HAL Id: jpa-00247864
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00247864
Submitted on 1 Jan 1993
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Structural and electro-optical studies of the smectic polymorphism of a homologous series of chiral molecules
Patrick Hamelin, Anne-Marie Levelut, Philippe Martinot-Lagarde, Claude Germain, Lionel Liebert
To cite this version:
Patrick Hamelin, Anne-Marie Levelut, Philippe Martinot-Lagarde, Claude Germain, Lionel Liebert.
Structural and electro-optical studies of the smectic polymorphism of a homologous series of chiral molecules. Journal de Physique II, EDP Sciences, 1993, 3 (5), pp.681-696. �10.1051/jp2:1993160�.
�jpa-00247864�
Classification
Physics
Abstracts61.30E 64.70M
Structural and electro-optical studies of the smectic
polymorphism of
ahomologous series of chiral molecules
Patrick
Hamelin,
Anne-Marie Levelut,Philippe Martinot-Lagarde,
Claude Germain and Lionel Liebert(*)
Laboratoire de
Physique
des Solides, Universit6 de Paris-Sud, Bfitiment 5IO, 91405Orsay,
France(Received 28 October 1992, accepted in
final
form 5 February 1993)Abstract. The molecular
organization
in bulksamples
of the smectic Omesophase
of2-heptyl
and
2-octyl 1,4-terephthalydene-bis-4-aminocinnamates
mixtures is studied by various methods.The
phase diagrams
are obtainedby thermo-optical
and microcalorimetricanalysis.
The structures areinvestigated by X-ray
diffraction and the electricalproperties (spontaneous polarization,
dielectric constants) are studied in detail. The smectic O
pha8e
has a lamellar structure in which the molecules are tilted in thelayers.
The order inside thelayers
isliquid-like
but, contrariwise to the smectic C phase, where it is uniform, the azimuth tums between twoadjacent layers
with anangle
of
nearly
180°. We observe the smectic O-smectic C transitionby varying
temperature orby applying
an electric field. Moreover, the smectic C-smectic O-smectic C sequence is obtained in anarrow composition range. Our results are in good agreement with those
previously
reportedobtained on thin films growing at the isotropic liquid-smectic interface.
Some
mesophases
of chiralmesogenic
molecules havespecific symmetry properties
related to the twistedconfiguration
of the molecular directors which form a helicoidal array with apitch
which isgenerally
of the order of I ~Lm. In this field the studies of chiral smectic C(Sc«)
which shows ferroelectricproperties
have beendeveloped
in view ofelectro-optical applications [I].
In the course of the search for chiral materials with
good electro-optical properties
two newmesophases
the smectic O(So)
and the smecticQ (S~)
were observed in 1983[2],
in acompound
which in addition shows an unusualmesomorphic
behaviour. The moststriking
feature is the difference between the
polymorphism
of the racemic mixture and that of theoptically
active pure enantiomer since the first one has a clarification temperature 25 Khigher
(*) Nous tenons h
exprimer
ici toutce que nous devons h Lionel Liebert, l'initiateur au sein du laboratoire de nombreuses collaborations entre chimistes et
physiciens.
Son enthousiasme delongue
date pour lespropridtds
fascinantes descomposds
ddcrits ici a dtd pour nous extrEmement stimulant, et resteencore trbs
pr6sent
dans notre mdmoire bienqu'une
annde se soitddjh
6couldedepuis
sadisparition
brutale.
than the second. Moreover the
S~ mesophase
has nolonger
a lamellar structure but isorganized
with a 3Dlarge
sizetetragonal
lattice(1422)
and it existsonly
forquite
pureenantiomers and over 2.5 K below the clarification temperature.
Recently optical
observations of the racemic mixture have shown that theSo
grows in successiveparallel
molecularlayers
at theisotropic liquid
smectic interface. In eachlayer
the molecules areorganized
as in a smectic Clayer,
with aliquid
likeordering
of the centers of mass and aunique
orientation of the director which is tilted withrespect
to the normal to the smecticplanes
; however thesymmetry
of thephase
is different since there are mirrorplanes
at each interface betweensuccessive molecular
layers implying
therefore that the translationperiod
is twice the thickness of onelayer [3].
Thisorganization
which was seen at theSo-liquid
interface and under theaction of a weak electric
field,
is consistent withX-ray
diffractionpattems
of the racemic mixture in an oriented state[2].
However the behaviour of theoptically
active mixtures is stillquestionable
at least for bulksamples
since in a molecular twisted array with a nonperiodic
in-layer ordering,
the smecticperiod
as measuredby X-ray diffraction,
is not modifiedby
theoccurrence of a twist axis nomJal to the
layer planes
andby
the way for the twisted state of anantiferroelectric array of the successive
layers (Sc.
with apitch
close to twice thelayer thickness).
During
the last two years different kinds of chiral smectics have been discovered andanalysed.
On the one hand transitions between several fluid smecticphases
were observed in a pure chiralcompound
and it has beensuggested
that some of thesephases
have a fern- or an antiferroelectric character[4].
On the other hand the existence of a chiral smectic A(S~~)
was asserted fromoptical
andX-ray
diffraction data[5].
