C AHIERS DE
TOPOLOGIE ET GÉOMÉTRIE DIFFÉRENTIELLE CATÉGORIQUES
I VAN K OLÁR
A general point of view to nonholonomic jet bundles
Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques, tome 44, no2 (2003), p. 149-160
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CTGDC_2003__44_2_149_0>
© Andrée C. Ehresmann et les auteurs, 2003, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
A
GENERAL POINT OF
VIEWTO NONHOLONOMIC JET BUNDLES
by Ivan KOLÁR
CAHIERS DE TOPOLOGIE ET
GEOMETRIE DIFFERENTIELLE CA TEGORIQ UES
Volume XLIV-2 (2003)
Resume. Un foncteur de jets d’ordre r general sur des vari6t6s fibr6es est défini comme 6tant un sous-foncteur du r-ième prolonge-
ment non-holonome pr6servant les produits fibr6s et contenant le r-
ieme prolongement holonome. Les foncteurs de jets sont caractérisés
en termes d’algebres de Weil. En utilisant ce mod6le alg6brique, nous
classifions tous les foncteurs de jets du second ordre et en d6duisons deux r6sultats g6om6triques dans le cas d’ordre sup6rieur.
Our
starting point
was the classicaldescription
of allproduct
pre-serving
bundle functors on thecategory Mf
of smooth manifolds and smooth maps in terms of Weilalgebras,
see[7]
for a survey. In[8]
wecharacterized in a similar way all fiber
product preserving
bundle func- tors on thecategory FMm
of fibered manifolds with m-dimensional bases and fiberpreserving
maps with localdiffeomorphisms
as basemaps. As a
partial
result we obtained acomplete description
of allbundle functors on the
product category Mfm
xMf
that preserveproducts
in the secondfactor,
whereMfm
denotes thecategory
of m-dimensional manifolds and localdiffeomorphisms.
In
[6]
we introduced thegeneral
concept of an r-th orderjet
functoron
Mfm
xMf
as a subfunctor of the r-thnonholonomic jet
functorJr that preserves
products
in the second factor and contains jr. Thenwe clarified that these functors are in
bijection
with the invariant Weilsubalgebras
A CD£ containing Drm,
whereD£ = Jro (Rm, R)
andD£
=Jro (Rm, R).
In Section 2 of the present paper we define an r-th order
jet
functor on7Mm
as a fiberproduct preserving
bundleThe author was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic
under the project MSM 143100009.
subfunctor of the r-th nonholonomic
prolongation
that contains the r- th holonomic one. Ouralgebraic description implies immediately
thatthere is a canonical
bijection
between thejet
functors onMfm
xMf
and
FMm.
To demonstrate the usefulness of ouralgebraic model,
weprove in Section 3 that the
only
second orderjet
functors areJ2, J2
and the semiholonomic one
J2.
Then we deduce twogeometric
resultsfor the
higher
order cases. In Section 4 we prove that theonly
thirdorder
jet
bundle with theproperty
that its three canonicalprojections
to the first order
jet
bundle aregeometrically independent
is the wholethird order nonholonomic
jet
bundle. In Section 5 we describe alljet
subfunctors of the functor
Jr’r-1
of semiholonomic r-th orderjets
thatare holonomic up to the order r - 1.
All manifolds and maps are assumed to be
infinitely
differentiable.Unless otherwise
specified,
we use theterminology
and notation from the book[7].
1. The foundations
The
primary
result in this field reads that everyproduct
preserv-ing
bundle functor on thecategory Mf
is a Weil functorTA,
whereA is an
arbitrary
Weilalgebra. Moreover,
the natural transforma- tionsTA --> T A
of two such functors are inbijection
with thealgebra homomorphisms
A eA, [7].
For a bundle functor G on
Mfm
xM f ,
an m-dimensional manifold M and a manifoldN,
wewrite, analogously
to thejet
case,or or
for the submanifold of
G(M, N)
with the firstprojection x
or secondprojection
y orboth, respectively.
We say G is of order r in the firstfactor,
if for every localdiffeomorphisms f1, f 2 :
M -> M and everymap g : N - N, implies
x E
M, x
=f1(x)
=f2 (x)
E M. We say G preservesproducts
in thesecond
factor,
ifwhere
Q
is another manifold. In[8]
we deduced that the bundle func- tors onM f m
xMf
of order r in the first factor andpreserving prod-
ucts in the second factor are in
bijection
with thepairs (A, H),
whereA is a Weil
algebra
and H :Grm->
Aut A is a grouphomomorphism
of the r-th
jet
group in dimension mGr
into the group of allalgebra automorphisms
of A. For every twopairs M,
N andM, N,
every localdiffeomorphism f :
M-> M and every map g : N -->N, G(M, N)
isan associated bundle to the r-th order frame bundle prM of M and
If G =
(A, H),
H :Grm ->
Aut A is another suchfunctor,
then thenatural
transformations
G - G are inbijection
with theequivariant algebra homomorphisms
A -> A.Consider a bundle functor F on the
category FMm.
