• Aucun résultat trouvé

How Poor are Current Bibliometrics in the Humanities? Numismatic Literature as a Case Study

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "How Poor are Current Bibliometrics in the Humanities? Numismatic Literature as a Case Study"

Copied!
42
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

275

How Poor are Current Bibliometrics in the Humanities?

Numismatic Literature as a Case Study

François de Callataÿ*

Numismatics is a field of research for which current search engines are of a very limited use (with an exception, to handle with caution, for Publish or Perish). It may be estimated that Scopus covers c. 1.8% of the relevant literature (c. 450 pages out of the c. 25,000 produced every year) while the Web of Science is absolutely mute. A detailed analysis performed on the main numismatic periodicals both confirms the value of the ERIH index and invites some important corrections. Forgotten are the American Journal of Numismatics, which is to be classified as International 1, the Rivista Italiana di Numismatica, which is to be classified as International 1 or 2, as well as Numismatica e Antichità Classiche, while the Bolletino di Numismatica, the British Numismatic Journal, and Israel Numismatic Research certainly qualify for a national level. The study points out how numismatics is a self-sufficient field, with a specific literature referring first to itself, and how, compared with other fields in the humanities, it regularly needs to refer to very old literature.

This paper is about numismatic bibliometrics. Its aim is twofold: 1) for the general reader, to offer a rather frightening case study of how entire fields of the humanities are poorly covered by the current usual tools (WoS, Scopus, SCImago); 2) for those more interested in numismatics, to investigate the role and pattern of the main periodicals.

* Royal Library of Belgium, Université libre de Bruxelles and Ecole pratique des Hautes Etudes (Paris). The author is grateful to Catharine Lorber who kindly revised his English.

(2)

Twenty years after publishing a first essay on numismatic bibliometrics, many changes have occurred.1 In the 1990s, the indexes of the International Surveys of Numismatic Research, published once every six years in association with the International Numismatic Congresses, were still the best and possibly also unique instruments to give some measure of the quoted literature. Since that time, bibliometrics have invaded the academic world—even the humanities—although with considerably less efficient coverage.2 With its respectable Renaissance tradition of periodicals created before the mid-nineteenth century, and connected to, as well as nurtured by, the non-academic world of collectors, numismatics could be described as one of the areas most resistant to this invasion. And yet, even if perceived as a threat, and sometimes vilified as a perverse improvement or an intellectual heresy, bibliometrics are coming. This paper focuses on periodicals, leaving aside the more controversial debate about how to estimate the scientific production of specific authors.

1. Numismatic Bibliometrics:

The Very Poor Current State of the Art

There is a large literature denouncing the poorly coverage of the humanities by existing search engines. It is enough here to recall what are the two main reasons for this: 1) Search engines focus on periodicals while, for the humanities, literature published in other types of publications continues to vastly dominate the scene (books by one or several authors as monographs, proceedings of conferences, Fest- schriften for colleagues, and exhibition catalogues); 2) Search engines vastly favor English while publications in the humanities continue to be multilingual.

As a result, only a small portion of what has been published in the humanities is taken into consideration by available search engines. Several graphs have been proposed to visualize how the coverage differs from one field to another. Graph 1 comes from the World Social Sciences Report 2010, carried out under the patron- age of UNESCO. It gives for each field the percentage of journal articles covered by the WoS for the years 1980–2007.

While it may be argued that the WoS covers at least 85% of all medical papers, and more than 70% for the natural sciences and engineering, social sciences fall considerably behind (with c. 50%—but possibly not psychology which behaves more like medicine). With a mere 10%, arts and humanities are still in another world, not to be compared with social sciences. Moreover, it is important to keep in mind that this alleged 10% is only for papers published in scientific periodi- cals, ignoring what appears elsewhere. As we shall see with numismatics, the real

1 Callataÿ 1992.

2 On this, see Hicks 1999; Jeanin 2003; Archambault and Gagne 2004; Comité National d’Evaluation de la Recherche 2006; and Kosmopoulos and Pumain 2008. The Revue européenne des sciences sociales devoted a full issue (45 [2007])to the “Evaluation en sciences sociales. Concepts, mesures et comparaisons.”

(3)

percentage of literature covered by the Web of Science, for example, is even more frightening.

Out of the c. 220,000 active and current scientific periodicals registered by Ulrich’s Periodical Directory, only a fraction—less than one tenth—is recorded by the most popular search engines such as the WoS (Web of Science—Thomson- Reuters: c. 12,000) or Scopus (Elsevier: c. 19,400). Among the c. 19,400 titles cov- ered by Scopus, a fair 3,000 are for the social sciences and c. 2,500 for the arts and humanities. This is just a portion. JournalBase, a French funded program, has produced a list of 21,405 titles for the SSH whose classification by main categories is quite appealing (Table 1, below).

Numismatics is at the crossroads of major fields of contributors in terms of number of periodicals: history (2,004 journals), archaeology (1,897), classical studies (1,897) and art/art history (1,700). Still, it is a small niche of approximately 40 major titles, nearly entirely neglected by main search tools. The Art & Hu- manities Citation Index (AHCI-Thomson/Reuters) is totally mute, even ignoring the Numismatic Chronicle and the Revue Numismatique while Scopus has only the Revue Numismatique on its list. SCImago does no better, taking into account only the Numismatic Chronicle.3

3 See http://www.SCImagojr.com/journalsearch.php.

Graph 1. Percentage of journal articles covered by the WoS (Web of Science) (1980–2007).

Source: ICSS Report 2010, fig. 7.1.

(4)

Table 1. The main categories of periodicals inside the SSH (from JournalBase).4

Categories Number of titles Percentage

Psychology and cognitive sciences 3,267 15.0

History 2,004 9.3

Archaeology 1,912 8.9

Classical studies 1,897 8.8

Art and art history 1,700 7.9

Administration and commercial sciences 1,034 4.8

Literature 963 4.5

Economy 950 4.4

Environment sciences 921 4.3

Sociology 855 4.0

Geography 683 3.2

Linguistics 657 3.1

More comprehensive (but not a searchable engine) is the European Review Index for the Humanities (ERIH) produced by the European Science Foundation.

In its last version (2011), it included eight numismatic titles: two classified as International 1 (Numismatic Chronicle and Revue Numismatique), two as International 2 (Revue belge de Numismatique and Schweizerische Numismatische Rundschau), and four as National (Annali dell’Istituto italiano di Numismatica, Jahrbuch für Numismatik und Geldgeschichte, Numizmatische Zeitschrift and Schweizer Münzblätter).

Table 2. Numismatic journals classified by ERIH.5

Titles Category

Numismatic Chronicle Int1

Revue Numismatique Int1

Revue belge de Numismatique Int2 Schweizerische Numismatische Rundschau Int2 Annali dell’Istituto italiano di Numismatica Nat Jahrbuch für Numismatik und Geldgeschichte Nat

Numizmatische Zeitschrift Nat

Schweizer Münzblätter Nat

4 See M. Dassa, C. Kosmopoulos, and D. Pumain, JournalBase. A comparative international study of scientific journal databases in the social sciences and the humanities (see http://

cybergeo.revues.org/22864).

5 See https://www2.esf.org/asp/ERIH/Foreword/search.asp.

(5)

As we shall see, despite some necessary adjustments, this classification is not too far removed from reality.

I would argue that the only useful search engine for the humanities is Publish or Perish, developed by Anne-Wil Harzing (Melbourne University). Recycling the data provided by Google Scholar (notoriously known, however, for the opacity of its algorithms), this free search engine gives in one click for each journal different data among which are their H-Index, G-Index, the number of citations, the number of cited papers, as well as many more parameters based on these primary data. Table 3 provides a list of 53 current numismatic periodicals, given in the declining order of their G-Index:

Table 3. Data for current numismatic periodicals in Publish or Perish (August 15, 2013).