The molecularorganization
of thisphase
appears to be consistent withpreviously predicted
models of the twistgrain boundary phase (TGB) [6].
In thisphase
the helix axis is nolonger
normal to thelayer planes.
Therefore better information on the
thermodynamical,
structural andelectro-optical
properties
of theSo phase
willclarify
theproblem
of the electricproperties
of the chiral form.In order to
improve
ourknowledge
we have follow theimpact
of theoptical activity,
of thelength
of the molecules of the sameseries,
and of the electric field upon thestability
and thephysical properties
of theSo phase.
Experiments.
Up
to now theSo phase
hasonly
been detected in onecompound,
the2-octyl 1,4- terephthalydene-bis-4-amino
cinnamate[2].
Shorter chain derivatives of the same series have beenprepared, they present
a smecticmesophase
the structure of which has notyet
beenunambiguously
established[7].
SYNTHESIS. The
2-alkyl 1, 4-terephthalydene-bis-4-aminocinnamates
wereprepared
accord-ing
to the usual way[8, 9].
Esterification of the different alcohols
by
thep-nitrocinnamoyl
chloride(from
acid +
SOCI2),
then reduction(Fecl~
+NH~ )
of the nitroester into the aminoester followedby
its condensation with a
half-equivalent
ofterephthaldehyde.
Ethanol has been used for most ofrecrystallizations.
The2-alkyl terephthalydene-bis-aminocinnamates
present three different stereo isomers. The pure activecompounds (R, R)
or(S, S)
are obtained fromcommercially
available(Aldrich)
R or S alcohols. The reaction of a racemic mixture of alcoholsprovides
anoptically
inactive mixture of 0.25(R, R),
0.25(S, S)
and 0.5(R, S) molecules,
this last onecannot be obtained
separately.
We have focussed our attention on two
compounds
of this series : theoctyl (Cg)
and theheptyl(C7)
derivatives. Oneimportant problem
is theactivity
of thecommercially
available alcohols which drives thepurity
of themesogenic compounds.
In fact the2-heptyl
alcohols(R)
and
(S) provided by
Aldrich have ahigher optical activity
than the(R)
one used in aprevious study [7].
Moreover thespecific
rotation isnearly
the same(in modulus)
for the four alcohols of two different chainlengths
used in oursynthesis.
Therefore we assume that all ourderivatives are
optically
pure. The NMR spectra of the finalproducts
of thesynthesis
assert also the absence of any other kind ofimpurities.
CHARACTERISATION oF THE MESOPHASES.
Optical microscopy
and differentialscanning calorimetry (D.S.C.)
have beenperformed
on purecompounds
and onbinary
and temarymixtures in order to detect
phase
transitions. Moreover we have also observed contactpreparations [10],
in order to cover some ranges of concentration which seem ofpeculiar
interest.Optical properties
such asspecific
rotation ofpolarization
andpitch
of the helical array have also been measured.ELECTRO-OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS.
Optical microscopy
between crossedpolarizers
have beenperformed
in a Mettlerheating
stage. Furthermore the texturalchanges
underapplication
of an electric field are studied on
samples
sandwiched between twoglass plates
coated with ITO. The director orientation isgenerally planar
and thesample
thickness of 20 ~L. The spontaneouspolarization
is measuredby
a direct methodalready
described[I ii
the samedevice allows measurements of the a-c- dielectric constant.
X-RAY DIFFRACTION EXPERIMENTS. Two kinds of
experiments
have beenperforrned.
Powder pattems
using
a Guinier cameraequipped
with aheating
device allows an evaluation of the smecticlayer periodicity.
Under the action of amagnetic
field it ispossible
to orient thesamples, provided
that themesophase
is not too viscous in case of a twisted array the fieldstrength
must behigher
than a threshold value whichdepends
on thepitch
and on the twist elastic constant. In our device we have amagnetic
field of 1.7 Tacting
on asample
held in 1.5 mmglass
tube and we have encountered some difficulties onaligning
chiral smecticphases.
In bothexperiments
the X rays are issued from a reflection on acrystal, selecting
theCUK«j
radiation forpowder patterns
and the CUK« doublet for orientedpatterns.
Phase
diagram.
Figure
I presents thephase diagrams
of thebinary
mixtures of the twooptically
activeantipodes C7
andC8.
At a firstglance they
appear to be very similar : in both cases the solidus linegives
the evidence of a solid racemate, themelting
temperature of this racemate is about 112 °C forCg
and 105 °C for theC~
derivatives while themelting
temperature of theantipodes
are 95 and 85 °C
respectively.
Bothsystems present
apositive
azeotrope for the clarificationtemperature
which ishigher
of 25 and 22 K for theC~
andCg
racemicmixtures, respectively,
than for the
corresponding
pure active derivatives.The
tridimensionally
orderedtetragonal phase S~
isonly
seen for the pure activecompounds Cg
of more than 90 §b ofoptical purity
and within 1-3 Kjust
below theclearing point.
