owo R
LD HEALTH ORCANIZATION
EXPERT ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Seventh session
Bamako L6-20 June 1986
ORGANISATION MONDIALE DE LA SANTE
ocP/EAC7. 1
(ocP/86.3)
ORIGINAL: ENGLISH
ONCHOCERCIASIS CONTROL PROGRAI'{I"IE IN I^IEST AFRICA
THE ROLE IMPACT AND ORGANIZATION OF DRUG TREATI,IENT
AS A MEANS OF ONCHOCERCIASIS CONTROL
I^IITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE
TO IVERMECTIN AND TO THE OCP ARNA
@
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATTONORGANISATTON MONDIALE DE LA SANTE
THE ROLE. IMPACT AND ORCANIZATION OF
AS
A
MEANS OF ONCHOCERCIASISWITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE
TO IVERMECTIN AND TO THE OCP TA.BLE OF CONTENTS
BACKGROUND AND GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS. .. . . .
ocP /86.3
ORIGINAL: ENGLISH
ONCHOCERCIASIS CONTROL PROCRAMME
IN
hIEST AFRICA DRUG TREATMENT CONTROLAREA
A 1 2
B 3 4 5 6
The search
for
a drug..The purposes Ernd effects
of
dof
onchocerciasis control. .rug treatment
in
the contextPage
3 3 3
IVERMECTIN... .
Registration. . ..
Caveats and exclusion
criteriae...
Dosage and formulation.
Marketing and
distribution
control. ..General considerations. .
Use
of
an immunodiagnostictest....
ORGANIZATIONAL ASPECTS OF IVERMECTIN DISTRIBUTION. . . .
...
. .General considerations. .
organization conducted vector
of
ivermectin control operationsdistribution
during periodof
ocpOrganization maintenance/surveillance
of
ivermectindistribution period:
Devorution during the and post_OCpivermectin.4 4 4 5 5
C.
POTENTIAL USE OF IVERMECTININ
TTIE OCPAREA..
57.
Generalconsiderations..
8'
useof
ivermectinin
the pre-Extension area (r9g5boundaries)
569.
Useof
ivermecrinin
rhe Extensionareas...:.:.:.:.:.::..::::::.
7D
10.
11.
72
14
F.
L5.
16.
8 8 9 10
11 E POTENTIAL USE OF SERODIAGNOSIS. ..
...
13
11 11
DISTRIBUTION OF IVERMECTIN AND TECHNICAL COOPERATION... 72 Support
to
the strengtheningof
health caredelivl.y -"y"a".s...
Support
to
procurementof ivermectin
L2L2ocP/86. 3 Page 2
G FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS AND OPERATIONAL RESEARCH CONCERNING
TTIE USE AND DISTRIBUTION OF IVERMECTIN
IN
OCP ANDOTHER ONCHOCERCIASIS-INFESTED AREAS..
rssues and studies
of direct
relevanceto
the useof
ivermectin.rssues and studies
of direct
relevanceto
thedistribution
of ivermectinH POTENTIAL USE OF IVERMECTIN IN AREAS WITHOUT OCP-LIKE COI.I'TROL
ONCHOCERCIASIS- INFESTED PROGRAMMES....
J.
POTENITIAL USE AND EFFECT OFA
MACROFILARICIDE....Annex
1:
Estimationof
the numberof
beneficiariesof
ivermectin t,reatmentin
the oCP area (1982)Annex 2: Recapituration
of
the potential useof
ivermectin andof
theorganization
of its distribution within
the OCparea...
Annex
3:
Estinationof
manpower requirementsfor
large-scale case- treatmentin
Western Extensionarea...
Page
L7.
18.
L2
t2
14
14
L5
t6
L9
20
ocP/86.3 Page 3
A.
BACKGROUND AND GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS1.
The searchfor
a druA1.1 In
the absenceof
an effective and convenient anti-onchocerciasis drug anenableto
large-scaledistribution.
the basic technical approachof
the Onchocerciasis Control Programmein
WestAfrica
(OCP) has sofar
consisted ofcontrolling
the vectorin
orderto interrupt
the transmissionof
the parasite.However, OCP
is
making considerableefforts
through the Onchocerciasis Chemotherapy Project, (OCT)to identify
and develop medicamentsof
potentialinterest to
the controlof
the disease.2.
