THE PRESENCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF SMALL CARNIVORES IN OIL PALM PLANTATION AND CARNIVORES IN OIL PALM PLANTATION AND
THEIR ROLE IN CONTROLLING RAT DAMAGE : PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM A CAMERA
TRAPPING STUDY TRAPPING STUDY
Mohd Naim
1, Andreas Dwi Advento ,
1, Sudharto Ps ,
1, Andrew P. , Jennings
2, Geraldine Veron
3, Aude Verwilghen
4, Jean-Pierre
Caliman
11SMART Research Institute (SMARTRI), Jalan Teuku Umar, No: 19 Pekanbaru 28112, Riau, Indonesia.
2Small Carnivores – Research and Conservation, 83 St. Lawrence Street, Portland, ME 04101, USA.
3Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Département Systématique et Evolution, UMR CNRS 7205 OSEB, 57 rue Cuvier, CP 51, 75231 Paris cedex 05, FRANCE.
4CIRAD, UPR Systemes de Perennes, F-34398 Montpellier, France.
Oil palm
4 major Vegetable Oil crops 2010*
Land use:
170 Mio ha
Indonesia = 5.7 Mio ha*
Malaysia = 4.1 Mio ha*
* H t d / t d l t
Fitzherbert et al. (2008) Source: Oil world (2010)
* Harvested area/matured plant
Oil palm
9 Oil palm plantations support fewer species than forests
(Fit h b t t l 2008) (Fitzherbert et al., 2008)
9 19 species of carnivores were recorded in forest adjacent to oil recorded in forest adjacent to oil palm plantations
(Maddox et al., 2007)
Pest problem
in oil palm plantation in oil palm plantation
9 Oil palm subject to attack by pests in the field
9 Rats are one of the most
destructive, causing problems from nursery to mature areas
nursery to mature areas
(Wood and Chung, 2003; Anon, 2007)
Predators of rats
9
Numerous predators of rats include various species of cats, civets, owls, snakes, and monitor lizards
(Wood, 1976)snakes, and monitor lizards
(Wood, 1976)9
The barn owl has been intensively studied
(Lenton, 1984; Smal, 1988; Naim et al., 2010; 2011)
9
But other predators are poorly known, and there are only very few studies on these species, especially in oil palm
S A l (2012)
p , p y p
plantation
(see: Lim, 1974; 1999; Chung, 2000;Scott and Gemita, 2004; Rajaratnam et al., 2007) Source: Ancrenaz et al. (2012)
Camera traps
9 Become increasingly popular in recent years in Indonesia and other
S th t A i t i
Southeast Asian countries
(Maddox etal., 2007; Arlyne et al., 2009; Jennings et al., 2010)
9 Applications range from species 9 Applications range from species inventories to estimation of animal density and abundance
(O’Connell et al., 2011)9 Our study was initiated to investigate the presence and distribution of small carnivore species in oil palm plantation and the effect of habitat within and
d il l l t ti ll
around oil palm plantation on small
carnivore species
Study sites
¾ The study was conducted in two mature oil palm plantations:
Source: Google map
p p
Rama-rama (A) and Libo (B) estates in Riau Province, Indonesia, from March 2012 to March 2013
March 2013
¾ The terrain was flat to undulating
Camera trap positions
LI004
C i i
LI002 LI003
LI001
Camera trap position
Camera trap positions
RA001 RA002
RA004
RA003
Camera trap position
Installation of camera trap
Camera trap position, brands, effort and altitude ,
Estate Site
number Position Camera Brand Trap nights Altitude (m)
Libo LI001 Near Conservation area Reconyx 250 84
LI002 Near Settlement Reconyx 249 63
LI003 Near Conservation area Bushnell 238 51
LI004 Near Conservation area Bushnell 70 34
Rama-rama RA001 Centre of oil palm estate Bushnell 247 32
RA002 Near Forest Reconyx 247 22
RA003 Centre of oil palm estate Bushnell 246 46
RA004 Near Forest Reconyx 109 27
Results
Leopard cat,
Prionailurus bengalensis
Common palm civet,
Paradoxurus hermaphroditus a ado u us e ap od tus
Malay civet,
Viverra tangalunga
Viverra tangalunga
Monitor lizard,
Varanus salvator
Varanus salvator
Records of
small carnivores and reptile
No. of independent pictures CPUE
Estate Camera Trap Small Carnivores Reptile Small Carnivores Reptile
s a ca o es a d ept e
p p p
LC PC MC ML LC PC MC ML
Libo LI001 (cons) 23 15 0 3 9,20 6,00 0,00 1,20
LI002 ( ttl ) 9 3 0 0 3 61 1 20 0 00 0 00
LI002 (settle) 9 3 0 0 3,61 1,20 0,00 0,00
LI003 (cons) 30 4 0 10 12,61 1,68 0,00 4,20
LI004 (cons) 36 1 0 0 51,43 1,43 0,00 0,00
Total Libo 36 1 0 0 12,14 2,85 0,00 1,61
Rama-rama RA001 (centre)( ) 4 2 0 1 1,62 0,81 0,00 0,40
RA002 (forest) 31 0 1 0 12,60 0,00 0,41 0,00
RA003 (centre) 13 0 1 0 5,28 0,00 0,41 0,00
RA004 (forest) 27 1 0 1 10 98 0 41 0 00 0 41
RA004 (forest) 27 1 0 1 10,98 0,41 0,00 0,41
Total Rama-rama 75 3 2 2 7,61 0,30 0,20 0,20
Remarks: CPUE= Catch Per Unit Effort, number of photographs for each animal per 100 trap nights.
