Therefore, dm +
I = 2Hence,
over~2, dm + ~
= o. This is suffi- cient toverify
the lemma.2 . 6. THEOREM. -
If
M =Sm + 1,
m + 1 even, then asalgebras,
Proof -
This is immediate from theLeray-Hirsch
theorem and the fact that i* is anisomorphism
in dimensions which aremultiplies
of m.The case when
M = Sm + 1
with m + 1 odd isconsiderably
easier.H* (SZ Sm + 1 )
is the dividedpolynomial algebra
ongenerators
yi, ... , 3~ - - ’ and in the SS for p,
dm + 1 yk = o,
so that i* issurjective
over Z as well as over
~2.
2 . 7. THEOREM. -
If l~ = Sm + ~, m + I odd,
then asalgebras
over~,
2 . 8. COROLLARY. -If m >__ l,
the cuplength of
H*
(A
Sm +1; ~2)
isinfinite.
Proo, f : - H* (A Sm + 1; ~z~
contains the dividedpolynomial algebra
over
~G
on generators y~, y2, ..., yk andcalculating
binomial coefficients mod 2 we find that the cupproduct
Vol. 9, n° 3-1992.
310 E. FADELL AND S. HUSSEINI
is non-zero for all k
>
1.2 . 9. Remark. -
Corollary
2. 8implies
that thecategory
ofm>_ 1,
is infinite.However,
the direct argument in[FH1]
issimpler.
Never-theless,
we will needCorollary
2.8 later on tocompute
a relative cupproduct.
Our nextexample
cannot be handledusing [FHl].
Let
f
denote any mapf : M -~ M
and consider itsgraph
1
x f:
M -~ M x M. LetA f
M denote the total space of the induced fibrationas in the
following diagram:
An
important
case for us in theapplication
to begiven
in Section3,
isM = Sm+ 1,
m + 1 even,and f
theantipodal
map.(If
m + 1 isodd, f is homotopic
to theidentity and AI M "" A M).
Notice that in this casepj
does not admit a section which iswhy [FHl]
does notapply.
Let d
denote the differential in the SS over Z for the fiber mapp .
Theanalogue
of Lemma 2. 4 is:Proof.- Furthermore,
2 .11. LEMMA. - Let i : SZ M ~
A f M,
where M = Srn+ 1 ~
m + 1 even, andf
the
antpodal
map.Then,
is
surjective. Furthermore,
over~,
theimage of
contains the divided
polynomial algebra
in H*(Q M).
Proof. -
It followsby
induction that over 7Lwhere,
asabove,
the yk are generators of thepolynomial algebra
H*(Q 1).
Thisobservation suffices to -prove the lemma.
Annales de I’lnslÏtul Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
2 .12. COROLLARY. -
A f M,
where M =Sm + 1,
m >1,
hasinfinite
cuplength
over Z andZ2
and hencef
M hasinfinite
category.2.13. COROLLARY I
as
algebras.
Our next
example
is thecomputation
on the cuplength
of A C Pn. We will make use of the fact that 03A9CPn has the samehomotopy type
asWorking
overZ andemploying
thediagrams (3), (4)
and(5),
let x denote agenerator
of u a generator ofH2 (C pn),
and yI, y2, ... y~, ... the
generators
of the dividedpolynomial algebra
incorresponding
to H*(~ 1).
Also let yI = y, to conform to someprevious
notation. We may assume that in the SS for p~ .Then,
Lemmas 2 . 1-2 . 2 obtain withonly
notationaladjustments
andd 2 (x) _ - u,
andd2 (x) = 0. k = ~ , ... , h
and the differential
operators d~
are all trivial for 2j 2 n -1.
At thelevel we have
i = o,
... , n,where ( )
indicates"generated by".
We will need the
following
in the SSfor q
in(5).
2 .14. LEMMA. - Let ui = 1 X u 1 in H*
(C pn
XThen,
in the SS
for
7 the elementis a
d2 cocycle,
i. e.,d2 (w)=
0. w is agenerator of
kerneld2
chosen sothat
d2n ( y) = yv. Therefore,
in theSS for
p in(5)
we haved2n (y)
=d2n
=(n
+1
2ln x.Proo f
:~On the other
hand,
ifwe
have, by equating coefficients,
a~ = a2 = .. - = an+ I and w generates kerd2. Thus, d2 y = ~ w
sinceH2n
+1 (MI) _
0 and w cannot survive. There is no loss ofgenerality
if westipulate
thatd2 (y)
= w.Finally,
in the SSfor p, we have
2 .15. LEMMA. - On the
SS for p
we haveVol. 9, n° 3-1992.