The purposes and effectsof
drus treatment in the cont,extof
onchocerciasis control2.L
The useof
a drugin
the controlof
onchocerciasis coutd serve two purposes:to treat
patients suffering from the disease andto
control transmission.Transmission-control by means
of
a drug would mean reducing/etiminating the productionof
microfilariaein
the already infected partof
the population(chemotherapy) and/or preventing
larval
stagesof
the parasitein
previously non-infected persons from developing
into
reproductive adult r{,orms(chenoprophylaxis); however, r+ith the present limited knowledge
of
the two modesof
actiontheir
respective contributionsto
the controlof
transmissionwill
not be considered separatelyin this
paper.2-2
The useof
a drugfor
thefirst
purposeri.e.
the mEulagementof
individualcases
of
onchocerciasis (case-treatment), aimsat alleviating
hunan suffering byeasing symptoms
of
the disease, preventingits
serious skin and ocularmanifestations and, eventually, achieving complet,e
cure.
Although the emphasishere
is
on the treatmentof
individuals, the suppression/eliminaiionof
themicrofiraria
loadwill
arso contributeto
transmission-contror.2.3
Given an ideal drug and perfectlogistics,
complet,e transmission-control andelimination
of
the0.
volvulus reservoir should theoretically be possible without vectorcontrol. In
practice. however,for
some timeto
come(it'ever)
no drug is like1yto
conformwith
the requirements (1001effective,
no side-effects. noexclusion
criteriae,
etc.),
and the demandsfor
delivery systems and on resourcescould well exceed the national
capacity.
Ant,i-onchocerciasis drugs are therefore notlikely to
replacelarviciding in
the OCP area as a meansof
t,ransmi-ssion-control.
2-4 It is
expectedthat
theeffect of
drugs usedin
the OCp area would beequally potent as ("savanna") and "non-blinding" regards the treatment
("forest")
and forms controlof
onchocerciasis.of
both the "blinding"2.5
Whether the drugis
a macrofilaricideor
amicrofilaricide,
the ultimateeffect
should,in principle.
be the sane bothin
respect,to
transmission-control andto
case-treatment. The differencewill
be oneof
applicaEion. One single treatment shouldsuffice for
Ehe macrofilaricide (under ideal conditionsl wnite amicrofilaricide will
needto
be givenat
regularintervals
(depending on theduration
of its effect) until
the reproducEive female h,ormsdie out
qtZ-t5 years) (unlessit
also had a cumulative macrofiraricidaleffect).
0cP/85. 3
Page 4
B.
IVERMECTIN3.
Registration3.1
PhaseIII trials of
ivermectin were startedin
1985 and Merck, Sharpe &Dohme (MSD) intends
to
applyfor
registration based ona
twelve-mcnth fotlow-upof
thesetrials. It is
hopedthat
approvalwill
be granted by July 1987. The applicationwill
probabty be submittedto
the French Drug Registrationauthorities which,
in
caseof
acceptance. shouldfacititate
the approvalof
thedrug
for
use byall
those countriesin Africa.
America and Asia whereonchocerciasis
is
endemic.3.2
There may be a time-lapseof
some months betweenregistration
and marketing4.
Caveats and exclusioncriteria
4.f
MSDis likely to
put forward a numberof
caveatsfor
the useof
ivermectin.most
of
which might be issued as exclusioncriteriae
by WHO.At
the present timethe following populat,ion Broups would probably be excluded from treatment:
-
children betow a certain age, say eight yea.sl.-
h,omenof
child-bearing age unless a pregnancytest. or
history and absenceof
signs, show then noE,to
be pregnant.-
women who are breastfeedingl.persons h,ith severe disease
of
theliver,
kidneyor
central nervous system.persons
living in
an area exposedto
epidemicsof
cerebro-spinal fever
or
human trypanosooiasisat
the t,imeof
the proposed ivernectin treatmentl.4.2
Furthernore, MSDwill in alt
likelihood issue the following additional caveats:initially,
ivermectin should be used onlyin
the t,reatment ofhunan onchocerciasis.
-
the minimuninterval
between single doses should besix
monthsalthough three-nonth intervals might eventually be permitted (see paragraph 1.2 below).
4.3
Also, t,he compErnywilI,
no doubt, make availableto
the medical profession information regarding such pharnacodynanic aspectsof
ivermectin as the degree to whichit is
retainedin
the body with possibletater
release,its
possible toxic manifestations. and the ant,idotesto
be usedif toxicity
occurs.lMay subsequently be relaxed.
ocP /86.3 Page
!