LC= Leopard Cat (Prionailurus bengalensis); PC= Common Palm Civet (Paradoxurus hermaphroditus) MC= Malay Civet (Viverra tangalunga); ML= Monitor Lizard (Varanus salvator).
Comparison of occupancy of
small carnivores and monitor lizard
Species Occupancy
Species Occupancy
Libo Rama-rama
Leopard cat 0.36 0.29
C l i t 0 13 0 02
Common palm civet 0.13 0.02
Malay civet 0 0.01
Monitor lizard 0.12 0.01
Remark: Occupancy of each species was calculated using PRESENCE 4.1 software.
Occupancy of
small carnivores and monitor lizard
Location Small carnivores Monitor lizard
LC PC MC
Near forest 0.41 0.01 0.01 0.01
Near forest 0.41 0.01 0.01 0.01
Near consv. area 0.44 0.16 0 0.11 Centre of estate 0.16 0.03 0.01 0.01
Near settlement 0.18 0.06 0 0
Remarks: Occupancy of each species was calculated using PRESENCE 4 1 Remarks: Occupancy of each species was calculated using PRESENCE 4.1
software.
LC= Leopard Cat (Prionailurus bengalensis); PC= Common Palm Civet (Paradoxurus hermaphroditus); MC= Malay Civet (Viverra tangalunga); ML= Monitor Lizard (Varanus salvator).
Activity pattern of leopard cat
leopard cat
6 78 9
phed
near forest area
12 14 16
phed
near conservation area
01 23 4 56
.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ,00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .00 .00
no of photograp
0 2 4 6 8 10
8.00 9.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1,00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 0.01 1.02 2.03 3.04 4.05 5.06 6.00 7.00
no of photograp 17.00-18. 18.01-19. 19.01-20. 20.01-21. 21.01-22. 22.01-23. 23.01-00. 00.01-01, 01.01-02. 02.01-03. 03.01-04. 04.01-05. 05.01-06. 06.01-07. 07.01-08. 08.01-09. 09.01-10. 10.01-11. 11.01-12. 12.01-13. 13.01-14. 14.01-15. 15.01-16. 16.01-17.
hour
17.00-18 18.01-19 19.01-20 20.01-2 21.01-22 22.01-23 23.01-00 00.01-0 01.01-02 02.01-03 03.01-04 04.01-05 05.01-06 06.01-07 07.01-08 08.01-09 09.01-10 10.01-1 11.01-12 12.01-13 13.01-14 14.01-15 15.01-16 16.01-17
hour
2 2,5 3 3,5
ographed
in centre of oil palm
2 2,5 3 3,5
graphed
near settlement
0 0,5 1 1,5 2
8.00 9.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1,00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 0.01 1.02 2.03 3.04 4.05 5.06 6.00 7.00
no. of photo
0 0,5 1 1,5 2
8.00 9.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1,00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 0.01 1.02 2.03 3.04 4.05 5.06 6.00 7.00
no of photog 17.00-18 18.01-19 19.01-20 20.01-21 21.01-22 22.01-23 23.01-00 00.01-01 01.01-02 02.01-03 03.01-04 04.01-05 05.01-06 06.01-07 07.01-08 08.01-09 09.01-10 10.01-11 11.01-12 12.01-13 13.01-14 14.01-15 15.01-16 16.01-17
hour
17.00-18 18.01-19 19.01-20 20.01-21 21.01-22 22.01-23 23.01-00 00.01-01 01.01-02 02.01-03 03.01-04 04.01-05 05.01-06 06.01-07 07.01-08 08.01-09 09.01-10 10.01-11 11.01-12 12.01-13 13.01-14 14.01-15 15.01-16 16.01-17
hour
Activity pattern of Common palm civet
common palm civet
Common palm civet
5 6 7
aphed
2 3 4
no. photogra
0
n 1
hour
Activity pattern of Malay civet
Malay civet
Malay civet
2
phed
Malay civet
1
of photogra
0
No o
hour
Activity pattern of monitor lizard
Monitor lizard
3,5 4 4,5
phed
Monitor lizard
1,5 2 2,5 3
of photograp
0 0,5 1 ,
no o
hour
Rat Damage
10,00
Libo estate 10,00 Bukit Mas estate
10,00
Rama-rama estate
7,50 7,50 7,50
5,00
damage
5,00
damage
5,00
damage
2,50
2,50
d
2,50
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
0,00
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
0,00
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
0,00
year year year