• Aucun résultat trouvé

Introduction Slides

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Introduction Slides"

Copied!
22
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

EuroHCIR 2013

At SIGIR2013 in Dublin Ireland 1st August 2013

(2)

UNDERSTANDING EACH OTHER

Activity: Line up according to how interested in humans and IR systems you are

Left wall - Completely IR Systems

(3)

ABOUT US

Tony Russell-Rose Kristian Norling

Max Wilson Birger Larsen Preben Hansen

(4)

Leif Azzopardi - University of Glasgow Pia Borlund - Royal School of LIS

Paul Brindley - University of Nottingham Marc Bron - University of Amsterdam

George Buchanan - City University London Paul Clough - University of Sheffield

Arjen de Vries - CWI Anna Divoli - Pingar

David Elsweiler - University of Regensburg

Gene Golovchinsky - FX Palo Alto Laboratory, Inc.

Martin Halvey - Glasgow Caledonian University Morgan Harvey - University of Lugano

Charlie Hull - Flax

Peter Ingwersen - Royal School of LIS Jaap Kamps - University of Amsterdam Mounia Lalmas - Yahoo Research Barcelona

Joe Lamantia - Oracle

Ian Ruthven - University of Strathclyde Tyler Tate - TwigKit

(5)

SUBMISSIONS

2011 2012 2013

0 25 50 75 100

ATTENDANCE

2011 2012 2013

0 25 50 75 100

British HCI 2011 SIGIR 2013

IIiX2012

(6)

OUR AIMS THIS YEAR

Create opportunities for HCI+IR collaboration

Establish natural areas of mutual interest

(7)

THE PLAN

Facilitate lots of discussion and opportunity to collaborate

Key motivating talks

Plenty of space for discussion per talk

Some activities to get to know people

(8)
(9)

THE TALKS

(10)

EACH TALK

10 mins to present

15 mins discuss in groups

5x30s to pitch back to room

(11)

LIGHTNING TALKS

Posters are by coffee. Now until lunch Other workshop attendees during coffee

Lunch is in the dining hall

(12)
(13)

DINNER

Who's for dinner?

(14)

EDITING DOCS

Group 1 - http://bit.ly/hcirTg1

Group 2 - http://bit.ly/hcirTg2

Group 3 - http://bit.ly/hcirTg3

Group 4 - http://bit.ly/hcirTg4

(15)
(16)

ACTIVITY DOCS

Group 1 - http://bit.ly/hcirAg1

Group 2 - http://bit.ly/hcirAg2

Group 3 - http://bit.ly/hcirAg3

Group 4 - http://bit.ly/hcirAg4

(17)

Leif Azzopardi - University of Glasgow Pia Borlund - Royal School of LIS

Paul Brindley - University of Nottingham Marc Bron - University of Amsterdam

George Buchanan - City University London Paul Clough - University of Sheffield

Arjen de Vries - CWI Anna Divoli - Pingar

David Elsweiler - University of Regensburg

Gene Golovchinsky - FX Palo Alto Laboratory, Inc.

Martin Halvey - Glasgow Caledonian University Morgan Harvey - University of Lugano

Charlie Hull - Flax

Peter Ingwersen - Royal School of LIS Jaap Kamps - University of Amsterdam

Mounia Lalmas - Yahoo Research Barcelona Joe Lamantia - Oracle

Ian Ruthven - University of Strathclyde Tyler Tate - TwigKit

Paul Thomas - CSIRO

Elaine Toms - University of Sheffield Robert Villa - University of Sheffield

THANK YOU

We provided the place.

You provided the workshop.

Authors, Reviewers, SIGIR2013 & attendees

(18)

REQUEST

Please email me PDF of posters

Please email me slides (PDF?)

Please email links to demos or data if available

(to put on website)

(19)

FEEDBACK?

It's not over yet...

(20)

DINNER

Porterhouse Nassau Street

(“possibly the longest bar in Dublin”) 6:30pm

(21)
(22)

Références

Documents relatifs

Four considerations play a role in selecting training data: (i) data should be thematically similar to the test data, i.e., treat the same topics (ii) data should be similar in style

These four question processing streams use the two data sources for this task, the Dutch CLEF newspaper corpus and Dutch Wikipedia, as well as fact tables which were generated

We experimented with the combination of content and title runs, using standard combination methods as introduced by Fox and Shaw [1]: combMAX (take the maximal similarity score of

In order to make it possible for our answer re-ranking module (described in section 6) to rank answers from different streams, we took advantage of answer patterns from

Given a topic (and associated article) in one language, identify relevant snippets on the topic from other articles in the same language or even in other languages.. In the context

Language restricted Since we know the language of the topic in each of the translations, and the intention of the translated topic is to retrieve pages in that language, we may

When we examined the assessments of the answers to the three different question types, we noticed that the proportion of correct answers was the same for definition questions (45%)

For both English and Portuguese we used a similar set of indexes as for the monolingual runs described earlier (Words, Stems, 4-Grams, 4-Grams+start/end, 4-Grams+words); for all