Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Physical Review A, 23, 5, 1981-05-01
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.23.2502
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Propagation narrowing in the transmission of a light pulse through a
spectral hole
Eberly, J. H.; Hartmann, S. R.; Szabo, A.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
NRC Publications Record / Notice d'Archives des publications de CNRC:
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=4baf6e2f-ab96-45fc-89f1-77f03983d1c9
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=4baf6e2f-ab96-45fc-89f1-77f03983d1c9
PHYSICAL
REVIE%
A VOLUME23,
NUMBER 5 MAY1981
Propagation narrowing in the transmission
of a
light pulse through
a
spectral hole
J.
H.EberlyDepartment ofPhysics andAstronomy, University ofRochester, Rochester, New York14627
S.
R.
HartmannColumbia Radiation Laboratory, Department ofPhysics, Columbia University, New York, New York10027
A.Szabo
Diuision ofElectrical Engineering, National Research Council ofCanada, Ottawa, Canada K1AOR8
(Received 20 October 1980j
We comment on the spectral modification and temporal reshaping ofanarrow-band light pulse propagating through an atomic absorber that has a still narrower spectral hole. The regime ofpropagation narrowing is distinguished from the regime ofBeer'slaw.
I, INTRODUCTION
Hole burning
is
the termfor
the selective photo-excitation ofatomsor
molecules in asmall por-tion ofan inhomogeneously broadened optical ab-sorption line. Inthis region of the line, followingthe photoexcitation, there will be fewer than the normal number of atoms
or
molecules in theirground
states.
A subsequent narrow-band weak probe pulse will sufferless
than normal attenua-tion ifits
center frequencylies
within the excita-tion region. The resulting absorption curvemapped out by scanning the frequency of the probe beam has ahole in
it.
Figure 1shows an example. All ofthisis
well known.'
In the present note we address aquestion that comes up when the weak probe pulse has
a
spec-tral
width greater than the width of the hole,as
shown in Figure
2.
This questionis:
Whatis
the temporal form of the transmitted pulse'? The un-certainty relation6pAz
)
1suggests that b7in-creases
because hpdecreases,
but in order to answer the question properly it turns out to benecessary to consider the propagation ofthe probe pulse through
a
finite depth ofabsorber. If the probe pulseis
weak enough to have negligible effect onthe hole, then the question can be an-swered analytically in closed form.II. PROPAGATION OFWEAK OPTICAL PULSES
THROUGH BROADBAND INHOMOGENEOUSLY
BROADENED ABSORBERS
Inthe familiar two-level-atom model
for
anabsorber,
'
transmission and absorption of lightare
governed by the equation(s/az+ 8/act)$(t,
z)= 2ni(u&/c) 6'(t,z),
where gand 6'are
the complex envelopes of theelectric
field strength and the atomic polarization density. An expressionfor
5' involves the off-diagonal part of the two-level atom's densityFIG.
1.
ADoppler-broadened absorption line with ahomogeneously broadened hole.
FIG.
2.
The initial probe pulse spectrum (shaded)overlaid on an absorption line with amuch narrower
spectral hole.
PROPAGATION
NARROWING IN THETRANSMISSION
OF A~.
.
2503matrix inthe rotating wave approximation, averaged over the Doppler distribution ofatomic
veloci-ties:
(f'(t,z)=
ted(r„(t, z;
v)}„.
(2)S(t,
z)=Jt
e(v,z)e '"'dv/2s,
(4a)(tz)=
f
„p(v,,z)e'
'du
2/w", (4b) and find the equation[s/sz
—iv/c
—if
(v)+—,'
g(v))e(v, z)=0,
where
f
andg
are
the dispersive and absorptive parts of the dipole reactionfield:
(5) Here, pf
is
the density ofatomsand d'is
themag-nitude of the atomic transition dipole matrix
ele-ment along the direction of theelectric
fieldvec-tor.
If,
as
we assume, theelectric
field of the probe pulseis
too weak toalter
the shape of the inhomo-geneous line (with the hole already burned intoit),
then the equation obeyed byr»(t,
z;
v)is
simplys2
„/st
= —(P+2/2)r„+
(i)
dg.
