• Aucun résultat trouvé

SlXn REMAINDERS: FUNCTIONS OF SEVERAL VARIABLES,

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "SlXn REMAINDERS: FUNCTIONS OF SEVERAL VARIABLES,"

Copied!
28
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

REMAINDERS: FUNCTIONS OF SEVERAL VARIABLES,

B y A R T H U R S A R D 1

of FLUSHING, INT. Y .

1. I n t r o d u c t i o n . M a n y of t h e r e m a i n d e r s R ( x ) ~ R x in t h e t h e o r y of ap- p r o x i m a t i o n s r e l a t e d t o a f u n c t i o n x ~ x(s), 0 ~< s <_ l, are f u n c t i o n a l s which are linear on C n or Cn_ 1 a n d zero w h e n e v e r x is a p o l y n o m i a l in s of degree n - - 1 . (Defi- nitions are given in sections 2,3 below.) A c c o r d i n g l y t h e following k n o w n t h e o r e m s [5; 2 ; 7 ; l l ] are of i m p o r t a n c e .

M a s s t h e o r e m . S u p p o s e that R x is a f u n c t i o n a l linear on C n a n d zero f o r degree n - - 1 . T h e n there is a f u n c t i o n fl(s) c o]2 such that

(. ,1

R x = ..toX"(s)dfl(s) , x e C~ I

H e r e xn(s ) s t a n d s for t h e n t h d e r i v a t i v e of x. A fuller s t a t e m e n t is t h e o r e m (4:3) below.

K e r n e l t h e o r e m . S u p p o s e that R x is a f u n c t i o n a l linear o n Cn_l, n > 1, a n d zero f o r degree n - - 1 . T h e n there is a f u n c t i o n f ( s ) ~ o)) such that

SlXn

R x = (s)f(s)ds , x ~ C~ . A fuller s t a t e m e n t is t h e o r e m (4:15).

T h e p r e s e n t p a p e r e x t e n d s t h e a b o v e t h e o r e m s to f u n c t i o n a l s on spaces of f u n c t i o n s of several variables. T h e o r e m s (5:11), (6:11), (9:5), a n d ( 9 : l l ) a f f o r d d i r e c t access to i n t e g r a l f o r m s of r e m a i n d e r s in t e r m s of p a r t i a l d e r i v a t i v e s of o r d e r n, and, f u r t h e r m o r e , c o m p l e t e l y c h a r a c t e r i z e t h e cases in which t h e i n t e g r a l f o r m s

1 T h e a u t h o r g r a t e f u l l y a c k n o w l e d g e s f i n a n c i a l s u p p o r t received f r o m t h e Office of N a v a l R e s e a r c h , u n d e r c o n t r a c t w i t h Q u e e n s College, F l u s h i n g , N. Y.

(2)

are valid. T h e integral f o r m s lead, a m o n g o t h e r things, t o appraisals of r e m a i n d e r s a n d to criteria of best a p p r o x i m a t i o n (section 8).

T h e c h a r a c t e r of o u r results is i n d i c a t e d b y t h e following t h e o r e m , which is a c o n s e q u e n c e of t h e o r e m (6:11) a n d l e m m a (6:3). T h e space Bp, q of f u n c t i o n s x = x(s, t) is defined in section 6.

Kernel t h e o r e m . Let p, q be positive integers and a, b fixed numbers, 0 ~ a, b ~ 1. Put n = p + q . Suppose that R x is a functional linear on Bp_l,q_ 1 and zero whenever x is a polynomial in (s, t) of degree n - - 1 . Then there are functions: fi(t), i < p; g(s, t); hi(s), j < q, all in o f , such that

61 ~.I 1

R x =--- --~" foxi. n_i(a, t)fi(t)dt~-I I,, xp'q(s' t)g(s, t)dsdt

i ~ p o

,1

4- . ~ ~foxn-j'j(s' b)hJ(s)ds , x E Bp, q .

) < q

T h e t e r m s in this e q u a t i o n c a n n o t be c o m b i n e d since t h e r e are f u n c t i o n s x ~ Bp, q for which one a n d only one of t h e n ~ - I t e r m s will be d i f f e r e n t f r o m zero.

An i l l u s t r a t i o n is given in section 7.

T h r o u g h o u t we shall consider spaces of f u n c t i o n s defined on t h e u n i t h y p e r - s q u a r e U " : t h e set of points in euclidean m-space w i t h c o o r d i n a t e s all b e t w e e n 0 a n d l, end values included. Our t h e o r e m s t r a n s f o r m in t h e n a t u r a l w a y to spaces of f u n c t i o n s defined on a h y p e r - r e c t a n g l e with sides parallel to t h e axes. T h e f a c t t h a t o u r t h e o r e m s refer to f u n c t i o n s d e f i n e d on U m r a t h e r t h a n on a general c o m p a c t m e t r i c space leads to t h e following a d v a n t a g e : t h e relations defining t h e kernels a n d t h e masses are simpler t h a n t h e y otherwise would be [6; 10].

T h e f u n c t i o n a l s R x to which our t h e o r e m s a p p l y n e e d n o t i n v o l v e all of t h e u n i t s q u a r e Urn; for e x a m p l e , R x m i g h t be d e f i n e d on a space of f u n c t i o n s x d e f i n e d on a subset of U m, for t h e n R x is defined, a f o r t i o r i , on a space of f u n c t i o n s defined o n U m.

T h e spaces B(p) a n d A(p) are i n t e r e s t i n g in t h e m s e l v e s , as t h e c o m p l e t e core of a f u n c t i o n in e i t h e r space is a u n i q u e c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n of t h e f u n c t i o n i n t e r m s of i n d e p e n d e n t elements.

2. Linear f u n c t i o n a l s . R i e s z ' s t h e o r e m . A functional Rx, defined on a space X of e l e m e n t s x, is a c o r r e s p o n d e n c e f r o m X t o t h e real n u m b e r s . Suppose t h a t X

(3)

R e m a i n d e r s : F u n c t i o n s o f S e v e r a l V a r i a b l e s 9 3 2 1

is a n o r m e d linear space. T h e f u n c t i o n a l R x is said t o b e l i n e a r if it is a d d i t i v e : R ( x ~ - y ) -~ R x - ~ R y , x, y ~ X ,

a n d c o n t i n u o u s a t one p o i n t , s a y t h e o r i g i n :

R x - + O w h e n e v e r [ l x l [ - > 0 , x E X .

O b s e r v e t h a t t h e a d d i t i v i t y implies t h a t R 0 ---- 0. I n e a c h p a r t i c u l a r s p a c e X t h a t we consider, we define t h e n o r m ]lxl[ explicitly. A l i n e a r f u n c t i o n a l R x is c o n t i n o u s a t e v e r y p o i n t , a n d h o m o g e n e o u s :

R ( c x ) -~ c R x , c a r e a l n u m b e r , x ~ X .

T h e a b o v e u s a g e of t h e w o r d " l i i i e a r " is t h a t of F. R i e s z a n d B a n a c h . [1, pp. 23, 26-27, 36-37].

All spaces X t h a t we consider a r e spaces of f u n c t i o n s of real v a r i a b l e s ; a d d i t i o n a n d s c a l a r m u l t i p l i c a t i o n of e l e m e n t s of t h e s p a c e a r e t o be u n d e r s t o o d as a d d i t i o n a n d s c a l a r m u l t i p l i c a t i o n of t h e f u n c t i o n s .

T h e s p a c e C~ is t h e s p a c e of f u n c t i o n s x = x ( s l . . . sin) c o n t i n u o u s o n t h e u n i t s q u a r e U m, w i t h n o r m

[Ixl] = Ilxllc~' = m a x ]x(s 1 .. . . . sin) I .

(8) ~ U m

A f u n c t i o n y ~- y ( s l , . . . , sin) is of bounded v a r i a t i o n on U m if it h a s t h e following p r o p e r t i e s : i) F o r all s u b d i v i s i o n s of U ~ i n t o a finite n u m b e r of r e c t a n g l e s w i t h sides p a r a l l e l t o t h e axes, ~ ' ] A 1 . . . A ~ [ is b o u n d e d , ii) F o r one p a r t i c u l a r v a l u e s o of e a c h a r g u m e n t sv, ~ is a f u n c t i o n of b o u n d e d v a r i a t i o n in t h e r e m a i n i n g m - - 1 v a r i a b l e s . Conditions i) a n d ii) i m p l y t h a t for a n y f i x e d v a l u e s o of s v, v ---- 1 . . . m,

is a f u n c t i o n of b o u n d e d v a r i a t i o n in its r e m a i n i n g m - - 1 v a r i a b l e s . W e use t h e s y m b o l c/) t o d e n o t e t h e class of f u n c t i o n s of b o u n d e d v a r i a t i o n in t h e i r v a r i a b l e s , w i t h o u t r e g a r d to t h e n u m b e r of v a r i a b l e s .