5 Dosage and formulation
5.t
The minimum effective single doseof
ivermectin recommended by MSDis likely to
be 150 mcg/kg, but scored tabletsof
6 mgwill
be manufactured permitting easy dosagein
the rangeof
!0-200 mcg/kg.5.2
The ma:<imuminterval
between individual doses may vary accordingto
the purposeof
dispensing thedrug. It
would thus appear that one dose every sixmonths might maintain adequate
microfilarial
suppressionfor
most purposes(including transmission-control) although three
to six
month intervals coutd benecessary
for
case-treatment when thereis
a highrisk of
ocular onchocerciasis developing int,oblindness.
However. aninterval of
three months must.for
thetime being, be regarded as the minimum compatible with
safety.
Ivermectin isknown
to persist in
the body (especiallyin fat
and certain other issues)for
at least a oonthafter
a single dose, andit
must be consideredthat
thereis
an asyet unassessed
risk of toxicity
associated with the dosage given more frequently than once every three months.6 Marketinq and
distribution
control6.1 It is likely that
ivermectinwill
be supplied by MSD through WHO only for usein
onchocerciasis-afflicted countriesat
a very reasonableor
zero cost.5.2 In
orderto
avoid individuats receiving the drug,either
inadvertenEly or deliberately,at
shorter intervals than the minimum recommended (see paragraph5.2 above) a
fairly strict
control must be kept on the delivery system and thisin particular if
multiple outlets are available(e.g.
hospitals, heatth centres,OCP sectors/sub-sectors)
to
eachof
which an individual might applyfor
treatmentin relatively
quick succession.C.
POTEI'TTIAL USE OF IVERMECTIN IN THE OCp AREA27.
General considerations7.L
The main-characteristicsof
ivermectin which makeit particularly
anenableto
usewithin
the OCP area can be summarized as follows:it
can be given orallyin
a single dose, repeatable probably every threeto
twelve months;it is
highlyeffective
as amicrofilaricide.
without seriousside-effects;
and thus suitablefor
large-scaledistribution
as and when required.7.2 It is
iEportantto
st,ressthat
ivermectinis effective
against the forms of O.volvulus foundin
both savanna and forest areasin
WestAfrica
(and inGuatemala).
It is
reasonableto
assunethat it wilL
actsatisfactorily
againstall
geographical formsof
the parasite.7
-3
Onelimitation
on the useof
ivermectin would be that perhapshalf of
the female populationwill
escape treatmentif
the above mentioned exclusioncriteria
(pregnant and lactating women as well as chitdren below the age
of
eight) continueto
app1y. A rough assumptionis that
only 55/,of
thetotal
infected populationwill
be treatable.2See Annex
2 for
recapiEulation.ocP/85.3 Page 5
7.4
However, the reduct,ionin
theeffect
on transmission cont,rol resulting from excrusions findingsof
would a study carried notattain
out 35/., asin
Cameroon suBgestedrain-forest villages in
the preceding paragraph. (main- vector:if
the s.squaqosum)3,e." valid
alsoin
the ocparea.
Accordingto this
study g5i. ot transmission originated from persons betweenlt
and 40years;
upto
ale 20.males and females contributed equally
to
transmission but above 20,,.1.s
contributed 1.5 times as much as females; and children aged 5-10 years wereresponsible
for
only about 6%of
thetotal
transmission. The application of these estimatesto
the situationin
the ocP area woutd seemto
indicate t,hat thereduction
in
transmission control due t,o the exclusionof
children, pregnant andIactating women from treatnent, would be
in
the orderof
20-25%rathlr
if,a" 351.7.5
An attemptis
madein
Annex 1to
estimate the numbersof
persons who,if
large-scale treatment wiEh ivermectin h,ere contemplated. would actually qualifyfor
recei.ving the drug (estimatesfor r98Z). At
the same time, an analysis of these figures throws some interestinglight
on the cost-effectivenessof
using ivermectinin
various partsof
the OCp area.7.6
The calculations have been made separatelyfor
theoriginal
OCp area and for the three extension areas.viz
rvory coast (L979), the western Extension(L986/87) and the Southern EiEension
(LgS6/57)'i.""".
Separare esrimar,es are madein
AnnexI for
the nunbersof
personsto
be treatedif
a diagnostic survey preceded treatmentof
detected positives andif
a branket, treatment ofcommunities
in
the endemic areas were made withoutprior
diagnostic surveys.7.7
These estimates are referredto in
the fotlowing whenarriving
atconclusions regarding the use
of ivermectin. It
should be stressed that many of the assumptions on which the calculations are based are opento
discussion.B ].Vermec n the -Ex area
t
8.f
Onchocerciasis has now been controlledin
the major partof
the originalProgramme area (002 01)
to
the exEentthat it is
no longer a public healthproblem and
that
transmissionof
the parasibeis virtually interrupted.
