A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION B
J EAN -M ARC D ERRIEN
On the existence of cohomologous continuous cocycles for cocycles with values in some Lie groups
Annales de l’I. H. P., section B, tome 36, n
o3 (2000), p. 291-300
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPB_2000__36_3_291_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 2000, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section B » (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/anihpb) implique l’accord avec les condi- tions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute uti- lisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
291
On the existence of cohomologous continuous cocycles for cocycles with values in
someLie groups
Jean-Marc
DERRIENUniversite de Bretagne Occidentale, Laboratoire de Mathematiques, 6, avenue Le Gorgeu, BP 809, 29 285 Brest Cedex, France
Received in 28 January 1999, revised 23 September 1999
Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Probabilités et Statistiques 36, 3 (2000) -300
@ 2000 Editions scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved
ABSTRACT. - In this paper, we prove that any
integrable cocycle
defined on a
"regular" dynamical system,
non-atomic andergodic,
andwith values in certain connected Lie groups
(among
which are theconnected,
abelian orcompact,
Liegroups)
admits acohomologous
continuous
cocycle,
whichgeneralizes
a result of A.V.Kocergin [4]
andD.J.
Rudolph [6].
@ 2000Editions scientifiques
et médicales Elsevier SASRESUME. - Dans ce
papier,
on montre que toutcocycle integrable
defini sur un
systeme dynamique "regulier",
nonatomique
etergodique,
et a valeurs dans certains groupes de Lie connexes
(dont
les groupes de Lie connexes, abeliens oucompacts)
admet uncocycle
continuqui
lui estcohomologue,
cequi generalise
un resultat de A.V.Kocergin [4]
et D.J.Rudolph [6].
@ 2000Editions scientifiques
et médicales Elsevier SAS1. INTRODUCTION
Let X be a
compact
metric space, J1 a Borelprobability
on X andT : X ~ X an invertible and bi-measurable transformation that preserves the measure J-L. In the
following,
we also assume that this"regular"
dynamical system (X,
/~T)
is non-atomic andergodic.
Let G be a
(multiplicative)
connected Lie group withidentity e
andequipped
with a Riemannian metric g, invariant underright
and lefttranslations. We call d the associated
geodesic
distance which is also invariant underright
and left translations. This condition ofinvariance,
which is realized if and
only
ifAd(G)
iscompact,
is of course satisfied when G is abelian orcompact (see [7]).
We recall
that,
in this context, acocycle
w : X - G is a measurable function ({J : X ~ G. We denote as usualTwo
cocycles
and ({J2 are said to becohomologous
if there exists ameasurable
function 1/1’ :
X -~G,
called the transferfunction,
such thatUnder the
previous hypothesis,
we shall prove thefollowing
theorem.THEOREM 1.1. - Let X ~ G be an
integrable cocycle; i. e.,
such thatr
Then,
there exists acontinuous cocycle @ :
X ~ G ahd a measurablefunction ~ :
X -~ G such thatThis result
generalizes
a result of A.V.Kocergin [4]
and D.J.Rudolph [6]
which deals with the real-valuedcocycles
and from which weeasily
deduce a similar result for the
cocycles
with values in the groupS
1of
complex
numbers of absolute value 1 or with values in R"(see
also
[2]
for a detailedpresentation
of different results of A.V.Kocergin
on
regularization,
and[ 1,3,5]
for otherproof
andapplications).
293
J.-M. DERRIEN / Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare 36 (2000) 291-300
Theorem 1.1 is a consequence of the
following
lemma and theorem which areproved
in Section 2 and Section3, respectively.
Lemma 1.1 is an
approximation
result of bounded measurable func- tions with values in Gby
continuous functions.LEMMA 1.1. - For every bounded measurable
function f :
X ~ Gand every s >
0,
there exists a continuousfunction
F : X ~ G such thatThe theorem below
gives
as aparticular
case the existence of abounded
cocycle
which iscohomologous
to agiven integrable cocycle,
with control of the transfer function.
THEOREM 1.2. - Let ~p2 : X ~ G be two
cocycles
such that) )
1 +00.For every C >
1/ 03C62)~1,
there exists a measurablemap 03C8 :
X ~ Gsuch
that, if
we putthen we have:
We can
apply
Theorem 1.2 and Lemma 1.1 to obtain Theorem 1.1.Indeed,
with theseresults,
we may constructby
induction three sequences of functionssuch that
Thus,
since +00, the sequence ofprod-
ucts
(~,~
...(/)2 ~1 )n
convergesuniformly
to a continuous function~ : X ~
G,
whichby (*) implies
that the sequence converges almosteverywhere
to ~ .Furthermore,
since the sequence ofproducts
converges almosteverywhere
to a measur-able
So,
we obtain theidentity
by taking
the limit withrespect
to n in the sequence ofexpressions
2. PROOF OF LEMMA 1.1
It is sufficient to prove
that,
for every bounded measurable functionf :
X - G and for every £1, ~2 >0,
there exists a continuous function F : ~ ~ G such thatWithout loss of
generality,
let us assume thatf
is not almosteverywhere equal
to e.The
proof
of the statement is divided into threesteps.
First step: Case where G is a Euclidian space.