Here, t),=
6
(2))is
the detuning between pulsefre-quency and the Doppler-shifted atomic resonance frequency and P
is
the halfwidth ofthe homogeneous component ofthe atomic absorption line. Anaverage over
6's
is
equivalent to an average'overv
s.
Because
Eqs.
(1)and (3)are
linear theyare
trivially solved byFourier
transform methods.We define
linewidth
is
appreciablygreater
than6v„we
can takeg(v)
=g(0) for
all significant frequencies(~ v~&5v,). Then the only significant frequency
dependence
is
dueto
the Gaussianfactor
that came from the incident pulse. Thus the pulse retainsits
Gaussian shape andis
simply attenuated uni-formly at all frequencies accordingBeer's
law:)e(v z)]
—
[g ] -&2/~"0) (10)All this
is
well known, andCrisp'
has given interesting examples showing dramatic departures from the kind of behavior implied by (10)whenthe pulse bandwidth
is
muchgreater,
rather thanless,
than the Doppler linewidth.III. PROPAGATION THROUGH ASPECTRAL HOLE
With the background formulas derived in
Sec. II,
itis
easyto
take into accounta
narrow hole in the Doppler line.For
simplicity we will take the shape of the Doppler curve,as
wellas
the hole, to be Lorentzian. Thisis
realistic as far as
the holeis
concerned and not abad approximationfor
the Doppler curve because we will be con-cerned only withits
center portion. Another simplication will be totake the centers of the spectral curves of the incident pulse, the Dop-pler line, and the hole all to coincide at v=0, as
shown in
Fig.
2. Under these conditions the angular bracket inEqs.
(6)is
to be interpretedas
an average over Doppler detuning4
with the normalized weight functionP* 1
P+)
))g2+
(P2c)2/()=--;G~(
'
),
(8a) wherep*
is
obviously now the Doppler width. Thenwe can evaluate the brackets in
Eqs.
(6)by explicitintegration and find (8b)
Here, G
is
the primitive attenuation parameterfor
the problemG= 4)&N d ()()/)2
c,
v/P* vlP»
1+
(~/~*)'1+
(/
)+
(v/))')')+
(u/Pg)') ' (11b)and the angular brackets denote the Doppler average.
The solution to Eq. (5)
is
immediate:e(v
z}
g e &./2(u/6RO) gf(R)g -)/22(v)ge
vz
— oe e e (8)(9) However, in the usual
case,
when the DopplerWe have assumed that the incident pulse
is
Gaus-sian in time, with bandwidth 5v, and temporallength 2
s/6v,
.
The pulse Fourier energy spectrum obviously changes with propagation:
[e(v z)~ = [g ( e «/ 0&'e
2-o&-where o.
is
the normal Doppler absorption coeffi-cient at linecenter:
n =
4s+d'e/kcP*,
(12)P*»
5vo»
Ps»
P.
In other words, we assume the Doppler line to be much broader than any other spectral feature,
and the width of the incident pulse to be much
broader than the hole in the Doppler line. The
and
p*
and peare
the half-widths of the Dopper line and the hole, respectively. Weare
principally interested in the limitsJ.
H.KBKRI.
Y,
S.
R.
HARTM ANN, AN DA.
SZABO underlying homogeneous widthis
takento
benegligibly small compared to all the other widths. These conditions
are
qualitatively met by the curves inFig. 2.
Given relation
(13),
thereare
two distinct re-gions ofthe spectrum:(a) The region ofProPagation narrouing, where
v6 Ps.
(b) The region of
Beer's
Ime, wherev»
P„.
We have discussed region (b)briefly in
Sec.
II.
Region (a)
is
characterized bya
simple appraxi-mate expression for g(v):8.
0,
-40
0
—2 aZ =2.0 g(v)=~(vlPs)'.
Thus, in region (a)we have
Ie(v
z)I'=
I& I'(14)
(15)
v/3
vpFIG.
4.
The spectrum ofthe probe pulse, as in Fig.3,
except that the normal component of absorption has been removed.where
5v(z)=
Ps/[uz+
(Ps/5v,)']'i'.