However.there remains a reservoir
of
O.vo1vtrlus which, atthough greatly diminisnea, mightstill
have thepotential for
Uecoming a sourceof
renewed transmission. Further researchis
therefore requiredto
deternine thelevel of
the parasite(microfilariae)
loadat
which vector cont,rol may eventually cease.In
the fewresidual areas where tow-tevel transmission conti.nues. the
risk of
developing ocurar manifestationsis
probablyinsignificant
(ATp below 3oo).8.2
Thesituation in
areas exposedto
reinvasionof infective
savanna blackflies remains unsatisfactory insofar as the downward trendof
the community load of infection has been halted and the conEinuing exposureto
new infections givesrise to
onchocercal eye manifestations.8.3 In
those partsof
theoriginal
oCP area where transmissionis virtually
interrupted and vector controlis at
the maintenancelevet
(e.g. o0Z 01) thlrewill
belittle. if
any, useof
ivermectinfor
the purposeof
transnission-control.
Also the needfor
treatmentof
individuar patientswill
beinsignificant
insofar as very fewclinical
cases remainafter
more than ten yearsof
continuing vector control.3Duke. B.o.L. and Moore.
P.J.
(1968): "The contributionof
different, age groupsto
the transmissionof
onchocerciasisin
a Cameroon forestvillage".
Annali of,
22_2g.0cP/85. 3
Page 7
B'4
Theprincipal
use by the Programmeof
ivermectinwithin
theoriginal
OCparea
wilr
therefore be the treatment (or prevention)of
neh, cases that may occur dueto
reinvasionof
infect,ive blackfliesor
as aresult of
persistent rocalizedfailure in larvicidal
t'hatlarviciding will
extend controlto
such the as OCP has occumed Extension areasin
a over few small the nextfoci.
two civenor three years. the problemof
reinvasion shoutd become oneof
minor concern.However. shoutd isolated instances
of
reinvasionof infective
savanna brackflies(ATP above 300) ever occurr large-scale
distribution
woutd beinstituted
inexposed villages both
for
the purposeof
transmission-control and case-treatment.Ivermectin could be used
in
a simitar manner andwith
the same intentions in casesof
resumptionof
transmission dueto local failure of larviciding in
alimited geographical
area.
rn such placesit
wourd be used as a supplement tolarviciding
with the goalof
reducing themicrofilari.al
reservoir mtre rapidry than would otherwise occur.8'l
ivermectin For the being sakeutitised for of
conpleteness. transmission-control mention should bein
made circumscribed instancesof
thepossibility
ofofunmanageable resistance
to
tarvicides atthough such instances are untikety to occurin
theoriginal
OCp area.8'5
treatment The fotlowing considerationin
theoriginal
OCP area supports concerning cost-effectiveness the conclusions arrivedof
ivermectinat
in paragraph 8.3 above. Accordingto
the estimatesin
paragraph 2of
Annexf. if
blanket Eotarof
t,reatnent more thanfor
four Ehe pu"posemillion
peopreof
transmissionlco.rtrolin
theoriginal
OCp were areainstituted,
would have ato
be given the drugin
one year (1987)to
reach the 335 oo0 personsstilr
harbouringparasites'
infected time. caser rvermectin a cost-effectiveness wourd thus beratio likely to
dispensed[o rf
decrease even peopleto
catch further onetightly
with8'z
ivermectin The conclusion treatmentto in
be the drawnoriginal
from these OcP area estiEatesfor
the would purpose seemof to
vector controtbe that would invorve considerable extra expense without the expectationof
any great additional benefitto
that obtained by simply*"iiins for
the eriminationof
thereservoir through natural death
of
parasites.8'8
The treatment by ivermectinof
patients suffering from the non-blinding formof
onchocerciasiswithin
forest and mixea ro"est7sar".r.r"a".a",
now excruded fromcontrol by oCP. would become the responsibility
of
the national healthauthorities'
possibry with some technical advile from the progranme.9.
9'L
rn paragraph 2.2 aboveit is
suggestedthat
the ideal drug dispensed under perfect conditionsof logistics
could-byitsetf
"""utt in
comprete transmission- control achievedin
the Ocp area bytarviciding
as a sore meansof
controt.However. as there
is
no complementarityin
the actionof
the th,o methods (at reast during the attack/consolidation phase) a choice imposesitself.