(2:1) R i e s z ' 8 t h e o r e m . S u p p o s e that R x i s a f u n c t i o n a l l i n e a r o n C~. P u t

9 t !

(2: 2) r ( s l , . 9 s ~ ) ~ = , ,

ROsi(sl)...08m(Sm) i f S l . . . S r ~ > 0 , where

(2: 3) 08, =

O,,(s) = !

1 if 8 =<

8 t

! 0 if s > s ' .

21 -- 642138 A c t a m a t h e m a t i c a . 84

(4)

T h e n 7 9 ~fi, a n d

f I

(2:4) R x . . . x ( s l , . . . , s,~)dT(s 1 . . . . ,Sm), X 9 C ' ~ .

0 0

C o n v e r s e l y , i f 7(s, . . . . , s i n ) 9 (2:4) d e f i n e s a f u n c t i o n a l w h i c h is l i n e a r o n C ~ .

T h e definition (2: 2) involves a n e x t e n s i o n of t h e d e f i n i t i o n of R, since t h e a r g u m e n t of R is n o t a c o n t i n u o u s f u n c t i o n . Such a n e x t e n s i o n can be m a d e in m a n y w a y s ; one such way, which is d i r e c t a n d c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e e x t e n s i o n of

(2:4) as a L e b e s g u e - S t i e l t j e s integral, is t h e following. L e t

(2:5)

O~,,~(s) , k = l , 2 . . . .

be, for each s', a sequence of c o n t i n u o u s f u n c t i o n s which c o n v e r g e m o n o t o n e l y to 0~,(s). T h e n t h e sequence RO~,~, ~ 1 ( s l ) . . . 0/~, k,,(sm) converges as ( / c l , . . . , k~) -+

! t

(cx~ .. . . , ~ ) ; its limit is t a k e n as t h e d e f i n i t i o n of 7 for s l . . . s m > 0. W i t h this definition 7 will be c o n t i n u o u s f r o m a b o v e for positive a r g u m e n t s :

(2:6) 7 ( s l q - O . . . Sm~-O) : 7 ( s l , . . ., sin), s 1 . . .sm > 0 .

T h e following conditions d e t e r m i n e 7 in (2 : 4) u n i q u e l y : i) ~, 9 ~ l / a n d vanishes when- e v e r one of its a r g u m e n t s vanishes, ii) (2:4) a n d (2:6) hold. [8; 9; 4, pp. 262-271;

1, p. 61; 3].

3. C o n v e n t i o n s a n d f u r t h e r n o t a t i o n . W e say t h a t f u n c t i o n s a ( s 1 . . . s.~) a n d f l ( s l , . . . , sin) are e q u a l w i t h c o u n t a b l e e x c e p t i o n s , a n d we w r i t e t h i s :

06 ~ - f l , w . c . e . ,

if ~ a n d / ~ are e q u a l e x c e p t w h e n s, is one of a c o u n t a b l e set of values, v ---- 1, 2 . . . or m . (Thus ~ a n d fl are equal e x c e p t on a c o u n t a b l e n u m b e r of ( m - - 1 ) - p l a n e s p e r p e n d i c u l a r to t h e axes.) " C o u n t a b l e " is t o be u n d e r s t o o d as " c o u n t a b l y infinite, finite, or z e r o " .

E q u a t i o n s m a r k e d *, such as (4 : 8), are to be u n d e r s t o o d as follows. T h e f u n c t i o n or fl defined in t h e e q u a t i o n is zero w h e n e v e r a n y one of its a r g u m e n t s is zero;

t h e f u n c t i o n is as w r i t t e n w h e n e v e r all its a r g u m e n t s are positive.

W e s a y t h a t a f u n c t i o n a l R x is zero f o r degree n - - 1 if R x = 0 w h e n e v e r x is a p o l y n o m i a l of degree n - - 1 in all its variables.

E x p o n e n t s will fl iicate, n o t powers, b u t powers d i v i d e d b y t h e factorial of

(5)

Remainders: Functions of Several Variables. 323 t h e e x p o n e n t :

s ~ 1, s 1 - = s , s ~ = s ' s / 2 . . . . , s ~ - ~ s m - l " s / m . . .

I n d i c e s are n o n - n e g a t i v e integers, e x c e p t w h e r e o t h e r w i s e i n d i c a t e d .

4. F u n c t i o n s of o n e v a r i a b l e . Let C~ b e t h e s p a c e of f u n c t i o n s x = x ( s )

w i t h c o n t i n u o u s n t h d e r i v a t i v e , s e U 1, t h e n o r m b e i n g

Itxll

= Ilxlle~ = m a x Ixi(s)].

s ~ U 1 i = 0 , . . . , n

F o r c o n s i s t e n c y of n o t a t i o n w i t h l a t e r sections, we define t h e spaces B n, A n as follows :

B n = C n ; A n = B n _ 1 - - - C n _ 1, n > 1 . L e t a b e a f i x e d n u m b e r 0 < a __< 1.

(4:1) T a y l o r ' s f o r m u l a o n B n. I f x e B n, n > 1, then

8

x(s) = ~ ( s - - a ) i x i ( a ) + ~ ( 8 - - 8 ) n - l x n ( 8 ) d ~ , 8 e U 1 9

i < n r

More g e n e r a l l y (4: 1) holds if x h a s a n a b s o l u t e l y c o n t i n u o u s ( n - - 1 ) t h d e r i v a t i v e . T h e core of a f u n c t i o n x in Bn is t h e n t h d e r i v a t i v e x~(s); t h e complete core is t h e core t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e n n u m b e r s xi(a ), i < n. T a y l o r ' s f o r m u l a (4: 1) m a y be u s e d to e x p r e s s all t h e d e r i v a t i v e s of x of o r d e r less t h a n n in t e r m s of t h e c o m p l e t e core of x. Hence [[X][Bn a n d t h e m a x i m u m of t h e a b s o l u t e v a l u e s of t h e e l e m e n t s in t h e c o m p l e t e core of x a r e e q u i v a l e n t n o r m s in t h e sense t h a t e a c h is a t m o s t a c o n s t a n t t i m e s t h e o t h e r .

T h e c o m p l e t e core of x e B~ m a y be t h o u g h t of as t h e i n d e p e n d e n t p a r t of x a n d as a n i n d e p e n d e n t v a r i a b l e .

(4:2) L e m m a . B n c A n = B~_I, n > I . IlXilB~ > ilxtlA~, x e B n . A f u n c t i o n a l linear on A N is a fortiori linear on B,,.

(4 : 3) M a s s t h e o r e m o n B,,. S u p p o s e that R x is a f u n c t i o n a l linear on B n a n d zero f o r degree n - - 1 . T h e n there is a f u n c t i o n fl(s) ~ Q]) such that

1

(4: 4) R x ~- IoXn(s)dfl(s) , x e B n .

2 1 " - 6 4 2 1 3 8 A c t a mathematica. 84

(6)

Conversely, given a f u n c t i o n fl ~ 9 , (4: 4) defines a f u n c t i o n a l which is linear on B,~ a n d zero f o r degree n - - 1 .

T h e mass fl m a y be defined as follows:

(4:5) fl(s') = R (s--~)~-lOo,(~)d~, n _>- 1 , * ,

a

(4:6) fl(s') = ROs,(s ) , n = O, *

The asterisks * indicate t h a t the formulas (4: 5), (4: 6) a p p l y for s' > 0 a n d t h a t fl(0) --~ 0. W e call fl a mass even t h o u g h fl m a y be decreasing.

P r o o f . The t h e o r e m is a corollary to Riesz's t h e o r e m (2:1) for functions of one variable. F o r n ---- 0, t h e t h e o r e m is Riesz's t h e o r e m itself. F o r n ~ 1, Taylor's f o r m u l a (4: 1) implies t h a t

( 4 : 7 ) R x = R I : ( s - - 8 ) n - l x n ( 8 ) d ~ , z E B n ,

since R x is zero for degree n - - 1 . N o w t h e second m e m b e r of (4:7) is defined a n d a d d i t i v e for x n e Co 1. F u r t h e r m o r e I[xn]Iv~ -+ 0 implies t h a t

is (8--8)n-lxn(8)d'8 Bn --> 0 a

a n d hence t h a t R x --+ O. Hence t h e second m e m b e r of (4: 7) is a linear f u n c t i o n a l on C~ for x~ e Co 1. Hence b y Riesz's t h e o r e m (4:4) a n d (4:5) hold.

As in Riesz's t h e o r e m t h e relations (4:5), (4:6) involve a n extension of R x o n t o a space t h a t includes the a r g u m e n t of R in (4: 5), (4: 6). The extension m a y be m a d e in m a n y w a y s ; for preciseness we u n d e r s t a n d (4:5) as a definition b y mono- t o n e limits :

(4: 8) fl(s') = lim R (S--'~)n-~08,, k('~)cl~ , * ,

k .---~ eQ Ca

where 08, ,k(s) is a sequence (2:5). The limit (4:8) exists a n d fl(s'+O) = fl(s'), s ' > O.