That
is,
in the region of propagation narrowing the spectrumis
Gaussian but witha
variable width. Note that at of@=0the widthis
equal to the initial pulse width 5pp and only becomessmall-er
dueto
propagation. Thedecrease
can, however, be rapid because I'e/5v, can be muchless
thanunity. The threshold
for
propagation narrowing occurs atnz=
(I'„/5v,)'.
In the region of
Beer's
law the spectrumis
aJ.so Gaussian, but with width 5po, independent
of
nz.
Tointerpolate between regions (a) and (b)
re-quires the full expression (11b) for g(v). In
Fig.
3 we show the full (e(v,
z}('
as afunction of vfor
several values of
az,
given theratios
P*/5vo=
~
andPs/5vo=1/10.
The two distinctGaus-sians appropriate to spectral regions (a)and (b)
are
evident. Figure 4shows the effect of the holealone by plotting (e(v,
z)('
without thefirst
term ofg(v). In effect,Fig.
4 shows that the relative importance ofthe hole grows with propagation, but,as
expected, only near linecenter.
The broad base ofall ofthe curvesis
simplyexp[-
(v/5v,)']
~IV. TIME-DEPENDENT FEATURES
The exact expressions obtained in
Sec.
IIIfor
(e(v,z}(',
as
wellas
the approximate relations valid in the regions of propagation narrowing andBeer's
law, permit good qualitative estimates ofthe time dependence ofthe transmitted pulse. However, Ie(v,
z)('
does not provide everything, because the consequences off
(v)are
not included.In this section we present the results of numerical computation of the Fourier transform (4a},
there-by giving the full space-time behavior of
g(t,
z}.
Figure 5 shows the temporal behavior ofthe transmitted pulse after propagation toez
=2.
Aclear
departure from the Gaussian shape of thel.O l. O-Ig (t,z)l vs t QZ
=2.
0.
5-0
-2
v/SvoFIG.
3.
Me spectrum ofthe probe pulse (e(v,z)(2 sta succession of propagation depths ~s
=0.0,
0.
5,1.
0,
and
2.0.
The horizontal axis is inunits of6v().I a~w~~a~
0
20 403Ppf
FIG.
5.
'Hle probe pulse intensity Ih(t,z)(t tnsrb; trary units as afunction of time, after propagating twoabsorption depths into the medium. The horizontal axis
PROPAGATION
NARROWING IN THETRANSMISSION
OFA.
..
2505 IO0.04:-Ig(t,
z)l vs t AaZ=6.
)00
8sot 4 0.02:-I P P0
~ I ~aI~ ~~ ~)0
svot 20 40FIG.
S.
The probe pulse intensity(8(t,z)~
as a func-tion oftime attwo different spatiaL positions,«
=0a«
2. The vertical axis is logarithmic, but tothe samescale as in Fig. 5, and the units of time are (6vo)
FIG.
7.
The probe pulse intensity )8(t,z)(t as a func-tion of time after propagating sixabsorption depths intothe medium. The vertical axis isto the same scale as Fig. 5, and the units oftime are (6po)
input pulse
is
evident in the trailing portions of the transmitted pulse. InFig.
6we show the data ofFig.
5again, but with the z=0 curve addedfor
comparison. At 5pog=
2the tra, iling edge of thetransmitted pulse becomes stronger than the tail of the incident pulse, although it
is
two orders of magnitude weaker than the incident pulse peak.Finally,
Fig.
V shows the transmitted pulse at &z =6.
Itis
seen that the bulk ofthe pulse energyis
now inthe long tail, and one can begin to say that a single frequency-time uncertainty relation againdescribes
the pulse reasonably well. The temporal width ofthetail
is
roughly W3times thewidth shown in
Fig.
5, in accord with (16) since(P„/5v,
)' is
negligible. Moreover, we note that the resonant interaction ofpulse and atoms, during the pulse transmission,is
fully coherent in our model. Thisis
responsiblefor
the slight inter-ference minimum thatoccurs
between the twocomponents ofthe pulse.