Given,therefore. that vector contror has proved
itself to
be capabreof
completeinterruption
of
transnission, and insofar as thedistribution of
ivermectinwill
be encumbered by a number
of
technical and operationalrestrictions,
rarvicidingwill
renain the preferred, and excrusive. methodof
transmission-controrin
the Extension areas during the at,tack,/consolidation and beginningof
the maintenance phase.0cP/85. 3
Page 8
9.2
On the other hand, with a high morbiditylevel,
reaching hyperendemicproportions
in
many partsof
the Southern and Western Extension areas, thereis
aconsiderable potential
for
the useof
ivermectinto alleviate
the symptoms of onchocerciasis and prevent the further developmentof
ocular manifestations in the large populationsafflicted
by the disease.9.3
As and when the Extension areas moveinto
the maintenance phase tarit,h agradually diminishing comnunity load
of
infection and greatly reducedrisk
of transmission. ivermectinwill
cometo
ptay the semerole
asthat
describedin
the preceding sectionin
regardto
theoriginal
OCP area,i.e. to
control sporadic occurrencesof
localized0.
volvulus t,ransmission andto treat
patients infected by the disease during such outbreaks (should they ever occur).9.4
Accordingto
the calculations madein
paragraph 5of
Annex1,
blanket treatment with ivernectin would(in
1987) cover a toEal populationin
the Extension areasof slightly
more than threemillion in
orderto
reach the onemillion
requiringtreatnent.
Three persons would therefore be given the drug to catch each infected case (often heavilyinfected).
Blanket treatment mighttherefore be the most cost-effective approach Eo ensuring
that all
cases of onchocerciasisin
high-risk areas aretreated.
However,further
thouBht might be givento
the economyof scale. It
could thus be argued that once theinitial
"extra"
efforts
had been expended on case-finding. large-scale treatnent limitedto
persons showing symptoosof
the disease might be less expensive thanconducEing 'rindiscriminate, blanket treatment once
or
twice a yearfor
aprolonged period.
9.5
Asin
theoriginal
Progranne areat ivernectin could also be used on a large scaleto
control the non-blinding"forest" tlpe of
onchocerciasiswithin
the Extension areas with the understandingthat
therole of
OCPin this
respect would belimited to
the provisionof
technical advice.D.
ORGANIZATIONAL ASPECTS OF IVERIT{ECTIN DISTRIBTITION410.
General consider:ations10.1 When considering the
relative
cost-effectivenessof
indiscriminate blanket treatment andof
large-sca1edistribution
confinedto
infected persons, as has been attemptedln
the two preceding sections, other fact,ors than the number of personsto
receive the drug should be takeninto
account. asfor
example, thelikelihood
that
current, diagnostic methodswill
miss a considerable population oflightly
infected cases and the eventual pricingof
ivermectin.10.2 The need
to
avoid repetitionof
dosage leadingto
excessof
thelimits
of safety (see paragraph 5.2 above) implies that, recordswill
haveto
be keptof alt
persons treated, a requirement which constitutes an important operational constraint on whichever delivery system
is
instituted.10.3 The success
of
an ivermectindistribution
proBrarnme (and indeedof
any formof
large-scale chemotherapy)will
depend on the extentto
which national health care systems are ableto
ensure the required population coverage andto
continue doing soat
the prescribed intervals during a prolonged period (12 years ornore).
Prerequisitesfor
a community-based delivery systemin
any country would 4see Anne*2 for
recapitulation.oc? /86.3 Page 9
appear
to
bepolitical
commitment and nanagerial competence; areliable
andeffective logistic
and communicationsysten;
well-moLivated. well-trained andwe1l-supported
staff;
theability of
the health systen5to
penetrateinto
eventhe most remote
areas;
and adequatefunding.
Provenability to
cope with other public health programmes, such as EPI.in
the recent past might serve as a good yardstick by whichto
measure a country's potentialability for
ivermectin dist,ribution.10.4 Fottow-up exaninations should be carried out
in
a sma1l numberof
indicator villages with a viewto
determining the degreeof
thoroughness with whichivermectin
distribution is
being carried out checkinginter alia
on thevalidity of
censusfigures,
the issuingof tablets,
and the immediate post-treatment levelsof
ivernectinin
plasmaor
urinein
orderto
assess the assiduityof
the drugdistributors.
Such villages could also be usedfor
assessing the success of case-treatmentin
termsof
declineof microfilarial
densitiesin
the skin and inthe'eye.
Aparticular
aspectof
follow-up would be the monitoringof
thepossible development
of
resistanceto
ivermectin.11
of
ivermectir.distribution
duri vector control operations11.1 As a general
principle
ivermectindistribution
schemes should be based on and conducted by the existing national health care systems as partof
the ongoing disease controlactivities.