312 E. FADELL AND S. HUSSEINI
Proof -
We use induction on k.2 1 6. COROLLARY. -
If
r is aprime
which divides n +1,
then in the SSfor
p over7~r
we haved2n (x)
= 0 and( yk)
= 0for
all k >_ 1.Hence,
theinclusion map i : Q C I’n ~ ~ ~ P‘~ induces
surjections
and
hence,
asalgebras,
We need to extend some of these results to
configuration
spaces. First let M =FN
the N-thconfiguration
space of Euclideank-space (~k.
Recall,
thatAlso,
theprojection (~~) given by
is
locally
trivial with fiber whereQN
is a set of(~ -1 ~ points.
Inparticular,
p2:F2 (~k) -~
with fiber o. HenceF2
~ 0 andwe have for 1~ >_ 3
so that
A F 2
IRK has infinite cuplength
overZ2.
It is easy to see that pN admits a section forN > 3.
In fact we willproduce
anequivariant
sectionwhich will be needed
by
the nextexample.
2.17. LEMMA. - For
N >-- 3, FN (Rk) ~ FN-1 (Rk)
admits a section 03C3 with the property that a(
-x) _ - ~ (x).
Proof -
LetDefine
and set
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
YA J
2 . 18. THEOREM. - has
infinite
cuplength
overk >-_ 3, N >_ 2.
Proof - By
theprevious
lemmaApN:
AF~
~ A admitsa section for
N > 3
and henceby
induction the result follows.We now
consider
theconfiguration
spaceanalogue
ofCorollary
2. 12.We define
AA F~ (lRk)
as apull-back by
thediagram
’where
A (x 1, ... , x~) _ ( - x i , ... , - xN) .
Thus, ~,A FN (~k)
is the space ofpaths
q =(ql’
...,qN)
inFN
suchthat
q~ ( 1 ) _ - q~ (o). Then,
the fibration inducesp~
admits a sectionusing
the section 6 of Lemma 2 . 17. It is easy toidentify
up tohomotopy type,
with ofCorollary
2 .12.Combining
the remarks we obtain:2.19. THEOREM. - For
N >__ 2, k > 3,
the cuplength infinite.
Our final
computation
concerns the relativecategory
of a certainpair
which can be estimated
by considering
H*(X; A)
as a module over H*(X).
In
[BR],
Bahri and Rabinowitzexploited
apurely topological
result thatthe free
loop
spaces AF~
and AF2 (IRk)
were not of the samehomotopy type
to prove a theorem of the3-body type concerning
the existence ofan unbounded sequence of critical values without a
symmetry
conditionon the
potential (see
Section3).
Thistopological
result is derived from aresult of
Vigue-Poirier
and Sullivan[VS]
to the effect that the rational Betti numbersof AF 3 k >_ 3,
wereunbounded,
while thoseof A F2 (IRk)
were bounded. The
following
result(theorem) provides
an alternative tool for the Bahri-Rabinowitz theorem andwill, hopefully, play a
role in the-case N>3.
First we recall one of the definitions of relative
category
introduced in[Fl], [F2].
2.20. DEFINITION. - Let
(X, A)
be atopological pair.
Acategorical
cover for
(X, A)
oflength n
is an(n+I)-tuple
of open setsV 1, ... , Vn)
suchVo
deforms in X to A relative toA,
and
Vi,
deforms in X to apoint. cat (X, A)
is the minimumlength
Vol. 9, n° 3-1992.
314 E. FADELL AND S. HUSSEINI
of such
categorical
covers if suchcategorical
covers exist.Otherwise,
setcat
(X, A)
=00.The next result is the
analogue
for cuplength
in thissetting, using
thefact that over any commutative
ring
ofcoefficients,
H*(X, A; R)
is amodule over H*
(X; R). Although,
the resultdepends
on coefficients wewill not
display
it in the notation.2. 21. PROPOSITION
[Fl]. - If
there exist n elements ul, ..., u,~ in H*(X) of positive
dimension such that theproduct
ul u2 ... un is not in the annihila-tor
of
H*(X, A),
then cat(X, A)
> n.Now,
letM = S
1 v ... vS~
denote awedge
ofspheres
of dimension>_ 2
and M’ a"subwedge"
which we take to beSi
v ... vSk,
Weemploy Proposition
2. 21 andCorollary
2. 8 to prove thefollowing.