In this case, let us cover the closed ball of centre e and radius
295
J.-M. DERRIEN / Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare 36 (2000) 291-300
by
a finite number ofpairwise disjoint
measurable sets,Ai, A2,
... ,Ak,
such that there exist c1 , c2,..., ck in G that
satisfy
Then we consider a first
approximation
F of F as theproduct
ofcontinuous functions
f;,
i =1, ..., k, constructed, by using that p
isBorel and that G is a
complete
Riemannianmanifold,
in such a way thatwhere
Vi
is an open set that containsEi
:=f -~ (Ai ), lCi
is acompact
set that is contained inEi,
and/~(C~ B ~2/~’
Now we obtain
easily
thatand if we set
F is as desired.
Second step: There exists a constant 17G such that the conclusions of the
lemma
are valid for any measurable functionf :
X -~ G such that~1G~
Indeed,
since theexponential
map is one-to-one and onto, andLipschitz,
from a closed ball~(0, ~c)
of the Liealgebra 9
of G(equipped
with the scalarproduct given by
the Riemannian metricg)
onto the ball
B (e,
ofG,
this statement is a consequence of the result of the firststep applied
to9.
Third step: The
general
case.Let us choose an
integer k
suchf ) (~ ~/ k
17G and let usput
ai i =
1,2.
By cutting
aminimizing geodesic
from e tof (x ) , x
EX,
intok pieces
of the same
length,
we may define k measurable functionsfl, f2,
...,fk
from X into G such that
From the second
step,
there exists for each i a continuous functionFi
such that
Then the
product
F =Fi F2 ... Fk
satisfies theinequalities
and
which
completes
theproof.
03. PROOF OF THEOREM 1.2 We shall use the
following
result on Lie groups.LEMMA 3.1. - Let C be a
positive
constant and k anon-negative integer.
There exists a measurable map
such that
J.-M. DERRIEN / Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare 36 (2000) 291-300 297
Proof -
Since the distance d is invariant underright
and left transla-tions,
we haveThus,
since G is acomplete
Riemannian manifold(being
connectedand
homogeneous),
we can choose~o,
in a measurable way, on aminimizing geodesic
between e andsuch that
Assume now that
~o, ~1, ... , ~ p, 0 ~
pk,
have been chosensatisfy- ing
.
and
Then we may
choose ~+1
on aminimizing geodesic
from e toin such a way that
and
which
completes
the constructionby
induction. 0Proof of
Theorem 1.2. - Let usput f (x) :
=(x ) , ~p2 (x ) ) ,
x E X.By
thepointwise ergodic theorem,
wehave,
for almost all x inX,
For these x, the set
N (x)
ofpositive integers k
such thatis
empty
or bounded.So we can
put
and consider
l (x)
the smallestnon-negative integer
l such thatWith this
construction,
we have(1) if l (x)
> 0 thenk(Tx)
=k(x)
+1, (2)
ifI (x )
= 0 thenk ( T x )
=0, (3)
X isequal
to thedisjoint
unionup to a set of measure zero,
(4)
the setsform a
partition
ofX,
up to a set of measure zero, and =A0,1+k .
Lemma 3.1 allows us to construct a measurable map
ip :
X ~ G suchthat:
(a)
for x EX, ~p2(x)) C, (b)
for x E X such thatlex)
=0,
(Choose,
for-k (x ) C i ~ 0, x
such thatlex)
=0,
theproduct
ofthe
(k (x )
+ i +l)th
coordinate of299
J.-M. DERRIEN / Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare 36 (2000) 291-300
bY
Let us show now that the
function 03C8 :
X ~ G definedby
satisfies the conclusions of the theorem.
.
Firstly,
let us prove theidentity
We
distinguish
two cases.First case :
lex)
> 0. Thenk ( T x )
=k (x )
+ 1 and soSecond case:
l (x)
= 0. Thenk(Tx)
= 0 andthus, by (b),
we have.
Moreover,
we haveby (a),
.
Finally,
the measure of thesupport of 1/1
is less than as{x E X f}
c[/ # 0]
andACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I am
greatly
indebted to EmmanuelLesigne
who told me about theproblem.
I would like to thankhim,
Cornelia Drutu and Yves Lacroix for fruitful discussions.Note added in
proof
The conclusion of Theorem 1.1 has been
recently
obtained forcompact
connected metric groupsby
E. Lindenstrauss(Ergodic Theory
andDynamical Systems
19(4) ( 1999) 1063-1076).
REFERENCES
[1] Depauw J., Théorèmes ergodiques pour cocycle de degré 2, critère de récurrence pour cocycle de degré 1, d’une action de
Zd.
Application au réseau électrique stationnaire, Thèse, Brest, 1994.[2] Derrien J.-M., Sur 1’existence de cohomologues réguliers pour les cocycles inté- grables, in: Publication des Séminaires de Probabilités de Rennes, 1995.
[3] Katok A., Constructions in ergodic theory, unpublished paper.
[4] Kocergin A.V., On the homology of functions over dynamical systems, Dokl. Akad.
Nauk. SSSR 231 (1976); Soviet. Math. Dokl. 17 (6) (1976) 1637-1641.
[5] Lesigne E., Equations fonctionnelles, couplages de produits gauches et théorèmes ergodiques pour des mesures diagonales, Bull. Soc. Math. France 121 (1993) 315- 351.
[6] Rudolph D.J., Zn and Rn cocycle extensions and complementary algebras, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 6 (1986) 583-599.
[7] Sternberg S., Lectures on Differential Geometry, Prentice Hall, 1964.