HAL Id: jpa-00246380
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00246380
Submitted on 1 Jan 1991
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Dynamics of charged particles near a black hole in a magnetic field
Valdimír Karas, David Vokrouhlický
To cite this version:
Valdimír Karas, David Vokrouhlický. Dynamics of charged particles near a black hole in a magnetic
field. Journal de Physique I, EDP Sciences, 1991, 1 (7), pp.1005-1012. �10.1051/jp1:1991184�. �jpa-
00246380�
Classification
Physics
Abstracts04.20 97.60L
Dynamics of charged particles
near ablack hole in
amagnetic
field
Vladimir Karas and David
Vokrouhlick§
Department
ofAstronomy
andAstrophysics,
CharlesUniversity, (vbdskh8,
15000Prague,
Czechoslovakia
(Received12December1990, accepted
infinal form
1March1991)
Abstract. Flow lines of the
plasma
near amagnetised
Kerr-Newman black hole are studied within the framework of theguiding
centreapproximation.
Surfaces of constantmagnetic
and electric flux are constructed and theshape
of theplasma
horizon is discussed.1. Introduction.
Black holes immersed in cosmic environments are of
longstanding
interest toastrophysicists.
Effects
accompanying
the accretion of matter onto a black hole couldexplain
violent processes, which occur in quasars andgalaxies
with active nuclei[lj.
The electro-vacuum solutiondescribing
anisolated, rotating, electrically charged
black hole(Kerr-Newman solution)
is well understood and itsuniqueness
is proven[2, 3]. (Hereafter,
we do not take atheoretical
possibility
of a nonzeromagnetic charge
of the hole intoaccount.) However,
realistic solutions with externalmagnetic
fields andcomplicated
motions ofplasma
are muchmore difficult to handle.
Analytic models,
no matter howinspiring they
are,require
furtherassumptions (on
the symmetry of theproblem,
theequation
of state,etc.)
to become tractable[4, 5].
Self-consistentdescription
of a black holemagnetosphere
is constructednumerically (see,
e-g-,Refs.[6-9]
and references citedtherein)
and even so the current models suffer from serious inconsistencies[10].
This paper extends theapproach
of Damour et al.[I Ii
whoinvestigated
theregions
ofmagnetic
support ofplasma
near a black hole andconstructed flow lines with the framework of the
guiding
centreapproximation.
We assume that the
magnetic
field isgenerated
far from the blackhole,
so that near thehole it appears as uniform.
Therefore,
we canemploy
aspecial exacj
solution of the Einstein-Maxwell
equations describing
amagnetised
Kerr-Newman(MKN)
black hole[12].
Thissolution is
stationary
andaxially symmetric, magnetic
fieldbeing asymptotically (far
from thehole) parallel
to the rotation axis. In section2,
to elucidate the structure of theelectromagne-
tic
field,
we construct surfaces of constantmagnetic
and electric flux. Then we discusspotentially
stableregions
of themagnetosphere
where themagnetic
force can balance the electric one. Theboundary
of thisregion
is referred to as aplasma
horizon[13].
Theshape
of theplasma
horizons in variousconfigurations
withuncharged
orweakly charged
black holes1006 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
I M 7were
plotted by
Hanni[14]
and Damour et al.[llj. However,
the existence of theplasma
horizon isonly
a necessary condition for themagnetosphere
to be stable andphysical significance
of thisapproach
is very limited(for
critical remarks about theconcept
of thefilasma
horizon see Burman[15]). Indeed,
with alarge
value of theangular
momentum orcharge
of the hole we can see that rathercomplicated topology
of theplasma
horizon does not meet characteristic features of theplasma
motion.Flow lines of the
plasma
which are constructed in section 3 then describe the structure of themagnetosphere
moreappropriately,
as describedoriginally
in reference[I Ii.
We compare the flow lines near a MKN black hole with those constructed within theapproximation
of theelectromagnetic
test fields in the fixedbackground
metric of an isolatedrotating (Kerr)
black hole. Forastrophysically
relevant values of themagnetic
field theapproximate
flow lines coincide with exact ones. InAppendix
we estimate corrections to the flow due to the drift of theparticles
causedby
the stronggravitational
attraction near the horizon of the hole.2.