2 . 22. THEOREM. - cat
(AM, AM’)
=00.Proof -
We work with7L2
coefficients.Consider the
diagram
where i*
surjects
because A M’ is a retract of A M and r*injects,
where r:is a retraction which takes AM’ to a
point.
Sincehas infinite cup
length
the result follows.2 . 23. Remark. - In the Lusternik-Schnirelmann method it is useful to know that when the
category
of a space X isinfinite,
there arecompact
subsets ofarbitrarily high category
in X. When the cuplength
ofX, using singular cohomology,
is infinite over some coefficientfield,
this isautomatic
[FHI].
We are indebted to LuisMontejano
forsuggesting
theuse of "infinite dimensional
topology"
toverify
that when X is an ANR(sep.met.)
and has infinitecategory,
then X hascompact
subsets of arbitra-rily high
category. Forexample,
if X is a Hilbert manifold modelled on aHilbert space
H,
thenby
a result of D. Henderson[H],
X = P xH,
where Pis a
locally
finitepolyhedron.
If X has infinitecategory,
then so does P.Since P is a-compact, it is now an exercise to show that P has
subpo- lyhedra
ofarbitrarily high category
in P.In the next section it will be necessary to
apply
some of thecomputations
of this section to the
corresponding
Sobolev spaces. Let(lRkN)
denotethe Sobolev space of T
periodic
functions q : !? -~ which areabsolutely
continuous and have square summable first
derivatives. q
can be repre- sentedby q = ((q 1, . - - , qN)
where each qi : (F~ ~ The innerproduct
forAnnales de I’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
Wi: 2 (I~~‘N)
isgiven by
Let
CT
denote the Banach space of continuousT-periodic
functionswith the uniform norm. We may
readily identify C~ (lRkN)
with AIRkN.
Itis a well-known
fact [K]
that theinclusion
i :WT~ 2 CT
is acontinuous
injection,
whoseimage
is dense inCT
Define an open set A(N)
cWT~ 2
as follows:Then,
where is an open subset of A
Then, by
a theorem of Palais[P], i is
ahomotopy equivalence.
ThusA (N)
has both infinite cuplength
over7L2
and infinitecategory. Now,
introduce an action ofZ2 = {1,03B6} on W1, 2T (RkN) by (03B6q)(t)=-q(t+T 2), 0~t~1.
LetE 0
denote the fixed
point
set of thisaction, namely those q
suchthat 03B6q=q.
Then
Eo
is a closed Hilbertsubspace
of LetCo
denote thecorresponding subspace
ofCT Then, again Eo continuously injects
into
Co,
withimage
dense inCo.
LetAo (N) = A (N) n Eo
andAo FN (~kN) - FN Then, by
the sameargument
asabove, Ao (N)
andAo FN (lRk)
have the samehomotopy type.
ButAo FN (I~~)
may be identified withAA FN (fRk)
of the theorem 2 . 19.Thus, Ao (N)
has infinite cuplength
over7L2
and infinitecategory. Summarizing:
2.25. THEOREM. - Let
Then,
both A(N)
andAo (N)
haveinfinite
cuplength
over~2
and henceinfinite
category(with
compact subsetsof arbitrarily high category).
3. A HAMILTONIAN SYSTEM OF THE N-BODY TYPE Consider a
potential
function V :FN
of thefollowing
form:Vol. 9, n° 3-1992.
316 E. FADELL AND S. HUSSEINI
and the
following properties
for(V1)
(V2) Vij(q, t)=Vji(q, t)
andVij(q, t)=Vij (q, t + 2
(V 3) t)
~ - ~ asq ~ 0 uniformly
in t.(V4)
There existsR)
on aneighborhood W of 0 in IRk
such
that:
(a)
+ ooas q - 0,
T].
