• Aucun résultat trouvé

Dehydration- -impregnation by soaking combined with impregnation by soaking combined with fermentation:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Dehydration- -impregnation by soaking combined with impregnation by soaking combined with fermentation: "

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Dehydration

Dehydration- -impregnation by soaking combined with impregnation by soaking combined with fermentation:

fermentation:

an innovative alternative to traditional cured meat process an innovative alternative to traditional cured meat process

IUFoST XIII-2006, Nantes, France

Experimental set-up Experimental set-up

concentrated solution

Salt: 50 g/kg water

glucose syrup DE21:

950 g/water incubator at 25°C

meat fillets (beef, 7 x5 x1 cm3)

Agitating table (1.7Hz, amplitude 2 cm)

Results Results

Conclusion Conclusion

This study clearly indicated that lactic acid fermentation occurred in a meat fillet that had been previously dehydrated and impregnated with salt and sugars by DIS treatment.

Further work will aim at identifying the best meat formulation by DIS that allows optimal fermentation kinetics, and at better understanding the underlying biochemical mechanisms.

Santchurn, S.J. 1 , Petit, T. 2 , Talon, R. 3 , Trystram, G. 4 and Collignan, A. 1

1Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, Cirad-Réunion, Pôle agroalimentaire, Station de la Bretagne, BP20, 97408 Saint-Denis cedex 9, Réunion, France.

2Laboratoire de Chimie des Substances Naturelles et des Sciences des Aliments, Université de la Réunion, Saint Denis Messag. Cedex 9, Réunion, France.

3Unité Microbiologie, INRA-Theix, 63122 Saint-Genès Champanelle, France

4Unité Mixte de Recherche Génie Industriel Alimentaire, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Industries Alimentaires (ENSIA), 1 avenue des Olympiades- 91 744 Massy Cedex, France

Abstract

An innovative combined method is being proposed for the fermentation of meat. The new process consists of two successive operations: a first dehydration-impregnation by soaking treatment (DIS) (also known as osmotic treatment ) to partially dehydrate and to impregnate the meat fillet with salt and sugars, followed by a controlled fermentation with added starter culture. This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of meat formulation (i.e. removal of water and addition of salt and sugars) by DIS on the kinetics of fermentation.

After 24h

Inoculation of beef fillets with Lactobacillus sakei at the rate of 10

7

cfu/g

Incubation 25°C, RH 90%, Sampling times: 0, 8, 24 & 72 h

Dewatering-impregnation by soaking

(DIS) Fermentation

Acknowledgements Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Conseil Régional de La Réunion for its financial support.

The combined treatment allowed satisfactory lactic acid fermentation of the meat, with a significant 1-log increase in the number of lactic acid bacteria (Fig.1a) accompanied by a decrease of 0.4 unit in the meat pH (Fig.1b) within a fermentation period of 72h.

An average of 0.35 g/100g (dry basis) of D-lactic acid was produced in the first 24 h of incubation, after which this amount decreased continuously to 0.14 g/100g (dry basis). Whereas L-lactic acid concentration, initially at 0.47 g/100g (dry basis), showed a continuous decrease throughout the incubation period to reach 0.14 g/100g (dry basis) at 72h. These observations suggest that both L- and D- lactic acids were utilised by microorganisms and/or other biochemical reactions during the incubation period.

After the DIS treatment, the meat fillets showed:

ƒa water loss of 32,

ƒa salt gain of 1.7, and

ƒa sugar gain of 6.6 g/100g initial mass

Analyses physicochemical:

• pH

• D- and L- lactic acid contents Microbiological:

• Lactic acid bacteria

• Yeasts

Fig. 1: Change in (a) microbial load, (b) meat pH, D- and L-lactic acid contents during fermentation of DIS-treated meat fillets

1E+06 1E+07 1E+08 1E+09 1E+10

0 25 50 75

Fermentation time (h)

1E+02 1E+03 1E+04 1E+05 1E+06

Lactic acid bacteria

yeast

(a)

Lactic acid bacteria (cfu/g) Yeast (cfu/g)

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

0 25 50 75

Fermentation time (h)

4.5 4.8 5.1 5.4

pH D-lactic acid

L-lactic acid

(b)

Lactic acid content (g/100g dry basis) pH

Références

Documents relatifs

In this study, high performance anion exchange chromatography (HPAEC) with conductometric detection was used for determining lactic acid content of apple juice subjected

cremoris ATCC 19257; M17 broth, Broth used to culture lactococci; MRS broth, de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe broth used to culture lactobacilli; N 0 , The viability of lactic acid bacteria

The effectiveness of combined process using water steam (10 seconds, 70°C and 98°C) and lactic acid concentrated solutions (1 minutes, 5% and 10% lactic acid), on the inactivation

Moreover, glucose consumption was more rapid in the second cas.e, suggesting that both sugar formulation and water loss must be studied in order to identify the best formulation

The new process consists of two successive operations: a first dehydration-impregnation by soaking treatment (DIS) (also known as osmotic treatment ) to partially dehydrate and

The effect of different molecular weights of precursors including HTNR oligomer and PLA prepolymer of diblock and triblock copolymer on the mechanical properties of

Although LAB have been used to ferment soy juice for decades, the roughly 300 LAB strains (from the Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc and Streptococcus genera) that

Summary: A Western diet containing 50% of plant-based protein is healthier and would help to reduce the environmental impacts of food systems to contribute to meeting worldwide