The C~compound presents
asingle
fluid smecticphase
at everycomposition
but it appears,looking
at contact
preparations
that the smecticphase
is different for the racemic mixture and for the pureantipodes,
theseparation
between the twophases
is astraight
lineparallel
to thetemperature
axis andcorresponds
to anoptical activity
±Fo(70 ~Fo
< 60§b).
Thisphase separation
line crosses the clarificationspindle
withoutdisturbing significantly
itstopology
however a clear
jump
is seen in thedependence
of theclearing enthalpy
versuscomposition
inC~(R, R)
+C~(S, S) (Fig. 2).
In order toidentify
these two smecticphases
we have studiedbinary
and temary mixtures of derivatives of different chainlengths. Figure
3gives
thebehaviour of the temary
diagram C~(R, R), C~(S, S), Cg(R, R).
It appears that the twodifferent kinds of
binary
mixtures ofC~
andCg
presentonly
theSo phase,
except a smallT1°cj Tj°c)
160 ~
160
L
140 140
S~ So
120
SO
ioo ioo
K
C7(R,R) C7(S,S) C8(S,S) C8(R,R)
Fig.
I.Binary phases
diagrams of theantipodes
of2-heptyl
(left) and2-octyl
(right)terephthalydene-
bis-aminocinamates K : crystal, L
isotropic liquid, Sc, So.
smectic phases,S~.
mesophase with atetragonal
lattice, TTemperature,
The hatched areascorrespond
tobiphasic
zones.AH
(cavmole)
loco
soo
o
F
Fig.
2.Clearing enthalpy jump
AH versus theoptical activity
F of the C7 derivative.(°c)
C~R,R)
'~° Sc
~
na2 n~4 c~
sc
'>
'
' ,
.'
~O ,' ,
,' ,
,' , ,
c~js,Sj c~S,s)
Fig.
3.-Projection
onto thecomposition plane
(mole fraction) of the ternary phasediagram
of C7(R, RI,C7(S,
S)C8(S,
S). The vertical hatched area is a zone ofpolymorphism So-S~
while theobliquely
hatched area is a zone ofpolymorphism So-Sc.
Theazeotropic clearing points
are located on the dashed line. Theinterrupted
linecorresponds
to mixtures of racemic C7 withCs(S,
S). The temperaturebehaviour of these mixtures are shown (see the insert), in a narrow range of
composition, including
the temary mixture To.S~
area and a very limitedbiphasic
areacontaining
two smecticphases
for ~0.7 molesC7(R,
R)
+ 0.25 molesCg(S,
S)
and within 5 K in thevicinity
of themelting point. Temary
mixtures can
present
a smecticpolymorphism
in a wide range ofcomposition (Fig. 3),
moreover a reentrant sequence
involving
a centralSo phase
has been observed in a temarymixture
To
0.375[C7 (R,
R +C7 (S,
S)]
+0.230(Cg (R, R))
moles. A quaternary racemic mixtureRo
0.35[C7(R,
R +C7(S,
S)]
+ 0.15[Cg(R, R)
+Cg(S,
S)]
moles has a similar reentrant sequence. In both cases anenthalpy peak
is seen in D.S.C. tracesonly
for the upper transitiontemperature
between the twosmectics,
thisenthalpy
is of local/mole
for the temary mixture and 14 cal/mole for the racemic quatemary mixture. The lowtemperature
transition isspread
over a fewdegrees
and no measurableenthalpy
can be associated to this transition(Fig. 4a).
Structural studies.
The structural studies of the
Cg
derivatives have beenalready published
therefore we will not discuss here thephase
oftetragonal
(1422)
lattice[2].
If weexcept
thisphase, powder pattems
of the two derivatives and of their mixtures allcorrespond
to fluid lamellarphases
with alayer
periodicity significantly
smaller than the molecularlength
and close to 30A
for all thesamples.
The smecticperiodicity
of the reentrant mixtures does not show anydiscontinuity
at the smectic-smectic transitions but ajump
of theexpansion
coefficientcorresponds
to the lower temperature transition(Fig. 4b).
In order to make a structural distinction between the twosmectic
phase
we examinedmagnetically
orientedsamples
of various racemic mixtures.Figure
5gives
theX-ray
diffraction pattems obtained after a slowcooling
of thesamples
of different mixtures from theisotropic liquid. Figure
5a for the racemicC7
mixture istypical
of aAH
(Kcavmole.K~
~
36o 40o 44o
T(K~
a)
d
jAi
31.5
31
433 TlK~
~°
too 120 14o loo T
b)
Fig.
4. Thermal behaviour of the Ro mixture 0.70 rac C7 + 0.30 rac C8. al DSC trace AH versus temperature T. Among the two transitionsSo-Sc
(marked down by the arrows), only that ofhigher
temperatureprovides
a measurableenthalpy peak.
b) layer thickness d dependence versus temperature T showing a dilatation jump at the lower temperature So-Sc transition.">
~'
~~
,
( i] b"
h Id
~
~
""
~ '~~
,
-~ '
-'~~j~
j fG~~ '~~
l'~, f.).(, )~"' ]Ii
~
-'» ] / '~
=~- Q~
~~
a) c)
b)
d)
f~ e)
Fig.
