HAL Id: jpa-00212421
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00212421
Submitted on 1 Jan 1990
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of
sci-entific research documents, whether they are
pub-lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
The end vector distribution function of a self-avoiding
polymer chain or a random walk for short and large
distances : corrections to the scaling
S. Stepanow
To cite this version:
899
Short Communication
The end
vector
distribution function of
aself-avoiding
poly-merchain
or arandom walk for short and
large
distances :
corrections
to
the
scaling
S.
Stepanow
Thchnische Hochschule "Carl Schorlemmer"
Leuna-Merseburg,
SektionPhysik,
DDR-4200Merseburg,
D.R.G.(Reçu
le 18 décembre 1989,accepté
sous forme définitive
le 14 mars1990)
Résumé. 2014 La distribution de
probability
de la distance bout à bout est étudiée à l’aide du groupede renormalisation. Des corrections à la loi d’échelle ont été obtenues pour les distances courtes et
longues.
Abstract. 2014 The end vector
distribution function of the
self-avoiding polymer
chain isinvestigated
using
the renormalization group(RG)
method. The corrections to thescaling
behaviour are found for small andlarge
distances.1
Phys.
France 51(1990)
899-904 15 MAI 1990,Classification
Physics
Abstracts 05.20 - 05.40 - 81.20’SIt is well-known that the end vector distribution function of a
self-avoiding polymer
chain or a random walkobeys
thescaling
law[1]
where d is the
space
dimension,
R ~ LI’ is the mean chain end-to-enddistance,
and v is the criticalexponent.
According
to[2-5]
the functionf (x)
behaves forlarge
and short x as*
large x [2, 3]
900
* short
[4,5]
where y
is the criticalexponent.
In thepresent
letter we will show that(2)
and(3)
areonly
validfor intermediate x. In the limit x ---> 0 there
appear
corrections to thepower
law(3).
In the limitx --> oo,
(2) changes
to the Gauss function.The distribution function of the end vector,
p(r),
is defined as followswhere the
average
isperformed
with the aid of the Edwards Hamiltonian[6].
Theright-hand
sideof
(4)
is the ratio of the number of states of thepolymer
chain with the fixed end-to-end distance tothe total number of states of the
polymer.
The numerator in(4),
which we denoteby
G(r),
is the Fourier transform of the end-to-end chain correlation functionG(p) = (exp(ip(r(L) - r(0)))).
The denumerator in(4)
isG(p
=0) .
Theperturbation expansion
of G(p)
inpowers
of the excludedvolume
strength
vo can berepresented by
means ofdiagrams
[5].
The result of the calculation ofG(r)
up to the first order of vo iswhere z =
Vol-2 (d/27rl)d/2
LE /2
= voLE/2, £
= 4 -d,
x= r2d/(2IL).1
is the statisticalsegment
length,
and L is the contourlength
of the chain.r(x)
is the Euler gamma function and03C8(a,
b,
x)
is the confluenthypergeometric
function of second art. The massdivergency
has been eliminated from(5).
The constantvo
is introduced in order to facilitate the way ofwriting
the formulae. Itoffers no
difficulty
to rewrite the formulaethrough
the variablesvol-4
and L1. From(5)
we obtainup
to the first order of-* small
r
where C = 0.5772... is the Euler number.
* large r
We
begin
with theregularization
ofG(r)
for small r. Theterm - (41e)
z in(6)
can be eliminated from theperturbation
expansion by
the redefinition of L in theprefactor
as followsThe term
(2/£) . Z .
xE /2
forces theappearance
of the counterterm X as a factor inG(r) :
We notice that X does not
depend
on L. The last twosingular
terms in(6)
change
theargument
where
’Ib the first order of e,
Xr
coincides with X andXL
withL’/L.
Notice that theexpansion
parameter
of L’/L
and X are different.Equations (8), (9)
and(11)
must becompleted
by
the renormalizationprescription
of the interaction constant. In accordance with[7,8]
we haveEquations (8), (9), (11),
and(12)
enable one to obtain the differentialequations
of the renormal-izationgroup
[7-9].The
solution of the lattergives
In the
scaling regime,
which is definedby
the condition that the second terms in brackets of(13)
and(14)
are much moregreater
than one, we obtainwhere v =
1/2
+e/16
+ ...and -y
= 1 +e /8
+ ... are the criticalexponents
computed
to order e.G(p
=0)
behaves in thescaling regime
as[4]
’
The
exponential
function in(10)
is obtained in thescaling regime
asLet us consider the condition
determining
thescaling regime.
