• Aucun résultat trouvé

THE RESISTIVITY OF AMORPHOUS METALLIC ALLOYS DOWN TO 60 mK

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "THE RESISTIVITY OF AMORPHOUS METALLIC ALLOYS DOWN TO 60 mK"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: jpa-00217887

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00217887

Submitted on 1 Jan 1978

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

THE RESISTIVITY OF AMORPHOUS METALLIC

ALLOYS DOWN TO 60 mK

R. Cochrane, F. Hedgcock, B. Kästner, W. Muir

To cite this version:

(2)

JOURNAL DE PHYSÏQUE Colloque C6, supplément au n" 8, Tome 39, août 1978, page C6-939

THE RESISTIVITY OF AMORPHOUS METALLIC ALLOYS DOWN TO 60 mK

R.W. Cochrane, F.T. Hedgcock, B.J. Kastner and W.B. Muir

E. Rutherford Laboratory, UoGill University, Montreal H3A 2T8 Canada.

Résumé.- On a mesuré la résistivité de quelques alliages amorphes métal-métaloides entre 60 mK et 300 K. La résistivité à basse température est plus ou moins semblable pour tous les échantillons. Elle décroît avec l'augmentation de la température jusqu'à un minimum au voisignage de 10 K. Aux températures plus élevées on trouve, entre les divers échan-tillons, des différences profondes qu'on attribue à l'influence particulière du Mo sur la diffusion électronique.

Abstract.- We have measured the resistivity of a number of metal-metalloid amorphous alloys from 60 mK to room temperature. The low temperature behaviour is qualitatively similar for all the alloys : a decreasing resistivity with increasing temperature to a resisitivity minimum in the vicinity of 10 K. Marked differences in the temperature dependences at higher

temperatures are attributed to the scattering from particular components such as Mo.

Considerable interest has focused on the temperature dependence of the resistivity in amor-phous metallic alloys where one commonly observes a resistance minimum and a temperature variation of the form, - In T, at lower temperatures /l/. Seve-ral models have been proposed to explain this be-haviour such as scattering from localized spin excitations in amorphous ferromagnets / 2 / , the temperature dependence of the Debye-Waller factor

13/, and scattering from tunneling states in the

non crystalline structure /4/. The latter model predicts a resistivity term, p °= - ln(T2 + A2) , implying that p should saturate below A < 1 K, a temperature characteristic of the energy splitting of the tunneling states. Though saturation of the resistivity has been reported for several alloy systems /5,6/ very little is known in detail about the general resistivity behaviour of amorphous alloys at very low temperatures.

In this paper, we report resistance mea-surements from 60 mK to 40 K on four amorphous ferromagnets, Feit0Niitop14B6 (metglas 2826), Fe^g

Ni<toB20> Fe80B20(2 6 0 5) a n d F e78M o2B20 (2605 A) •

For the last sample we have extended the data to 296 K because of the exceptional behaviour of the resistivity of this alloy at higher temperatures.

The measurements below 40 K were made in a dilution refrigerator using an A.C. - four

termi-nal method with resolution of a few parts in 106

111. The samples (typical size 6 x 0.2 x 0.005 cm3)

were attached to the mixing chamber with GE 7031 varnish using mylar foil for electrical insulation.

At temperatures below 0.1 K thermal contact of the samples was maintained with a heat flow of less

than 3 nW per cm2 of contact area.The temperature

above 0.4 K was measured by a calibrated Ge resis-tor and below 0.4 K by a Speer carbon resisresis-tor ca-librated against CMN. Theerror in the temperature determination was + 3 % above 0.4 K and + 5 % below 0.4 K.

The figure shows the normalized resistivity data on a log T scale for all samples. The most striking feature of the data is that the tempera-ture dependent resistivity of three of the samples is qualitatively identical, the exception being the Fe73Mo2B20sample which has a maximum at 28 K

follo-wed by a second minimum at 165 K 18/.

At low temperatures all the samples show a minimum below which p increases as log T (straight

lines in figure.). At still lower temperatures the resistivity deviates from log T towards saturation at the point indicated by the vertical arrow; the approach to saturation is so gradual that the re-sistivity is still increasing at 60 mK as reported earlier for Feit0Nit*oplltB6 1^1 • A fit of the

func-tion, ln(T2 + A2) , to the resistivity data is

generally poor below 0.3 K.If the tunneling model is correct this behaviour implies that a distri-bution of A values is required to fit the data over the entire temperature range.

A closer look at the figure allows the following points to be made :

1) the resistivities Fe^gNi^gPmBg and Fe^oN;i-M.oB20

below 10 K differ only by a scaling factor. This

17 - T.2

(3)

f a c t o r must be due t o t h e d i f f e r i n g m e t a l l o i d components.