The definitionof the order of F is based on the
concept
of(q,
s,r)-jet,
s >q
r,[7].
We say that F is of the order(q,
s,r),
if for every two fiberedmanifolds p :
Y -M,
p : Y - M and every twoFMm-morphisms
implies
The
integer
r is called the base order of F. Int8]
we deduced that the fiberproduct preserving
bundle functors onF Mm
of the base order rare in
bijection
with thetriples (A, H, t),
where A and H are as aboveand t :
Drm
-> A is anequivariant algebra homomorphism.
We havewhere tM :
Trm M --> TA M
is the natural transformation inducedby
t and the inclusion PrM C
T§gM
is taken into account.Further, F f :
FY - FY is the restriction and corestriction ofpr f[TA f], f being
the base map off . Moreover,
if F =(A, H, t)
is another suchfunctor,
then the natural transformations F - F are inbijection
withthe
equivariant algebra homomorphisms
p : A -> Asatisfying t
=p o t.
Every
bundle functor F onFMm
induces a bundle functorFo
onMfm
xMf by
where M x N-> M is the
product
fibered manifold andf
x g isinterpreted
as anFMm-morphism t lV1
x 7V ->M -->(M)
X lV ->M).
If we have a fiber
product preserving
bundle functor F =(A, H, t),
then
2. Jet functors on 7Mm
The construction of the bundle
Jr(M, N)
ofr-jets
of an m-dimen-sional manifold M into a manifold N can be
interpreted
as a bundlefunctor on
Mfm
xMf, [7].
We have J r =(Drm, C),
where the canon-ical action C
of Grm
onDrm = Jor(Rm, R) is
thejet composition, [8].
C.Ehresmann introduced the bundle
Jr (M, N)
of nonholonomicr-jets
ofM into
N, [4].
Even Jr is a bundle functor onMfm
xMf.
In[3]
wededuced Jr
= (Mrm, C),
where the action C ofGr
onD£ = Jro(Rm, R)
is the
composition
of nonholonomicjets, [4]. According
tof3],
In
[6]
we defined thegeneral concept
of an r-th orderjet
functor Gon
Mfm
xMf.
This is a subfunctorthat preserves
products
in the second factor.By
Section1,
thesefunctors are in
bijection
with theGrm-invariant
Weilsubalgebras
A ofDrm satisfying
Write
CA
for the restriction of the action C to A.Obviously,
The
injection iA : Drm
-> A is alsoequivariant,
so that A induces afunctor (A, CA , i A )
onFMm.
One verifieseasily
that the functoron
0M m
coincides with the horizontal extension of G introduced in[6].
In this sense, the classicalr-jet prolongation
of fibered manifolds coincides withJh
and the r-th nonholonomicprolongation Jh
o ... oJh
r-times
coincides with
Jhr.
Todistinguish clearly
the bundle functors onMfm
xMf
andJ’JL4 m ,
we shall use this somewhat nonstandard notation in what follows.Now we are in
position
to introduce thegeneral
concept of an r-th orderjet
functor onFMm.
Definition. A bundle functor F on
FMm
is said to be an r-th orderjet functor, if Jhr C F C Jhr
and F preserves fiberproducts.
By
Section1,
we haveFo
=(A, CA)
andThis
implies
thefollowing general result,
which has been known as anobservation in several concrete cases.
Proposition
1.Every
r-th orderjet
functor F onFMm
is the hor- izontal extension F =(FO) h
of its restrictionFo
toMfm
xMf.
0Remark. For every functor on
Mfm
xM f
of the form G =(A, H),
we can define its vertical extension
G,
onJ’M m
aswhere vA :
D’
-> A is the zerohomomorphism.
One verifieseasily
see
[2]
for more details. In the case G is ajet functor,
this concept coincides with that one introduced in another way in[6].
3. The classification of second order
jet
functorsThe second semiholonomic
prolongation -2 of a fibered manifold
Y is a subbundle of
Yh2 Y
characterizedby Jl/3
=01,
whereB : Jh Y
->Y and
/3i : Yh2Y --> J1h are
thetarget jet projections
andJ1hB
:J2H y -> J1n Y is the induced map. Further one definies J2 (M, N) -
J2h(M
x N ->M) . Obviously, J2
orJ2 h
isa jet
functor onMfm
xMf
or
FMm, respectively,
andJ-2h
is the horizontalextension of J2 .