Periodical G-Index H-Index Number of

citations Number of papers

Numismatic Chronicle (UK 1839) 23 18 2789 911

British Numismatic Journal (UK 1904) 15 12 723 242

Revue Numismatique (FRA 1836) 14 12 967 1000+

Numisma (SPA 1951) 11 10 628 311

Israel Numismatic Journal (ISR 1963) 11 8 293 65 Annali dell’Istituto italiano di

Numismatica (ITA 1954) 9 6 251 73

Journal of the Numismatic Society of

India (IND 1939) 9 6 347 437

American Journal of Numismatics

(USA [1866–1919] 1989) 8 7 172 61

Jahrbuch für Numismatik und

Geldgeschichte (GER 1949) 8 7 177 65

Revue belge de Numismatique

(BEL 1841) 8 6 338 301

Schweizerische Numismatische

Rundschau (SWI 1891) 8 6 233 166

Rivista italiana di Numismatica

(ITA 1888) 7 7 501 566

Jaarboek voor Munt- en Penningkunde

(HOL 1893) 7 5 95 28

Nordisk Numismatisk Aarskrift

(1936) 7 5 245 108

Numismatische Zeitschrift

(AUT 1869) 7 5 231 131

(6)

Periodical G-Index H-Index Number of

citations Number of papers

Bollettino di Numismatica (ITA 1983) 6 5 122 261

Numismatica e Antichità Classiche

(SWI 1972) 6 5 160 106

Schweizer Münzblätter (SWI 1949) 5 5 115 180

Israel Numismatic Research

(ISR 2006) 5 4 43 20

The Numismatist (USA 1888) 5 4 147 195

Wiadomosci Numismatyczne

(POL 1957) 4 4 36 21

The Celator (USA 1987) 4 4 67 33

Armenian Numismatic Journal

(USA 1975) 4 3 37 12

Bulletin de la Société française de

Numismatique (FRA 1946) 4 3 122 76

Cahiers Numismatiques (FRA 1964) 4 3 52 38

Acta Numismatica (SPA 1971) 4 3 27 12

Nordisk Numismatisk Unions

Medlemsblad (1938) 4 3 74 46

Numismatic Digest (IND 1977) 4 3 61 23

Nummus (SPA 1952) 4 3 42 25

Studii si Cercetari de Numismatica

(ROM 1957) 4 3 46 16

Bulletin du Cercle d’Etudes

Numismatiques (BEL 1964) 4 2 31 72

De Beeldenaar (HOL 1977) 3 3 18 36

Buletinul Societatii Numismatice

Romane (ROM 1904) 3 3 25 11

Nomismatika Chronika (GRE 1972) 3 3 26 11

Numizmatika i Epigrafika (RUS 1960) 3 3 35 14

Oriental Numismatic Society

Newsletter (1970) 3 3 81 46

Geldgeschichtliche Nachhrichten

(GER 1966) 3 2 14 16

Notae Numismaticae (POL 1996) 3 2 15 6

(7)

Periodical G-Index H-Index Number of

citations Number of papers Numismatisches Nachrichtenblatt

(GER 1952) 3 2 12 8

Biuletyn Numizmatyczny (POL 1965) 2 2 25 13

Cercetari Numismatice (ROM 1978) 2 2 6 33

Coin World (USA 1960) 2 2 14 15

Folia Numismatica (TCH 1986) 2 2 5 11

Jaarboek van EGMP (BEL 1983) 2 2 4 5

Magazyn Numizmatyczny (TCH) 2 2 25 33

The Medal (UK 1982) 2 2 23 42

Münstersche Numismatische Zeitung

(GER 1970) 2 2 6 3

Numizmatika i Sfragistica (UKR 1963) 2 2 6 3

Numizmatikai Közlöni (HUN 1902) 2 2 23 12

Panorama Numismatico (ITA 1982) 2 2 9 4

The Shekel (USA 1968) 2 2 4 2

Australian Coin Review (AUS 1964) 1 1 1 1

La Vie Numismatique (BEL 1973) 1 1 2 4

As such, this table does not give too many absurd results. With 2,789 quota- tions for 911 papers, the Numismatic Chronicle is ahead in terms of quotations and the Revue numismatique is not very far off (and even beyond in terms of cited papers).

However, important biases are clearly present. First and as already denounced, these results under represent by a considerable margin anything not written in English, as anyone writing both in English as a second language and in a mother language may easily observe with his/her own statistics. Second, they also favor recent literature. Conversely, they disadvantage old journals for which the average number of citations per paper is low (see Revue Numismatique, Revue belge de Numismatique or Rivista italiana di Numismatica). A good example of this difference of treatment is provided by the Annali dell’Istituto Italiano di Numismatica, which are well referenced with consequently a higher G-Index (9 instead of 7) than the Rivista italiana di Numismatica while the number of citations is appreciably lower (251 instead of 501). A third and less expected bias is the fact that most of the quoted papers, even those published by the Numismatic Chronicle, have been integrated through Dialnet (dialnet.unirioja.es, referred to as

“publisher” [last column of the Publish or Perish charts]), a Spanish free portal of

scientific literature launched in 2001 and principally devoted to the social sciences

(8)

and the humanities. This gives an explanation for the excessively high results for some Spanish periodicals, like Numisma, here in fourth place, and Nummus.

There are other minor peculiarities such as the inflated importance given to the Journal of the Numismatic Society of India (here in seventh place), the high score of the British Numismatic Journal, which benefits from being cited frequently by British historians in relevant places for bibliometrics, and some others. However, despite these many defects, the Publish or Perish engine already appears to provide some statistical robustness and it is beyond any doubt that improvements can be expected in the future.

The same feeling of general plausibility is generated if one looks at the most cited papers. For the Numismatic Chronicle again, the four most cited articles are (Table 4):

Table 4. Four most cited papers in the Numismatic Chronicle (Publish or Perish, March 29, 2012).

Number of

citations Author Paper Year

57 C. J. Howgego Why did ancient states strike coins? 1990 45 W. W. Esty Estimation of the size of a coinage: a survey and

comparison of methods. 1986

34 D. G. Sellwood Some experiments in Greek minting technique. 1963 33 T. V. Buttrey Calculating ancient coin production. 1993

This ranking is not a matter of great astonishment. Two comments however:

a) with a higher result of 91, the most cited paper of Christopher Howgego is to be found in the Journal of Roman Studies,6 which in turn is no surprise since the JRS has a better H-Index than the NC; b) looking at the most quoted papers, it is clear that some areas of the numismatic world have been more thoroughly reported than others. Indo-Greek numismatics is a good case with a high ratio of reporting.

Hence the fact that six out of the seventeen most quoted papers published by the Revue Numismatique are devoted to this kind of coinage while the number of papers cited for the Journal of the Numismatic Society of India is no less than 437 (the fourth highest result, to be compared, e.g., with the 65 for the Jahrbuch für Numismatik und Geldgeschichte).

En passant, one will notice the very limited score achieved by the most quoted article in the most quoted numismatic periodical, about one tenth of a good score for a paper about cognitive sciences.

6 Howgego 1992.

(9)

2. Numismatic Bibliometrics: An Attempt to Go Further

2.1. Improving the ERIH Index for numismatic periodicals

What follows is an attempt to go further with numismatic bibliometrics. For ten major periodicals, three recent issues have been systematically scrutinized (usu- ally the years 2009–2011), considering all references to other numismatic periodi- cals. For each of these periodicals, one gives the cumulative number of citations to itself and to the others (Total), as well as the same grand total less the amount of auto-citations (last column). It is likely and here assumed that this last column gives us the best evidence for classifying numismatic periodicals in order of im- portance. Consequently, the nineteen numismatic periodicals taken into account in Table 5 (below, among which are the eight recorded by ERIH indicated in bold typeface) have been classified in their decreasing order of this last column.

It turns out that the eight journals taken into account by the ERIH index pro- vide about half (49.4%) of the quoted information for all the periodicals. The per- centage grows further to 84.6% when considering the nineteen periodicals listed in Table 5. These numbers are typical for a rather small field.

Moreover and, as already noted for the humanities generally, citations of pa- pers in scientific periodicals represent only a fraction of all the citations. Data given in Annex 3 allow for a sample of five issues to estimate this fraction (Table 6):

Table 6. Journals versus total number of citations for some numismatic periodicals.

Journals NC

2011 RBN 2009 RBN

2011 RIN 2010 RN

2011 Total

Total number of citations 908 653 445 851 696 3553

Total for journals 187 82 125 102 91 587

Total for ERIH periodicals 102 56 69 32 47 306

% ERIH/total number of citations 11.2 8.6 15.5 3.8 6.8 8.6

% journals/total number of citations 20.6 12.6 28.1 12.0 13.1 16.5

Out of the total number of citations, c. 16.5% come from scientific periodicals,

an estimate divided by two if only taking into account the ERIH periodicals. In

other words, 5/6 of the references are not to be found in periodicals and only 1/12

come from the main journals listed by the ERIH index. It is worthwhile to repeat

here that, since search engines like Scopus or SCImago cover only one of the eight

ERIH periodicals (and nothing else), the covered percentage of numismatic litera-

ture can be safely estimated to be below 2%.

(10)

Ta bl e 5. D et ai ls o f ci ta tio ns b y n um ism at ic j our na ls.