This condition is different for thequantities
L’,
XL
andX,
Xr.
For L’ it isgiven
by
theinequality z
» 1(large
vo andL). The
scaling regime
for X andX r
is definedby
Independent
of the value of vo this condition breaks down forsufficiently
small r. In the limit r -->0,
X tends to 1.As a
consequence,
the number of states of aself-avoiding ring polymer,
which isproportional
toG(r
=0),
does not contain the renormalization factor X. The characteristic r*separating
the902
V4’e now show that r*
given
by
(19)
isproportional
to the blob dimension. The number ofsegments
in a blobVbj
=r*2 /12
obeys
the condition" ’"
which is
equivalent
to(19).
Forlarge
va, r* tends to zero.Now we turn to the renormalization of
G(r)
forlarge
r.The
1/e poles
of(7)
force the renormalization ofG(r)
as followswhere
- ... » Il
Th the first order of e there is no difference between
both X
in theprefactor
and in theexponent.
Analogous
to(13)
and(14)
the renormalizationgroup
enables one to obtainIt is easy to see that in the
scaling regime
that is in accordance with
(2).
The factor1/
(X
Ld/2)
in(20)
gives
in thescaling regime
re /4 IL d/2
that coincides to the first order of - with theprefactor
in(2).
In thescaling regime
our results coincide with that obtainedby
Oono et al.[10].
From
(22)
it followsthat,
in the limit r ---> oo, X tends to one and as aconsequence
f (x)
instead of
(2)
changes
to e-X. The characteristic r = r**separating
thescaling regime
from thenonscaling
oneobeys
the conditionthat can be rewritten as follows
The ratio of r** =
zR2/Ro
to the stretchedlength
of thepolymer,
rstr =L,
is obtained asIn the limit of
large
L it follows that r** > rsir The latter means that r** liesbeyond
theapplica-bility
of the Edwards model for realpolymers.
However,
there exists another relevant case. Letus increase L and
keep z
constant. Then we obtain r** rstr. The latter case is relevant forlarge
polymers
with moderate excluded volumestrength
vo.Now we will show how the behaviour of
G(r)
forlarge
z follows from thegeneral
RGwhere X and L scale as
The anomalous critical dimensions yX and ys are
expressed by
the criticalexponents
as follows[11]
In the renormalization scheme with cutoff
(,A2-scheme),
which can be used as theparameter
of theRG,
Amin
is the final value of the latter(see
[7,11]).
The Fourier transform of(25)
yields
Restricting
ourselves to the first term in theexpansion
ofGreg(x)
we obtainThe
application
of the ultraviolet renormalizedtheory
to thestudy
ofscaling
behaviourrequires
using
thematching
condition[11,12].
In the limit oflarge
r,Amin
has to be identifiedaccording
to(22)
asThe
latter,
in combination with the secondequation
of(26), gives
anequation
forAmin,
the solu-tion of which isFrom
(29)
and(31)
wefinally
obtainIn summary, we have considered the end vector distribution function of a
self-avoiding
poly-mer chain
by
means of the RG method. In contrast to theprevious investigations
we have estab-lished the deviations from thescaling
behaviour for small andlarge
distances. We have obtained theexpression
for the characteristic distance r*(r**)
below(above)
which the des Cloizeaux(Fisher-McKenzie-Moore) scaling
law is violated.Acknowledgements.
1 would like to thank Professor G. Helmis for a useful discussion.
References
[1]
DE GENNES P.G., Scaling Concepts
inPolymer Physics (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y.)
1979.[2]
FISHER M.E., J.
Chem.Phys.
44(1966)
616.[3]
McKENZlE D. S. and MOORE M. A., J.Phys. A
4(1971)
L82.[4]
DES CLOIZEAUX J.,Phys.
Rev. A 10(1974)
1665.[5]
DES CLOIZEAUX J. and JANNINKG.,
LesPolymères
en Solution : leur Modélisation et leur Structure904