• Aucun résultat trouvé

Smoking and corneal biomechanics

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Smoking and corneal biomechanics"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Article

Reference

Smoking and corneal biomechanics

HAFEZI, Farhad

HAFEZI, Farhad. Smoking and corneal biomechanics. Ophthalmology , 2009, vol. 116, no. 11, p. 2259.e1

DOI : 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.07.039 PMID : 19883854

Available at:

http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:22464

Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version.

1 / 1

(2)

Smoking and Corneal Biomechanics Dear Editor:

Changes in the biomechanical properties of the human cornea play an important role in the pathogenesis of corneal dystrophies such as pellucid marginal corneal degeneration and keratoconus. The latter primarily affects young people and is a leading cause of severe visual impairment. Kera- toconus is characterized by weakened corneal biomechanics that leads to progressive bulging and thinning of the cor- nea.1Spoerl et al2have shown recently that the incidence of keratoconus is distinctly reduced in smokers suggesting that smoking improves the biomechanical properties of the cornea.

This hypothesis is further supported by studies showing that cigarette smoke contains compounds that enhance corneal bi- omechanics: formaldehyde crosslinks the cornea and experi- mentally increase the tissue’s resistance to collagenases.3,4

We investigated potential changes in the biomechanical properties of the cornea in chronic smokers and nonsmokers using the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA), a device that utilizes a dynamic bidirectional applanation process to mea- sure biomechanical parameters.5We conducted a prospec- tive comparative case series study including 110 eyes (56 eyes from nonsmokers and 54 age-matched eyes from chronic smokers). The study was approved by the institu- tional review board of the canton of Zurich and adheres to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects pro- vided written informed consent to participate. Patient age ranged from 20 to 69 years (nonsmokers: mean age 44.7 years, median age 46.0 years; smokers: mean age 44.3 years, median age 43.0 years). Inclusion criteria for smokers were current smoking and a smoking history of at least 10 pack years. A pack year, as defined by the National Cancer Institute, was calculated by multiplying the number of packs of cigarettes smoked per day by the number of years the

person has smoked (www.cancer.gov/Templates/db_alpha.

aspx?CdrID⫽306510).

Nonsmokers were defined as those who had never smoked. Scheimpflug analysis was performed in all eyes to rule out corneal ectatic diseases. The main parameters for corneal rigidity, as measured by the ORA, are the Corneal Resistance factor (CRF) and Corneal Hysteresis (CH). In smokers, we observed statistically significant increases of CRF (P⬍0.0001, Student t-test) and CH (P⫽0.02, Student t-test, seeTable 1).

In conclusion, our results suggest that chronic smoking has a beneficial effect on corneal biomechanics. Obviously, we do not recommend tobacco smoking in patients suffering from keratoconus due to the associated health risks. How- ever, the relationship between chronic smoking and corneal biomechanics observed here may help the clinician to better assess the speed by which keratoconus will probably progress.

FARHADHAFEZI, MD, PHD Zurich, Switzerland References

1. Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol 1998;42:297–

319.

2. Spoerl E, Raiskup-Wolf F, Kuhlisch E, Pillunat LE. Cigarette smoking is negatively associated with keratoconus. J Refract Surg 2008;24:S737– 40.

3. Madhukumar E, Vijayammal PL. Influence of cigarette smoke on cross-linking of dermal collagen. Indian J Exp Biol 1997;

35:483– 6.

4. Wollensak G, Spoerl E. Collagen crosslinking of human and porcine sclera. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:689 –95.

5. Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, et al. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea mea- sured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:5337– 47.

2259

(3)

Table 1. Ocular Response Analyzer Readings: Differences in Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Nonsmokers vs Smokers

Nonsmokers (n56) Smokers (n54) PValue

CRF 10.62.0 11.62.0 0.000013211*

CH 10.22.0 10.72.1 0.02*

CHcorneal hysteresis; CRFcorneal resistance factor.

Statistical analysis was performed using Student t-test.

*P0.05.

Ophthalmology Volume 116, Number 11, November 2009

2259.e1

Références

Documents relatifs

(A) Anterior corneal surface area measured at central 4.0 mm diameter (square millimeter) in normal eyes and keratoconus stages according to the Amsler–Krumeich Classification..

The less known exclusive Strontium-/Yttrium-90 beta irradiation without surgery with a total dose of 36 Gy in six fractions has shown to be an efficient, and to date,

Kmax has numerous limitations, which include: a single point reading is a poor descriptor of the cone morphology, a change in cone morphology (eg, a nipple cone progressing to

In terms of the overall effect of the combined treat- ment in our study, Group 2 (ICRS first, then CXL) had a statistically significantly higher overall increase in CDVA and decrease

New corneal cross-linking (CXL) devices are capable of using higher UV-A light irradiances than used in original CXL protocols.. The Bunsen-Roscoe law states that a

Of the various therapeutic options included in the may bring on symptoms of angina, he said, thinning guidelines, corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) is the cornea may

The standard biomechanical measurement method (stress-strain extensiometry) analyzes the force necessary to induce a progressive strain in the corneal tissue [3,4] and serves

Even when using fluence twice as high as the one used in current clinical CXL settings, circumferential UV-A irradiation of the corneal limbus does not alter the regenerative