JournalsAIIN 2009– 2011

AJN 2009– 2011

INR 2010– 2012

JNG 2009– 2011

NAC

2008– 2010

NC 2009– 2011

RBN 2009– 2011

RIN 2009– 2011

RN 2009– 2011

SNR 2009– 2011

TotalTotal (self-citations excluded) NC145527261812429415433401277 RN17181413124619178516257192 AJN+MN1039351121739141717201162 RBN10179133283216818198 RIN2243-208295211118691 AIIN1913511187237710182 SNR61016221191012189678 NAC732422137201029068 NZ-118-9648124949 SM124211236594545 BollNum5---64216464343 BSFN4244-185374211642 JNG-2115-761584530 INJ-738-510-2416729 INR-1233-1241315724 BNJ-2---13216-2424 CahNum---2-2111522323 NCirc-415151-2-1919 BCEN11---811311616

(11)

JournalsAIIN 2009– 2011

AJN 2009– 2011

INR 2010– 2012

JNG 2009– 2011

NAC

2008– 2010

NC 2009– 2011

RBN 2009– 2011

RIN 2009– 2011

RN 2009– 2011

SNR 2009– 2011

TotalTotal (self-citations excluded) Per. ERIH771187653472491621041921111189- Per. Total (selection)116192193941043502262583511542,038- Per. Total1262202151211304662583193851682,408- % Per. ERIH/ total61.153.635.343.836.253.462.832.649.966.149.4- % Per. Sel./ total92.187.389.877.780.075.187.680.991.191.784.6- Articles

23 +8 27 +2 45 +4

36

57 (17 N) 62 +17 29 +12 47 +15 72 +6 39 +81 437- Pages824725569780133215097281639154076810,414- Ref. per./ page0.150.300.380.160.100.310.350.190.250.220.23-

(12)

It cannot be doubted that results presented in Table 5 give a more accurate view of numismatic journals than the Publish or Perish index (Table 3, above) or the ERIH list (Table 2, above). The Numismatic Chronicle and Revue Numisma- tique come first in the three different rankings. If we consider the ERIH list, it is all the more remarkable that seven out of the eight journals under consideration are classified among the ten first (Table 7).

Discrepancies are of two kinds. One has already been pointed out: journals too well classified in the Publish or Perish index, due to different kinds of biases, but actually not much quoted in recent numismatic literature. More worrying is the second category: journals which should be taken into account by the ERIH index.7

Table 7. Comparison between Callataÿ 2013, ERIH 2011, and Publish or Perish 2013.

Journals Callataÿ 2013 Last column of Table 5

ERIH 2011 Publish Or Perish H-Index 2013

NC 277 Int1 23

RN 192 Int1 14

AJN + MN 162 - 8 +

RBN 98 Int2 7

RIN 91 - 7

AIIN 82 Nat 9

SNR 78 Int2 8

NAC 68 - 6

NZ 49 Nat 7

SM 45 Nat 5

BollNum 43 - 6

BSFN 42 - 4

JNG 30 Nat 8

INJ 29 - 11

INR 24 - 5

BNJ 24 - 15

CahNum 23 - 4

Missing in the ERIH list for at least an International 2 ranking but more suit- ably an International 1 (as the Revue belge de Numismatique) are the American

7 Which aims to produce a list of high level scientific journals, implying to fulfil a series of criteria—as the 16 criteria of Scopus—, and with, consequently, an important rate of non- admission (c. 75%).

(13)

Journal of Numismatics (which continues the American Numismatic Society Mu- seum Notes) and the Rivista italiana di Numismatica. Other journals certainly de- serve to be inscribed as National, such as the British Numismatic Journal or Israel Numismatic Research, which has been launched recently with a high standard (while the Israel Numismatic Journal experienced difficulties appearing on a regu- lar schedule in the last two decades). Numismatica e Antichità classiche is more difficult to evaluate since it stands on different fields but it also certainly deserves an International 2 ranking, if not only for numismatics.

2.2. Integration level of numismatic literature

Do the main numismatic journals belong to a single and large scientific community quoting the same literature whatever their provenances? Details of Annex 2 do not invite optimism. Even major national journals remain centered on local literature, due to the nature of the published papers. This is true for the Numismatic Chronicle and the Revue Numismatique, but it also holds for the Revue belge de Numismatique and the Rivista italiana di Numismatica. All these journals continue, year after year, the good practice of quoting first of all themselves (see Table 5).

The Revue Numismatique and the Revue belge de Numismatique offer an el- oquent example of opposite citations: while the French journal quotes itself 85 times and the RBN only 16 times, the Belgian journal does the same in the other way, with 83 self-citations as against only 19 in the RN. This is typical for a non- integrated field of research where every journal has its own local agenda.

Additional proof of this is provided by SCImago, whose low interest in nu- mismatists has already been underlined since at this stage it only includes the Nu- mismatic Chronicle. Among the many graphs produced by this powerful search tool, one is devoted to the level of self-citations to compare with citations from elsewhere. When comparing the Numismatic Chronicle with the Journal of Roman Studies, it immediately becomes apparent that the level of self-citation is by far higher in the Numismatic Chronicle (Graphs 2–3, below).

Numismatics appears to be a self-sufficient field, well organized with a specific literature for specific topics, and consequently a high ratio of self-citations. From that perspective, the Numismatic Chronicle offers one of the best (or worst) exam- ples with no less than a 27% of self-citation rate as far as periodicals are considered (see Table 5, below).8

8 Comparing the number of self-citations with the total number of citations from scien- tific periodicals, we get the following order: RIN = 30% (95 out of 319), NC = 27% (124 out of 466), RBN = 26% (83 out of 258), RN = 22% (85 out of 385), AJN = 18% (39 out of 220), NAC = 17% (22 out of 130), JNG = 12 % (15 out of 121), SNR = 11% (18 out of 168).

(14)

3. Numismatic Bibliometrics:

How Old is the Quoted Numismatic Literature?

In their intense competition to dominate the market, search engines developed by private companies will continue to improve their coverage of existing literature. At the moment, Scopus is ahead for what may be found outside periodicals. This is good news for the humanities. What is less auspicious is that the quoted literature in the humanities may be very old, as illustrated by Graph 4.

With a median age of 14 years, arts and humanities refer to a much older literature than in medicine (6 years). En passant, it is interesting to observe that nowhere has the median decreased during recent decades.

Graphs 2–3. Citation vs. Self-Citation for the Numismatic Chronicle (top) and the Journal of Roman Studies (bottom) (SCImago Journal and Country Rank, March 2012)*

* See http://www.SCImagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=6700153306&tip=sid&clean=0 (NC) and http://www.SCImagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=6500153192&tip=sid&cle an=0 (JRS).

(15)

To calculate the median average of cited literature requires other figures (see Annex 3). Table 8 sums up the results obtained for five recent issues of the NC, RBN, RIN, and RN.

Table 8. Median of cited literature in some recent numismatic journals.

Journal NC 2011 RBN 2009 RBN 2011 RIN 2010 RN 2011

Ref. Total 908 653 445 851 696

Median 24 years 17 years 18 years 19 years 22 years

With a median of cited literature between 17 years (RBN 2009) and 24 years (NC 2011), numismatic literature comes behind what is supposed to be the mean for the arts and humanities (c. 14 years), themselves considerably distant from the mean in social sciences (c. 8 years).

To allow for a more detailed commentary than what could be said about the rough median, we need to characterize the observed shape of the curves. Graph 5 (below) gives the general model for the social sciences and the humanities.

In both cases, the peak of citations is obtained for literature four or five years old, but the slopes of the curve afterwards are very different, hence also the differ- ence of height for the peaks. For numismatic citations, we have recorded years of publication for five issues of major journals. For each of these five issues, Graph 6 (below) gives the percentage of citations in five-year periods.9

At first sight, the shapes of the curves look generally similar (but see below) and go well beyond what has been modelled for the humanities. The number of quotations older than 60 years is impressive: c. 12/13% for RBN 2009 and 2011 and c. 19% for RIN 2011 or RN 2011 and c. 22% for NC 2011. Graph 7 (below) allows for comparison between the curves modelled for numismatics and those modelled for social sciences and humanities.

9 For the details, see Annex 4.

Graph 4. Median age of cited literature by field (100-year citation window) (1980–2005). Source: ICSS Report 2010, fig. 7.2.

(16)

The curve for numismatics starts below the one supposed to describe the humanities, not to speak of social sciences, but sometimes large differences can observed as in the case of RBN 2009. The issue of that particular year combines the proceedings of an international conference held in Brussels in June 2008

Graph 5. Obsolescence curves of cited literature for social sciences and the humanities.

Graph 6. Percentages of citations by periods of five years for some numismatic journals.

(17)

(pp. 1–158: From mints to markets) and other papers (pp. 159–229), some of them dealing with modern Belgian numismatics.

With a peak at c. 20%, the proceedings of the conference display a pattern of citations far better than the average for e numismatic literature, in line with what has been argued for the humanities (with the same median of 14 years for the cited literature), while the second part of RBN 2009 resorts to even more old citations than the average obtained for numismatics (see Graph 8).