5. X-ray diffraction pattems of samplesaligned
with a magnetic field of 1.7 T. Racemic mixtures of a) C7, b)C8,
c, d, e)To, atrespectively
T= 110 °C, 140 °C, 155 °C. In 0 the small
angle
area for a mixture of 0.5 mole C7 + 0.5 mole Cs. The magnetic field isalong
the vertical direction.single
domain ofSc phase
: the director isnearly parallel
to themagnetic
field while several orders of reflection on thelayer planes
arealigned
in a direction at about 45° of that of themagnetic
field. In fact the number of visible reflections(three)
is unusual for aSc
and isindicative of a well stratified structure. We get a
single
domainprobably
because the smecticphase
is obtaineddirectly
from theisotropic phase
and growseasily
inlarge
domains.Figure
5b is obtained for theCg
racemicmixture,
thelayers
have aunique
orientation while the director takes two different orientations each at 45° of thelayer
normal the number of orders of reflection is stillhigh, therefore,
thelayer
character islikely
to be the same in the twophases.
Figures 5c, d,
e represent three different patterns of the quatemary mixtureRo respectively
atI lo
°C,
140°C,
155 °C.Figures
5c and 5e are similar tofigure
5a and therefore appeartypical
of a
Sc phase
whilefigure
5d is similar tofigure
5b ; let us note that the orientation of thelayer planes
does notchange significantly through
the smectic-smectic transitions while the director has aunique
direction with respect to the normal to thelayer (corresponding
to aSc phase)
at I lo °C and 155°C,
and reorients at least in two directionsequally
tilted withrespect
to thelayer
normal at 140 °C in theSo phase.
Moreover the
X-ray pattem
of a mixture of 0.5 molesC7(R, R)
+ 0.5 molesCg(S, S)
issimilar to
figures
5b and 5d. Therefore we can characterizeunambiguously
the diffraction pattern of analigned sample
of anSo phase.
Thelayer periodicity
is the same inSc
andSo phase
the molecules are in aliquid
state inside thelayers
and their director is tilted with respect to thelayer
normal with anangle
of 45°. Theonly
difference is that the directorpoints
in aunique
direction in theSc phase, involving
a2/m point
group symmetry(racemic mixtures)
and in two directionslying
in the sameplane, involving
a 2/m 2/m 2/mpoint
group symmetry, for a non-chiralSo phase.
It has been shownby optical
observations ofSo
filmsfloating
on anisotropic droplet
that the director takes two definite directionsmaking
the sameangle
with thelayer
normal, andcorresponding
toopposite
azimuthalorientations,
uniform in each
layer
andaltemating
from onelayer
to the next one. This altemation canextend over loo
layers.
A similar structure can be found inCg compound
of 0.91optical
activity
but an overall twist oflarge pitch
0.36 ~cm issuperimposed
above this local order[12].
The
X-ray
pattems ofSo
racemic mixtures are consistent with the factthat,
in bulksamples,
the director takes two directions
equally
tilted with respect to thelayer plane
but withopposite
azimuthal directions. Since the reentrant mixture
clearly
shows that theSc-So
transition involves reorientations of the director without modification of thelayer
texture, the double director orientation isactually
a structural feature and not a textural one. The two directororientations can be distributed either in the same
layer,
on each side ofw walls in a
periodic
array, or in successive
layers,
theninducing
a smectic superstructure. However onpowder
and oriented patterns we have no detected anyBragg peak
issued from a modulation of thedensity
either in a direction
parallel
to thelayer plane
with a wave vector smaller than 200A
or
in a direction
perpendicular
to thelayer plane
at least with a wave vectorlarger
than thelayer
thickness and smaller than15001
(~ 50layers )-. Moreover,
on the pattem of a
mixture of 0.5 mole
C7 (R,
R + 0.5 moleCg (S,
S)
there is no diffusescattering corresponding
to any fluctuations of wave vector
larger
than thelayer periodicity (Fig. 5fj.
Therefore thestructure described in reference
[3]
isfairly
consistent with theX-ray
pattem of bulksamples,
since we must assume that the different director orientations are linked
by
a twist axisparallel
to the
layer
normal. For the racemicmixtures,
this structure can be describedby
the space group2/c 2/m 21/m,
with asymmetry
of translation(periodicity) only along
the zdirection,
theperiod
cbeing equal
to twice thelayer thickness,
I-e. 60A.
Such a structure has also been
proposed
in order toexplain
thepolymorphism
of some chiralcompounds describing
an antiferroelectric smecticphase S~c [4].
Let us remark that thedipole
array is antiferroelectric in an unwound
So~ sample
:however,
for a racemicmixtures,
if(R)
andIS) species
areequally
distributed in eachlayer,
as it seems to be from our observation of a 0.5 molesC7 (R,
R)
+ 0.5 molesCs(S,
Smixture,
theSc
andSo phases
are bothparaelectric.
Therefore we
prefer
tokeep
the labelSo
rather thanS~c [4].
Furthermore in order to test the ferro- and antiferroelectric behaviour of various mixtures we haveperformed electro-optical
experiments.
Electro-optic
behaviour.On
slowly cooling samples
sandwiched between twoglass plates,
from theisotropic phase
weobtained a
planar
orientation of the director unless thesample
thickness is very thin(<
3~Lm).