The relation (4: 6) is u n d e r s t o o d similarly. This completes t h e proof, as t h e converse p a r t is i m m e d i a t e .

I f t h e f u n e t i o n a l R x is linear on B~_~, n ~ 1, (henee on Bn), t h e relation (4:5) m a y be used w i t h o u t (4:8), since t h e a r g u m e n t of R in (4:5) is an element of Bn_ P The relations (4: 5) a n d (4: 8) will t h e n be eonsistent, since

I8 I8 Bn-1

(4:9) lim (s--~)n-lo,,(~)d~ - (s--i)n-~os,,k(~)d~ = 0 .

k - - > oo a a

(7)

Remainders: Functions of Several Variables. 325 F u r t h e r m o r e (4: 5) implies t h a t

(4: 10) fl(s') = R ( s - - s ' ) ' % , ( s ) .

For, a n asterisk is n o t needed a f t e r (4: 10), since t h e a r g u m e n t of R in (4: 10), when s' ~- 0, is shOo(s) -~ 0 for all s > 0. Also,

S

(4: 11) (s--~)n-lOs,(g)d~ = (s--s')~Os,(s)-{-[(s--a)'~--(s--s')'~]O.,(a), n > 1 , a

8 8 8 t

a s m a y b e s e e n bY w r i t i n g I = f ~ - i ~ S i n c e t h e l a s t t e r m of (4: 1 l) is a p o l y - a 8" a

nomial in s of degree n - - 1 , (4: 5) does indeed i m p l y (4: 10).

(4: 12) A n e x t e n s i o n of R . Once t h e f u n c t i o n 8 has been defined, we m a y e x t e n d the R of t h e o r e m (4::3) as follows. P u t

(4: 13) R + x -~ t Xn(S)dS(s ) , x e B + ,

J u 1

where Bn + is t h e space of functions x with n t h derivative Lebesgue-Stieltjes inte- grable relative to 8 and, if n > 1, w i t h absolute b y continuous ( n - - 1 ) t h derivative.

Then B n c B + a n d R x ~ R + x for x e B~. F u r t h e r m o r e

S

(4: 14) 8(s') ~-- R + (8~-8)n-lOs,(i)di , n > 1, w . c . e . , * a

For, t h e a r g u m e n t of R + in (4: 14) has t h e n t h derivative 08,(s ) for s # s' a n d there- fore is a n element of B + except w h e n s ~- s' is a d i s c o n t i n u i t y of 8(s). Hence b y 13), t h e second m e m b e r of (4:14) equals I 08,(s)dS(s) = 8(s') whenever s' is a (4:

d U 1

c o n t i n u i t y of 8, t h a t is, w i t h only countable exceptions. B y (4: 11), (4: 14) m a y be w r i t t e n

8 ( s ' ) = R + ( s - - s ' ) ~ O A s ) , w . c. e . , *

(Here t h e case n ---- 0 is valid also).

(4:15) K e r n e l t h e o r e m , S u p p o s e that R x is a f u n c t i o n a l l i n e a r o n A,~ ~ B n _ 1, n > 1, a n d zero f o r degree n - - 1. T h e n there is a f u n c t i o n f ( s ) e G]) s u c h that

(4: 16) R x : I Xn(S)f(s)ds , x e B ++,

U 1

w h e r e B ++ i s the s p a c e o f f u n c t i o n s x w i t h a b s o l u t e l y c o n t i n u o u s ( n - - 1 ) t h derivative.

(8)

Conversely, given a f u n c t i o n f(s) e ~ (4: 16) defines a f u n c t i o n a l which can be extended so as to be linear on A n a n d zero for degree n - - 1 .

T h e kernel f(s) m a y be defined as follows:

(4: 17) f(~) = R+(s--~)n-l~a,~(~), w . c . e . , * ,

where

1 if a < = ~ < s , (4:18) Wa,~(~) ---- O~(a)--O~(s) ---- --1 if s __< g < a ,

0 otherwise ;

O~ is defined i n (2:3), a n d R + is the extension (4: 12) with n replaced by n - - 1 . Observe t h a t Bn c B ++ c An; so t h a t , in particular, (4: 16) holds f o r x e B n.

A c t u a l l y B~ ++ is n o w t h e same space as B + defined in (4: 12), b u t this f a c t is n o t used in t h e proof or t h e application of t h e present theorem.

The relation (4: 17) m a y be w r i t t e n in t h e following a l t e r n a t i v e forms, often useful for calculation:

(4: 19) f(~) -~ --R+(s--~)n-lO~(s) --- R+(s--~)n-x[1--O~(s)] , w. c. e., * , since R + x is zero for degree n - - 1 .

I f R x is linear on An_l, n ~ 2, t h e relations (4:17 a n d 19) hold with R + replaced b y R a n d w i t h w. c. e. deleted.

P r o o f : One proof is to apply t h e mass t h e o r e m (4:3) on Bn_ 1 a n d t h e r e a f t e r integrate b y p a r t s [7; 11]. Here we follow P e a n o ' s original suggestion [5] as this leads to t h e simplest proof in t h e case of several variables.

B y (4: 18) Taylor's f o r m u l a (4: 1) m a y be w r i t t e n

x(s) : ~ (s--a)ixi(a) + I (8--8)n-l~l)a,s(8)Xn(8)ds , X e B ++ .

i < n r U 1

Hence

(4: 20) R x = R I u I d 8 ( 8 - - 8 ) n l~a,s(8)Xn(8) . . . . . ' x e B ++ 0 N o w

1

(4: 21) R x --- fodfl(S)Xn_l(s) , x e Bn_ 1 ,

where fl ~c/), b y the mass t h e o r e m (4:3) w i t h n replaced b y n - - 1 . A p p l y (4:21) to (4: 20). T h e n

1 dsy)a,s(8)Xn(8 ) = Iuld~xn(~)i~ldfl(s)wa,,(~), x e B~ ++ , R x = fodfl(s) i w

(9)

Remainders: Functions of Several Variables. 327 b y F u b i n i ' s t h e o r e m since Xn(8)~)a,s(8 ) i s i n t e g r a b l e d~d~(s). H e n c e

Irjld~xn ++

R x = (~)f(~) , x e B , , where

(4:22) f(s) : f l uI[O~(a) - - O~(8)]dfl(8) = - - i U 1 O~(s)dfl(s)= - f l ( ~ + O ) , 1

since I dfl(s) ~ 0 b y (4:21) w i t h x e q u a l to t h e p o l y n o m i a l 8 n-1. Since f l e c]~,

f ~ p

d 0

also. This p r o v e s t h e first p a r t of t h e t h e o r e m .

L e t R + be t h e e x t e n s i o n (4: 12) of R w i t h n r e p l a c e d b y n - - l :

I U l x n - 1

R+x ---- (s)dfl(s) , x e B~_ l + .

N o w ~0~,,(~) as a f u n c t i o n of s is c o n s t a n t e x c e p t w h e n s = ~ , b y (4:18). H e n c e ( 8 - - 8 ) n - - l ~ a 8(8) , ~ Bn_ 1 + e x c e p t w h e n ~ is a d i s c o n t i n u i t y of ft. H e n c e

R+(8--8)n-ly~a,s(~) = I ~)a,*(k)dfl(s) -~ f(~) , w. c. e. , ,1 U 1

b y (4:22). This establishes (4:17),

To p r o v e t h e converse, suppose t h a t f ( s ) e ~1;, Define t h e f u n c t i o n a l R as R x = f(s)dx,~_~(s) -~- f(1)x~_~(1)--f(O)Xn_~(O ) + (s)df(8) .

U z

This f u n c t i o n a l is linear on An, reduces to (4: 16) for x e B~ , a n d vanishes for ++

degree n - - 1.

This completes t h e p r o o f of t h e t h e o r e m .

(4 : 23) R e m a r k . Suppose t h a t a f u n c t i o n a l R * x is linear on B n or A m b u t n o t necessarily zero for degree n - - 1 . One can c o n s t r u c t a r e l a t e d f u n c t i o n a l R x which will be zero for degree n - - 1 as follows:

R x = R * x - - ~ ~ c~xi(a ) , i < n

where c~ = R * ( s - - a ) i, i < n. T h a t R x is zero for degree n - - 1 follows f r o m t h e f a c t t h a t x(s) = ~ (s--a)~xi(a) w h e n e v e r x is a p o l y n o m i a l of degree n - - 1 . N o w R x is

i ~ n

linear on B~ or A~ w h e n e v e r R * x is. T h u s t h e mass or kernel t h e o r e m s m a y be

(10)

a p p l i e d t o R x t o give a f o r m for R ' x :

R * x : R x + ~ cixi(a ) .

i<~ n

5. F u n c t i o n s o f t w o v a r i a b l e s . T h e s p a c e Bp, q. L e t a, b be f i x e d n u m b e r s , 0 _< a, b ~ 1 ; a n d let 19, q b e f i x e d n o n - n e g a t i v e integers, P u t

n ~ p + q .