Graph 7. Obsolescence curves of cited literature for numismatics compared with social sciences and humanities.

Graph 8. Obsolescence curves of cited literature in RBN 2009 (international conference versus other papers)

(18)

This is more remarkable than it may seem since by nature numismatics calls for old quotations more than in any field we may think of. This is partly due to the seniority of the discipline: large corpora of the late nineteenth century (e.g., the BMC or Historia Nummorum for Greek coins) are still important references.

Catalogues of public or private coin collections are not published twice in the same century and have to be quoted whatever their age. Another major reason for old references has to do with size and means. Numismatic studies is a very large field nowadays cultivated by a substantial but limited number of authors. The indices of the International Surveys of Numismatic Research, published once every six years, register papers written by some 5,000 authors (c. 4,500 for Berlin, 1997 and c.

5,000 for Madrid, 2003). But not all branches can be thoroughly investigated at the same time and, as everywhere, trends promote enthusiasm or neglect. RBN 2009 offers a quantified confirmation that Belgian numismatics was thoroughly pur- sued before World War I, at a time of great nationalism in what was then a young and extremely wealthy country. In contrast, and for different reasons, coinages of the Low Countries have been rather neglected since World War II, hence the host of quotations referring back to the nineteenth century. Such phenomena may be detected in several areas and bibliometry is here helpful.

4. Numismatic Bibliometrics:

How Large is the Current Literature?

Finally: how large is the yearly numismatic literature? The answer very much de- pends on how we define it. Several approaches may be attempted. A first one is to measure the annual amount of literature produced by the main scientific peri- odicals. Table 9 (below) gathers for the eight ERIH journals (plus the AJN and the RIN) the number of papers (before slash), and the number of pages (after slash) for articles (first line), notes (second line) and reviews (third line).

These observations are summed up in Table 10 (below) which gives for each periodical the yearly average per category.

If on one hand, as it has been argued above, the eight ERIH periodicals con- tribute c. 8% of the total quoted literature in numismatic papers and, on the oth- er hand, roughly 2,000 pages of numismatic literature are published every year by these eight periodicals (Table 10 [below]. Total 8, last row), then we may be tempted to extrapolate the yearly gross amount of numismatic pages suitable for scientific quotation to c. 25,000 (2,060/8 x 100).

It should be stressed again that, out of these c. 25,000 pages a year, nothing is

covered by the Art & Humanities Citation Index (AHCI-Tomson/Reuters), while

Scopus and SCImago cover a meagre 1.8% (only the Revue Numismatique for Sco-

pus and the Numismatic Chronicle for SCImago: c. 450 pages).

(19)

Ta bl e 9. N um be rs o f p ap er s, n ot es, a nd r ev ie w s f or t he 8 n um ism at ic p er io di ca ls in ERIH + AJ N an d RIN (2001–2010)

Journal2001200220032004200520062007200820092010Total NC 13/281 9/50 15/24 14/338 13/74 16/42 16/337 12/64 17/33 11/222 19/113 17/23 23/321 9/83 15/32 26/389 11/107 9/19 22/276 7/72 10/46 17/381 9/92 12/24 20/397 6/106 11/23 23/412 4/100 7/18 185/3354 99/861 129/284

RN

26/455 2/28 19/40 15/370 2/30 17/52 20/442 3/10 22/60 15/354 - 18/49 12/185 1/19 19/47 22/424 3/14 16/40 10/299 3/25 12/39 20/463 2/12 15/37 14/376 3/57 16/39 25/530 1/15 13/56 169/3898 20/210 167/459

RBN

12/198 4/22 17/24 6/152 6/34 14/22 7/229 5/29 19/29 7/216 6/21 13/29 7/216 5/35 16/23 9/159 9/27 12/20 7/134 13/41 9/20 4/155 22/51 12/16 11/208 5/22 8/15 7/187 7/50 20/30 78/1638 82/332 140/228

SNR

8/194 - 6/37 7/154 1/3 4/23

?

9/159 - 6/43 10/207 - 4/16 8/170 - 9/70 7/170 - 5/44 8/187 - 4/27 29/307 - - 4/255 - 4/23 90/1803 1/3 42/283

AIIN

6/189 7/92 1/43 5/261 6/85 - 3/173 8/53 -

TablesTables

5/181 7/112 - 5/210 3/36 1/7 6/283 4/57 - 9/245 3/40 - 5/283 4/60 - 44/1825 42/535 2/50

NZ

15/301 1/8 -

--

8/174 - - 31/453 - -

-

8/182 - - 21/352 - -

--

83/1462 1/8 -

JNG-

11/152 - 8/16

-

6/147 - 17/44

-

12/257 1/2 6/16 7/154 1/40 13/44 12/168 1/18 11/35 12/231 - 11/24 10/245 2/32 14/32 70/1354 5/92 80/211

SM??

9/28 - 5/7 12/54 - 6/9 10/59 1/2 10/14 7/59 - 6/12 10/56 2/6 4/10 7/35 5/15 6/8 6/60 - - 11/74 - 4/9 72/425 8/23 41/69

(20)

Journal2001200220032004200520062007200820092010Total Total 8 ERIH 68/132 6 25/134 77/197 93/144 1 16/139 64/132 89/163 9 31/262 58/177 76/148 1 29/220 54/210 95/202 4 43/245 60/147 101/182 4 17/225 46/101 85/198 6 18/257 62/168

Total 81657171220781911241621502411 AJN 8/145 1/62 1/4 7/178 1/44 - 7/156 - -

-

15/267 1/35 - 9/151 1/50 - 7/182 1/8 - 28/615 - - 7/225 - - 7/130 1/86 - 95/2049 6/285 1/4

RIN

10/354 - 6/11 27/463 - 18/25 15/516 2/6 9/23 19/496 4/18 6/28 20/414 2/9 10/37 19/469 4/37 7/53 16/466 5/44 7/32 16/474 4/70 8/62 17/498 5/51 7/35 16/442 7/48 7/44 175/4592 33/283 85/350

Total 10

87/182 2 29/152 83/225 128/21 22 19/183 74/171 117/22 59 36/349 65/230 99/212 9 35/272 61/242 139/31 13 47/315 68/209 125/23 22 22/276 53/136 108/25 58 26/391 69/212

Total 102199247628382643363727343161

Ta bl e 10. Y ea rly a ve ra ge n um be rs o f p ag es p ub lis he d b y t he 8 n um ism at ic p er io di ca ls in ERIH + AJ N an d RIN (2001–2010).

NCRNRBNSNRAIINNZJNGSMTotal 8AJNRINTotal 10 Papers3353901641772161461359716602044592323 Notes862133-731942272928284 Reviews284623378-2110173-35208 Total44945922021429714716511120602335222815

(21)

Is the result of c. 25,000 numismatic pages published every year realistic?

The DONUM database of the American Numismatic Society is now rich with c.

170,000 entries, including books and auction catalogues (c. 120,000 in 1998).10 Without catalogues, it is likely to register c. 140,000 entries for papers only, which points in the direction of a yearly average of at least 1,500 new entries for recent years (likely closer to 2,000). This is a huge work and the warmest thanks must be given to the ANS for creating, maintaining, and developing such a useful tool for the numismatic community. Out of these c. 1,500/2,000 new registered papers every year, approximately 100, as an average, are published in the eight ERIH pe- riodicals (see Table 9. Row “ERIH 8 Total”, first line). Multiplying the 1,660 pages of these c. 100 papers (see Table 10. Total 8, first line) by 15 or 20, we get a similar result: the total citable numismatic literature per year approximates 24,900–33,200 pages. Or, assuming a similar length for the ERIH papers (c. 19 pages [see Table 9.

last column]) and the other numismatic literature (which combines a proportion of lengthy monographs with possibly shorter papers published elsewhere), again one gets a result of the same magnitude (19 x 1,500 = 28,500).

However, this does not take into account the countless bulletins published by local numismatic circles as well as many other sources. Every year, Belgian or Swiss numismatic societies customarily provide a list of all the papers dealing with the numismatics of their own countries (see RBN and SM). Bibliometrics are dif- ficult to apply to such a material of diverse conditions but it is clear enough that it multiplies the number of pages by at least a factor of 2.

For Belgium, taking only the pure numismatic papers or books related to lo- cal coinages, there is a total of 3,175 pages for 2010.11 Belgium is a country with a long tradition of cultivating numismatics but it is clear that its relative share is well beneath 1/8 of the total numismatic literature produced in the world, with a figure of 25,000 pages published annually.