Magnetitsed
Kerr-Newman bIack hole : theeIectromagnetitc
field andplasma
horizon.Four parameters describe the
space-time
of the MKN black holecompletely
the massM, specific angular
momentum a andcharge
e of thehole,
and themagnetic
field parameterBo.
We usegeometric
units with thevelocity
oflight
andgravitational
constantequal unity.
Thus,
for the black hole mass parameter we haveM[cm]
+ 1.5 x
10~(M/M~ (M~ being
thesolar
mass);
forspecific angular
momentuma[cmj
+3.3x10~'~ fi[cm~/s];
for electriccharge e[cm]
+2.9x10~~~ I[esu]
and for themagnetic
fieldparameter Bo[cm~~]
+2.9 x
10~~~ jio [gauss].
The
space-time
element of the MKN metric inspheroidal
coordinates(xi x~, x~, x~)
m
(t,
r,o,
q~)
can beexpressed
in the standard form of anaxially symmetric stationary
metricds~
=
e~
~dt~
+e~ *(dq~
wdt)~
+e~~ dr~+ e~?
do ~(l)
with
e~~
=
[A[~3AA~~, e~*
=
[A[~~A3~~sin~o,
e~~
=
[A[~3A~~, e~?
=
[A[~3,
3=r~+a~cos~o, A=r~-2Mr+a~+e~,
~ ~~~ ~ ~~~
~~~
~~~~ ~'
~ ~
~°
~~~
~Explicit expressions
for the functions w, ~P and I weregiven by
Garcia Diaz[12]. Having astrophysical applications
onmind,
we assume weak values of themagnetic
field(104 gauss)
and linearize allexpressions
for the metric tensor andelectromagnetic
field components in adimensionless
parameter
Em[Bo M[
« Iw m
(2r-e~)aA~~-2Boer(r~+a~)A~~,
A m I +
Bo
ear3~sin~
oiBo e(r~
+a~)
3~cos b
(2)
(The
linearized MKN solution was alsoinvestigated [16].
In Section 3 an error inEquation (9)
of this reference is
corrected.)
Rathercomplicated
formulas for the components of theelectromagnetic
field tensor in terms of the functions ~P, I wereoriginally
derivedby
Emst and Wild[17]. Starting
from theirexpressions
we constructed the surfaces df constantmagnetic
and electricflux,
which aregiven by
constancy of the real andimaginary part
of~P'mA~~(~P- ~Boi), (3)
r/M
~r/M
a)
b)
Fig.
I.- Twotypical configurations
of themagnetic
and electric lines of force near an extreme[e=
(M~-a~)~'~], magnetised
Kerr-Newman black hole with p =0.018,a/M=
0.99 (a), and p =0.071,a/M=
0.99(b).
The latter casecorresponds
to anuncharged configuration,
e + 2Bo Ma
=
0. Far from the hole the
magnetic
lines of force become uniform andparallel
to the rotation axis, which goesvertically
in thefigure. Figures
aresymmetric
with respect to theequatorial plane
andaxially symmetric
about the rotation axis. Near the horizon(denoted by
thequadrant
r/M =I) they obviously
have adipole-like
structure(a),
but in anuncharged
extremeconfiguration
(b) themagnetic
field lines areexpelled
out of the horizoncompletely.
Electric lines of force are in bothcases
asymptotically
radial. In(b)
theirshape, unexpected
on the basis of ourexperience
with ananalogous problem from the classical
electrodynamics
of rotating magnetisedspheres (cf.
Thome et a/.[23]),
isproduced by
the effects of thegravitomagnetic
interaction.respectively (Fig. I).
These surfaces canequivalently
be defined as surfaces wheremagnetic (electric)
lines of force reside :according
to Christodoulou and Ruffini[18]
the lines ofmagnetic (electric)
force are tangent to the forceexperienced by
amagnetic (electric) charge
at rest with
respect
to thelocally nonrotating
frame(LNRF). (Shapes
ofasymptotically
uniform field lines in the test field
appromixation
wereplotted by
a number of authors[19- 23].)