2) The r e s i s t i v i t i e s of Fe40Ni40B20 and F e g O B p ~ below 4 K have t h e same t o t a l change b u t a s l i g h t l y d i f f e r e n t temperature dependence. This change i n behaviour i s due t o t h e d i f f e r e n t t r a n s i t i o n e l e - ments.

3) Below 4 K t h e r e s i s t i v i t i e s of Fe80B20 and Fe78 Mo2B20 a r e i d e n t i c a l .

F i g . 1 : Normalized r e s i s t i v i t y a s a f u n c t i o n of l o g T. The lower t h r e e curves have been z e r o s h i f t e d a s i n d i c a t e d by t h e h o r i z o n t a l arrows. The f u l l curve

i s a f i t t o l n ( ~ ~

+

A ~ ) w i t h d = 0.45 K. T h i s l a s t p o i n t , i n c o n t r a s t w i t h t h e v e r y d i f f e r e n t behaviour of t h e s e a l l o y s a t h i g h e r tempe- r a t u r e s , i n d i c a t e s t h a t t h e Mo p l a y s a unique r o l e i n t h e e l e c t r o n i c s c a t t e r i n g . We s u g g e s t , t h e r e f o r e , t h a t a 4d- t r a n s i - t i o n m e t a l l i k e Mo i n low c o n c e n t r a t i o n does not change t h e average s t r u c t u r e o r t h e e l e c t r o n i c den- s i t y of s t a t e s b u t r a t h e r i n t r o d u c e s a l o c a l i z e d and p o s s i b l y r e s o n a n t s c a t t e r i n g c e n t e r i n t h e s e amorphous a l l o y s . Table : Experimental d a t a Sample Fe40~i40P14B20 143

2 7

0.9605 20 8.1 2 0.1 (metglas 2826*) Fe40Ni40B20 1 2 7 2 6 0.9279 19 5.4

2

0.1 F e 8 ~ B 2 ~ 1 2 5 2 6 0.9694 15 4.5

2

0.1 (metglas 2605*) Fe78M02B20 1 2 5 2 6 0.9991 8(165) 4.0+0.1** (metglas 2605A*)

* supplied by Allied Chemical Corporation

N.J.

**

taken at 2 K.

References

/ I / See f o r example : Hasegawa, R. and T s u e i , C . C . , Phys. Rev. (1971) 214.

/ 2 / Madhukar, A. and Hasegawa, R., S o l i d S t a t e Commun.

3

(1974) 61.

131 Markowitz, D . , Phys. Rev.

B

(1977) 3617. /41 Cochrane, R.W., H a r r i s , R., Strom-Olsen, J . O . ,

and Zuckermann, M.J. Phys. Rev. L e t t .

35

(1975) 676.

/ 5 / Rapp, O . , Bhagat, S.M., and Johannesson, Ch., S o l i d S t a t e Commun.

2

(1977) 83.

161 Rapp. O . , Grindberg, J.E., and Rao, K.V.,Proc. 23rd Conf. Magnetism and Mag. M a t e r i a l s , Minneapolis U.S.A. (1977).

/ 7 / Cochrane, R.W., K z s t n e r , B.J. and Muir, W.B. t o be p u b l i s h e d .

I 8 1 Rayne, J . A . and Levy, R.A., i n Amorphous Magne-

t i s m 11, p. 319, e d i t e d by Levy,.R.A. and Hasegawa, R., Plenum P r e s s , New York and London

Références

Documents relatifs

After annealing our samples well above Tx the resistance minima became extremely shallow (no- te the large scale in figure 1 ) and are shifted to very low temperatures so that

In the pre- sent study we report the temperature dependences of the magnetic anisotropy and the composition depen- dence of the distribution of the magnetic hyperfine fields

These factors cause ties of transition metals amorphous alloys resistance to rise with temperature, All (metal glasses) suggested that in the low the mentioned mechanisms, both

cubic compounds, such a resistivity minimum resulting from a crystal field effect may be observed when the 03935 triplet is the ground state.. However, the agreement

They are given by the amorphous Mg-Zn alloys prepared by getter- following integrals over the partial dyna- sputtering have been reported by Hauser and mica1 structure

The upturn of the resitivity below the temperature of magnetic ordering and the positive magnetoresitance of nickel-rare-earth alloys [l] have been accounted for by a positive

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

Abstract.- It is shown for the Co-B series that changes in the temperature coefficient of resistivity, a , produced by a few percent of crystals within an amorphous