10 See Hahn 2012.

11 See Dewit 2011, who gives 288 entries broken down as follows: general studies: 808 p. (nos. 2, 3, 6, 8, 9); ancient coinages: 408 p. (nos. 10–12, 14–16, 18, 20, 22, 23, 29, 34, 36–38, 41, 43, 48–50); medieval coinages: 865 p. (nos. 53, 54, 61–65, 67–72, 75, 78, 80, 85, 86); modern coinages : 116 p. (nos. 87, 89, 92, 93, 95, 98, 99, 100, 102, 103, 107) ; con- temporary coinages: 369 p. (nos. 108–112, 117); medals: 533 p. (nos.: 118, 120, 123–127, 130, 131, 133–144, 146–148, 150, 152, 153, 157, 159, 160, 164, 167– 173, 176, 177, 179, 180, 183–208, 210–212, 214, 216, 218 ; varia: 76 p. (nos. 252, 253, 256, 258, 259, 261, 262, 275–278, 280–284, 286–288).

(22)

References

Archambault, E., and E. Gagne (eds.). 2004. L’utilisation de la bibliométrie dans les sciences sociales et les humanités. Science—Metrix, report for the Canadian Research Council for the Humanities (http://www.science-metrix.com/fr/

projets_2004_Bibliometrie_Sciences_Sociales.htm)

Callataÿ, F. de. 1992. L’activité numismatique dans le monde vue à travers les index des 5 derniers Surveys. Annotazioni Numismatiche 7: 133–141.

Comité National d’Evaluation de la Recherche (CNER). 2006. Pour une meil- leure évaluation de la recherche publique en sciences humaines et sociales. Paris (http://www.cner.gouv.fr/cgi-bin/htsearch).

Dewit, H. 2011. Bibliographie de la numismatique belge 2010—Bibliografie van de belgische numismatiek 2010. RBN 157: 295–318.

Hahn, E. 2012. Analyze this: article records in DONUM. ANS Magazine 1: 46–49.

Hicks, D. 1999. The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social sci- ence literature and the bibliometrics consequences. Scientometrics 44.2: 193- Howgego, C. 1992. The supply and use of money in the Roman world 200 bc to ad 215.

300. JRS 81: 1–31.

Jeanin, Ph. 2003. Revumétrie de la recherche en SHS. Rapport synthétique et final de mission (1999–2003). Ministère délégué à la recherche et aux nouvelles technologies, France (http://www.revues.org/cost/images/1/12/JEANIN_,_

Rapport_final2003a.pdf).

Kosmopoulos, C., and D. Pumain. 2008. Révolution numérique et évaluation

bibliométrique dans les sciences humaines et sociales. Revue européenne des

sciences sociales 46 (141): 73–86.

(23)

Annex 1. Data for Defunct Numismatic Periodicals (see P

ublishor

P

erish

, August 15, 2013)

Journal G index H index Citations Papers

ANS Museum Notes (USA 1945–1988) 13 11 497 94

Numismatic Circular (ENG 1892) 7 5 237 143

Zeitschrift für Numismatik

(GER 1874–1935) 7 5 105 224

Hamburger Beiträge zur Numismatik

(GER 1947–1984) 6 5 106 36

Journal International d’Archéologie et de

Numismatique (GRE 1898–1927) 6 3 41 8

Berliner Münzblätter (GER 1863–1942) 4 4 38 12

Numario Hispanico (SPA 1952–1967) 4 3 51 19

Numismaticky SboRNik (TCH 1953–1989) 4 3 35 22

Blätter für Münzfreunde (GER 1875–1963) 3 3 28 12

Circolo Numismatico Napoletano

(ITA 1916–1990) 3 2 13 4

Deutsches Jahrbuch für Numismatik

(GER 1938–1941) 3 2 15 4

Annotazioni Numismatiche

(ITA 1991–2002) 2 2 15 9

Annuaire de la Société française de Numismatique et d’Archéologie (FRA 1866–1896)

2 2 12 58

Aréthuse (FRA 1923–1931) 2 2 12 5

Bollettino di Numismatica e di Arte della

Medaglia (ITA 1903–1905) 2 2 12 7

Bollettino italiano di Numismatica

(ITA 1983–2009) 2 2 6 3

Canadian Antiquarian and Numismatic

Journal (CAN 1872–1933) 2 2 18 8

CronacaNumismatica (ITA 1989–2011) 2 2 5 9

Démaréteion (FRA 1935–1936) 2 2 4 10

Gazette numismatique française

(FRA 1897–1914) 2 2 6 3

De Geuzenpenning (HOL 1951–1978) 2 2 7 3

(24)

Mitteilungen bayerischen numismatischen

Gesellschaft (GER 1882–1937) 2 2 8 3

Monatsblatt der numismatischen

Gesellschaft in Wien (AUT 1891–1917) 2 2 4 2

Periodico di Numismatica e Sfragistica

(ITA 1868–1874) 2 2 12 6

Rassegna Numismatica (ITA 1904–1930) 2 2 11 5

Numizmatičar (SER 1978–1996) 1 2 4 5

Annuario Numismatico Rinaldi

(ITA 1947–1950) 1 1 2 1

Archéonumis (FRA 1972–1976) 1 1 2 1

Archiv für Medaillen und Plaketten-Kunde

(GER 1913–1926) 1 1 4 1

Helvetische Münzenzeitung

(SWI 1967–2001) 1 1 3 1

Numismatische Beiträge (GER 1968–1990) 1 1 2 1

Blätter für Münzkunde (GER 1834–1844) 0 0 0 0

Bulletin de la Société suisse de

Numismatique (SWI 1882–1892) 0 0 13 0

Courrier Numismatique (FRA 1923–1934) 0 0 0 0

Frankfurter Münzzeitung

(GER 1900–1933) 0 0 0 0

Der Münzen- und Medaillensammler

Berichte (GER 1961–1990) 0 0 0 1

Numismatické Listy (TCH 1945–1989) 0 0 0 6

This list partly mirrors the tragic political history of the twentieth century with

its two World Wars which, among others, several German numismatic societies

didn’t survive, or, in the 1990s, the fall of communist regimes known to have been

favorable for non-profit historical enterprises (admittedly sometimes tainted by

nationalism) while the market economy proved to be lethal. Standing well beyond

are the Museum Notes of the American Numismatic Society, now replaced by the

American Journal of Numismatics. It is clear that the combined results of these two

periodicals which is just one with different names through time would rank very

high on Table 3, possibly just behind the Revue Numismatique.

(25)

AIIN 2009 (37 quotations) AIIN 73, 136, 137, 193 AJN (+MN) 137

AnnotazioneNum 137

BCEN 135

BollNum 175, 178, 228

BSNR 170, 170

NC 101, 101, 137 Numismat 138

RBN 100

RIN 27, 135, 149, 173, 180, 184, 184, 188, 228 (9)

RN 135, 135, 136, 152, 178, 187

(6)

SCN 149, 169, 170, 170

SNR 174

AIIN 2010 (50 quotations)

AIIN 27, 116, 287, 289, 339 (5) AJN (+MN) 56, 72, 339

BSFN 77, 339

NAC 62, 78, 84, 318, 338 (5) NC 83, 93, 339, 339, 339, 351

(6)

Numismatica 351

RBN 57, 57, 96, 338, 338, 339, 339, 339 (8)

RIN 65, 65, 66, 66, 66, 132, 288, 288, 350 (9)

RN 57, 60, 65, 72, 72, 73, 79, 339

(8)

SM 338

SNR 28, 74

AIIN 2011 (39 quotations)

AIIN 25, 44, 48, 48, 48, 65, 89, 91, 91, 91 (10)

AJN (+MN) 26, 26, 64, 92, 127, 127 (6) BollNum 44, 132

BSFN 130, 130

GacNum 133

NAC 129, 199

NC 27, 34, 44, 63, 63 (5)

RBN 32

RIN 31, 44, 90, 132 RN 32, 63, 134 SNR 20, 21, 64

Annex 2. Details of cited literature for a sample of numismatic periodicals (by periodicals)

AJN 2009 (102 quotations)

AIIN 25, 45, 121, 196(4) AJN (+ MN) 25, 27, 27, 27, 27, 31, 46, 82,

82, 83, 83, 83, 97, 97, 149, 195, 199 (17)

BCEN 47

Cercetari

Numismatice 197, 201

HBN 199

INJ 120, 199

INR 44, 45, 46, 120, 121, 121 (6)

JNG 199

NAC 25, 84, 97

NC 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 26, 47, 82, 82, 83, 83, 83, 96, 97, 149, 150, 150, 150, 194, 194, 195, 195, 195, 197, 197, 199,199,199,199, 200, 201, 201, 202, 203 (34) NCirc 150, 194, 199