W e define t h e space Bp, q as t h e space of f u n c t i o n s x ~ x(s, t) whose d e r i v a t i v e s

(5:1)

xi, n_i(a,t), i < 1 9 ,

% ,

q(s, t),

x._j,j(s, b) , j < q ,

exist a n d are c o n t i n u o u s in t, (s, t), s, respectively, (s, t) 9 U s. H e r e x~,j s t a n d s for t h e p a r t i a l d e r i v a t i v e Oi+Jx/OsiOt j a c c o r d i n g t o t h e following c o n v e n t i o n as t o t h e o r d e r of d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n :

(5 : 2) Xi,j ~--

Oi-Pxp,j/O8 ~-p if i > p, j ~ q , OJ-qx i q/otJ-q if i g p, j > q , 0 *+3"

;-nXp,

q/Osi-POt j-q if i > p, j > q

t h e o r d e r of d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n being otherwise u n r e s t r i c t e d . T h u s in t h e last case of (5: 2), t h e d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n s in xp, q m a y be in a n y order, a n d t h e last i ~ - j - - n d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n s m a y be in a n y order. Also, t h e o r d e r in x~,j is u n r e s t r i c t e d if i ~ p, j ~ q. W e shall describe (5:2) as t h e c o n v e n t i o n of Bp, q.

T h e core of a f u n c t i o n x in Bp, q is t h e set of d e r i v a t i v e s (5: 1); t h e complete core of x is t h e core t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e n u m b e r s x~,j(a, b), i ~ - j < n. T h u s t h e c o m p l e t e core consists of 1 f u n c t i o n of t w o v a r i a b l e s ; n f u n c t i o n s of one variable, a n d n ( n + 1)/2 c o n s t a n t s . I n o r d e r f o r t h e core of x 9 Bp, q t o exist c e r t a i n d e r i v a t i v e s of x of lower o r d e r m u s t exist a n d be c o n t i n u o u s ; we say t h a t t h e l a t t e r d e r i v a t i v e s are covered b y t h e core.

T h u s f o r Bp, q, lowing:

(5: 3)

t h e d e r i v a t i v e s in t h e core or c o v e r e d b y t h e core are t h e fol- x~,j(s, t) , i ~ p , j ~ q ;

xi, j(a, t), i + j ~ n , j > q ; xij(s, b), i + j ~ n , i > p .

(11)

Remainders: Functions of Several Variables. 329 The

norm

of x in

Bp, q,

d e n o t e d b y IlXllBp, q, i s defined as the m a x i m u m of the absolute values of the derivatives (5:3), (s, t) e U ~.

(5:4) T a y l o r ' s f o r m u l a o n

Bp, q. I f x e Bp, q,

t

x(s, t) = ~ (s--a)i(t--b)Jxi,j(a, b ) ~ - ~ (s--a) i I (t--t)n-i-lxi'n-i(a' t)dt

i + j < n i < p b

8

~- ~ (t--b)J I (8--8)n-j-lxn-j'j(8' b)d~+T, (s, t) E U ~ ,

j < q a

where

s t

l ( 8 - - 8 ) p - 1 d 8 I ( t - - t ) q - l x p q(8, t ) d t ,

a b '

i"

T = (s,~)P-lXp, o(~, t)d~ ,

~a

ftb(t--t)q-lXo, q(s, t)dt , Xo, o(S, t),

p > : l , q _ > _ l ; p _ _ _ l , q = 0 ; p----0, q ~ : l ;

p : - q : - O .

P r o o f . Suppose t h a t p ~ 1, q >: 1;

x E B p , q.

B y Taylor's formula (4:1),

t

(5: 5)

x(s, t) = ~ (t--b)Jxo, j(s, b)+ fb(t--t)q-lXo, q(S, t)dt,

j < q

l"

(5:6)

Xo,j(s, b) = ~ (s--a)ixi j(a, b)+

( 8 - - 8 ) n - j - - l X n

j j(i, b)d~ , j < q,

~<n--j ' va -- '

(5: 7)

xo, q(s, ~) = ~ ' (s--a)%i,q(a, ~)+ ~)di .

i < p

W e will s u b s t i t u t e (5:6), (5:7) in (5:5). This will lead a m o n g other things to terms involving

t

I (t--t)q-lxi, q(a, t)dt, i < p .

b

N o w this q u a n t i t y vanishes at t = b, t o g e t h e r with its derivatives as to t of order less t h a n q. I t s derivative of order

j, j >=_ q,

is

xi,j(a, t).

Accordingly, b y Taylor's formula (4:1),

t j t

(5: 8)

I (t--t)q-lx~, q(a, t)dt = 2 " (t--b)Jxi,j(a, b) ~- Ib (t--t)n-i-lXi, n_i(a, t)dt, i < p .

b q<=j<n-i

W e now obtain (5 : 4) b y s u b s t i t u t i n g (5 : 6), (5 : 7) in (5 : 5) and using (5 : 8).

The other cases of (5:4) are established similarly and more simply.

(12)

T a y l o r ' s f o r m u l a (5 : 4) expresses x in t e r m s of its c o m p l e t e core. Applied to t h e d e r i v a t i v e s c o v e r e d b y t h e core, (5:4) a n d (4: l) express these d e r i v a t i v e s also in t e r m s of t h e c o m p l e t e core. H e n c e I[XlIBp, q a n d t h e m a x i m u m of t h e a b s o l u t e values of t h e e l e m e n t s in t h e c o m p l e t e core of x are e q u i v a l e n t n o r m s in t h e sense t h a t each is a t m o s t a c o n s t a n t times t h e other.

F o r each x e Bp, q t h e r e is a c o m p l e t e core. Conversely, g i v e n n ( n ~ - 1)/2 c o n s t a n t s : c i'j, i ~ - j < n; p c o n t i n u o u s f u n c t i o n s o f t: z i' n-i(t), i < p ; q c o n t i n u o u s f u n c t i o n s of s:

zn-J'J(s), j < q; a n d 1 c o n t i n u o u s f u n c t i o n of (s, t): z p' q(s, t); there is a u n i q u e f u n c t i o n x ~ Bp, q h a v i n g these e l e m e n t s as its c o m p l e t e core:

xl,j(a, b) -~ c i'j , i - ~ j < n , Xi, n_i( a,t) = z i'n-i(t) , i < p , (5: 9)

%,q(s,

t) = zP' q(s, t) ,

x,~_j,j(s, b) = z ~ J ' J ( s ) , j < q .

This m a y be established as follows. P u t t h e given elements into t h e second m e m b e r of (5:4), using (5:9). T h e second m e m b e r of (5:4) t h e n defines t h e f u n c t i o n x. T h e c o n v e n t i o n as t o t h e o r d e r of d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n e n t e r s here. T o i l l u s t r a t e t h e point, consider a t y p i c a l t e r m :

.t

y -= y ( s , t) = ( s - - a ) p-I I (t--t)qzP-1'q+l(t) d~ , p ~ 2, q ~ 0 m

.) b

T h e n Yo~ q+l( s, t) ~ ( s - - a ) P - l z p-l'q+i(t). Since z p-l'q+l is m e r e l y c o n t i n u o u s no f u r t h e r d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n s as to t are necessarily possible here. H o w e v e r yp_2,q+~(a, t), for e x a m p l e , exists. F o r

yp_~,q+~(a, t) ~-- ~ y p _ 2 , q ( a , t) - - ~ ( s - - a ) zP-l'q+l(t)dt : 0 .

b ~ s = a

T h e r e a d e r m a y v e r i f y t h a t y e Bp, q a n d t h a t t h e c o m p l e t e core of y vanishes, e x c e p t for yp_l,q+l(a, t) which equals zP-~'q+l(t).

An essential p o i n t here is t h a t each i n t e g r a l in (5:4) is differentiable at least p times as to s a n d q t i m e s as to t.

T h u s t h e c o m p l e t e core of x e Bp, q m a y be t h o u g h t of as t h e i n d e p e n d e n t p a r t of x a n d as an i n d e p e n d e n t variable.

(5:10) L e m m a . Bp, q c Bp_l,q, p ~ 1 .

llxllB~,~ >= IIx[IB~_~,q ,

x e Bp, q .

(13)

R e m a i n d e r s : F u n c t i o n s of S e v e r a l V a r i a b l e s . 331

A functional linear on Bp_s is afortiori linear on Bp, q.

Likewise for Bp, q-l, q ~ 1.

T h e c o n v e n t i o n s as to d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n in

Bp, q

a n d

Bp_l, q

are c o n s i s t e n t with one a n o t h e r ; b o t h arc to be followed a t t h e same t i m e w h e r e necessary.