Orthonormalcomponents
of the field in the LNRF areB~,~ +
iE~,~
= A'/~sin~
o30~P', (4)
B~o~ +
iE~o~
=(A/A)~/~
sin~ o3,~P' (5)
It can be verified that the field of the MKN black hole linearized in
p
and e coincide with asuperposition
of theaxisymmetric, asymptotically
uniformmagnetic
test field in the Kerr metric[24]
and the Kerr-Newmanelectromagnetic
field with thecharge
e + 2Bo
Ma.~The
term 2
Bo
Ma isexactly
the Wald'scharge [25]
which isrequired
to neutralize the Kerr black hole immersed in themagnetic
test field. Thiscorrespondence
between the exact solution and the test fieldapproximations
has been discussed in[26, 27].)
Now we turn to the
problem
ofstability
of theplasma
near the MKN black hole. Theplasma
horizon is defined as a surface in themagnetosphere satisfying
the condition[EXB[ =E~ (6)
for the electric and
magnetic
field three-vectors in the localframe,
orequivalently [11, 14]
V~ V~=0, V~WF~~F~P~p, (7)
1008 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I M 7
where
F~~
denotes theelectromagnetic
fieldcomponents
and ~ p is thefour-velocity
of a zero-angular-momentum
observer(ZAMO).
This choice of thepreferred
frame appears natural becausespace-time (I)
isstationary
andaxisymmetric(I). Figure
2 shows theshape
of theplasma
horizon around a fewnearly
extreme(a~
+e~
-
M~) configurations
of the MKN black hole. It can be seenthat,
ingeneral,
stableregions
of themagnetosphere
as definedby
theplasma
horizon do not agree with a moresophisticated approach
of section 3. In otherwords,
flow lines of matter that cross the
plasma
horizon do notnecessarily
hit the horizon even in the case when definition(7)
of theplasma
horizon withpreferred
ZAMOS isaccepted.
Moreover,
we note that theshape
of theplasma
horizon will be different in anotherframe,
what restricts usefulness of thisconcept significantly.
0.
Fig,
2. Plasma horizons in the MKNspace-time
with p= 0.05 and
a/M
= 0.95.
Hatching
denotes the unstableregions
with V~ V"< 0 as defined
by equation (7).
The black hole horizon is denoted by aquadrant
in eachfigure.
The values ofe/M
are shown withfigures e/M
~ 0.095
corresponds
to thepositive
totalcharge
of the black hole ; this case was discussed by Hanni f14] in detail.3. Motiton of the
guiding
centre.In this section we construct flow lines of the
plasma
in the framework of theguiding
centreapproximation [28, 29].
First we assume with Damour et al.[I Ii
that theelectromagnetic
field variations are small within a Larmor radius and a Larmorperiod.
We further assume that all other forcesacting
oncharged particles except
for theelectromagnetic
one can beneglected.
This
approximation
is later found to be violatedonly
very close to the horizon(r
m r~= M +
(M~ a~
e~)~/~; seeAppendix). Now,
the motion consists of a localgyration (which
isaveraged
out in theguiding
centerapproximation),
an accelerationcorresponding
to thehyperbolic
motion in the frame i where themagnetic
and electric fields areparallel,
and a(')
Theonly
other frame that has beenfrequently
used with the Kerr-Newman geometry is the Carter frame[30]
which is connected with theprincipal
null congruence. However, one canverify
that(I)
inBoyer-Lindquist type coordinates does not allow of the PNC
photons, although they
do exists in thespecial
cases Bo = 0(Kerr-Newman
geometry), or a, e =0
(magnetised
Schwarzschild geometry).daft with respect to i. This frame is related to the LNRF
by
the Lorentz boost in a w- direction to thevelocity
v,magnitude
of which isgiven by
here E and B are the fields measured in the LNRF. The drift
velocity given by (8) acquires
values in the whole range
(0,1)
upper values near cusps(where
E.B =0 andE=B)
and near the horizon.Figure
3 showsprojections
of the flow lines on theq~ = const.
plane,
I-e- the linestangent
to the common direction of the electric andmagnetic
fields in the frame
orbiting
with thevelocity
u around the hole. Parametricequation
of thecurves is
dx)dA
=
E~
+ y ~/~e~~~ u~BJ,
I,j
m
1,
2(9)
where E'
=
Fj
~~,
B~=
*Fj
~ ~, and y= g~, goo
g~~. Putting
a= e =
0 in the metric
(magnetised
Schwarzschild blackhole)
we obtain uniform flow lines whichparallel
the o=
0,
waxis,
asexpected. (One
canverify
that ourequations (8), (9)
areequivalent
toEqs. (6)
and(8)
of Ref.[ll].)