11.2 However,
in
the caseof
large-scale applicationof
the drugfor
the purposeof
case-treatnentin
the Extension areas (see paragrapht.2
above) the presentstaffing
and communicationfacilities of
oostof
the national health care systemswill
probably not enable themto
cope ontheir
ownwith this
additional workload.Insofar. therefore, as OCP
will
be conducting aEtack/consolidation operations in the two Extension areas while large-sca1e treatment with ivermectinis
underway,the OCP entomological surveillance network coutd very well be "mobilized"
to
aid nationally directed drugdistribution.
Lax periodsof
the dry season when the entomologicalsituation is
comparatively quiet would beparticularly
convenient.The involvment
of
the Programmein
mass case-treatment would seem perfectlyjustified
evenif
OCP's nain concernlies in
thefield of
transmission -control.An added reason
for
making useof
OCPstaff in
such large-sca1e distributionprogremmes would be,
at least in
the Western Extension area,that all
local personnel. although assigned temporarily t,o the Programme. remain on the payrollof
the governments concerned.11.3 An attempt
is
madein
AnnexI to
obtain an idea about manpower requirementsfor
the Western Extension area (as an exanple)if
blanket treatment were applied twice a yearfor
the purposeof
treatingall
infected casesin
the area.According
to this
estimation, 45 teans (135 technicians, 45 drivers) woutd be needed as compared with 400 napionalstaff
assignedto
OCPin that
area for entomological surveillance alone.11.4 An advantage
of instituting
ivermectindistribution at
an early stage of operations (attack/consolidation phase) would bethat
the national health care systems became experiencedin
the managementof
mass applicationof
the drug.They would thus be prepared
for
handlinglocal
instancesof
renewed transmission by meansof
drug cont,rol during the maintenance phaseafter
the Programme has moved outof
the area (see section 12 below).5Possibly aided by other socioeconomic sectors.
ocP/86. 3
Page 10
1I.!
During thefirst
partof
the maintenErnce phasein
the Extension areas when OcP carries on with vector control as required, rarge-scale applicat,ion of ivermectinfor
case-treatment purposeswill
continue although on a gradually reducing scale insofar as theoriginal risk of
repeated O.volvulus infections givingrise to
serious ocular manifestations has been remorred by vector control and the adult female worms beginto
dieout.
Several modifications could then be madeto
thedistribution
scheme, including giving t,he drug once yearly insteadof twice;
concentrating onoriginally
hyperendemic communities, and, possibly,limiting
the treatmentto
persons who have beenidentified
during p".riorr"treatment rounds as patients actually suffering from onchocerciasis, according to a set
of
easily apptied signs and symptoms. The numberof distribution
teamswould therefore be gradually reduced and by the time OCP vector control ceases in a given O0Z there should be
little, if
any, needfor
case-treatmentto
be handledby special teems.
11.6 Special operational arranBements might. be required
for
the coordination of large-sca1e OCP supported case-t,reatment proBrErmmesin
savanna areas and those conducted by the national health authoritiesin
neighbouring/overlapping forestzones
for
the controlof
the non-brinding formof
the disease.L2.OrAanizat ion
of
ivermectintribution
durins posr-ocPmar_n /surveiltance Devolution and ivermectin
12.I
Devolut,ion hasuntil
recent,ly been seen as a processof
transferof
OCp operations a reducedscale.
(including vector Recent1y, however. control)it to
has the become Participating clear thaE Countries, devolution althoughin
thatatsense
is
an outdated concept;at
thetioe
the programme "hands over,, therewill
no longer be a need
for
vector control (onchocerciasis prevalence beingat
alevel at
*nationally directed, which transmission integrated surveillanceis
excluded). What andwilt
cont,rol" then beof
required the disease.is
rather 12.2 therefore The chatlenge facing the national health authoritiesat that
stagewill
be twofold
: to
ensure that neh, casesof
onchocerciasis wnich may occurare actually detected (as any other endemic disease under epidemiological surveillance) and that appropriate action
is
takenfor their control.
