• Aucun résultat trouvé

Program Committee

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Program Committee"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Program Committee

Leif Azzopardi University of Strathclyde Krisztian Balog University of Stavanger Nicholas Belkin Rutgers University

Toine Bogers Aalborg University Copenhagen Pia Borlund Royal School of LIS

Ruey-Cheng Chen RMIT University Paul Clough University of Sheffield Anita Crescenzi UNC SILS

Maria Gaede Humboldt-Universit¨at zu Berlin, Berlin School of Li- brary and Information Science

Mark Michael Hall Edge Hill University / Department of Computing Hugo Huurdeman University of Amsterdam

Jaap Kamps University of Amsterdam Evangelos Kanoulas University of Amsterdam Jussi Karlgren Gavagai & KTH

Diane Kelly University of Tennessee Knoxville

Marijn Koolen Huygens Institute for the History of the Netherlands Sanna Kumpulainen Tampere University of Technology

Birger Larsen Aalborg University Copenhagen

Vivien Petras HU Berlin

Mette Skov Aalborg University Mark Smucker University of Waterloo Jaime Teevan Microsoft Research

Suzan Verberne Institute for Computing and Information Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen

Emine Yilmaz University College London

Références

Documents relatifs

In order to make it possible for our answer re-ranking module (described in section 6) to rank answers from different streams, we took advantage of answer patterns from

Given a topic (and associated article) in one language, identify relevant snippets on the topic from other articles in the same language or even in other languages.. In the context

Language restricted Since we know the language of the topic in each of the translations, and the intention of the translated topic is to retrieve pages in that language, we may

When we examined the assessments of the answers to the three different question types, we noticed that the proportion of correct answers was the same for definition questions (45%)

For both English and Portuguese we used a similar set of indexes as for the monolingual runs described earlier (Words, Stems, 4-Grams, 4-Grams+start/end, 4-Grams+words); for all

Four streams generate candidate answers from the Dutch CLEF corpus: Lookup, Pattern Match, Ngrams, and Tequesta.. The Table Lookup stream uses specialized knowledge bases constructed

In effect, we conducted three sets of experiments: (i) on the four language small multilingual set (English, French, German, and Spanish), (ii) on the six languages for which we have

The Web Answer stream, for example, seemed to perform better than other streams on questions for which the answer was a date; the Pattern and Table Lookup streams had very