°(Y~.)
was introducedby
Gordon[G]
and called theStrong
Force Condi- tion. Consider thefollowing
Hamiltoniansystem
where
m = (ml, ... , mN)
is the mass vector with The functionalcorresponding
to(HS)
has the formThe
arguments employed
do notdepend
on the values mi so we assumethe masses mi = 1 and write
If we let E denote the Sobolev space
Wi’ 2 (~kN)
ofT-periodic, absolutely
continuous functions with
L2 derivatives,
then if(V 1) holds, I (q)
isC1
and bounded from below
by
0 on the open subsetwhich
corresponds
toWT° 2 (FN
We also define a closedsubspace Eo
of E as follows: Let
~2 = ~ l, ~ ~
denote thegroup
of order 2 with non-trivial element
ç.
Define theaction of 7L2
on Eby (~)(~)= 2014~( ~+~).
Then,
We also set
Ao (N)
=Eo
(~ A(N).
3 .1. THEOREM. -
If
thepotential
Vsatisfies (V 1 )
-(V4),
then(*)
pos-sesses an unbounded sequence
of
critical values.3 . 2. Remark. - The Coti-Zelati result
[C]
proves that when V is auton- omous andT-periodic,
that the minimum of(*)
is a critical value. The Bahri-Rabinowitz result[BR]
for N=3,
assumes no symmetry such asbut
imposes
conditions on behaviour of V and V’ atinfinity.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
Before
proceeding
with theproof
of Theorem 3 . 1 we observe that3 . 3. PROPOSITION. - Let
Io
denoteI (N).
Then criticalpoints of Io
are critical
points of
I.Proof. -
This is ageneral phenomenon. Namely
if a functional I is invariant under the action of a finite groupG,
then criticalpoints
of therestriction
Io
to the fixedpoint
set of the action arealways
criticalpoints
of I. In our case, if u E
E,
then u+ ~
u EEo
andand hence if q is a critical
point
forIo,
I’(q)
vanishes on E.Theorem 3. 1 Now follows from the
following
theorem.3 . 4. THEOREM. -
If
Vsatisfies (V 1 )
-{V4),
thenIo
=I|0 (N)
possessesan unbounded sequence
of
critical values.The
proof
will be broken down into a series of lemmas.3. 5. LEMMA
(Gordon’s
Lemma[G]). - If
Vsatisfies {V 1 ), (V3), (V4)
and
f a
sequenceq’~
inl~o (N)
convergesweakly
to q EEo,
thenif
q EaAo (N),
then
Io (qn)
~ + ~, whereaAo (N),
is theboundary of Ao (N)
inEo.
3 . 6. LEMMA. -
If
Vsatisfies (V 1) - (V4), Io satisfies
the Palais-Smale condition(PS)
onAo (N).
~roof. -
Letqn
denote a sequence inAo (N)
such thatIo
~ s >_ 0and
Io (qn)
~ 0.Then,
we may assumeIo (qn)
s + 1 and henceThen, since qn
EAo (N)
it follows
easily
that the sequence qn is bounded in theWi’ 2
norm.Again, by
standardarguments [Rl],
there is asubsequence,
also denotedby
qn, suchthat qn
convergesweakly to q
EEo,
and Gordon’s lemmaimplies
thatqo
~ 0 (N). Furthermore,
I’ has the form I’(q)
= q - where EP qn has a(strongly)
convergentsubsequence
inEo.
Since I’(qn)
--~0,
it follows thata
subsequence of qn
convergesstrongly to q
andIo
is(PS)
onAo (N).
The next lemma
merely
isolates the deformation theorem weemploy (see [R2]).
Vol. 9, n° 3-1992.
318 E. FADELL AND S. HUSSEINI
3.7. LEMMA. - Let Q denote an open set in a Hilbert space E and
a
C 1 functional
which isbounded from
below.Suppose
Isatisfies (PS)
on Q and we have the condition that when qn ~ q E q~ ES2,
then I ~ + ~, i. e. I is unbounded at the
boundary Then, for
c~
> 0 and U aneighborhood of K~ _ ~ ~
E Q : I(q)
= c and I’(q)
=0 ~,
there is0,
E~
and adeformation
tp : Q x I -~ Q such that(1)
cpo =identity,
S~ -~ S2 is ahomeomorphism,
t E I.(2) 03C6(q, t)=q
t~I.(3)
cp(q, 1 )
Eif
q EI‘ + E _ U ,
where(4)
we may takeU = QS .