These thinhomeotropic preparations
haveonly
been used forspecific
rotation measurements, thesamples
are too thin for the observation ofconoscopic
pattems, andby
theway we have not been able to measure the
birefringence
tensor. Thespecific activity
of the twoSc
andSo phases
have the same absolute value butopposite signs
in each side of thephase separation line,
whenlooking
at contactpreparation
ofC7
mixtures and of the reentrant temarymixture
To.
When the thickness of the
sample
exceeds 20 ~cm thesample
takes an overallplanar
orientation with a
juxtaposition
of domains with different director orientations(Fig. 6).
The behaviour ofsamples
ofbinary
mixtures ofC7
enantiomers under electric field is different on each side of linescorresponding
to theoptical activity
±Fo.
for mixtures with
[F
< Fo the behaviour is
typical
of aSc~ phase,
the helicoidal array isunwound
by
an electric fieldhigher
than a threshold value(1-5 x105Vm-')
and aspontaneous
polarization
appears. In the unwoundsample
theoptical
axes are at about 45° to thelayer
normal(Fig. 6g)
and their direction switches each time the electric field is reversedfor mixtures with
[F
~Fo
the director takes the same orientation with respect to thelayer
but athigher
values of the threshold(~
5 x10~
Vm~ '). Beyond
this threshold valuelarge
areas of the
sample
are oriented with the director at about 45° of thelayer
normal ;by
increasing
the field an uniformSc
texture can be obtained andthen,
the spontaneouspolarization
measured. In adecreasing
electric field dechiralisation lines can be observed and then a clear transition appears, the final statecorresponds
to neutral linesparallel
orperpendicular
to thelayer planes.
Therefore the average director orientation isperpendicular
to thelayer plane,
and since molecules are tilted with respect to thelayer normal,
the director is twisted with apitch
that is smallcompared
to thelight wavelength. By applying
an electric field on contactpreparations
of the twoC7
enantiomers it is shown that the electric field induces aSo~-Sc
transition since theseparation
line between the twophases
isdisplaced
in such a way that theSo~
area is reduced(Fig. 6g).
The behaviour of the chiral reentrant mixture
(To)
under electric field is similar : below 130 °C and above 150 °C, the electric field induces aSc~-Sc
second order transition(Figs.
6a, b,g)
and aSo~-Sc
first order transition(Figs. 6c,
d,e). Figure
7gives
the electricfield/temperature phase diagram
of thisoptically
active temary mixture. The threshold field isindependent
of thetemperature
for theSc~-Sc
transition and it increasesrapidly
whengoing
into the
So~
temperaturestability
range, its maximum value is 3 x 106 V/m at T= 143 °C.
Therefore the
So~-Sc
transition can be obtainedby varying
thetemperature,
concentration and electric field. However we have to notice thatSo~ samples
of mixtures of theCg antipods
couldnot be unwound
by
an electric field sinceelectrohydrodynamical phenomena
takeplace
beyond
the thresholdfield,
at least if theiroptical activity
is too low( [F
< 0.8
).
The samesituation
prevails
for mixtures ofC7(R,R)+Cg(S,S)
for a molar concentration inC7(R, R) comprised
between 0.25 and 0.5.In order to have a better characterization of the
electro-optical properties
of oursamples
wehave also measured the dielectric
susceptibility
associated with the Goldstonemode,
thepitch
of the helix and the electric spontaneous
polarization.
The relative dielectric
susceptibility
in the smecticplane,
e~, of the reentrant temary mixture To was measured as a function of temperature(Fig. 8).
To lower the ionic conduction effect themeasurement
frequency (300 Hz)
was chosen near the relaxationfrequency
of the lowfrequency
dielectric mode due to the helix deformation : the Goldstone mode[19].
TheJOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE T 1N'S MAY1091 27
Fig.
6.Optical microscopy images
between crossedpolarisers
(vertical andhorizontal),
the electric field E isperpendicular
to thepreparation.
Temary mixture To in theSc phase,
a) at 100°C, E= 0 b) same temperature E = 0.I MV/m
m the threshold ;f~ at lsl °C, E
= 0. Behaviour ofthe same
-
~imv/mi
3
. s
, ~
2
,
Sc.
i
Sc
S~
iiSc*
o
too im 14o 1llo
Fig.
7. Electric field E versus temperature Tphase diagram
of the To mixture. The hatched area is a coexistence zone ofSo
with Sc~ orSc.
The full linecorresponds
to the measured threshold field and the dashed line to the limit of the coexistence zone ofSo
withSc.
iso
' O
'
"
'
"
'
"
W'
~
Tocj
lW 110 140 100
Fig.
8.Temperature-T-dependence
of the relative dielectricsusceptibility
e~, in a directionparallel
to thelayer planes,
for the To mixture. The full circle is a measure with an additional DC fieldlarger
than thethreshold value (this point could be
compared
to the value of e, in theSo Phase).
Fig.