NNA 83

NomChron 198 Notae Numismaticae 198 Numismatika i Sfragistika 198 Numizmatičar 198

NZ 202

Rassegna

Numismatica 25

RBN 25, 25, 25, 26, 26, 31, 31, 45, 195, 202 (10)

RIN 198, 198

RN 26, 26, 83, 84, 84, 199 (6) SNR 46, 197, 199

AJN 2010 (25 quotations)

AJN (+ MN) 33, 33, 77, 77, 113 (5) ANS Magazine 212, 212, 215, 215, 215 (5)

BCEN 117

BNJ 211, 216

INR 77, 78

JIAN 22

JNFA 13

NC 77

NCirc 213

Numismatische Beiträge 211

(26)

RBN 78

RN 76, 214

Shekel 214

SNR 113

AJN 2011 (93 quotations)

AIIN 83, 85, 138, 138, 138, 141, 143, 146, 150 (9)

AJN (+ MN) 33, 52, 54, 54, 81, 84, 84, 84, 86, 139, 140, 143, 145, 145, 150, 179, 179 (17)

BSFN 81, 165

BSNR 14

Celator 33

GacNum 150, 152

INJ 51, 52, 52, 53, 53 (5) INR 52, 52, 52, 53

JNG 166

NC 33, 53, 82, 84, 85, 137, 139, 144, 144, 145, 145, 145, 146, 147, 147, 148, 150, 165, 166

(19)

NCirc 167

NumHisp 227 Numisma 138, 227 Numizmatika 14

RBN 81, 138, 138, 149, 152, 152 (6)

RIN 81, 165

RN 15, 85, 137, 138, 142, 142, 143, 143, 149, 165 (10)

SM 81, 85

SNR 81, 85, 137, 138, 139, 147 (6)

ZfN 83

INR 2010 (69 quotations)

AJN (+ MN) 10, 10, 12, 12, 12, 54, 55, 56, 57, 65, 96, 97, 158, 172, 173 (15)

ANA Journal 121

BSFN 10

BullCount 19

INJ 19, 29, 39, 54, 97, 121, 158, 158 (8)

INR 10, 28, 30, 121, 141, 149,

149 (7)

JNG 95

NAC 56

NC 10, 11, 11, 11, 11, 12, 12, 19, 56, 56, 96, 158, 158,

172 (14)

NCirc 10

NNÅ 56

NomChron 158

RBN 10, 11, 11, 97, 138 (5) RN 10, 10, 65, 96, 96, 96, 96

(7)SM 39, 56

SNR 10, 29

WiadNum 28

YarmoukNum 56

INR 2011 (66 quotations)

AIIN 161, 162, 162, 162 (4) AJN (+ MN) 31, 103, 103, 132, 171 (5) ANA Journal 132

Celator 59

INJ 18, 59, 75, 75, 75, 77, 77, 77, 102, 125, 131, 131, 160, 161, 184, 190 (16) INR 16, 18, 18, 31, 31, 31, 33,

33, 76, 131, 132, 132 (12) NC 18, 18, 33, 172, 190, 190 (6)

Notae Numismaticae 16, 16, 119

RIN 160, 171

RN 59, 160, 161

SM 33, 77

SNR 17, 17, 18, 31, 31, 76, 76, 77, 90, 90, 190 (11)

INR 2012 (80 quotations)

AIIN 179

AJN (+ MN) 14, 15, 15, 15, 15, 23, 23, 42, 77, 78, 78, 92, 105, 158, 179, 180 (16) ANA Journal 125

BSFN 77, 77, 79

CahNum 77

INJ 42, 42, 42, 78, 79, 105, 105, 106, 106, 112, 125, 145, 165, 190 (14) INR 14, 15, 30, 30, 30, 78, 80, 80, 92, 105, 112, 125, 143, 165 (14)

JSAN 79

MünstNumZei 165

NAC 180

NC 15, 23, 78, 78, 112, 113,

166 (7)

Numisma 180, 180 Numismatist 143

NZ 144

ONSN 165, 165, 166

RBN 15, 158, 180, 180

RIN 77

(27)

RN 15, 76, 77, 158

SNR 78, 78, 79

YarmoukNum 180

JNG 2009 (45 quotations, 11 papers, 226 p.)

AIIN 122

AJN (+ MN) 56, 58, 58, 59, 60 (5)

CahNum 75

Frankfurter

Münzzeitung 170

JIAN 60

JNG 57, 57, 58, 60, 123 (5)

Medal 150

NAC 56, 59, 122, 123

NC 56, 57, 57, 57, 58, 123 (6)

NNB 56

NCirc 123, 136, 145

NZ 200

RBN 124

RN 56, 59, 60, 73, 121, 122,

123 (7)

SNR 55, 75

ZfN 57, 57, 59, 59, 59 (5) JNG 2010 (33 quotations, 10 papers, 245 p.) AJN (+ MN) 19, 64, 128

BSFN 147, 152

GN 171, 175

HBN 22

JNG 19, 21, 168

MÖNG 129

NAC 68

NC 22, 22, 23, 67, 67, 67, 67, 128, 152, 168, 168, 169, 169, 185 (14)

NNB 208

Nomisma 66

Numizmatičar 194

NZ 135

SM 129

ZfN 20

JNG 2011 (43 quotations, 15 papers, 309 p.)

AJN (+ MN) 128, 209, 209

BSFN 67, 128

CahNum 70

Celator 63

JNG 24, 30, 42, 86, 106, 225,

247 (7)

Medal 257, 257

MÖNG 90, 179

NC 38, 58, 90, 129, 129, 130

(6)

NNB 210

NomChron 27

NCirc 65, 160

NZ 179, 180, 187, 193, 202,

204 (6)

RN 70, 299, 302, 304, 305, 305 (6)

SM 160

ZfN 42, 223

NAC 2008 (46 quotations)

Acta Numismatica 243

AIIN 54, 54, 54, 54 (4) AJN (+ MN) 240

BollNum 456 Cercetari

Numismatice 401

INJ 323, 323, 328

INR 326

JIAN 164

MBNG 54

NAC 141, 324, 327, 366, 367, 367, 398, 401, 455, 457 (10)

NC 54, 193, 239, 239, 241,

243, 399, 401 (8) Numisma 239

Panorama

Numismatico 399 Periodico di

Numismatica e

Sfragistica 432

RIN 54, 399, 399, 432, 456, 456, 457 (7)

RN 323, 398

SM 240

ZfN 457

NAC 2009 (54 quotations)

AIIN 105, 105, 106, 364 (4) Annuario

Numismatico

Rinaldi 312

BollNum 105, 106, 361, 365 (4) Bollettino di

Numismatica e

Sfragistica 361, 362 CronacaNum 297

Elsen Liste 363

HBN 364

MÖNG 276, 320

(28)

NAC 104, 131, 276, 311, 312, 313, 365 (7)

NC 195, 276, 297, 298, 302,

365 (6)

NCirc 364

NumNach 292 Panorama

Numismatico 321 Periodico di

Numismatica e

Sfragistica 317

RBN 106, 362

RIN 194, 277, 288, 311, 312, 322, 361, 363, 364, 364 (10)

RN 194, 195, 196, 290, 292, 293, 297, 361 (8)

SNR 364

NAC 2010 (31 quotations) AIIN 142, 146, 346 AJN (+MN) 141 BollNum 155 Celator 383 CronacaNum 382, 382

INJ 233, 233

JIAN 127

MMB 336

MÖNG 383, 383

NAC 142, 145, 214, 405, 407 (5)

NC 233, 233, 233, 382

RBN 134

RIN 146, 158, 406

RN 130, 382

SNR 154

ZfN 382

NC 2009 (106 quotations) Acta Numismatica 220, 221, 227

AIIN 201

AJN (+ MN) 2, 9, 34, 46, 46, 443 (6)

BNJ 215, 215, 453

BollNum 106, 109, 110

INJ 46

INR 47

JNG 524

JNSI 526

JONS 247, 262, 292, 300 (4)

NAC 197

NC 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 13, 30, 31, 34, 35, 43, 43, 43, 43, 43, 43, 43, 43, 51, 55, 69, 70, 71,

137, 137, 174, 197, 199, 205, 215, 215, 215, 219, 269, 287, 292, 408, 453, 453, 523, 523, 523, 528 (43)

NE 275, 275, 279, 284 (4) New Zealand

Numismatic Journal 26

NNUM 33

NumDigest 521

Numizmatika 270

NZ 112, 522

ONSN 141, 269, 272, 275, 280, 281, 287, 287 (8)

RBN 3, 30, 377

RIN 107, 109, 109

RN 43, 46, 107, 112, 245, 408,

425 (7)

SM 23, 197, 522

SNR 8, 57, 202

Yarmouk

Numismatics 280

ZfN 68

NC 2010 (172 quotations)