Thiscontrol
will rely
on the applicationof
community-wide drug treatment,of
t,hepopulations emong whom the new cases have appeared and
in
which recrudescence of transmission (Iocal breeding)is
suspected.12.1 The gradual assumption by Participating Countries
of this
thefinal
stage of onchocerciasis surveillance and controtwill
fottow E,he sane paEEernin
theoriginal
andin
the Extension areas, the former commencing the process h,ithin acomparat,ivery near future and the
latter in
about, eiBhtto
ten years.12.4
It is
expected that both the surveillance and the controlof
onchocerciasiswill
be inte8ratedwithin
theexisting
(and possibly reinforced) health caresystems. Insofar as the use
of
the drugis
concerned, ivermectinwill
serve bothpurposes: transmission-control. should new cases occur due
to local
breeding ofsavanna
blackflies.
and case-treatmentof
the patients thus contaninated.Another group
of
beneficiaries would be theoriginally
infected populations in the Ext,ension areas who have been treated since thestart of attacl
operations;at
the timeof
cessationof
OCP operationsin
a given O0Z.this
groupwiII
havebeen
for its
reduced treatment, (see paragraph considerablyin
si.zeIl.!
and should above) rro lo.rge. require a special set-upocP/86.3 Page 11
12.5 Although
it is
anticipatedthat
community-wide applicationof
ivermectin for the controlof
circumscribed retransmission would normally be handled by the existinBlocal
health care system. instances might occur when reinforcement could be requiredeither
from other partsof
the health servicesor
by recruiting additional personnel on a temporarybasis.
Such personnel would work under theinstructions and control
of
the health services.12.6 Again, individual national health authorities woutd decide on the extent to which ivermectin
will
beutilized for
the controlof "forest
onchocerciasis" and couldcall
upon OCP. and possibly WHO,for
technical recommendations.E.
POTENTIAL USE OF SERODIAGNOSIS13.
General considerations11.1 The Progranme
is
strengtheningits
researchin
thefield of
serodiagnosis of onchocercalinfections.
Theavailability of
a sensitive, specific and easily handled immuno-diagnostictest,
capableof
detecting recent infections (and possibly distinguishing between savanna andforest
type). would helpto
ensurethat newly infected patients could be detected and treated
at
an early stage of the disease,i.e.
beforeoicrofilariae in
the skin become a source oftransmission. Also, a
test fulfilling
the abovecriteria
would make thedetection
of
instancesof
circumscribed transmissionin
otherwise trErnsmission-freed zones
easier.
This wouldfacilitate
corrective action (transmission- control through drugdistribution)
and thereby eliminate therisk of
furtherspread.
1].2 In this
connectionit is
rdorth stressing that newly infected persons are not verylikely to
constitute a "hidden" sourceof
infection during the prepaterrt periodof
the disease (from L3 dermal penetrationuntil
the onsetof
cutaneousmanifestations) as blackfly cannot ingest microfitariae before they appear
in
theskin and subcutis and where they may give
rise to itching.
Thefirst
microfilariae are usualty detectable
in
skin-snips onlyafter.
say. nine monthsto
three years following penet.ration by thelarvae.
(N.B.:
microfilariae nay, however, bepresent in
the skin and transmissable without positive skin-snips or symptoms).13.3
Failing
the developmentof
a sensitive immunodiagnostic test, suitable forfield
use,it
may be necessaryto
consider using the Mazzottitest,
either generalizedor
as a patchtest. to
detect microfilariaeat
a very early stageafter their arrival in
the skin.14.
Useof
an immunodiagnostic test14.I
Should an operationat immunodiagnostictest
be found, case-treatment, mightbe "individuarized" rather than based on large-scare application and. as mentioned above, transmission-control
instituted at
an early date.14.2 However, the cost
of
applying and reading thetest
on a large-scale selective population basis would be quite high,in particular if
"detection rounds" wereto
be made everysix to
twelve months.ocP /86.3 Page 12
F.
DISTRIBTITION OF IVERMECTIN AND TECHNICAL COOPERATIONL5 Support to the strenAthenins o
f
health care delive rY s.Ystems11.1 The organization and management,
of
drug-dist,ribution programlnesin
theParticipating Countries
will
put considerabtestrain
on the national health care systems' which are already operating under serious constraints as regardsmanpoter and material resources.
It is
therefore encouragingthat
several representativesof
bhe donor communityat
recent sessi.onsof
theJoint
progranmeConmnittee have expressed readiness
to
support countriesin
the programme area in respectto their
assuming operational responsibilityfor
post-OCp surveillanceand control
of
onchocerciasis.11.2 The strengthening
of
the health care systemsto
be ableinter-atia to
deal with large-scaledistribution of
ivermectin must, continueto
be Bi"e"priority
attention. ltlHO, throughits
regionaroffice for Africa, is
reinforcing-its
technical cooperation withits
Members through a processof
decentralization of authority and operationalresponsibility.