(5: 11) M a s s t h e o r e m o n Bp, q.

Suppose that R x is a functional linear on Bp, q and zero for degree n--1. Then there are functions fli,] E '~]) such that

(5: 12)

R x =.~__~ SlXl, n~i(a, t)dfli'n~i(t)-~- ll SloXp, q(s, t)dfl~',(s, t)

1

+- .--'~ ~loxn-j'J(S' b)dfl'~-J'J(s) , x Bp, q .

J < q

Conversely, given masses fli, j e cl? '

( 5 : 1 2 ) d e f i n e s

a functional which is linear on Bp, q and zero for degree n--1.

The masses fli, j may be defined as follows:

t

fl~'~--i(t') = R(s--a)~l (t--t)n-~-lOt,(t)d-t, i < p , *

b

i"

fln-J,J(s') = R(t--b)J (s--i)'~-J-lO~,(i)di, j < q, *,

a

(5:13)

R I

(s-~)'-%,(~)d~I (t--~),-%(~)d~, p > 1, q > 1, *,

Ca db

ROt,(t ( 8 - - 8 ) p - 1 0 s , ( 8 ) d s , p ~ 1, q = O , *

[3p' q(s', t') = o

t

RO~,(s) \ (t--t)q-lOt,(t)dt , p = O, q ~ 1,

b

ROs,(s)Ot,(t ) , p = q = O, *

T h e asterisks i n d i c a t e t h a t t h e relations (5: 13) hold for positive a r g u m e n t s only, a n d t h a t each mass fli' j is zero if one of its a r g u m e n t s is zero. A t h e o r e m of C. A.

Fischers's [2] is r e l a t e d to t h e p r e s e n t t h e o r e m for p = q = 1 a n d R e m a r k (6: 18) below.

P r o o f . T h e proof is similar t o t h a t of t h e mass t h e o r e m on

B n,

Consider t h e case p >__ 1, q > 1. B y T a y l o r ' s f o r m u l a (5:4),

f: (t--t)n-i-lx i n~i(a, I: !: (t--t)q-lxp, ,(~,

R x = ~ , R(s--a) i t)dt-b R (s--8)p-ld8 t)dt

(5: 14)

_~_ /x, R ( t _ b ) j f 8 (s__~)n

J--lXn_j ' j(~,

b)dg, x ~ Bp, q.

2"<q a

(14)

Since the core of x ~ Bp, q m a y be a n y continuous functions, the t e r m s of (5 : 14) are defined a n d additive on t h e spaces of continuous functions of t, (s, t), a n d s, respec- tively, t h e i n d e p e n d e n t variables being the core of x. F u r t h e r m o r e each t e r m of (5:14) is continuous on C~ or C~, since R x is continuous on Bp, q. Hence Riesz's t h e o r e m applies to each t e r m , a n d (5:12), (5:13) are established.

The other cases are t r e a t e d similarly.

As in (4:5 a n d 6), we u n d e r s t a n d t h e definitions (5: 13) as definitions b y mono- t o n e limits. F o r example,

I~( P-IO~,, I t -q-~ot,,t--

(5:15)

flP'q(s',t')=- lim R s--Y) k(~)d~ (t--t) (t)dt,

k, 1 --> (oo, co) ~a b

p > l , q > l , * where 0,, k(s) is a sequence (2:5).

I f t h e f u n c t i o n a l R x is linear on Bp_l, q, p > 1, (hence on Bp, q), those relations (5: 13) in which t h e a r g u m e n t of R is a n element of Bp_~,q ( t h a t is, t h e first two relations of (5: 13)) m a y be used directly, consistently with their i n t e r p r e t a t i o n as definitions b y m o n o t o n e limits. This is proved as was the similar f a c t for B~_I a n d B n (cf. (4:9)). Likewise for Bp, q_~, q > 1. I f R x is linear on Bv_~, q_~, p > 1, q > 1, all t h e relations (5: 13) m a y , equivalently, be used directly. I n these cases t h e relations (5: 13) m a y be t r a n s f o r m e d b y t h e use of (4:11). I n particular, t h e masses fll, j t h a t are functions of a single variable t a k e on t h e simpler f o r m :

fl~' ~ ( t ' ) = R(s--a)~(t--t')~-iOt,(t), i < p , (5: 16)

fl~-J,a'(s' ) -- R(s--s')~-J(t--b)JO~,(s), j < q .

(5: 17) A n e x t e n s i o n o f / t . Once t h e masses /5 i'j h a v e been defined we m a y e x t e n d t h e R of t h e o r e m (5: l l ) as follows. P u t

(5:18) = z f S / P q(s, t)

+ 2," f x,~i, j(s, b)dfl n-j' J(s), x e By, q,

j < q U

where B~, q is t h e space of functions x for which Taylor's formula (5:4) holds w i t h integrable n t h derivatives a n d whose derivatives in ( 5 : 1 8 ) a r e Lebesgue-Stie]tjes integrable relative to their corresponding masses fli, j. T h e n Bp, q c B~, q, a n d R x = R + x for x ~ Bp, q. F u r t h e r m o r e t h e relations (5:13), w i t h R replaced b y R +, are valid with countable exceptions [13]; t h e relations (5: 13) t h u s modified m a y be t r a n s f o r m e d b y t h e use of (4:11).

(15)

Remainders: Functions of Several Variables. 333 6. F u n c t i o n s o f t w o v a r i a b l e s . T h e s p a c e .Zip, q, p ~_~ 1, q >: 1.

I n order to o b t a i n a kernel t h e o r e m w i t h converse, we i n t r o d u c e t h e space Av, q, 19 > 1, q > 1, defined as follows: Av, q is t h e space of functions x = x(s, t)

whose derivatives

Xi, n_i_](a, t) , g < 19--1 ,

(6 : 1) Xp_l, q_1(8, t) , n -~ 19+q,

x~_j_~,j(8, b), j < q--1 ,

exist a n d are continuous in t, (s, t), s, respectively, (s, t) e U 2. The order of differen- t i a t i o n in xi, j shall be restricted according to t h e c o n v e n t i o n of Bp_l, q_~.

The core of a f u n c t i o n x in Ap, q is t h e set of derivatives (6 : 1) ; t h e complete core of x is t h e core t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e n u m b e r s xi, j(a, b), i-~j < n - - l , (i,j) # (19-- l, q - - l ) . I n order for the core of x E A v , q to exist, certain derivatives of x of lower order m u s t exist a n d be continuous; we say t h a t the l a t t e r derivatives are covered b y t h e core.

Thus in Ap, q t h e derivatives covered b y t h e core are precisely t h e following: All t h e derivatives in t h e core of Bp_l, q-l, except Xp_l,q_l(8 , t), a n d all t h e derivatives covered b y t h e core of Bv_~, q-1.

The n o r m of x in Ap, q, d e n o t e d b y [IX[lAp, q, is defined as t h e m a x i m u m of t h e absolute values of t h e derivatives of x in t h e core or covered b y t h e core, (s, t) e U 2.

(6:2) T a y l o r ' s f o r m u l a o n Ap, q. I f x ~ A p , q,

t

x(s, t) = ~ (s--a)i(t--b)Jxi, j(a, b)-~ ~ (s--a)i I (t--t)n~-~xi,,~_i_l(a, t)dt

i+j<n--1 i<p--1 b

(i,j) # (p-~, q--D

+ ~ (t--b)J 18 (s-- 8)n--J--2Xn_j_i, j ( i , b)di + T , (s, t) e U s ,

j<q--1 ~a

where

T =

8 t

t ( s - ~ ) p - 2 d i l (t--t)q-2xp-l,q-~(i, t)dt, 19 > 2, q ~ 2 ,

*)a *)b

i8 (s--g) P~-2XP -1 , o(i, t ) d i , 19 > 2, q = I , a

t

Ib(t--t)q-2Xo, q_l(s, t)dt, 19 = 1, q > 2 ,

Xo, o(S, t) , 1 9 = q = 1.

This f o r m u l a is established in t h e same w a y as Taylor's f o r m u l a (5:4) on By, q.

T a y l o r ' s f o r m u l a (6:2) expresses x in t e r m s of its complete core inAp, q. Applied 2 2 - 642138 Acta mathematica. 84

(16)

t o t h e d e r i v a t i v e s c o v e r e d b y t h e core, (6:2) a n d (4: 1) express these d e r i v a t i v e s also in t e r m s of t h e c o m p l e t e core. H e n c e I lxl lAy, q a n d t h e m a x i m u m of t h e a b s o l u t e values of t h e e l e m e n t s in t h e c o m p l e t e core of x are e q u i v a l e n t n o r m s in t h e sense t h a t each is a t m o s t a c o n s t a n t t i m e s t h e other.