AJN (+ MN) 14, 54, 90, 196, 352, 353 (6)

ArMNumJour 9, 13, 14

BCEN 117, 202, 203, 239 (4) Beeldenaar 117, 295

BNJ 526, 529

BSFN 12, 117, 117, 120, 120, 198, 200, 200, 219, 229, 292, 294 (12)

Bulletin mensuel de numismatique et d’archéologie 289

CahNum 203

Celator 91, 93, 350 GeldNACh 199

HBN 218

Helvetische

Münzzeitung 120

INJ 322, 322

JIAN 8

JMP 117, 215, 219, 229, 258, 289, 306 (7)

JNAA 197

JNG 8, 117, 117

JONS 21, 27, 30, 35, 37, 40, 41, 47, 47, 353 (10) Money Trend 353

(29)

MÖNG 120, 120, 199, 323, 327,

328 (6)

NAC 71, 200, 200, 200 (4) NC 1, 23, 40, 70, 71, 73, 196,

197, 197, 199, 202, 214, 214, 214, 222, 233, 233, 265, 297, 322, 328, 357, 366,377, 457, 479, 494, 494, 494, 495, 496, 499, 499, 499, 517, 520, 526, 527, 527, 528, 531 (41) NCirc 124, 321, 325 NKözlöny 196

NNA 315

NNUM 220, 294

Numisma 114 Numismatic Digest 46

Numismatist 376 NZ 199, 201, 322, 366 (4) ONSN 25, 33, 351, 351 (4) RBN 8, 200, 203, 203, 229, 235,

245, 248, 353 (9)

RN 8, 30, 40, 91, 114, 114, 117, 196, 196, 200, 201, 201, 203, 214, 214, 223, 231, 254, 258, 295, 297, 304, 311, 351, 358 (25) SeabyCMB 352

SM 120

SNR 70, 123, 203, 203 (4)

ZfN 196

NC 2011 (187 quotations)

AIIN 51, 53, 63, 63, 90, 90, 104 (7)

AJN 4, 52, 53, 119, 474 (5)

ASFN 182

BCEN 184, 184, 311, 462 (4) Berliner Münzblätter 310

Blätter für

Münzfreunde 310, 311, 313

BNJ 259, 306, 306, 306, 308, 310, 312,425 (8)

BollNum 59

BSFN 183, 209, 306, 311, 313,

472 (6)

CahNum 207

Cercle numismatique

Val de Salm 307, 307, 307, 307 (4) Gazette numismatique 11, 313

GeldNach 308, 308, 308, 308, 308,

404,427 (7)

De Geuze Penning 182

INJ 67, 68, 71, 72, 72, 181, 183 (7)

INR 51

JIAN 127

JNG 51, 57, 313

JNSI 477

JONS 491

MÖNG 111, 184, 480

NAC 56, 181, 182, 182, 183, 183, 446, 507 (8)

NC 2, 2, 51, 52, 52, 52, 59, 67, 67, 111, 121, 122, 181, 182, 182, 184, 202, 203, 257, 309, 310, 310, 313, 314, 423, 425, 469, 469, 469, 470, 474, 475, 475, 484, 485, 485, 485, 494, 497, 497 (40)

NCirc 308, 309

NZ 113, 130, 365

Numismatische

Zeitung 313, 313

ONSN 478

RBN 183, 307, 307, 307, 310, 311, 311, 312, 312, 312, 312, 312, 312, 312, 312, 314, 314, 426, 426, 511 (20)

RIN 112, 113, 116, 116, 182 (5) RN 50, 51, 51, 51, 111, 111,

117, 181, 181, 182, 208, 309, 314, 405 (14) SM 53, 53, 113, 208, 310, 310,

310, 311 (8) SNR 52, 123, 181, 310 (4) Studia Numismatica 309

WN 204

ZfN 1, 111, 309, 309, 310, 311, 312, 314, 314, 426 (10) RBN 2009 (82 quotations)

AIIN 40, 132, 133, 134 (4) AJN (+ MN) 23, 27, 27, 78, 79, 127,

132, 147, 181 (9)

BCEN 51

Beeldenaar 226 Blätter für

Münzkunde 212, 213

BNJ 217

BollNum 8

BSFN 8, 8, 147

(30)

CahNum 30

JEGMP 214

JNG 33, 35, 178

NAC 30, 168

NC 7, 11, 28, 29, 92, 92, 92, 92, 109, 132, 134, 147 (12) NomChron 28

NZ 130, 188

RBN 30, 32, 41, 76, 78, 79, 144, 168, 169, 210, 211, 211, 212, 212, 213, 215, 219, 219, 219, 219, 223, 226, 226, 228 (24)

RN 28, 42, 73, 126, 168, 194,

217 (7)

SM 135

SNR 35, 130, 132

ZfN 34, 48, 197

RBN 2010 (51 quotations)

AIIN 30, 41

AJN (+ MN) 38, 39

BSFN 28, 43

ClasNumRev 31 Gazetta Numismatica 27 GeldNach 129

JEGMP 225

JNG 81, 213

Medal 129

MÖNG 74

NAC 36

NC 28, 57

NCirc 129

NZ 80, 100, 100

RBN 18, 55, 55, 57, 105, 106, 106, 106, 106, 106, 106, 129, 130, 137, 148, 159, 176, 177, 180, 190, 190, 190, 190, 222 (24)

RIN 98

RN 30, 40, 50

Slmovenska

Numiematika 81

SM 129

RBN 2011 (124 quotations) Acta Numismatica 191

AIIN 126

AJN (+ MN) 13, 13, 16, 16, 48, 52, 52, 52, 53, 89, 89, 90, 91, 92, 92, 92, 92, 92, 93, 93, 93,

111, 112, 117, 126, 128, 151, 192 (28)

BNJ 195

BollNum 8

INR 90, 125, 127, 128 (4)

JIAN 43, 111

JEGMP 186, 202, 204

JMP 176, 176, 176, 176, 176, 178, 182, 182 (8)

JNG 29

Muntklapper 232

NAC 19, 26, 33, 44 (4)

NC 39, 90, 92, 92, 93, 112, 112, 112, 112, 129, 146, 146, 194, 195, 197 (15) NomChron 145

NZ 8

RBN 26, 26, 33, 34, 35, 44, 44, 44, 44, 45, 89, 89, 90, 90, 92, 111, 111, 112, 118, 118, 126, 146, 176, 176, 189, 209, 222, 230, 230, 232, 234, 235, 237, 237,

243 (35)

RIN 89

RN 10, 34, 52, 91, 91, 92, 92, 126, 167 (9)

SeabyCMB 192

SM 91

SNR 11, 14, 40, 47, 89, 128 (6) RIN 2009 (141 quotations)

Acta Numismatica 376

AIIN 75, 76, 76, 121, 166, 259, 296, 296, 354, 577, 587 (11)

AJN (+ MN) 315, 351, 352, 352, 353, 542, 587 (7)

Berliner Münzblätter 294 Biuletyn

Numizmatyczny 352

BNJ 293

BollNum 75, 75, 75, 259, 477, 478 (6)

BSFN 350, 587

CahNum 76

Celator 315

CronacaNum 166, 531, 531, 531 (4)

INJ 351, 353

INR 121

JNG 353

(31)

LNVindobonenses 588

Medal 477

Medaglia 477, 477, 478

NAC 124, 259, 376, 376, 376, 376, 603 (7)

NC 75, 76, 76, 293, 293, 294, 294, 294, 315, 350, 350, 350, 350, 351, 351, 351, 351, 353, 353, 587 (20) Numisma 295

Numismatica 395 Numizmatičar 122, 294 Numismatiska

Meddelanden 165

Nummus 294

NZ 36, 315

Panorama

Numismatica 435, 435, 435, 531 (4) Rassegna

Numismatica 352

RIN 75, 75,77, 120, 120, 120, 120, 121, 123, 124, 165, 165, 166, 196, 259, 259, 315, 353, 376, 395, 435, 435, 435, 436, 436, 436, 477, 478, 499, 499, 531, 536, 542, 577, 577, 587,

603 (37)

RN 75, 77, 77, 120, 120, 121, 122, 225, 259, 294, 351,

352 (12)

SM 36, 36

SNR 165, 315, 602

SCN 294

ZfN 75

RIN 2010 (103 quotations)

AIIN 122, 123, 123, 123, 123, 123, 124, 202, 468, 468,

534 (11)

AJN (+MN) 42, 401, 476, 534,539 (5)

BCEN 542

BollNum 199, 199, 202, 203, 502,

502 (6)

BSFN 356

CronacaNum 230, 230, 230, 356 (4)