The natural transformations
01
andJl(3 corresponds
to theproduct projections
The relation q1= q2 characterizes the
subalgebra D2m C D2m
corre-sponding
to J-2 .Lemma 1. If A C
&m
is an invariantsubalgebra satisfying D2m
C Aan d
q1|A # q2 |A,
th en A =&m.
Proof.
Let1, ei
be the standardalgebraic generators of D2m
and1, ei
or1, ei2
be the standardalgebraic generators
of the first or second factor ofD1m O D1m.
Theinjection D2m
C&m
is characterizedby ei
->ei1
+ei2.
Each element X E
D2m
is of the formand we have
By equivariancy,
eachhomogenous component
of X E Abelongs
toA as well. Hence
On the other
hand, xqo(ei
+ei2)
eH)2m
c A. Take an element X E Asatisfying
ql(X) # q2(X).
ThenThis vector can be transformed
by GL(m, R)
CG2m
into anarbitrary
non-zero vector of Rm*. Hence each
e 2 E
A. Thenei
+e2
E Aimplies
e’
E A. Since1, ei
ande’
are thealgebraic generators
ofú)2m,
we haveA=D2m.
OProposition
2. AII second orderjet
functors areJ2, J-2
andJ2 .
Proof. By
Lemma1,
we have to discuss the case ql = q2. The second ordercomponent X2
of X E A is a bilinear form. Hence we haveX2 =
s(X2 )
+a(X2 ),
where s or a denotes thesymmetric
orantisymmetric part.
Ifa(X2) =
0 for all X EA,
we have A =D2m.
Assume there isan element X E A with
a(X2)=
0.By
thealgebraic
Darbouxlemma,
there exists a basis
e-i
of Rm* such thatConsider the linear transformation
e-1 1
->ce-1, e-i
->ei,
i =2, ... m, 0#
e E R.By equivariancy,
Hence
e-1
Ae2
E A. Thisimplies e-1 1 e-2 2
E Aand, by equivariancy,
ei1 ej2
E A for all i# j.
So we have A =D-2m.
O4. The third order nonholonomic case
By omitting
r - 1 terms in the tensorproduct (1),
we obtain ralgebra homomorphisms
We are
going
to show thatalready
in the third order we have a moresubtle situation than in Lemma 1.
The
algebraic generators of .
are1, 1 e 11 e 2 ei 3.
Thepart containing
the linear combinations of the
products
of two or three e’s will be calledthe second or third order terms of an element X E
D3m.
Hencesecond and third order terms.
For every t E
R,
we define(D3m)t
C&m
as the set of all elementssatisfying
One verifies
easily
that(&m)t
is an invariantsubalgebra containing D3m.
Write
J3t
for thecorresponding jet
functor onMfm
xMf.
It isinstructive to describe its horizontal extension
(J3t)h geometrically.
The
projections
induce,
for every fibered manifoldY,
threeprojections
qsY :J3h Y -->
Jh Y.
It is well known thatJ1hY->
Y is an afiine bundle. Hence Z EJh3Y belongs
to(J3t)hY
if andonly
ifq3Y (Z)
is the afline combinationof
q1 Y (Z)
andq2Y (Z). Thus,
the conditionq1|A, q21A
andq3|A
aredifferent for an invariant
subalgebra D3m
C A C&m
does notimply
A = D3m.
It is easy to
verify
that for anarbitrary
Weilalgebra B,
the setHom(B,D1m)
of allalgebra homomorphisms
is an affinesubspace
ofthe vector space
Lin(B, D1m)
of all linear maps of B intoD1m.
Proposition
3. LetD3m
C A C&m
be an invariantsubalgebra.
IfqslA, s
=1, 2, 3,
do not lie on the samestraight
line inHom(A, D1m),
th en A =
&m.
Proof. Omitting
one term in&m = D1m OD1m OD1m,
we obtain 3algebra homomorphisms
Since all
qs |A
aredifferent,
Lemma 1implies qst(A) = D2m
in all threecases. Write
A1
for the first orderpart
of A. Hence each X EA1
is ofthe form
If xi - yi = zi for all X E
A1,
we haveAl = (Õ3m)I,
whichcorresponds
to the one-semiholonomic
jets
from[6].
If in A there is anthen
D3m
c Aimplies (za - xi)ei3
E A.By equivariancy,
eachei3
E Aand then each
ei1
+ei2
E A. If all elements ofA1
are of thetype (2),
then
q1|A
=q21A.
Now it is easy to see that it suffices to discuss the case
Then
Since
q23 (A) = íí)2m, by
Lemma 1 there exist some(ui)
and(v;)
satis-fying
If
(ui
+Vi) =1= 0,
then(ui
+vi)ei1
EA1 implies
eachei1
EA1. Further, by (4)
eachei2, ei3
EA1,
so that A =íi)3m.