V. DISCUSSION
The spectral and temporal changes predicted
by solution (8)
are
illustrated in the figures. Theyare a
consequence ofpurely linear disper-sion theory andare
novel only in the sense thatclassic
discussions oflight propagation in dis-persive media do not appear to have included treatments either ofpurely inhomogeneous line broadeningor
of lines with holes inthem.Ex-perimental observations of the predicted peak delay and pulse lenghtening do not appear to have
been reported either.
Another view ofthese results
is
obtained byre-garding our model ofan absorption line with
a
holeas
acontinuous-band interferencefilter.
Inone sense
it
is
a
pure interferencefilter;
nof(v)=
z'nv/P„,
~zg(v)
—
zo!(v/Ps)(17a) (17b) This
is
aconsequence of the hole in the line, ofcourse.
For
a normal line without a hole, one hasg»
f
for
all frequencies near thecenter.
Finally, because ofthe linearity of the model, it
is
also possible totreat
the pulseas if
it were interacting with two entirely separate groups of atoms. Thefirst
group comprises the usual di-poleoscillators
in the full Doppler line, and the second groupis
aset
of "negative"oscillators
occupying a region ofwidth Ps at linecenter.
The negativeoscillators
emit rather than absorb light. Itis
the emission ofthe "negative"oscillators
that causes the growth, with increasing propaga-tion distance, of the peaks of the curves inFig.
4.
In this view ofthe model itis
the interference between the positive and negativeoscillators
at line center that causes the pulse lengthening. Inclassical
theory the negative dipoles can never be more "negative" than thereal
dipolesare
"positive,"
because theyare
designed only to cancel the real dipoles in a certain spectral re-gion. In the quaritum theory the negative atomsare
not so severelyrestricted.
For
example, the hole has been constructed in our treatment sothat g(0)=0.
Thatis,
we have assumed theabsence ofabsorbing dipoles at line
center.
How-energy
loss
mechanismsare
included in the model. However, conversion ofpulse energy intoloss-free
atomic dipole oscillations allacross
the Dop-pler line will nevertheless lead to pulse decay,and
it
is
morerealistic
to speak of an inter-ferencefilter,
as opposed to an absorptionfilter,
when the effect of f(v)
is
much more importantthan that of
g(v).
Formulas(11)
show thatfor
2506
J.
H.EBERLY,
S.
R..
HARTMANN, ANDA.
SZABO ever, the original preparation ofthe hole couldhave been arranged to include a degree ofatomic inversion at line
center.
Inthiscase
g(0)&0, andgain rather than
loss
would be expected. The "negative"oscillators
in the model would then more than cancel the positive ones. We will not explore thiscase.
ACKNOW'LED GMENTS
This
research
was partially supported by the Department of Energy, Contract No.DE-AC03-V6DP01118, the Joint Services Electronics
Pro-gram, Contract No. DAAG29-79-C-OOV9, the National Research Council ofCanada, the National Science Foundation and Army Research Office, Grant No. NSF-DMR80-06966, and the Office of
Naval Research, Contract No. N00014-79-0666.
We
are
grateful toJ. J.
Yeh andB.
J.
Hermanfor
assistance with the numerical integration requiredfor Figs.
5-V, and we acknowledge conversationswith M. A. Johnson,
B.
W. Shore, S.Stenholm, A. Szoke, andS.
J.
Yeh.See, forexample, discussions inA. Yariv, Quantum
Electronics (Wiley, New York, 1967),Chap. 8;
M. Sargent III, M. O. Scully, and W.
E.
Lamb,Jr.
,muser Physics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.,
1974),Chap. 10;and L.Allen and
J.
H.Eberly,Opti-cal Resonance and Tuo-Level Atoms (Wiley, New
York, 1975),Chap.
6.
2We follow the conventions of
L.
Allen andJ.
H.Eberly, see Ref.1.
31VI.D. Crisp, Phys. Rev. A
1,
1604(1970). SeealsoRef.2, Sec.
1.
8.
4A.Sommerfeld, Optics (Academic, New York, 1972); L.Brillouin, Wave Propagation and Group Velocity