~ ~
r/M
~ ~ ~r/M
~a) b)
Fig.
3.-Typical configurations
of the plasma flow lines near an extreme MKN black hole with p=
0.018, a/M
= 0.090
(a),
and p = 0.05,a/M
= 0.933
(b).
Charged particles
movealong
the flow lines in a directiongiven by
the direction of the electric field(El
=
Fib)
in i. To turn this direction we needEl
=
0 somewhere on the flow
line,
which canonly
be the case ofperpendicular
electric andmagnetic
fields in the LNRF.Such
places
doexist,
as discussed withfigure
4 below.It can be seen in
figure
3 thatonly
some of the flow lines(those coming along
the rotationaxis)
cross the horizon. Matter confined to the flow linescrossing
theequatorial plane (b
=
w/2)
outside te horizon does not fall(within
theapproximation adopted)
into the black hole. Wecomputed, numerically,
the « effective cross section of the hole(Fig. 4)
defined asa ratio
Jt/JtH
here Jt=
I (go
o
g~~
)~'~ do dq~ is the area of the surface r= const. m 500
M,
o wo~~~ (say)
far from the hole from which the flow lineseventually
thread thehorizon,
andA~
=
2 w
Ao
o
[~(r(
+a~)
denotes the surface of thehemisphere
located on1010 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
I M 79
~x
'
~
~
O.6
3
ENLARGED
°~-
1~96
0
~~ ~
a/M
Fig. 4. Solid line is an effective cross section of an extreme MKN black hole (p
=
0.05 for the capture of the flow lines (see the text). Broken line denotes the cross section computed with the flow lines
along
which the electric field in lF does notchange
its orientation. Consequently, chargedparticles
are accelerated
along
these lines in one direction fromlarge
distances into the black hole oroppositely, according
tosign
of their charge.the horizon. An
important configuration
is that with thevanishing
crosssection,
A
=
0,
because the accretion rate then goes to zero as well. One canverify
that this is the case of an extreme black hole with a zero total electriccharge
or, in the limit of a weakmagnetic field,
e=-2BoMa, [27].
In otherwords,
inequation(9)
one obtainsdr/dA =0,
do/dA
# 0 at r = r~just
for theuncharged
extremeconfigurations,
in which the flow lines donot cross the horizon. This is in agreement with Wald's
[25]
results about selective accretiononto a black hole in the test field
approximation. Analogous
results can be obtained withexact
expressions
of reference[12] (nonlinearized
in themagnetic
fieldparameter)
in thiscase the effective cross section vanishes for e
=
2
Bo Ma/(I El e~/4).
4. Conclusion.
In this paper we extended
previous
works about accretion of theplasma
onto amagnetised
black hole within the
guiding
centreapproximation.
Weemployed
the exact solution of the Einstein-Maxwellequations,
constructed the flowlines,
andcomputed
the effective cross section forcapture
of the material.Compared
to Wald'sanalysis,
the presentapproach
enables us to
study asymptotically
non-flatspace-times,
in which case energy ofcharged particles
atinfinity
cannot be defined.Acknowledgments.
We would like to thank J. Bibhk for
helpful
discussionsduring
this work. We are alsograteful
to the referee for
pointing
out several omissions in the first version of this paper.Appendix.
We estimated the value of the
gravitational
drift which forcescharged particles
to cross the field lines. We restrict to themagnetised
Schwarzschildmetric,
in which case theequation
ofmotion reads
dp/dt
=
rmg
+ q(E
+ v x B(io)
m is the rest mass of the
particle,
q is itscharge,
r is the Lorentz factor. In the orthonormal frame~(r)
"(1
2M/r)~'~ a,
,
e~o~ = r~ 30
,
e ~~~ =
(r
sin o)~ 3~ (11)
the
gravitational
acceleration has theonly
nonzero component in the radialdirection,
g~~~ =
(1
2M/r)~
~/~ Mr~~, (12)
and the
electromagnetic
field(4)-(5)
reduces to B~~~ =Bo
cos o,
B~o~ =
Bo(1
2M/r)~/~
sin o(13)
One can
verify
that the total forceacting
on aparticle
will beparallel
to themagnetic
field in a framemoving
in thew-direction
with thevelocity
wgiven by
~'~lg
(r)
q~B
(0)
B(r) q~B
~r)B(0) (14)
with respect to the frame
(11).