6 (continued).sample in the
So phase
at 140 °C with successively ; cl E= 0, d) E
=
5 MV/m, and e) retuming to
E=0;
g)
contactpreparation
of the C7antipodes
mixtures with anapplied
electric fieldE
= 0.33 MV/m, the optical
activity
decrease from the left side to the right one, crossing the frontier between the unwoundSc
state and the So~ state arrows points smectic C domains in thebiphasic
areawhich assert the
anisotropy
of the field effect.continuity
of p~ from one smectic C*phase
to the other C*phase
can be remarked. At bothphase
transitions betweenSc~
andSo
the p~jump
issignificant (Ap,
m70).
This difference in e~ at thephase
transitioncorresponds
well with the difference obtained when at 120 °C onepasses from the
sample
in the smectic C*phase
to thesample
measured under a5 x 106 V/m dc
applied field,
which field unwinds the helix and thus suppresses the Goldstone mode(e~
valuerepresented by
fullcircle).
In order to estimate the elastic energy involved
by
the helical array, an estimate of thepitch
of the
mesophase
is useful ; this can be obtained eitherby measuring
theperiodicity
of dechiralisation lines onplanar samples (for
theSc~),
orby measuring
thespecific
rotation onhomeotropic preparations (provided
the refraction indices areknown). Figure
9gives
the temperaturedependence
for thespecific
rotation of aCs sample
with a0.91optical activity
and for A
=
0.546 ~cm, the
corresponding
value of thepitch
deduced from these measurements is alsoreported
on the samefigure.
Thepitch
isnearly
constant between loo and 128° andequal
to 2 ~Lm, then it decreasesquickly
close to theclearing point.
The low temperature value fits well with the dechiralisation linespacing, while,
close to theclearing point,
the curve can bereasonably extrapolated
towards the value of0.36~Lm
estimatedby
Galeme and Liebert[10]
on smectic films at the contact of theisotropic liquid.
We havereported
above that thespecific
rotationchanges
itssign
oncrossing
theSo~-Sc~line
of transition whilekeeping
thesame absolute
value,
this means that the twophases
are twisted with similarpitches. However,
since the helical array is a modulation of thelayer periodicity,
thepitch
is notalways
unambiguously
defined. In fact theSo~ pitch
is close to the smecticperiodicity (I.e.
60A)
ifone chooses the smallest definition.
The spontaneous
polarization
is measured in theSc phase
onapplying
an electric fieldlarger
than the threshold value. For pure
C7(S, S)
orCg(S, S)
atl10°,
far from theclearing
temperature, this
polarization
is of about IDebye/molecule.
This is a ratherhigh,
but notunusual, value for a
Sc~ phase.
At a constant temperature, the spontaneouspolarization
of theC7
enantiomer mixtures increaseslinearly
with theoptical purity.
The mixtures ofC~
enantiomers cannot be unwound with a field lower than the
sample
breakdown,consequently
the
spontaneous polarization
cannot be measured in these mixtures. The spontaneouspolarization
of mixtures ofC7
andC~
has a non-monotonicdependence
i<ersus theircomposition (Fig. 10).
Thespontaneous polarization
of mixtures ofC7(R, R)
andC~(R, R)
goes
through
a minimum value for a mixture I/I with a ratioP~~~/P~,~
of about I.4. In mixtures ofC7(R, R)
andC~(S, S)
the spontaneouspolarization
isquite
linear for less than' '
' '
'
ioo ix
Fig.
9.Temperature-T-dependence
of thespecific
rotation fl and of thepitch
P (estimated from atypical birefringence
of 0.15, wavelength of thelight
0.546 ~m).(Debyewole)
C~jS,Sj
°
o-m o-is i
C~ (R,R)
Fig.
IO.Spontaneous polarisation P~
versus molecomposition
in C~Csis.
Sl mixtures squaresand dashed line for mixtures
C7(S,S)+C8(S,S)i
circles and full line for mixturesC7(R, RI
+Cs(S,S),
between 0.25 and 0.5C7(R,R)
mole the heli; cannot be unwound andconsequently,
the polarization cannot be measured.0.25
C7
mole, and it can beextrapolated
to zero for this concentration. As I;e ha,~epointed
outabove, the
polarization
cannot be measured between 0.25 and 0.5 C~ mole since the helix cannot be unwound. In the range 0.5-1C~
mole thepolarization
isnegative
and goes from 0 for 0.5C7(R,R)
moles tolDebye/mol
for the pureC7(R.R),
with anearly
lineardependence.
Discussion.
The symmetry of the
So phase
deduced fromX-ray experiments
onCs
andRo
racemic mixtureis orthorhombic
2/c2/m2j/m
with an absence ofperiodicity
in the abplane
and a lDperiodicity along
c(Fig.
Ila).
Based uponelectro-optical
observations on films[12],
we canassume that the local array derived from this symmetry is
preserved
in theSo~ phase.
All themirror
planes disappear,
the twist axis normal to thelayer plane
remains but thepitch
associated to this axis becomes incommensurate with the smectic
periodicity
whilebeing
close to it. Therefore the twistedSo~ phase
can be described as a twistedSc~
with apitch nearly equal
to twice the
layer
thickness(Fig. I16).