GacNum 505

Medaglia 398, 401, 433

MÖNG 356

NAC 122, 122, 169, 169, 199, 202, 203, 203 (8)

NC 38, 122, 124, 169, 201,

201, 203, 203, 356, 357, 476, 534, 539 (13) NKozloni 40

NNA 475

Numismatica 356 Numizmatičar 42 Numizmaticke

Vijesti 41, 42, 42 Numismaticky

Sboenrnik 201

NZ 38, 532

Panorama

Numismatica 496

RIN 38, 42, 43, 74, 123, 169, 200, 201, 201, 201, 202, 202, 230, 230, 230, 266, 266, 266, 400, 400, 432, 460, 468, 488, 503, 534, 534, 539, 548, 552 (30)

RN 505

SM 38, 534

SNR 43, 124, 201

WN 552

RIN 2011 (75 quotations)

ActaNum 95

AIIN 253

AJN (+MN) 47, 443

BollNum 239, 239, 240, 322

BSNR 435

CronacaNum 198

Medaglia 376, 376, 376, 464, 464,

464 (6)

NAC 126, 210, 239, 375, 400 (5) NC 47, 47, 94, 94, 322, 402,

420, 448 (8) Numismatica 240, 464, 464

NumKöz 435

Panorama

Numismatico 159, 159

RBN 126, 401

RIN 127, 127, 160, 160, 198, 210, 238, 238, 293, 294, 294, 321, 322, 322, 375, 375, 401, 424, 424, 424, 427, 435, 435, 443, 476, 476, 479, 479 (28)

RN 95, 95, 96, 96

SM 238, 293

SNR 27, 126, 128, 322

(32)

RN 2009 (139 quotations)

AIIN 199

AJN (+ MN) 79, 118, 363, 363, 366, 367, 435, 445 (8)

ArmJNumJour 374

BNJ 297, 297, 299, 303 (4) BollNum 198

BSFN 7, 78, 79, 79, 80, 189, 199, 211, 213, 297, 298, 298, 299, 299, 299, 299, 300, 300, 301, 301, 301, 301, 301, 302, 303, 304, 304, 304, 305, 312, 313, 315, 318, 319, 320, 321, 323, 387, 389, 473 (40) Bulletin de

Numismatique 301

CahNum 298, 302, 302, 302, 303,

356 (6)

Courrier Numismatique et Archéologique 331

GacNum 356

INJ 82

MittBayNumGes 189

NAC 178, 189, 190, 304, 429 (5) NC 79, 79, 79, 80, 80, 80, 80,

117, 117, 151, 151, 152, 192, 302, 302, 302, 379, 431, 444 (19)

NCirc 363

NNA 301, 303

NomChron 79 Numisma 356

NNB 300

NZ 150, 440

RBN 80, 174, 219, 299, 301, 303, 303, 304, 365 (9)

RIN 167, 197, 441

RN 79, 79, 80, 80, 80, 114, 155, 177, 212, 213, 219, 297, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 304, 311, 315, 322, 362, 365, 393, 441 (26)

SNR 197, 357, 364

RN 2010 (155 quotations) Acta Numismatica 146

AIIN 146, 147, 281, 284, 313,

315 (6)

AJN (+ MN) 34, 93, 147, 235 (4)

Annotazioni

numismatiche 224

BCEN 233, 414

Berliner Münzblätter 295, 297 BollNum 145

BSFN 28, 39, 41, 44, 49, 69, 70, 91, 91, 99, 175, 176, 176, 196, 240, 480, 482, 482, 482, 485, 512, 517, 553 (23)

BSNRomanie 296 CahNum 230, 510, 517 Gazzettino

Numismatico 281 GeldNach 414

INJ 92, 223,224

INR 223, 224, 233

JIAN 220

JNAAustralia 234

JNG 230, 233, 281, 427 (4) NAC 196, 281, 295, 297 (4)

NC 92, 102, 145, 145, 146,

154,197, 198, 221, 223, 223, 227, 227, 227, 228, 231, 234, 315, 365, 365, 365, 365, 457 (23)

NCirc 147

NNBlatt 233, 233, 233 Numismatika i

Sphragistica 224 Numismaticke Vijesti 415 Numismatique de l’Alsace 205

NZ 365, 415, 421, 439 (4) RBN 69, 106, 282, 427, 455 (5) RIN 144, 219, 220, 221, 222,

222, 225, 225, 233, 282,

326 (11)

RN 34, 34, 38, 70, 91, 91, 96, 97, 107, 144, 146, 155, 175, 176, 196, 197, 197, 197, 229, 229, 282, 282, 437, 441, 480, 480, 496, 561, 561, 561, 572 (31) SM 34, 281, 282, 283, 285 (5) SNR 98, 106, 146, 154, 177,

283, 326 (7) RN 2011 (91 quotations) Acta Numismatica 320

AJN (+ MN) 273, 341, 364, 364, 468 (5)

BCEN 45

(33)

BNJ 278, 279

BSFN 30, 84, 119, 258, 273, 277, 277, 320, 340, 372, 536 (11)

CahNum 271, 271, 282, 282, 283, 494 (6)

GacNum 260, 375, 385 Gazette numismatique 523

JNG 408

Mélanges de

numismatique 491

NAC 31

NC 45, 218, 257, 354, 377,

378, 403, 408, 467, 468, 468, 468 (12)

Numario Hispanico 352 Numisma 244, 244, 277

NZ 45, 340

RBN 83, 273

RIN 29, 30, 31, 32, 182, 218,

491 (7)

RN 30, 44, 45, 83, 83, 98, 111, 119, 119, 119, 218, 261, 261, 273, 289, 321, 324, 359, 361, 363, 376, 377, 403, 408, 409, 467, 491,

524 (28)

SNR 273, 276, 379

SNR 2009 (97 quotations)

AIIN 41, 48, 108, 174, 195, 213 (6)

AJN (+MN) 18, 60, 110, 128, 152, 162, 173, 187, 190, 233, 293 (11)

BollNum 174, 177, 187, 196, 302 (5)

BSFN 293

CahNum 292

Celator 293

INJ 253

INR 171

JIAN 293

JNAA 54

JNG 41, 48, 152, 152, 177 (5)

MBNG 47

NAC 47

NC 18, 55, 55, 55, 62, 112, 152, 152, 153, 153, 153, 220, 226, 233, 234, 253,

293 (17)

NomChron 293, 293

Numisma 98

NZ 207, 237

RBN 47, 237, 252, 289, 290, 292 (6)

RIN 47, 48, 213, 213, 228, 302,

303 (7)

RN 59, 104, 104, 104, 152,

152, 161, 162, 190, 254 (10)

SM 43, 187, 289, 292

SNR 25, 60, 61, 63, 127, 179, 207, 232, 293 (9)

ZfN 55, 128, 152

SNR 2010 (41 quotations)

AIIN 23

AJN (+MN) 69, 69, 76, 108

JIAN 115

JNG 70, 87, 179

NAC 9

NC 11, 87, 108, 115, 177, 179,

264 (7)

NZ 69, 176, 177, 177, 177, 178, 178, 178 (8)

RBN 179, 264

RIN 82, 86, 110, 264

RN 115, 175, 177

SM 115

SNR 8, 14, 109, 273

ZfN 109, 179

SNR 2011 (30 quotations) AJN (+MN) 97, 179

BCEN 97

BlätterMünzfreunde 157 BollNum 115

BSFN 158

CahNum 124

MBGN 157

NC 31, 66, 66, 66, 66, 97, 121,

183 (8)

NZ 97, 157

RN 115, 156, 157

SM 97, 114, 157, 172

SNR 31, 31, 31, 66, 172 (5)

Références

Documents relatifs

This study summarizes the refit of the 8.2 m LOA Government of Nunavut owned research vessel RV Papiruq to make it suitable for fisheries research in coastal (i.e.,

- In case of very different sclare measures between the variables, it is better to use the normalized Euclidean distance to give all the variables the same weight.. Note that this

The C++ language files contain the definition of the stochastic types on which the control of accuracy can be performed, CADNA C specific functions (for instance to enable or

Atlantic Provinces Library Association Lisa Goddard.. Memorial University Libraries

Here are some of them: no papers adopted interpretive paradigm, only one paper used theory, and more than one-quarter papers had no discernable research method.. However,

En dressant la typologie de la mise en forme des pages commémoratives sur la Révolution Mexicaine dans la presse illustrée entre 1921 et 1940, nous constatons l’abandon

This is further supported by the more prominent failure of micro-specimens within the hybrid layer after 1-year water storage, as was observed by SEM after bond strength testing, and

Given a Hilbert space H characterise those pairs of bounded normal operators A and B on H such the operator AB is normal as well.. If H is finite dimensional this problem was solved