Assume
(ui+vi)
= 0 is theonly possibility
in(4).
Then the induced linear mapA1 -> (q23 (A))1
has zero kernel. In otherwords,
everyyie2 +zi ei3
E(q23(A))1
= Rm* x JRm* determines aunique xief
E Rm*with the
property xi ei1+yi ei2+zi ei3
EA1.
This map Rm*x Rm* - JRm*is
GL(m,1R)-equivariant.
The standard methods from[7] yield
Since
D3m
cA,
we haveki + k2
= 1. Henceq1|A, q2 I A
andq3 I A
lie onthe same
straight
line. 0The bundle version of
Proposition
3 reads: if F is a third orderjet
functor and the restrictions
qslF, s
=1, 2, 3
do not lie on the samestraight
line in the above sense, then F =J3.
5. The subbundles of
Jr,r-1
Let
Jr
be the r-th ordersemiholonomic jet
functor and1f;-1 : Jr -+
Jr-l
be the canonicalprojection, [4].
In15]
we definedsee also
[9].
This is an r-th orderjet
functor onMfm
xMf.
In[5]
we deduced that + for every X EJ-r,r-1(M, N)Y
there is aunique
S(X) E Jxr (M, N)y satisfying
for all
Clearly,
S :J-r,r-1
->Jr is a natural transformation.Let
1, ei1,
... ,eir
be the canonicalalgebraic generators
ofDrm.
If wewrite
E’
=ei1+...
+eir,
then the Weilalgebra D-r,r-1 of J-r,r-1
is the
subalgebra
ofDrm
of the formThis defines an identification
If we write
analogously Drm
=Drm-1
xSrRm*,
thealgebra
versionS : D-r,r-1 -> Drm of (5) is
In
particular,
every X =b, B)
ED-r,r-1m
is of the formBy (6),
for another ZED-r,r-1,
Z =S(Z)
+L,
we haveThis formula
implies directly
r
Lemma 2. If P C ORm* is a linear
subspace containing SrRm*,
thenDrm-1
x P with themultiplication (7)
is asubalgebra of D-r,r-1 m.
Write C for the action of
Grm
onD-r,r-1m
determinedby
the functorJ-r,r-1. Using
the coordinate formula for thecomposition
of semi-holonomic
jets, [1],
we find that for each X + K EDr,r-1,
X EDrm,
K E ORm* and g E GrM,
where gi =
Tr1(g)
EG1m
=GL(m, R)
and I is the tensor action ofr
GL(m, R)
on 0JRm*. If thesubspace
P isGL(m, R)-invariant,
then(7) implies
thatDr-1m
x P is an invariantsubalgebra
ofD-r,r-1m
con-taining Drm. Conversely,
ifDrm-1
x P CD-r,r-1m
is anGrm-invariant
r
subalgebra containing Drm,
then P C ORm* is anGL(m, R)-invariant
linear
subspace containing
SrRm*.Thus,
we haveproved
Proposition
4. Thejet
subbundlesof Jr,r-1
are inbijection
withr
the
GL(m, R)-invariant
linearsubspaces
of 0IRm*containing
srJRm*.REFERENCES
[1] Cabras A., Kolá0159 I., Prolongation of projectable tangent valued forms, Arch.
Math. (Brno) 38 (2002), 243-257.
[2] Doupovec M., On the underlying lower order bundle functors, to appear.
[3] Doupovec M., Kolá0159 I., Iteration of fiber product preserving bundle functors, Monatsh. Math. 134 (2001), 39-50.
[4] Ehresmann C., Extension du calcul des jets aux jets non holonomes, CRAS
Paris 239 (1954), 1762-1764.
[5] Kolá0159 I., The contact of spaces with connection, J. Differential Geometry 7 (1972), 563-570.
[6] Kolá0159 I., Bundle functors of the jet type, Differential Geometry and Applica- tions, Proceedings, Masaryk University Brno, 1999, 231-237.
[7] Kolá0159 I., Michor P. W., Slovák J., Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993.
[8]
Kolá0159 I., Mikulski W. M., On the fiber product preserving bundle functors, Differential Geometry and Its Applications 11(1999),
105-115.[9] Libermann P., Introduction to the theory of semiholonomic jets, Arch. Math.
(Brno) 31 (1995), 183-200.
IVAN KOLAR,, DEPARTMENT OF ALGEBRA AND GEOMETRY, FACULTY OF SCI-
ENCE, MASARYK UNIVERSITY, JANACKOVO NAM. 2A, 662 95 BRNO, CZECH
REPUBLIC
E-mail address: [email protected]