In fact theelectro-optical properties
of the twistedSo~
are not consistent with the elastic modelI]
established for the twistedSc~, extrapolated
atsmall values of the
pitch
since in such a case the transition toward the SmC will occur at a veryg g
Fig.
II. Schematicrepresentation
of theSo
structure in its racemic state (al and in anoptically
active state (b).high
value of the eIectric field threshold E~:E~ =
[(ar/4)~
(K@~)/p~] q~
,
where K is the twist elastic constant, p~ the spontaneous
polarization,
and q the wavevector ofthe helicoidal array. If one assumes that K has the same order of
magnitude
in bothSo~ and
Sc~ phases,
the threshold field E~ would be six orders ofmagnitude higher
than it isactually
in ourexperiments.
In fact the elastic interaction between twoadjacent layers
of theSo~ phase
has to be reconsidered. The elastic interaction betweenneighbouring layers
in anantiferroelectric structure has been
already
modelledby
Orihara and Ishibashi[13]. They proposed
aphenomenological
model in order to describe a morecomplex
sequenceSCA~-Sc~~-Sc~
where the structure of SCA is that of ourSo~,
andSc~~
is a ferrielectric smecticphase. Actually taking
into account the fact that in our case thelayer
thickness and the tiltangles
do not varythroughout
theSo~-Sc~
transition asimpler
model can beproposed.
This isan
Ising-like
model which has beendeveloped
elsewhere[14].
We recall itshortly
here : the free energy isexpressed
as a function ofAp
where p is the azimutalangle
of the director in thelayer plane,
and Ap its variation between twoadjacent layers.
The free energy isdeveloped
into Fourier components of Ap,
taking only
the first two harmonics into account. This model is consistent with theexperimental
data on the reentrant mixtureTo.
The spontaneous
polarization
in theSc phase
has to be consistent with the molecularproperties
of the series here studied. The moleculardipole
is estimated for different conformations of the aromatic core : it varies between 0.I and 5.2Debye depending
on the relative orientations of thecarboxylic
and Schiff base groups whichgive
the maindipolar
contributions. We note that the
highest
valuescorrespond
to a syn- conformation of theterephthalidene
core. Therefore in order toexplain
the value of the spontaneouspolarization
inpure
C~
orC8
activecompounds
we must admit that syn- conformations are favoured in the smecticphase,
as it is the case, in the same temperature range, for thealkyl-terephthalidene- bis-butyanilines
which have a similar core[15].
Moreover the rotation of the molecule around itslong
axis iswidely hindered,
at least at the core level. This lastpoint
confirms our first X-ray observation about the
in-plane anisotropy
of the local array[2].
We note that ourexperimental
value of the spontaneouspolarization
at 110 °C is one order ofmagnitude higher
than the one
measured,
at theclearing temperature,
onSo
thin filmsby
Galeme andLiebert[12].
However the difference oftemperature (high
temperatureincreasing
the moleculardisorder),
and a too low estimate of the elastic constants couldexplain
thisdiscrepancy (I).
The Goldstone modeamplitude
measurementgives
an estimate ofP~/K.
Thisestimate is
compatible
with our value of thepolarization
and an elastic constant one order ofmagnitude higher,
but is notcompatible
with a ten times lowerpolarization. Finally
incoherentquasi-elastic
neutronscattering experiments
seem to confirm both theanisotropy
of the rotational motion of the molecule and thepredominence
of syn conformations[16].
The behaviour of the spontaneous
polarization
versus thecomposition
in mixtures ofC~
antipodes
shows that the conformation of individual molecules is not affectedby
somespecific
interaction between the two enantiomers. We have also
shown, looking
atX-ray
pattems of mixtures of the twohomologues,
that nosegregation
of molecules of differentchirality
and chainlength
takesplace
even at a short scale. However the decrease of the spontaneouspolarization
in mixturesC~(S,
S)
+C8 (S,
S)
can be related to anincreasing
rotational disorderinduced
by
the difference in chainlengths.
If now we tum our attention toC~(R, RI
+C8(S, S) mixtures,
it follows that a small amount of short chains inlonger
ones increasesdramatically
the molecular rotational and conformationaldisorder,
while a small amount oflong
chains in shorter ones does notchange
this molecular disordersignificantly.
This can beunderstood as holes are more effective in
creating
disorder thanbumps
but sinceonly
0.25 moles of
C~
can cancel thespontaneous polarization
of aC~(R, R)
+C~(S, S) mixture,
each
C~
molecule disturbs alarge
number ofC8
molecules which means that aC~(R, R)
molecule is surrounded
preferentially by C8(S, S)
molecules. This must be understood as anordering
interaction between molecules ofopposite chirality
rather than between molecules with different chainlengths, explaining by
the way thepositive azeotropic
behaviour of thebinary phase diagrams
ofantipodes
and the wide difference in the behaviour ofC~(S, S)
+C8(S, S)
incomparison
withC~(R, R)
+C8(S,
S)
mixtures.Conclusion.
The series of
2-alkyl 1,4 terephthalydene-bis-4-aminocinamates
presents a very unusualpolymorphism
: these derivativesbelong
to a class ofcompounds
with a ferro-antiferroelectric transition between fluid smecticphases.