Particular emphasisis
placed upon the developmentof
primary health care systems whichin
West African countrieswill
play an essentialrole in
the conductof
future schemesfor
thedistribution
of ivernectin.1l.l
Furthermore, WHO has a constitutionalrole to
playin
ensuring that external supportto
health developmentis
providedin
a coordinated manner and accordingto policies
andpriorities
commonly agreed upon. Thebilateral
donor agencies which have already indicated wiltingness at, JPC sessionsto
assist participating countrlesin
strengtheningtheir
health care delivery systems shourd beencouraged
to
consult, with WHO/AFROin
orderto
ensurethat aII efforts
to enhance these systems are we1l coordinated.15.
Support to procurement of
ivermectin15.1 Another
field in
which internationalsolidarity r.rilI
beof
importance is thatof
supplyof ivermectin.
Arthoughit is
expecled Ehat Ehe drugwilr
be distributedfor
case-treatmentat
alnostin
no thecost,
Extension large areas. quantities and the couldtotal
be required, cosEof
distributionin
particularmight very
well
be beyond the reachof
someof
the countries concerned. Severalorganizations and agencies, governmental and non-governmental, parti.cularly interested
in
the prevent,ionof
blindness, night be p.epa"edto
helpin
thisrespect.
WHO/AFRO and OCP could make an important contribution by organizing bulk-supplyof
the drug and possibly by setEing up a revolvingor spe-ial
fund.G F'TJRTHER IN/ESTIGATIONS AND OPERATIONAL RESEARCH CONCERNING T}IE USE AND DISTRIBTITION OF IVERMECTIN
IN
OCP AND OTHER ONCHOCERCIASIS-INFESTED AREASL7. Issues studies of
rect
relevanceto
the useof i
vermectin1/.1 The following issues
will
needto
be addressed:a mode
of
actionof
ivermectin on eqc&serggat
the biochemicat andmolecular levels
oc?/86.3 Page 1l
degree and duration
of
effect,of
ivermectinin
reducing the number of 0.volvulus L3 developingin
simulium fed onmicrofilarial
carriers indifferent
environments and recto.shistology
of
skinin
onchocereal patientsafter
ivermectin treatment, together with other immunologicar and biochenical investigations to deternine why the Mazott,i reactionis
so much less intense than withDEC
effect of
murt,iple dosesof
ivermectin,at different
intervars, onreproduction
of
Onchocerca h,ortrs(0.
volvulusin
man ando.
gibsoni incattle)
and on possible macrofilariciaataccivity
as wel1-as-EEffilitesof
concentration and persistenceof
the drugin
adult worms and nodulesepidemiological studies on
effect of
community-rrride ivermectint,reatnent on
microfilarial
reservoir and on the anountof
transmissionof 0.
volvurus (measured by ATp) occurringin
and around isolated comEunitiesin
endemic onchocerciasis areas without satisfactory vector controltherapeutic potentiar
of
ivermectin folrowed by a courseof
low-dose suramin (or any other macrofilariacide developedin
future) especiarly as regards preventionof
devel0pmentof
eye lesions; curing acutepruritic
skin lesions; and alterationof toxic
manifestat,ions associated with suranin8'
optimalinterval of
dosingto
prevent developmentof
eye lesions and to cure/prevent acutepruritic
dermal lesions and "sowda"h.
the safetyof
ivernectinin
pregnant womenr lactating women andchildren below the age
of
eight yearsi.
toleranceto
ivermectinin
patients receiving anEimararials (e.g.chloroquine, quinine and pyrimethamine/sulphonamide)
or
other drugslike
benzodiazepinesj'
possible cautionre.
useof
ivermectinin
areas where Loa loa andO.
volvulus co-exist as ivermectin treatment cou1d,*r.""Eti".iiv,
cause severe reactions
in
brainor
retina dueto
sudden deathof
large numbersof L.
loa microfilariaek'
collection the marketing andof
analysis ivermectinof
data on within possible the OCp areaadverse reactions following1'
closeunlikely;
watch however.for
development should resistance occurof
resistanceto it
ivermectin would probably evenif
spreadthisvery slowly due
to
long generation turnover timein
O.volvulus and absenceof
microfiraria multipticationin
thevectorGtr"ce-
woula belikely to
spread more rapidlyin
areas without vector contror. while spread would be almostnil
as long as adequate vector controlis
naintained.
U'2
Although the more basic research issues wourd seemto
be the concernof
MSD,OcP
will
haveto
be involvedin
studiesrelating to
"or" of
the epidemiological/operational research subjectstisted
above.b
c
d
e