Far from the hole we have rm
I,
g~~~ m
M/r~,
andw m
"~~'/~~
~,
(15)
qr
Bo
which is, in
fact,
a familiar formula for thegravitational
drift[29]
:w m
"~~
~~~ (16)
qB
In
general, equation (14) gives
Ii
imMBo
sin o 2 1'2 1'2~ ~ ~
q~~(B)r))
+B/0)
~~~~The corrections due to the
gravitational
drift can beneglected provided
Hi «I,
I-e- in theregion
$
»I (18)
2 M
pq
Since the
electrically charged particles
haveextremely large specific charge q/m
m 10~~ for
electrons), equation (18)
is satisfied forastrophysically
relevant values of themagnetic
fieldessentially
to the very horizon.References
[1] BEGELMAN M. C., BLANDFORD R. D. and REES M. J., Rev. Mod.
Phys.
56(1984)
255.[2] MISNER C. W., THORNE K. S. and WHEELER J. A., Gravitation
(Freeman,
San Francisco,1973).
[3] CARTER B., in Gravitation in Astrophysics, B. Carter and J. B. Hartle Eds. (Plenum, New York,
1987).
1012 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I M 7
[4] DAMOUR T., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 262
(1975)
11 3.[5] RUFFINI R. and WILSON J. R.,
Phys.
Rev. D 12(1975)
2959.[6] WILSON J. R., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 262
(1975)
123.[7] BLANDFORD R. D. and ZNAJEK R. L., Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 179 (1976) 433.
[8] MACDONALD D. A., Mon. Not. R. Astr. Sac. 211 (1984) 313.
[9] ZHANG XIAO-HE,
Phys.
Rev. D 39(1989)
2933.[10] PUNSLY B. and CORONITI F. V.,
Astrophys.
J. 350(1990)
518.[ll]
DAMOUR T., HANNI R. S., RUFFINI R. and WILSON J. R.,Phys.
Rev. D 17(1978)
1518.[12]
GARCiA DiAz A., J. Math.Phys.
26(1985)
155.[13]
RUFFINI R., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 262(1975)
95.[14] HANNI R. S., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 262
(1975)
133.[15] BURMAN R. R., Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 180 (1977) 227.
[16] HANNI R. S. and VALDARNINI R.,
Phys.
Lett. 70A(1979)
92.[17l
ERNST F. J, and WILD W. J., J. Math.Phys.
17(1976)
182.[18] CHRisToDouLou D. and RUFFINI R., Black Holes, C. Dewitt and B. S. Dewitt Eds.
(Gordon
and Breach, New York, 1973).
[19] HANNI R. S. and RUFFINI R., Lett. Nuov. Cim. is (1976) 189.
[20] BIChK J. and DVORAK L., Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2933.
[21] BIChK J. and KARAS V., Proc. of the Fifth Marcel Grossman
Meeting
on GeneralRelativity,
D. G. Blair and M. J.
Buckingham
Eds.(World
Scientific,Singapore, 1989)
p. 1199.[22] KARAS V.,
Phys.
Rev. D 40(1989)
2121.[23] THORNE K. S., PRICE R. H. and MACDONALD D. A., Black Holes The Membrane
Paradigm
~Yale University
Press, New Haven,1986).
[24] BIChK J. and JANI§ V., Mon. Not. R. Astr. Sac. 212 (1985) 899.
[25] WALD R. M.,
Phys.
Rev. D 10(1974)
1680.[26] DOKUCHAEV V. I., Sov.
Phys.
JETP 65 (1987) 1079.[27] KARAS V. and VOKROUHLICKV D., J. Math.
Phys. (1991)
in Press.[28] JACKSON J. D., Classical
Electrodynamics (John
Wiley & Sons, New York,1962).
[29] LEHNERT B.,
Dynamics
ofCharged
Particles~North-Holland,
Amsterdam,1964).
[30] CARTER B., Phys. Rev. 174