3.8. Remark..- The
proof
of Lemma 3.7requires only
a minormodification of the
proof
of theorem A. 4 in[R2]. Following
the notation in[R2],
letr . ~ ~ , . ~~ ~
and
Then,
A is closed in Q butAU(E2014Q)=A~
1 is closed in E. B is closed in Q but also closed in E because I is unbounded atFurthermore, A ~ (~ B=0 because ~ ~.
Afterrequiring
the cutoff function to be 0 onAl
and I onB,
theproof proceeds
verbatim and the Q is forced to be invariant under the flow.Next,
thecorresponding
abstract criticalpoint
theorem.3.9. LEMMA. - Let Q denote an open set in a Hilbert space E and
C~ functional
which isbounded from
below.Suppose f satisfies (PS)
on Q andf
is unbounded at theboundary If
+ ~then
f
possesses an unbounded sequenceof
critical values.Proof -
Theproof
isquite
standard aftermaking
a few remarks.First,
since Q is a Hilbertmanifold,
Q possesses compact subsets ofarbitrarily high
category(see
Section2.) Thus,
if we set andwe see that the
-
are finite and withc1=inf f.
The usual argu-Q
ments
apply
to show thatthe cj
are all criticalvalues,
and + oc(see [R2]).
Proof of
Theorem 3.3. - Theproof
is an immediateapplication
ofLemma 3.2 to Lemma 3.9.
l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Analyse non linéaire
REFERENCES
[AC] A. AMBROSETTI and V. COTI-ZELATI, Periodic Solutions of Singular dynamical Systems, Periodic Solutions of Hamiltonian Systems and Related Topics,
P. H. RABINOWITZ et al. Eds., 209, NATO ASI series, Reidel, 1987, pp. 1-10.
[BR] ABBAS BAHRI and P. H. RABINOWITZ, Periodic Solutions of Hamiltonian Systems of
the 3-Body Type, Annals Inst. H. Poincaré Analyse non linéaire, Vol. 8, 1991,
pp. 561-649.
[C] V. COTI-ZELATI, Periodic Solutions for N-body Type Problems, Preprint 1989.
[F1] E. FADELL, Cohomological Methods in Non-Free G-Spaces, with Applications to
General Borsuk-Ulam Theorems and Critical Point Theorems for Invariant Functionals, Nonlinear Functional Analysis and its Applications, Reidel 1986, pp. 1-47.
[F2] E. FADELL, Lectures in Cohomological Index Theories of G-Spaces with Applications
to Critical Point Theory, Raccoltat Di Università della Calabria, 1987, Cosenza, Italy.
[FH1] E. FADELL and S. HUSSEINI, A Note on the Category of the Free Loop Space, Proc.
Am. Math. Soc., Vol. 107, 1989, pp. 527-536.
[FH2] E. FADELL and S. HUSSEINI, Category of Loop Spaces of Open Subsets in Euclidean Space, Nonlinear Analysis, Vol. 17, 1991, pp. 1153-1161.
[G] W. GORDON, Conservative Dynamical Systems Involving Strong Forces, Trans. Am.
Math. Soc., Vol. 204, 1975, pp. 113-135.
[H] D. HENDERSON, Infinite Dimensional Manifolds Are Open Subsets of Hilbert Space, Topology, Vol. 9, 1970, pp. 25-33.
[K] W. KLINGENBERG, Lectures on Closed Geodesics, Springer-Verlag, GMW No. 230, 1978.
[P] R. S. PALAIS, Homotopy Theory of Infinite Dimensional Manifolds, Topology, Vol. 5, 1966, pp. 1-16.
[R1] P. H. RABINOWITZ, Periodic Solutions for Some Forced Singular Hamiltonian Systems, Festschrift in honor of Jürgen Moser, Analysis Et Cetera, Academic Press, 1990, pp. 521-544.
[R2] P. H. RABINOWITZ, Minimax Methods in Critical Point Theory with Applications to
Differential Equations, C.B.M.S. Ser. Math., Vol. 65, 1986, A.M.S., Providence, R.I.
[VS] M. VIGUÉ-POIRIER and D. SULLIVAN, The Homology Theory of the Closed Geodesic Problem, J. Diff. Geometry, II, 1976, pp. 633-644.
(Manuscript received August 28, 1 990.)
Vol. 9, n° 3-1992.