F o r each x 9 q t h e r e is a c o m p l e t e core. Conversely, given constants: c i'j, i ~ - j < n - - l , (i,j) # ( p - - l , q - - l ) ; continuous functions

of

t: zi'n~-l(t), i < p - - l ; continuous functions of s : z n-j-i' J(s), j < q-- 1 ; and a continuous function of (s, t) : z p-I' q-l(s, t) ; there is a unique function x 9 Ap, q having these elements as its complete core. This is u n d e r s t o o d a n d established precisely as was t h e similar f a c t (5:9) for By, q.

T h u s t h e c o m p l e t e core of x 9 Ap, q m a y be t h o u g h t of as t h e i n d e p e n d e n t p a r t of x a n d as a n i n d e p e n d e n t variable.

(6: 3) L e m m a .

A functional linear on Av, q is afortiori linear on Ap, q.

Bp, q ~ Ap, q c Bp_I, q-l"

][Xt[Bp, q ~ [IX][Ap, q ~ [lX[IBp_l,q_l 9

is a fortiori linear on Bp, q; a functional linear on By_l, q-1

(6:4) L e m m a . Ap, q c Av_l,q, p > 2 .

IIxtli~,q > IlxltA~_l,a.

A functional linear on Ap_l, q is afortiori linear on Av, q.

Likewise for Av, q-l, q > 2.

(6: 5) M u s s t h e o r e m o n Ap, q. Suppose that R x is a functional linear on Ap, q and zero whenever x is a polynomial in (s, t) of degree n - - 2 that is free of the term 8P-lt q-1. Then there are functions o~ i' j e ~fl such that

(6:6) R x ---- ~ llx~, ~_i_l(a, t)do~"~-i-l(t)-~-11 tlxp_l, q_l(s, t)d~p--1,g-l(8,

t)

i < p - 1 "20 *)0 "10

~- ~ flxn_j_l.i(S, b)d~n-J-l'J(s) , x e A p , q.

j < q--1 vO

Conversely, given masses ~i,j 9 9 , (6:6) defines a functional which is linear on Ap, q and zero whenever x(s, t) is a polynomial of degree n - - 2 that is free of the term 8P--lt q-1"

The masses oJ "i may be defined as follows:

(17)

R e m a i n d e r s : F u n c t i o n s of S e v e r a l V a r i a b l e s . 335

(6:7)

t

al, n-i-l(t' ) --__ R ( s - - a ) i Ib(t--t)n-i-~Ot,(t)dt ,

is n-j-2Os'

o~n-j--l'J(8 ') ~-- R(t--b) j (s--g) (g)dg,

a

0J~-l,

q--l(.~',

t") =

i < p - - 1 , * ,

j < q - - l , * ,

R l'~( s - - P-~O~, ~) (~)d~ I t (t--t)q-2Ot,(t t , - -)d- p > 2, q > 2 *

a b

ROt,(t ) s--g) (g)dg, p > 2, q = 1, *

~ a

t

ROs'(S) l (t--t)q-~Ot'(t)dt ' p = 1, q > 2 , * b

RO~,(s) Ot,(t ) , p = q : 1, *

The proof is similar to t h a t of the mass theorem (5: 11) on Bp, q.

The definitions (6:7) are understood as definitions b y monotone limits (cf.

(5:15)).

If the functional R x is linear on Ap_~, q, p ~ 2, (hence on Ap, q), the first two relations (6:7) m a y he used directly, consistently with their interpretation as definitions b y monotone limits. Likewise for Ap, q--i, q ~ 2. If R x is linear on Av_~, q-l, p ~ 2, q ~ 2, all the relations (6:7) may, equivalently, be used directly. In these cases, the relations (6:7) may be transformed by (4: 11). In particular,

~%i, n--i--l(t, ) ~ R(s__a)i(t__t,)n-i-lOt,(t) , i < p - - 1 ; (6: 8)

o~-J-]'J(s ') : R(s~s')'~-J-l(t--b)JOs,(s), j < q - - 1 .

(6:9) A n e x t e n s i o n of R . Once the masses eci, j have been defined, we m a y extend the /t of theorem (6: 5) as follows. P u t

(6:10)

i<p-i

§ X I x n - J - l ' Y ( s ' b l d ~ - J - l ' J ( s ) ' x e A ; , q , j<q-1 U

where A +, q is the space of functions x for which Taylor's formula (6 : 2) holds with integrable derivatives and whose derivatives in (6: 10) are Lebesgue-Stieltjes inte- grable relative to their corresponding masses ~'~. Then Ap, q c A~, q and R x ~ .R+x for x e Ap, q. Furthermore, the relations (6:7), with R replaced b y R +, are valid with countable exceptions; the relations (6: 7) thus modified may be transformed by the use of (4:11).

(18)

(6: 11) K e r n e l t h e o r e m . Suppose that R x is a functional linear on Ap, q zero for degree n - - 1 . Then there are functions fi, j such that

(6: ~2)

and

Rx = i ~ fu lxi' n-i(a' t)fi'n-i(t)dt -~ I fu/t)' q(8, t)fP'q(8, t)dsdt

§ ~ " I x,~_j,j(s, b)ff-J'J(s)ds, x 9 B;:~q,

<q U

where B+,+q is the space of functions x whose Bp, q core derivatives are integrable and for which Taylor's formula (5: 4) holds. The kernels fi'J 9 ~ . The two particular kernels fp-1, q+l(t ) and fp+l, q-l(s ) vanish at 0 and 1 and are integrals of functions in o]).

Conversely, given a set of kernels fi, j with the properties listed in the preceding paragraph, (6: 12) defines a functional R x which can be extended so as to be linear on A p' q and zero for degree n - - 1 .

The kernels m a y be defined as follows:

(6 : 13)

f~, n-i(~) ~_ R + ( s _ a ) i ( t _ ~ ) n - i - l ~ b ' t(t), i < p, fn-j,j(~) : R+(s__~)n-j-i(t__b)J~a,s(~), j < q , fP' q(~, t)

-~ R + ( s - - ~ ) P - l ( t - - t ) q - l v 2 a , s(8)~Yb, t(~) ,

W, C, e.~

w.c.e.~

w.c.e.~

where R + is the extension (6:9) of R, and ~ is defined in (4:18).

Observe t h a t Bp, q c B~,+q c Ap, q; so t h a t , in particular, (6:12) holds for x 9 Bp, q. A c t u a l l y B~,+q is n o w the same as B~, q defined in (5: 18), b u t this fact is not used in the proof or the application of the present theorem.

The relations (6: 13) m a y be w r i t t e n in alternative forms, b y the use of (4: 18).

I n particular,

(6: 14)

fl,

n-i(~) : __R+(s__a)i(t__~)n-i-lo~(t ) = R+(s--a)i(t--t)n-i-l[1--O~(t)], i < p , w . c . e , with t h e dual relation for f~-J'i(~), j < q.

If R x is linear on Ap_l,q_l, p ~ 2, q __~ 2, the relations (6:13 a n d 14) hold with the q- and w. c. e. deleted.

Observe t h a t R x is surely linear on Ap, q if it is linear on Bp_l, q-l, b y l e m m a (6:3).

P r o o f of t h e o r e m . Since R x is linear on Av, q, we m a y write R x in the form (6: 6).

++ Taylor's formula (5:4), (4: 18), a n d t h e fact t h a t R x is Suppose t h a t x 9 Bp, q.

zero for degree n - - 1 i m p l y t h a t

(19)

Remainders: Functions of Several Variables. 337 (6: 15)

Rx = ~ R(s--a) i fu(t--t)n-i-~y~b,t(t)xi, n_i(a, t)dt

~- R f fu~ ( s - ~)v ~(t--t)q-~Y~' ~(S)~fb't(t)xp'

q('~'

t)d~dt

- - 8 ) n - 3 - 1 ~ a ' s(8)Xn_j,j(8,

b )d~

, j < q

x ~ Bp, q

§

The derivation of (6: 12) from (6: 15) a m o u n t s to t h e interchange of R a n d t h e integral operator in each t e r m of (6: 15). Consider one of t h e terms, for example:

The a r g u m e n t of R in W is an element of

A~), q

whose core in

Ap, q

is zero except for its derivative of index p - - l , q--1. Hence, by (6:6) a n d Fubini's theorem,

W ~ f10

fl0d~P-l'q-l(8, t)flud~dt~f~, ~(~)y~b,t(t)xp, q(~, t ) :

where

(6:16) f(8, t) = l IU~a,s(8)Y~b,t(t)do~P-l'q-l(8, t) .

I t follows from (6:16) t h a t

f(s,

t ) e ~ , since

~p-1,

q--1 ~ . (One m a y actually evaluate the integral (6:16), by using (4: 18)).

F u r t h e r m o r e ,

.fP'q

defined in (6: 13) equals

f

with countable exceptions. For, p u t

y ~-- y(s, t) -~ (s--~)P-~(t--t)q-~y~, ~(s)YJb, t(~) 9

As a function of s, Fa, 8(~) is continuous a n d constant except at s = ~, by (4: 18).

