pression
of wateronly (group i), suppression
of feedonly (group 2 ), suppression
of water andfeed
(group 3 ), suppression
of feed and administration of 50 g sodiumsulphate
per animal. Theweaning-oestrus
interval varied little from one group to another(group
i :7 .6 days,
group 2 :7.6 days,
group 3 : 9.3days,
group 4 : m.9days).
Theweaning-conception
interval( 12 . 7 - 7 .6- 1 6. 0
and 21.8
days)
did notsignificantly
differ because of alarge
intra-treatmentvariability ( 73
to130
p.
100 ). However,
it was in the group where feed wassuppressed
and not water on theday
ofweaning
that no return to heat was noted versus 20to 30 p. 100in the other groups.But,
neitherweight gain performances during subsequent gestation
norprolificacy
of the animals at nextfarrowing
were affectedby
either of these treatments.Influence of the feeding level between weaning
and mating on the reproductive performances of multiparous sows
M. ÉTIENNE P. H. DUÉE J.
LEBOSTStation de Recherches suy
l’Élevage
des Porcs, I. N. R. A., C. N.R. Z.,
78350
Jouy
enJosas
This
study
was made with the aim ofsearching
for eventual effects ofoverfeeding
beforemating
on thereproductive performances
ofmultiparous
sows.3 6
adultLarge
White sows weredivided into 3 groups
according
to litter order andweight
atweaning.
Oneonly
feed was offeredat three different levels which were
kept
constant in each group between theday
afterweaning
and the
day
ofmating.
The amounts allotted were 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5kg
perday, respectively
ingroups 1,2 and 3.
During gestation,
all sows received 2.5kg
feed perday.
The results did not show any difference between the three groups of animals. The
weight
variations of the sows were
comparable ; however,
betweenweaning
andmating
theweight
losstended to decrease when the
feeding
level was enhancedduring
thisperiod.
911 the sowspartu- riated,
95 p. 100having
been fertilized at the 1st oestrus. The duration of theweaning-oestrus
interval
( 7 . 9 ,
m.4 and8. 3 days, respectively
for groups 1, 2and3 )
and theweaning-conception
interval
( 7 . 9 ,
13.5 and9 .8 days)
was short and did not differ between the groups. This was also the case for the number ofpiglets
born( 9 . 9
on anaverage)
and born alive per litter( 9 .6
on anaverage).
According
to thisstudy,
therelationship
between thereproductive performances
and thenutritional state of the sows at
mating
seemed to be low. Enhancement of thefeeding
level betweenweaning
andmating
ofmultiparous
sows did not affect theirfertility
and did not lead toimprove-
ment of their
prolificacy
even when the latter was poor. Furtherknowledge
of thephysiological
mechanisms involved should lead to a more accurate determination of the consequences