We haveprovided
evidence for a reentrant sequence in temary chiral mixtures and quatemary racemic(pseudo binary)
mixtures. The struturalstudy
of this last mixture
brings
a confirmation of the existence of azigzag
array of molecules(21
axisperpendicular
to the smecticplanes)
in the bulkSo phase.
Moreover thepitch
in thisphase
is
always
very close to twice thelayer thickness, reaching
this valueonly
for the racemic mixtures. This molecularorganization
is the same foroptically
purecompounds
and for everycomposition
of the two enantiomers aswell,
in factimplying,
that theSo~ phase
is not a true antiferroelectricphase.
Theelectro-optical properties
of the smecticphases
are consistent with the structural observations. Moreover the unusual behaviour of theclearing
temperature of(1) Indeed the
in-plane anisotropy
allows us to think that the elastic constants in the smectic plane for thiscompound
may be muchhigher
than the value taken in that paperby
analogy with usualSc.
binary
mixtures ofoptical antipodes
can be related tointra-layer
local interactions between molecules of differentchirality.
Let us remark that the increase of theclearing point
with adecreasing optical activity
isnearly
the same for theC~
and theC8
mixturesdespite
their differentpolymorphism. Finally
the addition of the meso stereoisomer(R, S)
does not disturbsignificantly
the structural andthermodynamical properties
of these systems[2, 7].
It seems therefore that the existence of a well stratified structure couldexplain
the weak influence of thestereoisomery
upon the smecticpolymorphism.
Since the
So~ phase
has apitch
of the order of 60I,
the three-dimensionaltetragonal phase
of unit cell 75. 5 x 75.5 x 68.4
I (1422)
which existsjust
below theclearing
temperature in thequasi
pure activeC8
derivatives can becompared
to the bluephases II 7]
since the lattice cellconstants scale as the
pitch
of theSo~ phase.
Therefore thevicinity
of thisphase
introduces thequestion
of the existence of defects in theSo phase.
If there is no evidence at all of aregular
array of
w walls
through X-ray
diffraction andoptical experiments,
however isolated linescorresponding
to a archange
of the azimutalangles
can exist insidelayers (such
lines are seenon thin
films) [3].
Moreover at thetransition,
thegrowing
process of theSc phase
inside theSo phase
is faster when thelayer planes
are orientedperpendicularly
to the mean interface between the twophases,
thusimplying
a coexistence of the twophases
at amicroscopic
scale and a defect mediatedgrowth (Fig. fig). Finally
we canpoint
out that we have seenanisotropic
diffuse streaks around the first-order
Bragg peak
onX-ray pattems
of theTo
mixture as well in theSo
as in theSc phases.
These streaks remind one of similar streaks seen on theX-ray
pattern of theSA phase
of some side chainliquid crystalline polymers.
Therefore it seems that agreat density
of dislocations is at theorigin
of these diffuse streaks in our system as it has beenshown for the case of the
polymers [18].
References
[1] MEYER R. B., LILBERT L., STRzELECKI L., KELLER P., J.
Phys.
Lett. France 36 (1975) 69.[2] LEVELUT A. M., GERMAIN C., KELLER P., LILBERT L., BILLARD J., J.
Phys.
France 44(1983)
623.[3] GALERNE Y., LILBERT L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 (1990) 906.
[4] CHANDANI A. D. L., GORECKA E., OUCHI Y., TAKEzOE H., FUKUDA A., Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 28
(1989) 1265.
[5] GOODBY J. W.. WAUGH M. A., STEIN S. M., CHIN E., PINDAK R., PATEL J. S., Nature 337 (1989) 449.
[6] RENN S. R., LUBENSKY T. C., Phys. Rev. A 38 (1988) 2132.
[7] KELLER P., Mol.
Cryst.
Liq. Cryst. Lett. 102 (1984) 295.[8] LECLERCQ M., BILLARD J., JACQUES J., Mol. Cl-y-it-
Liq.
Cryst. 8 (1969) 367.[9] TAYLOR T. R., ARORA S. L., FERGASSON J. L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 25 (1970) 722.
[10] SACKMANN H., DEMUS D., Mol.
Cryst. Liq.
Cryst. 2 (1966) 81 and ib.201(1973)
239.[11] MARTINOT-LAGARDE P., J.
Phys.
Lett. France 38 (1977) 19.[12] GALERNE Y., LILBERT L.,
Phys.
Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 2891.[13] ORIHARA H., ISHIBASHI Y., Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 29 (1990) 115.
[14] MARTINOT-LAGARDE P., HAMELIN P., submitted to P.R.L.
[15] CHARVOLIN J., DELOCHE B., J. Phys.
Colloq.
France 37 (1976) C3-59.[16] DIANOUX A. J., LEVELUT A. M., to be
published.
[17] DUBOIS-VIOLETTE E., PANSU B., Mol. Cryst.
Liq. Cryst.
165 (1988) 151.[18] DAVIDSON P., PANSU B., LEVELUT A. M., STRzELECKI L., J.
Phys.
II France1 (1991) 61.[19] MARTINOT-LAGARDE Ph., DURAND G., J. Phys. France 42 (1981) 269-275.