Also Fa, a(~) ~ 0. Hence the derivative yp_l,q_l(s, t) exists a n d equals ~a, 8(s)yJb, t(t) when s 4 ~, t ~= t; a n d t h e other Ap, q core derivatives of y exist a n d vanish. Now Fa,~(~)~b,t(t), s ~= ~, t =4= t, is integrable

daP-l'q-l(s, t)

except when ~ or t is a disconti- n u i t y of ~p-l,q-1. Also Taylor's formula (6:2) applies to

y,

since (s--5)P-l~fa, 8(~)

++ q l(s, t) has discontinuities at only countably m a n y is an element of B~)_a. As ap-1,

s a n d t [13], it follows t h a t y e A~,q with countable exceptions. Hence, by (6: 10),

(20)

~> = ~ = ..ii

~ a . ( ~ ) ~ , , ( ~ > ~ ~-~'~(',

'>

= i(~, ~), w

~ ~

f~, U

A similar t r e a t m e n t of t h e o t h e r t e r m s of (6: 15) establishes (6:12), (6: 13).

W e n o w show t h a t

fp-1, q+l(t )

vanishes a t 0 a n d 1 a n d is an i n t e g r a l of a f u n c t i o n in c,~. T h e kernel

fP+l'q-l(8)

is t r e a t e d similarly. T h u s ,

(6: 17) f p - 1 ,

q+l(~) __~ R(s_a)p-l(t_~)qWb ' t(~) ;

we write R i n s t e a d of R + as in (6: 13) because t h e a r g u m e n t of R in (6: 17) is an e l e m e n t of

Ap, q;

we h a v e s u p p r e s s e d t h e w. c. e., as we m a y . N o t e t h a t

fp-l,q+l(O

) =

R(s_a)P-ltq[Oo(b)_Oo(t)] = 0--0 = O,

since

tOo(t )

is zero f o r all t ~ 0. Also (4: 18), (6:6), a n d F u b i n i ' s t h e o r e m i m p l y t h a t

d~l i1

fp-l,q+l(~) = --R(s--a)p-l(t--~)qo-t(t) = -- ~ (t---t)Oi(t)do? -~'q-~(s, t) =

0 0

w h e r e

T h u s h e G];, since a ~G]~. Finally, f P - l ' q + l ( 1 ) = 0 b y (6: 17) since Wb, t ( 1 ) = 0.

I t r e m a i n s to p r o v e t h e converse. W e consider t h e t e r m s of (6:12) s e p a r a t e l y a n d i n t e g r a t e b y parts. F o r e x a m p l e , g i v e n t h a t fP' q E cp, consider t h e t e r m

U U

fP'q(1, 1)Xp_l,q_l(1 , 1)--fP'q(1, O)Xp_l,q_l(1 , O)--fP'q(o, 1)Xp_l,q_l(O,

1)

-F-fP'q(o,O)xp_l,q_l(O,O)--IiXp_l,q_l(1, t)dfP'q(1, t)-~-IiXp_Lq_l(O,t)dfP'q(o,t ) --flXp-l,q_l(s, 1)dfP'q(s, 1)~-flxp_l,q_l(s,O)dfP'q(s,O)

1 1

+ Io I0 "-~,,-~(''')':'''(''')' "~;,+.

T h e last m e m b e r of this equation is a linear functional on Ap, q, w h i c h reduces to W for x ~ Bp,+q a n d vanishes for degree n - - 1 .

(21)

Remainders: Functions of Several Variables. 339 T h e o t h e r t e r m s of (6 : 12) are t r e a t e d similarly b u t m o r e simply, e x c e p t for t h e t w o neighbors of W. Consider one of these. G i v e n t h a t f P - l ' q + l ( t ) = f~h(t)dt a n d

vanishes a t 1, w h e r e h e o]). T h e n i . 0

I uXp_I t)fP-1, q+t(t)dt ~- -- q(a, t)h(t)dt = -- (t) (a, t) -~

u

i

--h(1)xp_l, q_l(a, 1)-~h(0)Xp_l, q_l(a, O) -~- IoXp_l, q_l(a, t)dh(t) , x ~ B~,+q . B u t t h e last e x p r e s s i o n defines a f u n c t i o n a l linear on Ap, q a n d zero for degree n - - 1 .

(6: 18) R e m a r k . Suppose t h a t a f u n c t i o n a l R * x is linear on Bp, q or Ap, q b u t n o t necessarily zero for degree n - - 1 . As in (4:23), one m a y c o n s t r u c t a r e l a t e d f u n c t i o n a l R x which will be zero for degree n - - 1 :

R x = R * x - - ~ ci, jxi, j(a , b) ,

i ~ j < n

where ci, i ~ R * ( s - - a ) i ( t - - b ) j, i + j < n. T h e f u n c t i o n a l R x is linear on Bp, q if R * x is.

N o t e , however, t h a t g i v e n R * x linear on Ap, q, R x will be linear on Ap, q if a n d o n l y if cv_~, q -~ cv, q-1 ~ O,

7. I l l u s t r a t i o n . A simple i l l u s t r a t i o n of t h e k e r n e l t h e o r e m (6:11) is t h e following. T h e f u n d a m e n t a l r e c t a n g l e is - - 1 ~ s, t < 1;

R x = x(1, 1 ) - - x ( - - 1 , 1)-~x(1, - - 1 ) - - x ( - - 1 , - - 1 ) - - 4 x l , 0 ( 0 , 0) .

T h u s R x / 4 is, a m o n g o t h e r things, t h e r e m a i n d e r in t h e a p p r o x i m a t i o n of t h e deri- v a t i v e x~,0(0, 0) b y t h e i n d i c a t e d c o m b i n a t i o n of t h e c o r n e r values of x.

T h e f u n c t i o n a l R x vanishes for degree 2; R x is linear on B1, 0, h e n c e on A2, l, for all (a, b) ; R x is linear on B0,1, h e n c e on A1, 3, if a n d o n l y if b = 0.

T h e f o r m of R x on B ++~, 1 is .

(7:1) Rx = I Xo,~(a,t)f~ xl,~(a,t)fx'~(t)dt-4-II x~'l(s' t)ff'l(s' t)dsdt

[--l, 1] [--1, 1] --1 ~ 8, t ~ 1

I , B ++

Jr X3, o(S, b)ff'~ x E 2, 1 '

[--I, 13

where, for all a, b,

a n d

f~ = O, fl'z(t) = 2(I--It[), ff'~ = 2(1--[sl) 2 ,

(22)

I (1--1sl) s i g n u m

(st)

if a = b = 0 ,

y'1(8,

t)

/

1 - - s - - 4 ~ if a = b = - - l ,

e q u a l i n g one if s < 0, t < 0 a n d zero otherwise.

T h e f o r m of

Rx

on B ++ ( a , b ) - - (0,0), is 1,2~

(7 : 2)

where

Rx = I xo, 3(O, t)g~ 47 I I x1,:(s, t)gi'2(s, t)dsdt

[--1, 1] --1 --< s, t _~ 1

-@ X2, 1( 8, 0 ) g 2' 1(8) d8 Jl- X3, 0(8, 0 ) g 3' ~ x 1, 2 ,

I-i, i] I - i , i]

g~ = g~'l(s) =

0;

g"~(s, t) =

1--]tl;

g3'~ =

2(1--1sl) 2.

T h e coefficients in f3, 0 a n d ga' 0 are 2 i n s t e a d of 1 because of o u r c o n v e n t i o n a b o u t e x p o n e n t s .

8. A p p r a i s a l s a n d b e s t a p p r o x i m a t i o n s . I f

Rx

is a r e m a i n d e r , we m a y be i n t e r e s t e d in its appraisal. W e m a y appraise t h e s e p a r a t e t e r m s in (5:12) or in (6: 12) in t h e c u s t o m a r y ways. Such s e p a r a t e appraisals are efficient, since t h e e l e m e n t s of the core of x in

Bp, q

are i n d e p e n d e n t .

A l t e r n a t i v e l y we m a y appraise (6:12) as follows b y a g e n e r a l i z a t i o n of HOlder's i n e q u a l i t y . L e t

K i'j

be t h e set on which t h e kernel

fi'Jis

n o t zero; let

[Ki'J{

be t h e m e a s u r e of K i'j in t h e

t, (s, t),

or s space, as is a p p r o p r i a t e ; a n d let K = ~Y'

IKi'Jl.

i+j=n

E x c l u d e t h e case K = 0, for t h e n

R x

= 0 a n d no appraisal is needed. T h e n

(s: 1)

where

[Rxl ~ K i ~ 2 7 ]3Ci, n - i ( a , t)l~dt-~

Ixp, q( s, t)l r

i < p

Ki, n--i KP, q

+ 2 2 b)l d8 i o , x

j < q Kn-], j

Ki, n-i KP, q

I 9 . , 11/e' 1 1

§

Ifn-J'J(s)l* ds , - § j

j < q e

Kn--], )

n l , e > l ,

(23)

l ~ e m a i n d e r s : F u n c t i o n s of S e v e r a l V a r i a b l e s . 341 a n d e x p o n e n t s are u n d e r s t o o d as powers in the o r d i n a r y sense. N o w M~ is i n d e p e n - d e n t of x, a n d t h e m u l t i p l i e r of M~ in (8:1) is a n a v e r a g e of t h e absolute v a l u e of t h e core d e r i v a t i v e s of x in

Bp, q.

F i x e a n d n. Suppose t h a t one has t h e choice of several f o r m u l a s (6: 12) (which m a y be d i f f e r e n t f o r m u l a s for t h e same r e m a i n d e r

Rx

or f o r m u l a s for different r e m a i n d e r s , all in t e r m s of n t h derivatives.) Suppose t h a t one i n t e n d s t o appraise b y (8: 1) a n d t h a t one has no r e a s o n to p r e f e r t h e a v e r a g e of t h e absolute v a l u e of t h e n t h d e r i v a t i v e s on one class of sets

K ~'j

to t h e a v e r a g e on a n o t h e r class of sets

K i'j.

T h e n it is r e a s o n a b l e t o say t h a t t h a t f o r m u l a (6:12) is

best

which minimizes M~ [12].

I n t h e usual w a y we m a y a d m i t t h e values e = 1 a n d e = oo in (8: 1). T h e appraisal (8:1) m a y be a d j u s t e d to assign different weights to t h e core derivatives.

I n practice, t h e calculation of M , is o f t e n decisively simpler t h a n t h a t of Mr, e 4 : 2 .

F o r t h e illustrations of section 7, M 2 has t h e following values: (176/5) ~/2 for (7:1) w i t h a = b = 0; (496/5) 1/~ for (7:1) w i t h a ~ b = - - 1 ; (52/5) 1/~ for (7:2).

I n a similar fashion, we m a y appraise (5:12) b y a g e n e r a l i z a t i o n of t h e t h e o r e m of t h e m e a n :

(8:2)

[Rxl

~ m a x e s s sup

[Ixl, n_i(a,t)l, [xp, q(s,t)l, Ix~_j,/(s,b)l]M, x ~ B ; , q , i<p,j<q (s,t)@ U~

w h e r e t h e essential s u p r e m u m of each d e r i v a t i v e is t a k e n r e l a t i v e to its corresponding mass

fli,j,

a n d

~/Z ~ ~ I Idfl i'n-i(t) l -]- I I [aft p'q(s, t), + ~ I ' d~n-j'j(s) l 9

i < p .) U 1 e) e) U 2 j < q ~ U 1

If t h e appraisal (8:2) is to be used on a class of f o r m u l a s (5: 12), it is r e a s o n a b l e to say t h a t t h a t f o r m u l a is

best

for which M is least.

T h e appraisals (8 : 1 a n d 2) are efficient in t h e sense t h a t a n y r e d u c t i o n of t h e i r second m e m b e r s w o u l d m a k e t h e inequalities false. This is t r u e of (8: 2) because, b y c o n s t r u c t i o n , t h e masses fl~'J are c o n t i n u o u s on t h e r i g h t for positive a r g u m e n t s . 9. F u n c t i o n s of m v a r i a b l e s . T h e results of t h e previous section e x t e n d t o f u n c t i o n s of several variables. F o r t h e m o s t p a r t t h e proofs are d i r e c t generalizations of the earlier proofs. H e r e we s t a t e t h e principle facts. F o r m ~ 1 or 2 t h e concepts a n d t h e o r e m s of t h e p r e s e n t section are t h o s e of t h e p r e c e d i n g sections.

L e t (a) : (a 1 .. . . . am) be a f i x e d p o i n t in Urn; a n d let (p) : (Pl . . . Pro) be f i x e d n o n - n e g a t i v e integers. P u t

n = p ] + . . . +Pm 9

(24)

W e d e f i n e t h e s p a c e B(p) --- B m ... p~ as t h e s p a c e of f u n c t i o n s x = x(s) - - x ( s 1 .. . . . sin) w h o s e d e r i v a t i v e s

(9: 1) xil . . . i r a ( a 1 , . . . , a m ) , i x @ ' ' . @ i m ~-- n ,

a l l e x i s t a n d a r e c o n t i n u o u s i n t h e i r v a r i a b l e s o n U m, w h e r e av, v = 1 . . . m , is e i t h e r t h e c o n s t a n t a v o r t h e v a r i a b l e s~, a c c o r d i n g t o t h e f o l l o w i n g i n d u c t i v e r u l e , w h i c h we call t h e r u l e of B m ... pra:

F o r m = 1, a l = sl 9

( 9 : 2 ) F o r m > 1, (al . . . am_z) --~ (a I . . . am_l) a n d a m = s m if i m > P m ; (a I . . . . am_l) is d e t e r m i n e d b y t h e r u l e of B m ... p~_~ if i m ~ Pm a n d a m = s m if i m = Pro, am = am if i m < P m 9

W e s h a l l u s e t h e r u l e ( 9 : 2 ) t o d e t e r m i n e (a) = (al . . . am), g i v e n i 1 .. . . , i m, i n cases i n w h i c h i l - k 9 9 9 q - i m => P l q - " 9 " -kPm. T h e o r d e r of d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n i n xjl ... j~, w h e n x is c o n s i d e r e d as a n e l e m e n t of B m ... p~, is r e s t r i c t e d as follows. P u t qv = m i n (Pv,Jv), v = 1 . . . m. T h e n xjl ... j~ is t o b e u n d e r s t o o d as a d e r i v a t i v e of xql ... qa; a l l o r d e r s of d i f f e r e n t i a t i o n s i n xq~ ... q,~ a r e a l l o w e d a n d a l l o r d e r s of t h e r e m a i n i n g d i f f e r e n t i a - t i o n s n e c e s s a r y t o c a r r y xq~ ... qra i n t o Xjl ... ]~ a r e a l l o w e d .

T h e core of a f u n c t i o n x i n B(p) is t h e s e t of d e r i v a t i v e s (9: 1); t h e c o m p l e t e core of x is t h e core t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e n u m b e r s Xjl ... jm (al . . . am), j l - k " 9 9 - k j m < n.

(Cf. I l l u s t r a t i o n (9 : 8) b e l o w . ) I n o r d e r f o r t h e core of x e B(p) t o e x i s t , c e r t a i n d e r i - v a t i v e s of x of l o w e r o r d e r m u s t e x i s t a n d b e c o n t i n u o u s ; we s a y t h a t t h e l a t t e r d e r i v a t i v e s a r e covered b y t h e core.

T h e n o r m of x i n B(p), d e n o t e d b y [IXl[B(p), i s d e f i n e d as t h e m a x i m u m of t h e a b s o l u t e v a l u e s of t h e d e r i v a t i v e s of x i n t h e core o r c o v e r e d b y t h e core, (s) e Um.

A b a r y c e n t r i c d i a g r a m of t h e d e r i v a t i v e s of o r d e r n is u s e f u l i n c o n s i d e r i n g t h e core of x i n B(p).

(9 : 3) T a y l o r ' s f o r m u l a o n B(p). I f x ~ B(p),

X ( 8 ) = s ( s l - - a l ) i l . . . ( 8 m - - a m ) i m x i l . . . ira(a) + ~ 1 1 1 2 . . . I m X i l ... ira(3) ,

i 1 + " 9 9 +irn < n i 1 + " " 9 +im : n

(s) e U m ,

w h e r e (3) = (31 . . . 3m) is d e f i n e d i n t e r m s o f (a), d e t e r m i n e d by ( 9 : 2 ) , as f o l l o w s : { sv i f a~ = s~ a n d i v >__ 1 ,

Ty ~--

a v o t h e r w i s e ; a n d the operators I v are d e f i n e d as f o l l o w s :

Références

Documents relatifs

The following result comes from [Deb09], and is not proved in the following paper. Here, G is a function of the one-sided maximum, i.e. conditional on the r.v.. The result of this

Integral representations of several complex variables may be di- vided into three kinds. 1) There is a continuous differentiable sup- port function with a universal

L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » ( http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/ ) implique l’accord avec les

Since the second-order discontinuity points can be found in any of the global optimization algorithms the efficiency of the proposed algorithm FDM was compared with

He used (pluri-)subharmonic majorants and maximal functions to prove the existence of nontangential limits in a.e. This solves the problem in special cases.) As

We prove that continuity properties of bounded analytic functions in bounded smoothly bounded pseudoconvex domains in two-dimensional affine space are determined by their behaviour

Toute utili- sation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale.. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention

Compositio Mathematica, tome 17 (1965-1966), p. Toute utili- sation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de